Author Topic: Does Mike Wolfe have a valid point here?  (Read 9582 times)

donrhummy

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1924
  • Getbig!
Re: Does Mike Wolfe have a valid point here?
« Reply #50 on: February 08, 2007, 07:49:24 PM »
Umm, Joan Cusack is a better actress than Heather Graham by a lot, but who gets all the lead roles and endorsement deals? Heather Graham because she LOOKS 500 times better. Same thing with BB's and powerlifters. Just the way it is.

bigbadwolfe

  • Pros
  • Getbig IV
  • *****
  • Posts: 1548
  • Bigger Stronger Fatter then you!!!!
Re: Does Mike Wolfe have a valid point here?
« Reply #51 on: February 08, 2007, 08:11:06 PM »
Yeah I know, good looks=good money :) Fuck I'm working on it Hahaha!!!

Me at 340!!!! That is almost 80 pounds lost!!!


MisterMagoo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5591
  • And now, what joy will I have left to live for?
Re: Does Mike Wolfe have a valid point here?
« Reply #52 on: February 08, 2007, 08:35:26 PM »
A six pack might get you more pussy, but looking like this gets you a lot more respect. I could see the "400lb bench club" scramble like roaches when this dude walks into the bar.

so true. people forget that people may want to look like bodybuilders, but they always start out training thinking like powerlifters. they want to bench more than they can handle, squat more than they can, and deadlift more than they can safely handle.

imagine a picture of wolfe benching 800+ or a konsti deadlifting 900+ in an ad for BSN true-mass. here's the question, which would make you buy a supplement more: