Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: The_Hammer on June 09, 2012, 10:02:55 PM

Title: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: The_Hammer on June 09, 2012, 10:02:55 PM
Pacquaio Bradley has got to be the most corrupt decision/result in sports history.
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: Kilo Medic on June 09, 2012, 10:03:37 PM
No doubt!
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: AC Slater on June 09, 2012, 10:04:45 PM
no shit.  what fight was the judges watching?  pathetic.
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: seCrawler on June 09, 2012, 10:07:03 PM
Pacquaio Bradley has got to be the most corrupt decision/result in sports history.

Obviously, the fight was close going into the 10th.  Bradley pretty much took the last 2 rounds.  It's Manny's fault for not upping the attack in the last 2 rounds.  He sat on his so called lead.
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: delta9mda on June 09, 2012, 10:07:20 PM
i thought it was the 80 mr o?  ;D
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: Kilo Medic on June 09, 2012, 10:08:40 PM
The only time this fight was close was at the beginning of the first round!  Nothing was ever close!
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: BB on June 09, 2012, 10:09:12 PM
I usually don't feel this way, but Pacquiao should've walked out. It's a absolute horseshit decision.
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: Coach is Back! on June 09, 2012, 10:09:44 PM
If its not its damn close.
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: The_Hammer on June 09, 2012, 10:11:39 PM
Rumor is that Pacquiao is retiring out of disgust and pursuing religion/politics.

The fix was in.
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: K-1 on June 09, 2012, 10:12:22 PM
the roy jones jr robbery in Seoul.
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: BIG ACH on June 09, 2012, 10:13:07 PM
i thought it was the 80 mr o?  ;D

you stole my joke, well I was gonna say... its like if mentzer had won
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: asbrus on June 09, 2012, 10:14:05 PM
THE BIGGEST R0BBERY IN B0XING HIST0RY. SP0T 0N. MANNY W0N IT 10-2. I WANT T0 KILL THE JUDGES. I W0NDER H0W MUCH THEY WERE PAID. THERE NEEDS T0 BE AN INVESTIGATI0N ASAP.
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: seCrawler on June 09, 2012, 10:14:33 PM
Rumor is that Pacquiao is retiring out of disgust and pursuing religion/politics.

The fix was in.

Arum is Jew.  His boys control the money in boxing.  I don't see it, so help me out on this one.  Manny gave away the last 2 rounds, in which he should have gone for the knockout.  A rule in boxing is to win the last 2 rounds.
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: tommywishbone on June 09, 2012, 10:14:38 PM
i thought it was the 80 mr o?  ;D
81' Olympia.  ;D
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: asbrus on June 09, 2012, 10:15:18 PM
Arum is Jew.  His boys control the money in boxing.  I don't see it, so help me out on this one.  Manny gave away the last 2 rounds, in which he should have gone for the knockout.  A rule in boxing is to win the last 2 rounds.

Y0U DIDN'T SEE IT S0 SHUT THE FUCK UP. GTF0 HERE.
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: The_Hammer on June 09, 2012, 10:16:55 PM
THE BIGGEST R0BBERY IN B0XING HIST0RY. SP0T 0N. MANNY W0N IT 10-2. I WANT T0 KILL THE JUDGES. I W0NDER H0W MUCH THEY WERE PAID.

Strong speculation is that Golden Boy has deep ties with the NSAC and Manny was never going to win this fight to save face in regards to Mayweather.

I seriously think this will go down in history as the single fight that killed boxing.  the most popular boxer since Ali just got fucked live on TV.
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: K-1 on June 09, 2012, 10:17:57 PM
Rumor is that Pacquiao is retiring out of disgust and pursuing religion/politics.

The fix was in.

that or he was trying to start his own promotions company so he could finally get paid. Guy was under one of the worst contract ever as was first mentioned by floyd years ago then his wife said same thing last year.

Arum written all over this one. Give belt to bradley....pac you can either retire or get your belt back UNDER CONTRACT. LOL.

Do the math....Kahn was supposed to go with Bradley....Bradley signs with top rank....instantly gets shot at manny....and here we are.  
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: seCrawler on June 09, 2012, 10:19:09 PM
Strong speculation is that Golden Boy has deep ties with the NSAC and Manny was never going to win this fight to save face in regards to Mayweather.

I seriously think this will go down in history as the single fight that killed boxing.  the most popular boxer since Ali just got fucked live on TV.

RTFOL!

A foreigner boxer isn't going to kill boxing money, especially in Las Vegas and NY, in the USA.
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: Croatian on June 09, 2012, 10:20:46 PM
In pro bodybuilding:

 1. Apartheid + Joe Weider + Arnold = 2nd place for Serge Nubret at 1975 IFBB Mr.Olympia
 2. 1980 Ifbb Mr.Olympia
 3. 1981 Ifbb Mr.Olympia
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: seCrawler on June 09, 2012, 10:21:16 PM
that or he was trying to start his own promotions company so he could finally get paid. Guy was under one of the worst contract ever as was first mentioned by floyd years ago then his wife said same thing last year.

Arum written all over this one. Give belt to bradley....pac you can either retire or get your belt back UNDER CONTRACT. LOL.

Do the math....Kahn was supposed to go with Bradley....Bradley signs with top rank....instantly gets shot at manny....and here we are.  

Was this his last fight under Arum?  You are right about Arum pocketing about 40% of his dough.
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: Palpatine Q on June 09, 2012, 10:21:37 PM
Arum is Jew.  His boys control the money in boxing.  I don't see it, so help me out on this one.  Manny gave away the last 2 rounds, in which he should have gone for the knockout.  A rule in boxing is to win the last 2 rounds.

Did you see the fight?  the outcome was never in question , Manny hit him twice as often and twice as hard.

This isn't amateur boxing where little piddy-pat bullshit and staying active means anything, you have to land punches with bad intentions...I don't think that little shit landed one hard, clean punch the whole fight
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: seCrawler on June 09, 2012, 10:22:11 PM
Did you see the fight?  the outcome was never in question , Manny hit him twice as often and twice as hard.

This isn't amateur boxing where little piddy-pat bullshit and staying active means anything, you have to land punches with bad intentions...I don't think that little shit landed one hard, clean punch the whole fight

No, I just saw the last 2 rounds, which Bradley won.
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: Coach is Back! on June 09, 2012, 10:23:21 PM
In pro bodybuilding:

 1. Apartheid + Joe Weider + Arnold = 2nd place for Serge Nubret at 1975 IFBB Mr.Olympia
 2. 1980 Ifbb Mr.Olympia
 3. 1981 Ifbb Mr.Olympia

We're.talking about sports not bodybuilding. Bodybuilding isn't a sport. Hope that helped.
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: arce1988 on June 09, 2012, 10:23:28 PM
  Sports are always fixed...
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: asbrus on June 09, 2012, 10:23:39 PM
Did you see the fight?  the outcome was never in question , Manny hit him twice as often and twice as hard.

This isn't amateur boxing where little piddy-pat bullshit and staying active means anything, you have to land punches with bad intentions...I don't think that little shit landed one hard, clean punch the whole fight


HE'S TR0LLING. D0N'T FEED HIM.
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: K-1 on June 09, 2012, 10:25:47 PM
Was this his last fight under Arum?  You are right about Arum pocketing about 40% of his dough.

not sure but it's pretty obvious Arum wanted this to end on his terms.

I'm sure some things will surface in the next few weeks.
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: seCrawler on June 09, 2012, 10:25:58 PM

HE'S TR0LLING. D0N'T FEED HIM.

Actually, I'm not trolling. I'm assuming the fight was close going into the 11th and 12th.  I only listen to Emmanuel Steward.  Those other two are one-sided trolls.  Listing to Steward, I thought it could go either way.  I'd have to watch rounds 1-10.  Thanks.    
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: Palpatine Q on June 09, 2012, 10:26:30 PM
No, I just saw the last 2 rounds, which Bradley won.

That's great but there were 12 rounds in this fight. and he "won" them because Manny took them off, and he beat his fucking head in the rest of the fight.
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: Palpatine Q on June 09, 2012, 10:27:42 PM
Actually, I'm not trolling. I'm assuming the fight was close going into the 11th and 12th.  I only listen to Emmanuel Steward.  Those other two are one-sided trolls.  Listing to Steward, I thought it could go either way.  I'd have to watch rounds 1-10.  Thanks.    

Steward said it was a horrible decision...what are you talking about
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: fathead on June 09, 2012, 10:29:27 PM
Actually, I'm not trolling. I'm assuming the fight was close going into the 11th and 12th.  I only listen to Emmanuel Steward.  Those other two are one-sided trolls.  Listing to Steward, I thought it could go either way.  I'd have to watch rounds 1-10.  Thanks.    

watch the fight without hearing jim lampley blow paquiao the entire fight

he did the same thing in the last marquez fight.. which i thought pac shoulda lost
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: asbrus on June 09, 2012, 10:31:16 PM
Actually, I'm not trolling. I'm assuming the fight was close going into the 11th and 12th.  I only listen to Emmanuel Steward.  Those other two are one-sided trolls.  Listing to Steward, I thought it could go either way.  I'd have to watch rounds 1-10.  Thanks.    

L0L Y0U DIDN'T EVEN WATCH THE FIGHT. LMA0
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: Palpatine Q on June 09, 2012, 10:34:31 PM
watch the fight without hearing jim lampley blow paquiao the entire fight

he did the same thing in the last marquez fight.. which i thought pac shoulda lost

I think lampley is an idiot and disrregard his opinion, i watch the FIGHT. and Manny won that won that fight going away, it was never in question,.

Marquez was tagging him hard all nght long,and made a case for himself, that little bigheaded ni9.9er didn't do jack shit but "try hard"...who fucking cares. My new fighter that i hope dies in the ring
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: seCrawler on June 09, 2012, 10:35:42 PM
not sure but it's pretty obvious Arum wanted this to end on his terms.

I'm sure some things will surface in the next few weeks.

If he is going the Mayweather route with Arum, it's obvious Arum would burn him going out the door.
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: Palpatine Q on June 09, 2012, 10:42:25 PM
If he is going the Mayweather route with Arum, it's obvious Arum would burn him going out the door.

It's amazing to me that fight-fixing still goes on, with today's heightened media awareness nad technology, and all of the investigations and whatnot, it's a different world.  Goes to show you how powerful, and ballsy a guy like Bob Arum is.

And there is NO DOUBT in my mind that was a fixed fight
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: nzmusclemonster on June 09, 2012, 10:47:25 PM
I had it ten rounds to two for Pacquiao. Manny was the aggressor, higher punch %, and controlled the ring generalship. He shouldn't have pulled that non-sense keeping the World waiting at the beginning of the fight. It co$t him big time. At the end of the day though, compubox numbers are compubox numbers.

Manny owned the ring tonight. Bradley look like a guest in HIS ring.

I was shocked to hear the first score of 115 - 113...... and then to hear 2 of the judges gave it to Bradley. Still can't believe what I have just seen!!
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: outby43 on June 09, 2012, 10:47:49 PM
It's amazing to me that fight-fixing still goes on, with today's heightened media awareness nad technology, and all of the investigations and whatnot, it's a different world.  Goes to show you how powerful, and ballsy a guy like Bob Arum is.

And there is NO DOUBT in my mind that was a fixed fight

Had to be. No other plausible explanation.  I am not a Manny fan but Bradley did not deserve shit.
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: 240 is Back on June 09, 2012, 10:48:48 PM
Rumor is that Pacquiao is retiring out of disgust and pursuing religion/politics.

The fix was in.

We welcome his arrival to the politics board on getbig.
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: willie mosconi on June 09, 2012, 10:49:24 PM
Boxing has always been a corrupt sport
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: BB on June 09, 2012, 10:53:29 PM
Quick twitter scouting shows no one believing it, not one other boxer, no sports writers ringside, not even some of his friends. Closest was Amir Khan scoring it 7/5, everyone else had it 10/2.
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: seCrawler on June 09, 2012, 10:57:05 PM
Quick twitter scouting shows no one believing it, not one other boxer, no sports writers ringside, not even some of his friends. Closest was Amir Khan scoring it 7/5, everyone else had it 10/2.

And Khan's 7/5 could go the other way if Arum instructed the judges to call it tight, depending on how they saw the last two rounds, which I gave to Bradley. I'm just saying that would be their defense, but it's obvious if Manny is doing his own production company that wouldn't make Arum's pockets happy.
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: Iceman1981 on June 09, 2012, 11:02:40 PM
Pac got screwed.
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: BB on June 09, 2012, 11:05:34 PM
Here's the judge's score cards-


Roth gave Bradley 2,7,10,11,12. C.J. Ross gave Bradley rounds 2,5,7,8,10,11,12. Duane Ford gave him 1,5,7,8,9,10,12.
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: Overload on June 09, 2012, 11:14:33 PM
Rigged.

There is no way in hell Pac lost more than 3-4 rounds.

Last boxing i will ever watch and i've been watching Pac since the beginning.

Completely rigged, no chance in a millions years Pac lost that fight.


8)
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: Nails on June 09, 2012, 11:15:00 PM
Boxing will never change until they have an open scoring card after every round posted on a scoreboard for everyone to see
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: Palpatine Q on June 09, 2012, 11:18:58 PM
Did you see that little shithead,-right after, he won, he's already talking rematch and knew the date of the card....nah, he's not in Arum's pocket or anything

And Manny didn't sOund too enthusiastic about a rematch.
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: Overload on June 09, 2012, 11:20:53 PM
Did you see that little shithead,-right after, he won, he's already talking rematch and knew the date of the card....nah, he's not in Arum's pocket or anything

And Manny didn't sOund too enthusiastic about a rematch.

Pac knew the deal.

That's why he played the antics up front.

Boxing is dead. Pac destroyed him and made him look like a amateur.

What a fucking joke.


8)
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: no one on June 09, 2012, 11:29:36 PM


in before 'g-thang' shows up with his ebonics and conspiracy theories.
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: tonymctones on June 09, 2012, 11:35:41 PM
Manny is the most famous man in his country. He thought he was bigger then sport of boxing by making the World wait while he was getting ready watching basketball. He made a huge mistake doing that. Either way I don't believe we'll be seeing those three judges ever again judging a main event bout. 
it doesnt matter what happend before or after the fight, what matters is what happenen during the fight.

Manny dominated whats his face and for what its worth did it while seemingly putting forth little effort.

Manny won that fight and thats all that matters, if you dont like what he did before hand fine tarnish his reputation dont bring it up in response to the shitty ass decision.
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: maxkane69 on June 09, 2012, 11:57:30 PM
I have been saying for long time : "BOXING IS THE MOST CORRUPTED SPORT AFTER HORSERACING"
This is not the first fix in Pacquiao boxing career,infact Pacquiao vs Clottey was a fix (Clottey was paid to not even try to punch Pacquiao) and Pacquiao vs Mosley was a fix too ( Pac and Mosley agree to go the distance in a lopsided bout that resembled more an hug fest than a boxing match).
Also Mayweather vs Mosley (were Mosley stopped trying to win when he realized that he hurted Floyd for real) and Mayweather vs Ortiz (with a the ridicolous kiss in the cheek by Ortiz and floyd sucker punch with the refree looking on the other side ,WWE style) were fixed!
Mayweather vs Cotto was a fix too with Cotto leaving the ring after the decision without stay in the ring for the post fight interview and crying in the locker room for the shame to have agreed at fix match. Does anybody remember the scene from Raging Bull were Jake La Motta after volontary losing a fixed fight go in the locker room and cry over for the shame!

Tonite the fix was in and both boxers knew already the outcome since the biginning! Everything has been set up by Arum and rest of the mobster that run boxing so they can win big money with boxing bets and Arum and both fighters will make more money in the rematch!
Most of the time boxers have no choice but accept the fix otherwaise they will never boxe again!
The only STUPID are the boxing fans that paid for watching the fight and still believe that boxing is real.
Believe me between boxing and WWE there is not much difference nowdays!!!
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: seCrawler on June 10, 2012, 12:02:33 AM
Did you see that little shithead,-right after, he won, he's already talking rematch and knew the date of the card....nah, he's not in Arum's pocket or anything

And Manny didn't sOund too enthusiastic about a rematch.

From what I heard, Bradley signed with Arum, so both are his fighters.  If Manny goes his own way, would Floyd take the fight, given he won't touch a fight with Arum getting a sizable cut?  At the end of the day, I see why Floyd won't fuck with Arum anymore.  Oh, did anyone notice that Arum wasn't enraged by the decision?
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: Army of One on June 10, 2012, 12:20:03 AM
WTF??I turned the fight off after the 10th round and I had Manny up all 10 rounds, at absolute worst 9 rounds up, I come here assuming Manny won by at least 10 rounds, read the posts and assumed you were all being sarcastic as he won it so easily,and find out he fucking lost, are you kidding me?!!?!Biggest fix of any sport of all time!
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: polychronopolous on June 10, 2012, 12:23:31 AM
WTF??I turned the fight off after the 10th round and I had Manny up all 10 rounds, at absolute worst 9 rounds up, I come here assuming Manny won by at least 10 rounds, read the posts and assumed you were all being sarcastic as he won it so easily,and find out he fucking lost, are you kidding me?!!?!Biggest fix of any sport of all time!

It's certainly up there but I gotta disagree and say that Roy Jones Jr in the 88 Olympics was the poorest decision I ever witnessed.
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: maxkane69 on June 10, 2012, 12:38:27 AM
Here the video replay link of the fight :

http://www.mmaload.com/boxing-f44/video-pacquiao-vs-bradley-t56547.html
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: bigmc on June 10, 2012, 12:59:40 AM
boxing is dead

the money always talks
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: Bevo on June 10, 2012, 01:05:06 AM
Don't worry GH15 is already on the phone with the judges to overturn the ruling and have pacquiao retain his belt 8)
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: Army of One on June 10, 2012, 01:11:14 AM
lol, even Arum thinks its a fix


"Can you believe that?" promoter Bob Arum said. "I had it 10-2! After I got into the ring after the fight, I went over to Bradley and said 'You did very well.' He said, 'I tried hard, but I couldn't beat the guy.' This is crazy. You talk about killing boxing? All three scorecards you throw out."

"This is a death knell for boxing, and I'm going to make a ton of money on the rematch," Arum said.
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: Bam-bam on June 10, 2012, 11:11:23 AM
assbruise
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: The Abdominal Snoman on June 10, 2012, 04:46:49 PM
Congress goes after baseball but doesn't touch the NBA and Boxing. People should look into the connections between sports gambling and politicians/family.
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: Marty Champions on June 10, 2012, 06:40:41 PM
great white southern heritage rules over the yung african americans fighting to the death!
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: james72766 on June 10, 2012, 07:19:42 PM
There was a boxing/gambling reporter from Vegas on ESPN Radio this morning. He had the most realistic reason I've heard as to why this fight could have been fixed.

It all boils down with Arum making almost as much money from a Paq vs. Bradley rematch compared to a Paq vs. Mayweather fight, but without nearly as much at risk.

Since Arum promotes both Paq and Bradley, even though the gate will be much smaller, since he gets a cut of both and controls everything, he still stands to make a ton. Plus, regardless of the outcome, Arum still has the champion.

With Mayweather, Mayweather would control half of the promotions and, of course, Arum gets nothing from Mayweather other than headaches during contract negotiations. And of course, if Paq loses to Mayweather, there goes Arum's meal ticket.

Seems to make sense. In a scenario like this, I would imagine Paq was in on it. He didn't look like he was going for the kill. Even Max Kellerman, during the fight, said he sensed Paq had more in him and would have fought tougher if Bradley was providing a tougher fight. And Paq didn't look the least bit angered about the decision after the fight. Took it a bit too calm. Went a little overboard with his whole "I respect the decision of the judges" spiel as well I think.

He'll get a nice payday with a Bradley rematch. The reporter on ESPN said that the Vegas books will have Paq as a higher favorite than he was this fight due to the way he dominated.
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: asbrus on June 10, 2012, 07:40:00 PM
There was a boxing/gambling reporter from Vegas on ESPN Radio this morning. He had the most realistic reason I've heard as to why this fight could have been fixed.

It all boils down with Arum making almost as much money from a Paq vs. Bradley rematch compared to a Paq vs. Mayweather fight, but without nearly as much at risk.

Since Arum promotes both Paq and Bradley, even though the gate will be much smaller, since he gets a cut of both and controls everything, he still stands to make a ton. Plus, regardless of the outcome, Arum still has the champion.

With Mayweather, Mayweather would control half of the promotions and, of course, Arum gets nothing from Mayweather other than headaches during contract negotiations. And of course, if Paq loses to Mayweather, there goes Arum's meal ticket.

Seems to make sense. In a scenario like this, I would imagine Paq was in on it. He didn't look like he was going for the kill. Even Max Kellerman, during the fight, said he sensed Paq had more in him and would have fought tougher if Bradley was providing a tougher fight. And Paq didn't look the least bit angered about the decision after the fight. Took it a bit too calm. Went a little overboard with his whole "I respect the decision of the judges" spiel as well I think.

He'll get a nice payday with a Bradley rematch. The reporter on ESPN said that the Vegas books will have Paq as a higher favorite than he was this fight due to the way he dominated.

WHY W0ULD PAC BE IN 0N IT?
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: james72766 on June 10, 2012, 07:54:14 PM
A couple of reasons, there are rumors Paq owes Arum a ton of money. Arum may just control him.

Also, if Paq was holding back this fight, he would get an extra payday for the rematch against someone he knows he can beat, as opposed to being tested by Mayweather. To me, it just looked like Paq wasn't going all out, especially the few times he had him hurt. Looked like he was holding back.

Also, after obviously winning the fight, wouldn't you think he'd be more pissed about the decision? Paq was just too calm. Something doesn't add up.

Just my two cents.
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: Griffith on June 11, 2012, 02:05:06 AM
In pro bodybuilding:

 1. Apartheid + Joe Weider + Arnold = 2nd place for Serge Nubret at 1975 IFBB Mr.Olympia
 2. 1980 Ifbb Mr.Olympia
 3. 1981 Ifbb Mr.Olympia

So you saying Serge Nubret got gifted the second place?
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: JBGRAY on June 11, 2012, 04:15:21 AM
The Montreal Screwjob
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: James28 on June 11, 2012, 04:21:15 AM
They do it because they evoke passion from you lot. They know you'll also pay for the next fight. The next fix. Stop watching it. Stop discussing it.
Title: Re: Biggest Robbery in Sports History?
Post by: Griffith on June 11, 2012, 07:18:48 AM
The Montreal Screwjob
Good call!