Author Topic: Romano believes Mike Ohearn is natural  (Read 26110 times)

Bevo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18726
  • Middle Urinal at Buc-ee’s
Re: Romano believes Mike Ohearn is natural
« Reply #275 on: May 18, 2021, 01:33:36 AM »
No way guys in the 70s-80s ate like they do today. This is proven just by how much they weigh. Arnold at 6'2" topped off at 250 lbs in the off season. Ferrigno at 6'5" was 265 onstage in 1975. Nowadays guys under six feet are routinely 300 pounds plus in the off season and over 250 on stage. Even a 5'9" Phil Heath, who is not known as a mass monster, tips the scale around 250 lbs on stage.

Actually off season back then guys wouldn’t even lift much, and slimmed down. Arnold looked 200 tops off season, maybe 210 max

pellius

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22827
  • RIP Keith Jones aka OnlyMe/NoWorries. 1/10/2011
Re: Romano believes Mike Ohearn is natural
« Reply #276 on: May 18, 2021, 01:56:32 AM »
Actually off season back then guys wouldn’t even lift much, and slimmed down. Arnold looked 200 tops off season, maybe 210 max

Actually, I think Arnold did that once he became king and knew that there wasn't anybody that was a threat to him and he began to grow out of being. I think up until 1974, certainly when he first came to this country and was trying to make a name for himself. He was, like most of us, training year-round trying to advance. Once Sergio was out of the picture there really wasn't anybody left.

Van_Bilderass

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15022
  • "Don't Try"
Re: Romano believes Mike Ohearn is natural
« Reply #277 on: May 18, 2021, 02:00:46 AM »
That's like saying no a single bodybuilder ate like a pig before the "insuling GH gut era" ,,,, lol

In reality there were tons of guys that ate like pigs during the 80's in off season yet on stage not a single gut ...




If they did eat as much back then they would have weighed the same but they did not. They would've had a higher bf percentage, on account of the lack of GH and perhaps other nutrient partitioning drugs, but they would've weighed approximately the same. The pros didn't used to weigh 315 when off like Palumbo or 330+ or whatever Ronnie weighed at his largest.
They didn't eat 12 ounces of meat 6 times a day for years on end.

The drugs definitely contribute though. Visceral fat accumulation, some organ growth, just general water retention, which can further swell the stomach, leading to higher chance of diastasis, herniated stomach walls.

A couple of decades back Chad made a smart observation. He said the pros with the worst guts are those with short waists. Makes sense, there is less space.

Pet shop boys

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 11688
  • Getbig!
Re: Romano believes Mike Ohearn is natural
« Reply #278 on: February 15, 2024, 07:01:16 AM »
Romano hasn't changed his mind .....


Or have you now?





WooooSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

Taffin

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15905
  • Training out my gay penor...
Re: Romano believes Mike Ohearn is natural
« Reply #279 on: February 15, 2024, 07:03:05 AM »
Romano hasn't changed his mind .....


Or have you now?





WooooSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

Someone needs to post Romano the shrivelled balls shots
T

Dalnet

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1312
  • Getbig!
Re: Romano believes Mike Ohearn is natural
« Reply #280 on: February 15, 2024, 07:37:06 AM »
Someone needs to post Romano the shrivelled balls shots

Those leaks pretty much confirmed two things.

1. Bevo was right
2. Mike is juicing to high heaven

Taffin

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 15905
  • Training out my gay penor...
Re: Romano believes Mike Ohearn is natural
« Reply #281 on: February 15, 2024, 07:53:51 AM »
Those leaks pretty much confirmed two things.

1. Bevo was right
2. Mike is juicing to high heaven

Also - Mike fits a medium sock
T