Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Straw Man on March 13, 2018, 11:09:03 PM
-
Why is Fox News not reporting on this story?
-
Because there are more important things than reporting on a “who cares” hit piece. Move on fatty. You’re reaching. No one cares
-
Because there are more important things than reporting on a “who cares” hit piece. Move on fatty. You’re reaching. No one cares
So you don't care about Seth Rich ?
-
Because there are more important things than reporting on a “who cares” hit piece. Move on fatty. You’re reaching. No one cares
::)
-
Just quickly googled the guy. Do you think the Russians killed him or something?
-
Just quickly googled the guy. Do you think the Russians killed him or something?
Nope
Is that all you found in your quick Google search?
-
Nope
Is that all you found in your quick Google search?
No, I actually found way too much stuff about him in a general search and I was wondering what's the latest, what should Fox News be saying about him right now. Quickly text searched CNN's and Yahoo's main page for a headline with that name on it, but nothing.
-
No, I actually found way too much stuff about him in a general search and I was wondering what's the latest, what should Fox News be saying about him right now. Quickly text searched CNN's and Yahoo's main page for a headline with that name on it, but nothing.
Maybe Google works differently where you live
What are you searching by?
-
Maybe Google works differently where you live
What are you searching by?
How do you know I don't live within a mile of you?
-
How do you know I don't live within a mile of you?
Cool. When did you move here?
Do you rent or own. I bought my place 15 years ago. It would suck to have to pay for rent around here.
What phrase are you searching by?
-
Cool. When did you move here?
Do you rent or own. I bought my place 15 years ago. It would suck to have to pay for rent around here.
What phrase are you searching by?
The question was how do you know? Whether or not I do is on a need to know basis, and you don't need to know.
I already told you what I searched for. Can't you read? What's the big deal anyway. I asked a simple question and you keep dancing around it for some reason.
-
The question was how do you know? Whether or not I do is on a need to know basis, and you don't need to know.
I already told you what I searched for. Can't you read? What's the big deal anyway. I asked a simple question and you keep dancing around it for some reason.
Just quickly googled the guy. Do you think the Russians killed him or something?
you googled "the guy"?
-
you googled "the guy"?
No.
-
No.
are you sure
try googling "seth rich"
even better, I'll do it for you
http://bfy.tw/BsdL
what results do you get where you live?
-
are you sure
try googling "seth rich"
even better, I'll do it for you
http://bfy.tw/BsdL
what results do you get where you live?
I ain't clicking that. Who do you think you are, Coach?
-
I ain't clicking that. Who do you think you are, Coach?
ok
then just google "Seth Rich" and let us know what you find
everyone else can click the link. It's just a "let me google that for you" search
-
ok
then just google "Seth Rich" and let us know what you find
everyone else can click the link. It's just a "let me google that for you" search
I am not really feeling like searching again. Why can't you just tell me what you want Fox News to say about him?
-
I am not really feeling like searching again. Why can't you just tell me what you want Fox News to say about him?
yeah, typing two words into Google must be exhausting for you
-
yeah, typing two words into Google must be exhausting for you
Not really, it's very quick, simple and easy. How about you just tell me?
-
Not really, it's very quick, simple and easy. How about you just tell me?
I don't think you can handle it
that's probably why the information is censored where you live
-
I don't think you can handle it
that's probably why the information is censored where you live
It's so much easier with Google Chrome too. All I have to do is highlight any text on any page, right click and select Search Google For...
-
It's so much easier with Google Chrome too. All I have to do is highlight any text on any page, right click and select Search Google For...
that sounds like a lot of work
If you manage for find the energy to do that let me know what you find
-
that sounds like a lot of work
If you manage for find the energy to do that let me know what you find
Not really, all done with just a couple of clicks, no need to type anything. So easy a one armed man could do it.
-
Not really, all done with just a couple of clicks, no need to type anything. So easy a one armed man could do it.
great
when you work up the energy to do it let us know what you find
-
are you sure
try googling "seth rich"
even better, I'll do it for you
http://bfy.tw/BsdL
what results do you get where you live?
Thanks for that link, it helped
https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/973956798540529665?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet
-
Thanks for that link, it helped
https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/973956798540529665?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet
weird, it doesn't lead to a Twitter page but if anyone is dumb enough to fuck up clicking on a link it would be you
-
great
when you work up the energy to do it let us know what you find
Alright, you won't tell me so I searched again. I see now what you mean. Fox News sued by the guy's parents. So they're still not saying anything about this? It's probably because they're the ones getting sued for spreading fake news. Good. Let all news networks who spread false news get sued so they can pay for it and finally stop. CNN won't survive though.
-
weird, it doesn't lead to a Twitter page but if anyone is dumb enough to fuck up clicking on a link it would be you
It was right there on the google page. But fuck, you're a dumbass
-
Alright, you won't tell me so I searched again. I see now what you mean. Fox News sued by the guy's parents. So they're still not saying anything about this? It's probably because they're the ones getting sued for spreading fake news. Good. Let all news networks who spread false news get sued so they can pay for it and finally stop. CNN won't survive though.
Hey dumbass Straw, look at the screenshot. "Seth Rich on Twitter"
-
Alright, you won't tell me so I searched again. I see now what you mean. Fox News sued by the guy's parents. So they're still not saying anything about this? It's probably because they're the ones getting sued for spreading fake news. Good. Let all news networks who spread false news get sued so they can pay for it and finally stop. CNN won't survive though.
LOL - funny how you finally found the story but couldn't help yourself from trying to conflate Fox with CNN
I guess that gut level reaction is to be expected from Trumptards (I'm guessing you didn't vote for Trump but you're still a Trumptard in solidarity)
-
LOL - funny how you finally found the story but couldn't help yourself from trying to conflate Fox with CNN
I guess that gut level reaction to be expected from Trumptards (I'm guessing you didn't vote for Trump but you're still a Trumptard in solidarity)
Isn't that what you wanted me to do, find he story? How is that funny? And what in the world is a Trumptard, anyone who disagrees with you?
-
It was right there on the google page. But fuck, you're a dumbass
that Twitter comment wasn't there when I made this thread last night and not sure it was there when I made the link (look at the time stamp)
google updates search results so you have a point
see how that works?
Let's talk about your link
Why would quoting a lawyer "gut the story" as this person claims?
-
Isn't that what you wanted me to do, find he story? How is that funny? And what in the world is a Trumptard, anyone who disagrees with you?
I called you a Trumptard because you acted like one by trying to bring CNN into a story about Faux News
Same thing Trumptards do when trying to deflect a bad story (i.e. daily news) about Trump by bringing up Obama or Clinton
Trumptards gonna Trumptard
-
I called you a Trumptard because you acted like one by trying to bring CNN into a story about Faux News
Same thing Trumptards do when trying to deflect a bad story (i.e. daily news) about Trump by bringing up Obama or Clinton
Trumptards gonna Trumptard
I don't get it. I don't watch Fox News or CNN, but I've seen video compilations of CNN flat out lying and staging false news many times. That's the reason I said what I said.
Are you even able to define Trumptard?
-
I don't get it. I don't watch Fox News or CNN, but I've seen video compilations of CNN flat out lying and staging false news many times. That's the reason I said what I said.
Are you even able to define Trumptard?
I haven't seen any of those "video compilations"
I assume CNN was sued
Can you post some of those compilations here and I'll check them out
-
I haven't seen any of those "video compilations"
I assume CNN was sued
Can you post some of those compilations here and I'll check them out
They've been posted on this board more than once. I'll see if I can find it and post it when I get some free time.
-
They've been posted on this board more than once. I'll see if I can find it and post it when I get some free time.
please do
I'd like to see them
I assume there must have been some lawsuits too
-
please do
I'd like to see them
I assume there must have been some lawsuits too
Haven't heard anything about lawsuits, but I've seen the videos.
-
Haven't heard anything about lawsuits, but I've seen the videos.
these are videos of CNN anchor or anchors continuing to report on a story that is false?
-
these are videos of CNN anchor or anchors continuing to report on a story that is false?
Wait until you see it, then you tell me.
-
Lol!
-
Because there are more important things than reporting on a “who cares” hit piece. Move on fatty. You’re reaching. No one cares
Funny, last year you were making multiple threads a day about Seth Rich.
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=631475.0
-
Wait until you see it, then you tell me.
I did a quick search and found this but I don't consider pundits (many of whom are Republicans) making false comments on CNN to be the same thing as Fox New employees constantly promoting a story like the CT around Seth Rich
http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/tv/cnn/
-
Funny, last year you were making multiple threads a day about Seth Rich.
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=631475.0
Exactly
-
I haven't seen any of those "video compilations"
I assume CNN was sued
Can you post some of those compilations here and I'll check them out
Well, well, well, the best one I remember seeing seems to have been deleted from YouTube, by Hillary Clinton possibly.
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=641213.msg8955600#msg8955600
But here is another one:
There are more which I'll try to find when I get another break.
-
please do
I'd like to see them
I assume there must have been some lawsuits too
Found this one. There might be more.
CNN faced $100M lawsuit over botched Russia story
The specter of a $100 million libel suit scared CNN into retracting a poorly reported story that slimed an ally of President Trump’s — and forcing out the staffers responsible for it, The Post has learned.
The cable network’s coverage of Trump transition team member Anthony Scaramucci came amid federal scrutiny of corporate parent Time Warner’s pending purchase by AT&T — and the widespread belief among media execs that CNN President Jeff Zucker can’t survive a merger.
CNN immediately caved after Scaramucci, a financier and frequent network guest, cried foul and threatened to take legal action, sources said Tuesday.
Scaramucci got an unusual public apology but still hired a top Manhattan lawyer to put further pressure on CNN and “look after [his] interests in this matter,” one source said.
Sources also said the three journalists responsible for the retracted story — reporter Tom Frank, editor Eric Lichtblau and Lex Haris, who headed the CNN Investigates unit — were urged to resign.
https://nypost.com/2017/06/27/cnn-staffers-didnt-resign-over-retracted-story-they-got-fired/
-
Well, well, well, the best one I remember seeing seems to have been deleted from YouTube, by Hillary Clinton possibly.
http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=641213.msg8955600#msg8955600
But here is another one:
There are more which I'll try to find when I get another break.
I just watched your video
Do you seriously think any of these one time events in any way compares to Fox New "reporting" the same false story over and over and over again.
If you do, then tell me which one and how it's comparable to the Seth Rich scandal at Fox News
-
Found this one. There might be more.
CNN faced $100M lawsuit over botched Russia story
The specter of a $100 million libel suit scared CNN into retracting a poorly reported story that slimed an ally of President Trump’s — and forcing out the staffers responsible for it, The Post has learned.
The cable network’s coverage of Trump transition team member Anthony Scaramucci came amid federal scrutiny of corporate parent Time Warner’s pending purchase by AT&T — and the widespread belief among media execs that CNN President Jeff Zucker can’t survive a merger.
CNN immediately caved after Scaramucci, a financier and frequent network guest, cried foul and threatened to take legal action, sources said Tuesday.
Scaramucci got an unusual public apology but still hired a top Manhattan lawyer to put further pressure on CNN and “look after [his] interests in this matter,” one source said.
Sources also said the three journalists responsible for the retracted story — reporter Tom Frank, editor Eric Lichtblau and Lex Haris, who headed the CNN Investigates unit — were urged to resign.
https://nypost.com/2017/06/27/cnn-staffers-didnt-resign-over-retracted-story-they-got-fired/
again, how does this compare the the Seth Rich Scandal
I believe Fox News was eventually forced into admitting their story was fraudulent but only after weeks (or months) of constant coverage
Is that comparable to one story where retraction was almost immediate and people were fired
How does that compare to the Seth Rich scandal
Here's the Wiki page so you can check it out and then tell me how it compares
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Seth_Rich
-
I just watched your video
Do you seriously think any of these one time events in any way compares to Fox New "reporting" the same false story over and over and over again.
If you do, then tell me which one and how it's comparable to the Seth Rich scandal at Fox News
again, how does this compare the the Seth Rich Scandal
I believe Fox News was eventually forced into admitting their story was fraudulent but only after weeks (or months) of constant coverage
Is that comparable to one story where retraction was almost immediate and people were fired
How does that compare to the Seth Rich scandal
Here's the Wiki page so you can check it out and then tell me how it compares
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Seth_Rich
Wait. So you are saying:
1. It's okay if CNN reports fake news, but it's not okay if Fox News does it.
2. It's okay to report fake news as long as it's reported only once per fake news.
3. It's okay to report fake news, as long as they don't get caught.
4. It's okay to report fake news if they get caught as long as they admit it's fake news and retract less than a couple of weeks from the day they get caught.
5. It's okay to report fake news as long as they admit it's fake news and retract immediately after getting threatened with a lawsuit.
Gotcha. Okay.
Alright, you won't tell me so I searched again. I see now what you mean. Fox News sued by the guy's parents. So they're still not saying anything about this? It's probably because they're the ones getting sued for spreading fake news. Good. Let all news networks who spread false news get sued so they can pay for it and finally stop. CNN won't survive though.
Then you called me a Trumptard just for mentioning CNN.
-
;D
Wait. So you are saying:
1. It's okay if CNN reports fake news, but it's not okay if Fox News does it.
2. It's okay to report fake news as long as it's reported only once per fake news.
3. It's okay to report fake news, as long as they don't get caught.
4. It's okay to report fake news if they get caught as long as they admit it's fake news and retract less than a couple of weeks from the day they get caught.
5. It's okay to report fake news as long as they admit it's fake news and retract immediately after getting threatened with a lawsuit.
Gotcha. Okay.
Then you called me a Trumptard just for mentioning CNN.
-
Wait. So you are saying:
1. It's okay if CNN reports fake news, but it's not okay if Fox News does it.
2. It's okay to report fake news as long as it's reported only once per fake news.
3. It's okay to report fake news, as long as they don't get caught.
4. It's okay to report fake news if they get caught as long as they admit it's fake news and retract less than a couple of weeks from the day they get caught.
5. It's okay to report fake news as long as they admit it's fake news and retract immediately after getting threatened with a lawsuit.
Gotcha. Okay.
Then you called me a Trumptard just for mentioning CNN.
QFT
-
Wait. So you are saying:
1. It's okay if CNN reports fake news, but it's not okay if Fox News does it.
2. It's okay to report fake news as long as it's reported only once per fake news.
3. It's okay to report fake news, as long as they don't get caught.
4. It's okay to report fake news if they get caught as long as they admit it's fake news and retract less than a couple of weeks from the day they get caught.
5. It's okay to report fake news as long as they admit it's fake news and retract immediately after getting threatened with a lawsuit.
Gotcha. Okay.
Then you called me a Trumptard just for mentioning CNN.
As usual, you completely miss the point
the videos you posted aren't even a valid comparison
How about this
Let's compare the single story about Russia to the ongoing series of stories by Fox New about Seth Rich
Let me know if you're capable of focusing on that and having a conversation and I'll proceed later today
be honest
don't you're willing and capable if you're not actually going to follow through
-
don't you're willing and capable if you're not actually going to follow through
What?
-
What?
typical typo of mine
don't SAY you're willing and capable if you're not actually going to follow through
-
typical typo of mine
don't SAY you're willing and capable if you're not actually going to follow through
Okay.
-
Okay.
Let's start with the story CNN story you posted
please summarize the facts
when was the story printed/posted (date)
why and when was it retracted
did the people responsible for story suffer any consequences, if so what?
were any law suits filed?
-
Let's start with the story CNN story you posted
please summarize the facts
when was the story printed/posted (date)
why and when was it retracted
did the people responsible for story suffer any consequences, if so what?
where any law suits filed?
What else is there to discuss here? You are the one making the comparisons, not me.
You've made it very clear that you'll blindly defend CNN to the death, and will justify their fake news reporting no matter what.
I have not defended Fox News. On the contrary, I said GOOD that they got sued for reporting fake news.
Then I said ALL news networks that report fake news should be sued, so they can pay for it and stop.
Then, just because I mentioned CNN you got angry and called me Trumptard, a term meant to be derogatory and meant to offend.
So it seems you're the only one here who completely missed the point and the only one incapable of having a conversation.
-
What else is there to discuss here? You are the one making the comparisons, not me.
You've made it very clear that you'll blindly defend CNN to the death, and will justify their fake news reporting no matter what.
I have not defended Fox News. On the contrary, I said GOOD that they got sued for reporting fake news.
Then I said ALL news networks that report fake news should be sued, so they can pay for it and stop.
Then, just because I mentioned CNN you got angry and called me Trumptard, a term meant to be derogatory and meant to offend.
So it seems you're the only one here who completely missed the point and the only one incapable of having a conversation.
I asked you this
As usual, you completely miss the point
the videos you posted aren't even a valid comparison
How about this
Let's compare the single story about Russia to the ongoing series of stories by Fox New about Seth Rich
Let me know if you're capable of focusing on that and having a conversation and I'll proceed later today
be honest
don't SAY you're willing and capable if you're not actually going to follow through
you said
Okay.
are you going to follow through on your word or not?
-
I asked you this
you said
are you going to follow through on your word or not?
I said Okay to your typo explanation.
What else is there to discuss here? You are the one making the comparisons, not me.
You've made it very clear that you'll blindly defend CNN to the death, and will justify their fake news reporting no matter what.
I have not defended Fox News. On the contrary, I said GOOD that they got sued for reporting fake news.
Then I said ALL news networks that report fake news should be sued, so they can pay for it and stop.
Then, just because I mentioned CNN you got angry and called me Trumptard, a term meant to be derogatory and meant to offend.
So it seems you're the only one here who completely missed the point and the only one incapable of having a conversation.
-
I said Okay to your typo explanation.
What else is there to discuss here? You are the one making the comparisons, not me.
You've made it very clear that you'll blindly defend CNN to the death, and will justify their fake news reporting no matter what.
I have not defended Fox News. On the contrary, I said GOOD that they got sued for reporting fake news.
Then I said ALL news networks that report fake news should be sued, so they can pay for it and stop.
Then, just because I mentioned CNN you got angry and called me Trumptard, a term meant to be derogatory and meant to offend.
So it seems you're the only one here who completely missed the point and the only one incapable of having a conversation.
I'm saying let's compare the two
I'd be willing to compare the video you posted as well but that's a much much weaker case than the CNN story
You seem to be suggesting that they (the CNN Russia story you posted and the Seth Rich saga at Fox News) are equivalent
Do I understand you correctly?
-
I'm saying let's compare the two
I'd be willing to compare the video you posted as well but that's a much much weaker case than the CNN story
You seem to be suggesting that they (the CNN Russia story you posted and the Seth Rich saga at Fox News) are equivalent
Do I understand you correctly?
Are you really bored or something?
I have not defended Fox News. On the contrary, I said GOOD that they got sued for reporting fake news.
Then I said ALL news networks that report fake news should be sued, so they can pay for it and stop.
-
Are you really bored or something?
so you're saying you believe all "fake news" is equivalent
correct?
-
so you're saying you believe all "fake news" is equivalent
correct?
Really? Now you want me to define for you what is fake, false, not true?
Look, I have not defended Fox News, but all you've done here is blindly defend CNN's fake news reporting.
Why are you trying to put words in my mouth that I haven't said in order to fabricate a reason to argue about something?
Seriously, are you that bored? You should probably start this argument with someone defending Fox News.
-
Really? Now you want me to define for you what is fake, false, not true?
Look, I have not defended Fox News, but all you've done here is blindly defend CNN's fake news reporting.
Why are you trying to put words in my mouth that I haven't said in order to fabricate a reason to argue about something?
Seriously, are you that bored? You should probably start this argument with someone defending Fox News.
I'm trying to understand your beliefs
first of all "fake" or "fraudulent" is not hard to understand
it implies knowingly intending to deceive such as someone trying to sell you a fake Rolex watch
Can we agree on the definition of "fake"
-
I'm trying to understand your beliefs
first of all "fake" or "fraudulent" is not hard to understand
it implies knowingly intending to deceive such as someone trying to sell you a fake Rolex watch
Can we agree on the definition of "fake"
IF YOU ONLY PUT AS MUCH EFFORT INTO WORKING OUT THAT YOU DO BEING A LIB . . . . .
-
IF YOU ONLY PUT AS MUCH EFFORT INTO WORKING OUT THAT YOU DO BEING A LIB . . . . .
you have no clue how much effort I put into training or diet
which seems is par for the course for you on any topic discussed on this board
-
you have no clue how much effort I put into training or diet
which seems is par for the course for you on any topic discussed on this board
Except training. That i got down pretty damn well right now. :D :D :D
-
Except training. That i got down pretty damn well right now. :D :D :D
I'm sure you know your own training quite well as I'm sure everyone else (or most) do as well
-
I'm trying to understand your beliefs
first of all "fake" or "fraudulent" is not hard to understand
it implies knowingly intending to deceive such as someone trying to sell you a fake Rolex watch
Can we agree on the definition of "fake"
Really? Now you are trying to understand my beliefs? Because of my faith, my beliefs, you have many times called me a fundie, and therefore mentally ill by your definition.
Good, glad you understand what fake, false, untrue means and don't need me to define it for you.
Go start this argument with someone who defends Fox News. That way you two can argue about how your fake news network(CNN) is better than their fake news network. You picked the wrong guy to have this argument with.
-
Really? Now you are trying to understand my beliefs? Because of my faith, my beliefs, you have many times called me a fundie, and therefore mentally ill by your definition.
Good, glad you understand what fake, false, untrue means and don't need me to define it for you.
Go start this argument with someone who defends Fox News. That way you two can argue about how your fake news network(CNN) is better than their fake news network. You picked the wrong guy to have this argument with.
not sure why you decided to bring your faith into this topic
fake doesn't just mean "untrue"
It means fraudulent i.e. the intent to deceive
If you don't understand that then this conversation is pointless
-
not sure why you decided to bring your faith into this topic
fake doesn't just mean "untrue"
It means fraudulent i.e. the intent to deceive
If you don't understand that then this conversation is pointless
This conversation became pointless as soon as you made it perfectly clear that you'll blindly defend CNN no matter what, and that you justify their fake news reporting.
-
This conversation became pointless as soon as you made it perfectly clear that you'll blindly defend CNN no matter what, and that you will justify their fake news reporting.
I'm not defending CNN
where did you get that idea?
I'm trying to understand what is the definition of "fake news" and if all example are equivalent
You seem not to want to have that conversation
I should have known. We've done this many times. I try to actually engage you in an adult conversation and you, avoid, change the topic, etc..,
-
I'm not defending CNN
where did you get that idea?
From all your posts on this thread starting with you calling me Trumpard the moment I mentioned CNN, and following the video compilation and lawsuit against CNN article I posted, which are some of the reasons I mentioned CNN to begin with.
I'm trying to understand what is the definition of "fake news" and if all example are equivalent
You seem not to want to have that conversation
I should have known. We've done this many times. I try to actually engage you in an adult conversation and you, avoid, change the topic, etc..,
Yeah right, by calling me Trumptard just for mentioning your beloved fake news network, CNN.
-
From all your posts on this thread starting with you calling Trumpard the moment I mentioned CNN, and following the video compilation and lawsuit against CNN article I posted, which are some of the reasons I mentioned CNN to begin with.
Yeah right, by calling me Trumptard just for mentioning your beloved fake news network, CNN.
just another example of you trying to avoid having to have a detailed conversation about a topic
I've given you an entire page to try to have a normal conversation and you seem incapable and unwilling (the two very things I asked you before I attempted to have an adult conversation with you)
-
just another example of you trying to avoid having to have a detailed conversation about a topic
I've given you an entire page to try to have a normal conversation and you seem incapable and unwilling (the two very things I asked you before I attempted to have an adult conversation with you)
Obviously, from most of your posts on this board and by how you address most other members, you have no clue what a normal, adult conversations really is.
I find it awfully strange that all of a sudden you care what I think and what I believe, only after I posted the video compilation showing CNN reporting fake news, and after posting an article about a lawsuit involving CNN for reporting fake news.
I'm starting to think you really didn't believe that I would find video compilations of CNN reporting fake news, or that I would find an article about a lawsuit involving CNN for reporting fake news.
It seems your thread backfired and now you're pretending to care what I think or what I believe in order to find some way to discredit me, and some how find a way to cover up your thread fail.
Pathetic.
-
Obviously, from most of your posts on this board and by how you address most other members, you have no clue what a normal, adult conversations really is.
I find it awfully strange that all of a sudden you care what I think and what I believe, only after I posted the video compilation showing CNN reporting fake news, and after posting an article about a lawsuit involving CNN for reporting fake news.
I'm starting to think you really didn't believe that I would find video compilations of CNN reporting fake news, or that I would find an article about a lawsuit involving CNN for reporting fake news.
It seems your thread backfired and now you're pretending to care what I think or what I believe in order to find some way to discredit me, and some how find a way to cover up your thread fail.
Pathetic.
what's pathetic is you trying to avoid an actual conversation about the facts about your own posts
even more pathetic is you whining about someone calling you a name
I've been called every name in the book by people on this site ...who cares
It comes with the territory
-
what's pathetic is you trying to avoid an actual conversation about the facts about your own posts
even more pathetic is you whining about someone calling you a name
I've been called every name in the book by people on this site ...who cares
It comes with the territory
Thread fail. Your thread backfired. Deal with it.
-
Thread fail. Your thread backfired. Deal with it.
how can it backfire when you make a claim and then refuse to actually engage in a discussion
the fact of the matter is that Seth Rich's parents are suing Fox News
that what the subject of this thread is about and that is a fact (i.e. not fake news)
BTW - this is the 2nd law suit associated with Fox New's ongoing intentionally fraudulent story about Seth Rich's murder (as I'm sure already know given how well informed you are)
-
how can it backfire when you make a claim and then refuse to actually engage in a discussion
the fact of the matter is that Seth Rich's parents are suing Fox News
that what the subject of this thread is about and that is a fact (i.e. not fake news)
BTW - this is the 2nd law suit associated with Fox New's ongoing intentionally fraudulent story about Seth Rich's murder (as I'm sure already know given how well informed you are)
Your thread failed.
-
Your thread failed.
fake news
You attempted to make a comparison and now you unwilling to support or even discuss it which is because you know you can't.
-
fake news
You attempted to make a comparison and now you unwilling to support or even discuss it which is because you know you can't.
It failed.
-
It failed.
same old shit from you every time
you make a claim, offer some links and then refuse to discuss it or support it in any way
then you deflect, cry about someone calling you names and declare victory
same pathetic thing from you every time
-
same old shit from you every time
you make a claim, offer some links and then refuse to discuss it or support it in any way
then you deflect, cry about someone calling you names and declare victory
same pathetic thing from you every time
Failed.
-
same old shit from you every time
you make a claim, offer some links and then refuse to discuss it or support it in any way
then you deflect, cry about someone calling you names and declare victory
same pathetic thing from you every time
You seem very bitter and angry. Have a drink.
-
Failed.
Fake News
Trumptard logic at its finest
If CNN prints a story one time with an unverified source and virtually immediately retracts the story and fires the people associated with it that's EXACTLY the same as intentionally fabricating a story and repeating that fabricated story for weeks with multiple different media (internet, radio, TV), getting sued (two law suits so far) and NEVER firing anyone
Those two things are exactly the same in the Trumptard addled brain
Same addled brain that can't distinguish between intentional fraud and an error or just shoddy journalism
both are exactly the same in Trumptardia
I expect you'll be crying back soon with how I called you a name
-
Fake News
Trumptard logic at its finest
If CNN prints a story one time with an unverified source and virtually immediately retracts the story and fires the people associated with it that's EXACTLY the same as intentionally fabricating a story and repeating that fabricated story for weeks with multiple different media (internet, radio, TV), getting sued (two law suits so far) and NEVER firing anyone
Those two things are exactly the same in the Trumptard addled brain
Same addled brain that can't distinguish between intentional fraud and an error or just shoddy journalism
both are exactly the same in Trumptardia
I expect you'll be crying back soon with how I called you a name
There you go. Let all the anger out. Feel better now?
I knew you were just pretending to care about what I think or about my beliefs. I knew you were just pretending to want to have a normal, adult conversation.
You are just as dishonest as your beloved fake news network, CNN.
Thread fail. Your thread backfired. Deal with it.
-
There you go. Let all the anger out. Feel better now?
I knew you were just pretending to care about what I think or about my beliefs. I knew you were just pretending to want to have a normal, adult conversation.
You are just as dishonest as your beloved fake news network, CNN.
Thread fail. Your thread backfired. Deal with it.
LOL - what anger?
just pointing out your pathetic attempt at trying to "prove" your point which consists of providing a totally weak example and then refusing to support or debate it and then declaring yourself victorious
I doubt that even worked for you in kindergarten much less anywhere else in your life
-
LOL - what anger?
just pointing out your pathetic attempt at trying to "prove" your point which consists of providing a totally weak example and then refusing to support or debate it and then declaring yourself victorious
I doubt that even worked for you in kindergarten much less anywhere else in your life
Thread fail. Your thread backfired. Deal with it.
-
There you go. Let all the anger out. Feel better now?
I knew you were just pretending to care about what I think or about my beliefs. I knew you were just pretending to want to have a normal, adult conversation.
You are just as dishonest as your beloved fake news network, CNN.
Thread fail. Your thread backfired. Deal with it.
Let me know when you find some actual examples of fake news and hopefully you'll also have the balls to actually be able to defend your examples
-
Let me know when you find some actual examples of fake news and hopefully you'll also have the balls to actually be able to defend your examples
I am not defending Fox News. Who are you arguing with, yourself?
-
I am not defending Fox News. Who are you arguing with, yourself?
where did I say you were defending Fox News Trumptard?
-
The DNC had Seth Rich murdered for stealing internal intel re: HRC primary election fixing and providing same to Wikileaks. MS 13 cut outs were used to orchestrate the murder.
-
The DNC had Seth Rich murdered for stealing internal intel re: HRC primary election fixing and providing same to Wikileaks. MS 13 cut outs were used to orchestrate the murder.
does Trump have this vital info?
this seems helpful to him
-
does Trump have this vital info?
this seems helpful to him
Meltdown.
-
Meltdown.
so that's a no?
at least tell me Donny Jr is aware of this info
-
where did I say you were defending Fox News Trumptard?
Then what are you arguing about, and with whom, yourself?
Oh, that's right. You are angry that I mentioned your beloved fake news network, CNN. And you are even angrier that I actually posted a video compilation of CNN reporting fake news, and an article about a lawsuit involving CNN for reporting fake news. You didn't know these existed when you started this thread.
Your thread backfired.
Trumptard? Yeah, a Venezuelan resident (according to you anyway), who voted for Trump? That doesn't make sense. Only Democrats do this kind of voter fraud.
-
Not sure if Grasping is going to survive the beatdown in this thread by Loco....
-
Then what are you arguing about, and with whom, yourself?
Oh, that's right. You are angry that I mentioned your beloved fake news network, CNN. And you are even angrier that I actually posted a video compilation of CNN reporting fake news, and an article about a lawsuit involving CNN for reporting fake news. You didn't know these existed when you started this thread.
Your thread backfired.
Trumptard? Yeah, a Venezuelan resident (according to you anyway), who voted for Trump? That doesn't make sense. Only Democrats do this kind of voter fraud.
Why are Trumptards so stupid
I started a thread about the fact that Seth Rich's parents were suing Fox News over their ongoing fraudulent story about the murder of their son.
For some reason you attempted to turn that fact into a referendum on fake news but you don't seem to actually know what that even is
As for calling you Trumptard even though you've admitted you're a foreigner I don't see the problem
As I mentioned before, you're a Trumptard in solidarity.
Also, we know Trumptards love name calling so it's kind of hard to believe you have any problem with being referred to as a Trumptad
-
Why are Trumptards so stupid
Also, we know Trumptards love name calling so it's kind of hard to believe you have any problem with being referred to as a Trumptad
Oh, so that makes you a Trumptard, and me not so much. Gotcha.
BTW, your thread backfired. Epic fail.
-
Oh, so that makes you a Trumptard, and me not so much. Gotcha.
BTW, your thread backfired. Epic fail.
the thread is about the fact that Seth Rich's parents are suing Fox News
I guess you're saying the Trumptard perspective on this fact is that it's not true
Trumptards do love name calling
I don't recall you every calling out Trump for saying Crooked Hillary, Lying Ted, Low Energy Jeb, etc..
If you have said in a post that Trump shouldn't be doing this then go find it and post it here and then I'll stop referring to you as Trumptard
Otherwise, kind of hard to take you seriously when you whine about being referred to as a Trumptard
-
Trumptards do love name calling
I don't recall you every calling out Trump for saying Crooked Hillary, Lying Ted, Low Energy Jeb, etc..
If you have said in a post that Trump shouldn't be doing this then go find it and post it here and then I'll stop referring to you as Trumptard
Otherwise, kind of hard to take you seriously when you whine about being referred to as a Trumptard
If Trumptards do love name calling, then you must award yourself #1 Trumptard of this board.
Why would I whine about being referred to as Trumptard by you, or about being referred to by you in any other term or slur meant to be taken as derogatory or as offensive? You have been doing this to me and to most of the other members on this board for years. Nobody here takes you seriously.
I simply point out your name calling(Trumptard, fundie, moron, stupid, bitch, etc.) as evidence that you are a grumpy jerk who has no clue what a normal, adult conversation is. In this thread, I simply pointed out how you immediately resorted to name calling as soon as your beloved fake news network, CNN, was mentioned.
-
If Trumptards do love name calling, then you must award yourself #1 Trumptard of this board.
Why would I whine about being referred to as Trumptard by you, or about being referred to by you in any other term or slur meant to be taken as derogatory or as offensive? You have been doing this to me and to most of the other members on this board for years. Nobody here takes you seriously.
I simply point out your name calling(Trumptard, fundie, moron, stupid, bitch, etc.) as evidence that you are a grumpy jerk who has no clue what a normal, adult conversation is. In this thread, I simply pointed out how you immediately resorted to name calling as soon as your beloved fake news network, CNN, was mentioned.
Truth.
-
If Trumptards do love name calling, then you must award yourself #1 Trumptard of this board.
Why would I whine about being referred to as Trumptard by you, or about being referred to by you in any other term or slur meant to be taken as derogatory or as offensive? You have been doing this to me and to most of the other members on this board for years. Nobody here takes you seriously.
I simply point out your name calling(Trumptard, fundie, moron, stupid, bitch, etc.) as evidence that you are a grumpy jerk who has no clue what a normal, adult conversation is. In this thread, I simply pointed out how you immediately resorted to name calling as soon as your beloved fake news network, CNN, was mentioned.
wrong again Trumptard. I'm just trying to make you feel comfortable by following Trumps lead on this.
again, I offered to stop doing this if you can show me any post you made saying that Trump shouldn't be calling other people names.
pretty simple offer for you
btw - I've been called every name in the book on this board (ask Bum - he's done this as much as anyone) and you don't see me using that as an excuse to avoid debate or to avoid supporting my own arguments
I understand that Trump is a world class pussy but I didn't realize that was a common characteristic of all Trumptards (obviously a mistake on my part)
-
wrong again Trumptard. I'm just trying to make you feel comfortable by following Trumps lead on this.
again, I offered to stop doing this if you can show me any post you made saying that Trump shouldn't be calling other people names.
pretty simple offer for you
btw - I've been called every name in the book on this board (ask Bum - he's done this as much as anyone) and you don't see me using that as an excuse to avoid debate or to avoid supporting my own arguments
I understand that Trump is a world class pussy but I didn't realize that was a common characteristic of all Trumptards (obviously a mistake on my part)
Get over yourself. I don't have to do anything for you, and you can call me anything you want. Just don't expect anyone here to take you seriously. You have no clue what a normal, adult conversation is.
Funny, I thought you were about to say that I've called you every name in the book, which you couldn't because I haven't. So you instead bring up Bum into this? Pathetic. Unlike you, I don't resort to name calling if I'm out of arguments.
Your thread backfired. Epic fail.
-
This may be the worst meltdown by Grasping I have seen yet.
Guy has no logic behind anything he posts. Obsessed with/hates Trump and thinks of him as a loser, etc. because of the kind of person he is (calling people names, etc.) then calls other people names because......Trump does it. Huh?
I guess he is revealing the kind of individual he is as well?
-
Get over yourself. I don't have to do anything for you, and you can call me anything you want. Just don't expect anyone here to take you seriously. You have no clue what a normal, adult conversation is.
Funny, I thought you were about to say that I've called you every name in the book, which you couldn't because I haven't. So you instead bring up Bum into this? Pathetic. Unlike you, I don't resort to name calling if I'm out of arguments.
Your thread backfired. Epic fail.
I brought up Bum because he posted in this thread on this page and he is an example of someone who has called me many names and I don't sit around and whine about it
The thread is about Seth Rich's parents suing Fox News for the ongoing fraudulent story about their sons murder
If you think this thread is a "fail" then you obviously don't believe that Fox New ran that fabricated story over all kinds of media for many weeks
-
I brought up Bum because he posted in this thread on this page and he is an example of someone who has called me many names and I don't sit around and whine about it
Whing about that is more of a Trumptard thing. Very much like Trump himself who calls everyone names, criticizes everyone and then cries and whines like a bitch when people mock him.
The thread is about Seth Rich's parents suing Fox News for the ongoing fraudulent story about their sons murder
If you think this thread is a "fail" then you obviously don't believe that Fox New ran that fabricated story over all kinds of media for many weeks
-
FYI, you just quoted yourself. No idea why.
-
FYI, you just quoted yourself. No idea why.
Because . . . . lol
Talking to yourself?
He’s not that clever
He’d end up arguing with himself
And he'd probably still think he won the argument.
-
FYI, you just quoted yourself. No idea why.
of course you don't
that would require a shred of intelligence on your part
pretty obvious what happened
-
of course you don't
that would require a shred of intelligence on your part
pretty obvious what happened
Sorry! I forgot that you are arguing with yourself. Carry on.
-
Sorry! I forgot that you are arguing with yourself. Carry on.
yep, you're too stupid to figure out the obvious
that's why I didn't change it
-
Thread backfired. Epic fail.
Why is Fox News not reporting on this story?
It's probably because they're the ones getting sued for spreading fake news. Good. Let all news networks who spread false news get sued so they can pay for it and finally stop. CNN won't survive though.
>:( Trumptard
I don't watch Fox News or CNN, but I've seen video compilations of CNN flat out lying and staging false news many times.
I haven't seen any of those "video compilations"
I assume CNN was sued
Can you post some of those compilations here and I'll check them out
(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/wk3xUWtYkgs/hqdefault.jpg)
>:( Trumptard
I assume there must have been some lawsuits too
(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/wZviae0nswA/maxresdefault.jpg)
CNN faced $100M lawsuit over botched Russia story
The specter of a $100 million libel suit scared CNN into retracting a poorly reported story that slimed an ally of President Trump’s — and forcing out the staffers responsible for it, The Post has learned.
The cable network’s coverage of Trump transition team member Anthony Scaramucci came amid federal scrutiny of corporate parent Time Warner’s pending purchase by AT&T — and the widespread belief among media execs that CNN President Jeff Zucker can’t survive a merger.
CNN immediately caved after Scaramucci, a financier and frequent network guest, cried foul and threatened to take legal action, sources said Tuesday.
Scaramucci got an unusual public apology but still hired a top Manhattan lawyer to put further pressure on CNN and “look after [his] interests in this matter,” one source said.
Sources also said the three journalists responsible for the retracted story — reporter Tom Frank, editor Eric Lichtblau and Lex Haris, who headed the CNN Investigates unit — were urged to resign.
https://nypost.com/2017/06/27/cnn-staffers-didnt-resign-over-retracted-story-they-got-fired/
>:( Trumptard
Do you seriously think any of these one time events in any way compares to Fox New "reporting" the same false story over and over and over again.
I believe Fox News was eventually forced into admitting their story was fraudulent but only after weeks (or months) of constant coverage
Is that comparable to one story where retraction was almost immediate and people were fired
(http://moziru.com/images/comics-clipart-pow-wow-6.jpg)
Wait. So you are saying:
1. It's okay if CNN reports fake news, but it's not okay if Fox News does it.
2. It's okay to report fake news as long as it's reported only once per fake news.
3. It's okay to report fake news, as long as they don't get caught.
4. It's okay to report fake news if they get caught as long as they admit it's fake news and retract less than a couple of weeks from the day they get caught.
5. It's okay to report fake news as long as they admit it's fake news and retract immediately after getting threatened with a lawsuit.
Gotcha. Okay.
>:( Trumptard
>:( stupid
>:( foreigner
(https://i.imgflip.com/1nps77.jpg)
-
:D Straw, I think you may need a vacation. You are getting really worked up over "fake news".
-
Thread backfired. Epic fail.
(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/wk3xUWtYkgs/hqdefault.jpg)
(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/wZviae0nswA/maxresdefault.jpg)
(http://moziru.com/images/comics-clipart-pow-wow-6.jpg)
(https://i.imgflip.com/1nps77.jpg)
the thread is about Seth Rich's parents suing Fox News
so how exactly is that a fail
Oh wait, I forgot you only make declarations and then refuse or can't explain your own posts
I wonder what you'll do this time
Probably what you've always done, make excuses, whine about name calling but won't ever support or defend your own claim
-
the thread is about Seth Rich's parents suing Fox News
so how exactly is that a fail
Oh wait, I forgot you only make declarations and then refuse or can't explain your own posts
I wonder what you'll do this time
Probably what you've always done, make excuses, whine about name calling but won't ever support or defend your own claim
No, this thread is now about your beloved fake news network, CNN. Your thread backfired.
It's you, not me, who made it about CNN by complaining about my mention of it, and then asking me to post a video compilation showing CNN reporting fake news and an article about a lawsuit involving CNN because of their fake news reporting.
You could have just let it go at my first mention of CNN, but you didn't.
-
No, this thread is now about your beloved fake news network, CNN. Your thread backfired.
It's you, not me, who made it about CNN by complaining about my mention of it, and then asking me to post a video compilation showing CNN reporting fake news and an article about a lawsuit involving CNN because of their fake news reporting.
You could have just let it go at my first mention of CNN, but you didn't.
Nope, wrong again dipshit
I understand you wanted to make it about that but when you tried you then refused to actually discuss your own posts...remember
-
>:( dipshit
You made it about CNN, your beloved fake new network.
-
You made it about CNN, your beloved fake new network.
Oh poor, I called you name
you tried to conflate CNN with story about Seth Rich's parents suing Fox News but then you refused to discuss your own posts
All you've done this entire thread is dodge the subject
You started by pretending you couldn't find Google results
Then you brought up CNN and I gave you a specific offer and asked if you were capable of focusing on that and having a conversation. I asked you to answer the question honestly
Then you pretended not to understand my question
Then you said OK but later said you were only saying "OK" to understanding the question
and on and on, always avoiding having to support or defend your own posts
and here we are 5 pages later and you're still doing the same thing
-
Oh poor, I called you name
Yeah. So? That's what you do.
you tried to conflate CNN with story about Seth Rich's parents suing Fox News but then you refused to discuss your own posts
Not really. Sorry you took it that way, and sorry I hurt your feelings.
It really isn't my intention to get under your skin, but at the same time I don't mind that I do.
-
Yeah. So? That's what you do.
Not really. Sorry you took it that way, and sorry I hurt your feelings.
It really isn't my intention to get under your skin, but at the same time I don't mind that I do.
yes really, that's exactly what you did and when I offered to engage in a discussion about what YOU brought up you wouldn't defend your own statements
before even engaging the topic you brought up I asked if you were capable of focusing and having a discussion
I asked you to answer honestly so that I wouldn't be wasting my time
I guess I do have to give you credit for being dishonest and successfully wasting my time
-
yes really, that's exactly what you did and when I offered to engage in a discussion about what YOU brought up you wouldn't defend your own statements
before even engaging the topic you brought up I asked if you were capable of focusing and having a discussion
I asked you to answer honestly so that I wouldn't be wasting my time
I guess I do have to give you credit for being dishonest and successfully wasting my time
You asked me for stuff you thought I couldn't produce, and you were wrong. Give up already.
Your thread backfired.
-
You asked me for stuff you thought I couldn't produce, and you were wrong. Give up already.
Your thread backfired.
when I ask someone to post something I usually already know it exists
I want to see what you choose to post
After you posted it I gave you a specific offer to discuss one of the items you posted.
Here's that post
It's pretty obvious what I'm asking you but you chose to pretend not to understand
And then when you said "OK" you then pretended you were saying OK to understanding the question and not OK to focusing and having a conversation
As usual, you completely miss the point
the videos you posted aren't even a valid comparison
How about this
Let's compare the single story about Russia to the ongoing series of stories by Fox New about Seth Rich
Let me know if you're capable of focusing on that and having a conversation and I'll proceed later today
be honest
don't you're willing and capable if you're not actually going to follow through
-
when I ask someone to post something I usually already know it exists
I want to see what you choose to post
Add Liar to your resume. Not surprising seeing how you defend your beloved fake news network, CNN.
I haven't seen any of those "video compilations"
I assume CNN was sued
Can you post some of those compilations here and I'll check them out
please do
I'd like to see them
I assume there must have been some lawsuits too
-
Add Liar to your resume. Not surprising seeing how you defend your beloved fake news network, CNN.
yep, I was pretending not to be aware of what you might find
that's a common technique
It's not like I could google it first and find information for myself and then try to see what you could come up with and chose to post
that would be impossible
The point of course still being that I offered to discuss the things YOU chose to post and then you refused to support your own posts
Also, as I said previously, nothing you chose to post was "fake news"
-
Add Liar to your resume. Not surprising seeing how you defend your beloved fake news network, CNN.
yep, I was pretending not to be aware of what you might find
Yep, you're are now a self proclaimed liar. Good for you. That'll help your impeccable credibility on this board.
-
yep, I was pretending not to be aware of what you might find
Yep, you're are now a self proclaimed liar. Good for you. That'll help your impeccable credibility on this board.
yep, maybe next time when I say I'm not aware of something and ask you to post it you'll figure out that I'm setting you up
-
yep, maybe next time when I say I'm not aware of something and ask you to post it you'll figure out that I'm setting you up
Yep, I will follow your advice and assume that you are ALWAYS lying. Very well!
-
Yep, I will follow your advice and assume that you are ALWAYS lying. Very well!
The lady doth protest too much, methinks
Your first post on this thread was to lie about your google results
Just quickly googled the guy. Do you think the Russians killed him or something?
basically the exact same type of "deception" I used to get you to post videos and links
You know, the videos you then refused to debate or defend
-
The lady doth protest too much, methinks
Your first post on this thread was to lie about your google results
basically the exact same type of "deception" I used to get you to post videos and links
You know, the videos you then refused to debate or defend
Nope, unlike you I neither lied nor resorted to name calling.
And don't think for a moment that I'm buying your lie about pretending not to know about the CNN video compilation and the lawsuit article. You didn't know about those before you started this thread.
You did however pretend to care about my beliefs and pretended to want to have a normal, adult conversation after that. You realized your thread had backfired and were desperately looking for a way to discredit me and to cover up your epic thread fail.
Pathetic that you'd rather proclaim yourself the liar that you are than admit that your thread backfired.
-
Nope, unlike you I neither lied nor resorted to name calling.
And don't think for a moment that I'm buying your lie about pretending not to know about the CNN video compilation and the lawsuit article. You didn't know about those before you started this thread.
You did however pretend to care about my beliefs and pretended to want to have a normal, adult conversation after that. You realized your thread had backfired and were desperately looking for a way to discredit me and to cover up your epic thread fail.
Pathetic that you'd rather proclaim yourself the liar that you are than admit that your thread backfired.
Of course you "lied"
The first page of this post is full of your standard lying and game playing pretending not to get the results of a simple google search.
Notice in my later posts I politely asked you if you were capable of engaging in a discussion about YOUR posts and you again lied and continued your usual game playing and deflection
This thread is about Seth Rich's parents suing Fox news. I know you wanted to make it about something else and I even politely offered to entertain your attempt to change the topic but all you did was your usual game playing and refusal to defend your own posts
-
Of course you "lied"
The first page of this post is full of your standard lying and game playing pretending not to get the results of a simple google search.
Notice in my later posts I politely asked you if you were capable of engaging in a discussion about YOUR posts and you again lied and continued your usual game playing and deflection
This thread is about Seth Rich's parents suing Fox news. I know you wanted to make it about something else and I even politely offered to entertain your attempt to change the topic but all you did was your usual game playing and refusal to defend your own posts
Nope, unlike you I neither lied nor resorted to name calling.
Your thread failed miserably.
-
Nope, unlike you I neither lied nor resorted to name calling.
Your thread failed miserably.
it's pretty obvious you lied on the first page about not being able to find google results of Seth Rich's parents suing Fox News. I even entertained your bullshit by providing you a link with google results
After that you just played your usual games of attempting to derail a thread and again I even entertained your attempt to do that but of course then you lied about being willing to engage in a conversation about your very own posts and then started your usual whining about name calling as a way to continue to avoid talking about your own posts.
-
someone in this thread prove to me that this didn't happen! Right now! >:(
-
it's pretty obvious you lied on the first page about not being able to find google results of Seth Rich's parents suing Fox News. I even entertained your bullshit by providing you a link with google results
After that you just played your usual games of attempting to derail a thread and again I even entertained your attempt to do that but of course then you lied about being willing to engage in a conversation about your very own posts and then started your usual whining about name calling as a way to continue to avoid talking about your own posts.
Nope, unlike you I neither lied nor resorted to name calling.
Just out of curiosity, how is it "obvious" that I lied about missing it the first time? Is it because liars such as yourself believe that everybody else is a liar too?
You too missed the Twitter link Coach was talking about. It was right in front of your face and you missed it, or were you lying about missing it?
weird, it doesn't lead to a Twitter page but if anyone is dumb enough to fuck up clicking on a link it would be you
It was right there on the google page. But fuck, you're a dumbass
Hey dumbass Straw, look at the screenshot. "Seth Rich on Twitter"
The first thing I looked at and clicked on in my first search attempt was Seth Rich's Wikipedia page, which is at the very top and to the right of the Google search results. The Wikipedia page had way too much information on the guy, which I had no time and no interest in reading.
No, I actually found way too much stuff about him in a general search and I was wondering what's the latest, what should Fox News be saying about him right now. Quickly text searched CNN's and Yahoo's main page for a headline with that name on it, but nothing.
However, Wikipedia wastes no time informing the reader that the guy was murdered. The most recent thing I had read before seeing this thread was headlines about murder attempts in England by Russians. And since you're always like
:o Trump :o Russia :o Trump :o Russia :o Trump :o Russia :o Trump :o Russia :o Trump :o Russia :o Trump :o Russia :o
I thought this thread was somehow related.
Just quickly googled the guy. Do you think the Russians killed him or something?
I was sincerely relying on you, the thread creator, to elaborate since your thread title was nothing but some dude's name, and your first post was nothing but a vague question with no explanation and no clue as to why you were asking. You could have at the very least included a head line, a link to the story, or both.
-
Nope, unlike you I neither lied nor resorted to name calling.
Just out of curiosity, how is it "obvious" that I lied about missing it the first time? Is it because liars such as yourself believe that everybody else is a liar too?
You too missed the Twitter link Coach was talking about. It was right in front of your face and you missed it, or were you lying about missing it?
The first thing I looked at and clicked on in my first search attempt was Seth Rich's Wikipedia page, which is at the very top and to the right of the Google search results. The Wikipedia page had way too much information on the guy, which I had no time and no interest in reading.
However, Wikipedia wastes no time informing the reader that the guy was murdered. The most recent thing I had read before seeing this thread was headlines about murder attempts in England by Russians. And since you're always like
:o Trump :o Russia :o Trump :o Russia :o Trump :o Russia :o Trump :o Russia :o Trump :o Russia :o Trump :o Russia :o
I thought this thread was somehow related.
I was sincerely relying on you, the thread creator, to elaborate since your thread title was nothing but some dude's name, and your first post was nothing but a vague question with no explanation and no clue as to why you were asking. You could have at the very least included a head line, a link to the story, or both.
LOL - you're all over the map now
try to focus
Seth Rich's parents are suing Fox News for their ongoing fraudulent story about the murder of their son
-
LOL - you're all over the map now
try to focus
Seth Rich's parents are suing Fox News for their ongoing fraudulent story about the murder of their son
it's pretty obvious you lied on the first page about not being able to find google results of Seth Rich's parents suing Fox News.
Nope, unlike you I neither lied nor resorted to name calling.
Just out of curiosity, how is it "obvious" that I lied about missing it the first time? Is it because liars such as yourself believe that everybody else is a liar too?
-
Nope, unlike you I neither lied nor resorted to name calling.
Just out of curiosity, how is it "obvious" that I lied about missing it the first time? Is it because liars such as yourself believe that everybody else is a liar too?
You too missed the Twitter link Coach was talking about. It was right in front of your face and you missed it, or were you lying about missing it?
The first thing I looked at and clicked on in my first search attempt was Seth Rich's Wikipedia page, which is at the very top and to the right of the Google search results. The Wikipedia page had way too much information on the guy, which I had no time and no interest in reading.
However, Wikipedia wastes no time informing the reader that the guy was murdered. The most recent thing I had read before seeing this thread was headlines about murder attempts in England by Russians. And since you're always like
:o Trump :o Russia :o Trump :o Russia :o Trump :o Russia :o Trump :o Russia :o Trump :o Russia :o Trump :o Russia :o
I thought this thread was somehow related.
I was sincerely relying on you, the thread creator, to elaborate since your thread title was nothing but some dude's name, and your first post was nothing but a vague question with no explanation and no clue as to why you were asking. You could have at the very least included a head line, a link to the story, or both.
try to focus
Seth Rich's parents are suing Fox News for their ongoing fraudulent story about the murder of their son
-
try to focus
Seth Rich's parents are suing Fox News for their ongoing fraudulent story about the murder of their son
it's pretty obvious you lied on the first page about not being able to find google results of Seth Rich's parents suing Fox News.
Nope, unlike you I neither lied nor resorted to name calling.
Just out of curiosity, how is it "obvious" that I lied about missing it the first time? Is it because liars such as yourself believe that everybody else is a liar too?
-
Nope, unlike you I neither lied nor resorted to name calling.
Just out of curiosity, how is it "obvious" that I lied about missing it the first time? Is it because liars such as yourself believe that everybody else is a liar too?
You too missed the Twitter link Coach was talking about. It was right in front of your face and you missed it, or were you lying about missing it?
The first thing I looked at and clicked on in my first search attempt was Seth Rich's Wikipedia page, which is at the very top and to the right of the Google search results. The Wikipedia page had way too much information on the guy, which I had no time and no interest in reading.
However, Wikipedia wastes no time informing the reader that the guy was murdered. The most recent thing I had read before seeing this thread was headlines about murder attempts in England by Russians. And since you're always like
:o Trump :o Russia :o Trump :o Russia :o Trump :o Russia :o Trump :o Russia :o Trump :o Russia :o Trump :o Russia :o
I thought this thread was somehow related.
I was sincerely relying on you, the thread creator, to elaborate since your thread title was nothing but some dude's name, and your first post was nothing but a vague question with no explanation and no clue as to why you were asking. You could have at the very least included a head line, a link to the story, or both.
Try to pay attention Trumptard
-
Former Marine Charged In Shooting, Hit-And-Run Of Controversial Seth Rich Investigator
The Daily Caller ^ | Chuck Ross
Posted on 3/21/2018, 1:16:59 PM by Enlightened1
A former Marine, who claims to have worked as a special agent with the Department of Energy, has been charged with shooting and running over Republican lobbyist Jack Burkman, who conducted a controversial investigation of former DNC staffer Seth Rich’s murder.
Kevin Doherty, 46, was charged Monday with Use of a Firearm in the Commission of a Felony and two counts of Malicious Wounding, according to a press release from the Arlington, Va, Co. police department.
The Washington Post provided more details about the attack, which was the second to befall Burkman over the past several months. An unidentified assailant attacked Burkman with pepper spray at his home in January.
Burkman was shot and run over March 13 at a Rosslyn Marriott hotel’s parking garage. Burkman was there to retrieve what he thought were documents from an FBI whistleblower.
Doherty worked for Burkman on the Rich investigation until July 2017. Rich, a data analyst at the DNC, was murdered in Washington, D.C., on July 10, 2016, under mysterious circumstances. Doherty was an investigator on Burkman’s Profiling Project, the group he formed to solve the Rich case.
Rich’s death was initially described as a robbery gone wrong, but conspiracy theorists speculated he was killed due to involvement in stealing DNC emails eventually released through WikiLeaks. There is no evidence Rich was involved in handling DNC emails.
Burkman began working pro bono for Rich’s family in late 2016. He has come under heavy criticism for circulating unfounded theories about Rich’s death, including the Russian government was behind the killing. Burkman later claimed evidence suggested a serial killer murdered Rich.
Rich’s family members have since distanced themselves from Burkman.
Burkman fired Doherty and sent him a cease and desist letter, he told The Post.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
-
Try to pay attention Trumptard
it's pretty obvious you lied on the first page about not being able to find google results of Seth Rich's parents suing Fox News.
Nope, unlike you I neither lied nor resorted to name calling.
Just out of curiosity, how is it "obvious" that I lied about missing it the first time? Is it because liars such as yourself believe that everybody else is a liar too?
-
Nope, unlike you I neither lied nor resorted to name calling.
Just out of curiosity, how is it "obvious" that I lied about missing it the first time? Is it because liars such as yourself believe that everybody else is a liar too?
You too missed the Twitter link Coach was talking about. It was right in front of your face and you missed it, or were you lying about missing it?
The first thing I looked at and clicked on in my first search attempt was Seth Rich's Wikipedia page, which is at the very top and to the right of the Google search results. The Wikipedia page had way too much information on the guy, which I had no time and no interest in reading.
However, Wikipedia wastes no time informing the reader that the guy was murdered. The most recent thing I had read before seeing this thread was headlines about murder attempts in England by Russians. And since you're always like
:o Trump :o Russia :o Trump :o Russia :o Trump :o Russia :o Trump :o Russia :o Trump :o Russia :o Trump :o Russia :o
I thought this thread was somehow related.
I was sincerely relying on you, the thread creator, to elaborate since your thread title was nothing but some dude's name, and your first post was nothing but a vague question with no explanation and no clue as to why you were asking. You could have at the very least included a head line, a link to the story, or both.
Interesting that you can't legally defame the dead
I'm sure Faux New exploits this whenever possible
Nothing says family values or christian values like defaming a dead person and their family
Supposedly the Trump White house was involved in pushing this fake story
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2017/08/white-house-fox-news-seth-rich
The parents of slain Democratic National Committee staffer Seth Rich have filed a lawsuit against the Fox News Channel for coverage linking their son to the leak of thousands of party emails to WikiLeaks during the 2016 campaign. The lawsuit also names Fox reporters Malia Zimmerman and a periodic Fox commentator.
The May 2017 story echoed and propelled conspiracy theories about Rich's death and the DNC leaks, strongly suggesting his killing might have been related. U.S. intelligence officials under Presidents Obama and Trump say that people acting at the direction of the Russian government hacked into the DNC's servers.
Fox News retracted the story a week later after widespread outrage, but the network never apologized for the story or explained what went wrong.
In their federal suit, filed Tuesday in the Southern District of New York, the Riches allege that they have been "collateral damage in a political war" and say their son's death was exploited for political benefit. A spokeswoman for Fox News said late Tuesday that the network and Zimmerman will not comment, citing the pending litigation.
The Riches also sued Ed Butowsky, a Dallas investment manager who periodically offered commentary on financial matters for Fox Business Network and Fox News. Butowsky also figured as a defendant in an earlier lawsuit filed last August against Fox News and Zimmerman by their chief named source, a Fox News commentator named Rod Wheeler.
The Riches' lawsuit alleges "extreme and outrageous conduct" by Fox, Zimmerman and Butowsky in developing a false story "painting Joel and Mary's son as a criminal and a traitor to the United States." They also allege the network, the reporter and the investor made it appear that Joel and Mary Rich were involved in the deception.
https://www.npr.org/2018/03/14/593570579/seth-richs-parents-sue-fox-news-over-baseless-story
-
Pay attention. I never defended Fox News.
it's pretty obvious you lied on the first page about not being able to find google results of Seth Rich's parents suing Fox News.
Nope, unlike you I neither lied nor resorted to name calling.
Just out of curiosity, how is it "obvious" that I lied about missing it the first time? Is it because liars such as yourself believe that everybody else is a liar too?
-
Pay attention. I never defended Fox News.
Nope, unlike you I neither lied nor resorted to name calling.
Just out of curiosity, how is it "obvious" that I lied about missing it the first time? Is it because liars such as yourself believe that everybody else is a liar too?
pay attention
you made that statement already and I already responded
In my opinion (which I documented) you lied multiple times in this thread
Do you ever stop whining about name calling ?
-
In my opinion (which I documented) you lied multiple times in this thread
Yet you avoid explaining exactly how.
it's pretty obvious you lied on the first page about not being able to find google results of Seth Rich's parents suing Fox News.
Nope, unlike you I neither lied nor resorted to name calling.
Just out of curiosity, how is it "obvious" that I lied about missing it the first time? Is it because liars such as yourself believe that everybody else is a liar too?
-
Bump for Grasping's full admission of being a straight up liar. Another Trump characteristic that he supposedly despises. Hmmm.....
-
Yet you avoid explaining exactly how.
Nope, unlike you I neither lied nor resorted to name calling.
Just out of curiosity, how is it "obvious" that I lied about missing it the first time? Is it because liars such as yourself believe that everybody else is a liar too?
Nope it's because it was in the news that day and claimed you "googled the guy" but somehow didn't get the story even though it's the first thing that would have shown up in a google search at that time
the entire first page of this thread is you pretending you can't find the story
just your typical game playing nonsense
Not unlike most of your other posts. I should have known better than to trust you later.
-
Nope it's because it was in the news that day and claimed you "googled the guy" but somehow didn't get the story even though it's the first thing that would have shown up in a google search at that time
the entire first page of this thread is you pretending you can't find the story
just your typical game playing nonsense
Not unlike most of your other posts. I should have known better than to trust you later.
Nope, I google searched the guy only twice, missed the story only once. Go back and read the thread's first and second page again.
The entire first page of this thread is you trying to get me to do your job of fixing your pathetic thread for you, with nothing but some dude's name for a title and nothing but a vague question for the original post with no story headline or link to it. You've been posting here for years, yet you still can't even start a thread properly.
This thread was doomed to fail from the start.
-
Nope, I google searched the guy only twice, missed the story only once. Go back and read the thread's first and second page again.
The entire first page of this thread is you trying to get me to do your job of fixing your pathetic thread for you, with nothing but some dude's name for a title and nothing but a vague question for the original post with no story headline or link to it. You've been posting here for years, yet you still can't even start a thread properly.
This thread was doomed to fail from the start.
Grasping rarely has any idea or clue what he is talking about,
-
The real question is whether Straw raped Seth Rich's corpse.
Anyone willing to bet?
-
Nope, I google searched the guy only twice, missed the story only once. Go back and read the thread's first and second page again.
The entire first page of this thread is you trying to get me to do your job of fixing your pathetic thread for you, with nothing but some dude's name for a title and nothing but a vague question for the original post with no story headline or link to it. You've been posting here for years, yet you still can't even start a thread properly.
This thread was doomed to fail from the start.
correct - you googled his name and then you lied about not finding the results
This thread is about Seth Rich's parents suing Fox News for their ongoing fraudulent story about the murder of their son
Guess what, they are still suing Fox News as of this moment
What's the "fail" again?
-
correct - you googled his name and then you lied about not finding the results
Nope.
Alright, you won't tell me so I searched again. I see now what you mean. Fox News sued by the guy's parents. So they're still not saying anything about this? It's probably because they're the ones getting sued for spreading fake news. Good. Let all news networks who spread false news get sued so they can pay for it and finally stop. CNN won't survive though.
The only liar here, by your own admission, is you.
-
Thread backfired. Epic fail.
Why is Fox News not reporting on this story?
It's probably because they're the ones getting sued for spreading fake news. Good. Let all news networks who spread false news get sued so they can pay for it and finally stop. CNN won't survive though.
>:( Trumptard
I don't watch Fox News or CNN, but I've seen video compilations of CNN flat out lying and staging false news many times.
I haven't seen any of those "video compilations"
I assume CNN was sued
Can you post some of those compilations here and I'll check them out
(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/wk3xUWtYkgs/hqdefault.jpg)
>:( Trumptard
I assume there must have been some lawsuits too
(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/wZviae0nswA/maxresdefault.jpg)
CNN faced $100M lawsuit over botched Russia story
The specter of a $100 million libel suit scared CNN into retracting a poorly reported story that slimed an ally of President Trump’s — and forcing out the staffers responsible for it, The Post has learned.
The cable network’s coverage of Trump transition team member Anthony Scaramucci came amid federal scrutiny of corporate parent Time Warner’s pending purchase by AT&T — and the widespread belief among media execs that CNN President Jeff Zucker can’t survive a merger.
CNN immediately caved after Scaramucci, a financier and frequent network guest, cried foul and threatened to take legal action, sources said Tuesday.
Scaramucci got an unusual public apology but still hired a top Manhattan lawyer to put further pressure on CNN and “look after [his] interests in this matter,” one source said.
Sources also said the three journalists responsible for the retracted story — reporter Tom Frank, editor Eric Lichtblau and Lex Haris, who headed the CNN Investigates unit — were urged to resign.
https://nypost.com/2017/06/27/cnn-staffers-didnt-resign-over-retracted-story-they-got-fired/
>:( Trumptard
Do you seriously think any of these one time events in any way compares to Fox New "reporting" the same false story over and over and over again.
I believe Fox News was eventually forced into admitting their story was fraudulent but only after weeks (or months) of constant coverage
Is that comparable to one story where retraction was almost immediate and people were fired
(http://moziru.com/images/comics-clipart-pow-wow-6.jpg)
Wait. So you are saying:
1. It's okay if CNN reports fake news, but it's not okay if Fox News does it.
2. It's okay to report fake news as long as it's reported only once per fake news.
3. It's okay to report fake news, as long as they don't get caught.
4. It's okay to report fake news if they get caught as long as they admit it's fake news and retract less than a couple of weeks from the day they get caught.
5. It's okay to report fake news as long as they admit it's fake news and retract immediately after getting threatened with a lawsuit.
Gotcha. Okay.
>:( Trumptard
>:( dipshit
>:( stupid
>:( foreigner
(https://i.imgflip.com/1nps77.jpg)
-
Thread backfired. Epic fail.
(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/wk3xUWtYkgs/hqdefault.jpg)
(https://i.ytimg.com/vi/wZviae0nswA/maxresdefault.jpg)
(http://moziru.com/images/comics-clipart-pow-wow-6.jpg)
(https://i.imgflip.com/1nps77.jpg)
LOL - why do you keep bring up your own posts which you refuse to actually discuss ?
Any chance you'll ever be able to answer that question
Here's another question for you to not answer
Are Seth Rich's parents suing Fox News for their ongoing fraudulent story about the murder of their son?
-
Bump! :D
Report: Witness Prepared to Identify Two Killers of Seth Rich
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/07/exclusive-report-witness-prepared-to-identify-two-killers-of-seth-rich/ (https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/07/exclusive-report-witness-prepared-to-identify-two-killers-of-seth-rich/)
“We believe that we have reached the beginning of the end of the Seth Rich murder investigation,” Burkman told The Gateway Pundit in an exclusive interview Sunday. “After two long hard years of work, we have a witness who is prepared to identify the two killers of Seth Rich. One is reportedly a current DEA (Drug Enforcement Administration) agent, the other is reportedly a current ATF (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives) agent”
The witness, who “fears for his life,” will be accompanied by armed guards and disguise his identity as he details how two employees of the United States government killed Seth in a press conference slated for Tuesday.
-
Bump! :D
Report: Witness Prepared to Identify Two Killers of Seth Rich
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/07/exclusive-report-witness-prepared-to-identify-two-killers-of-seth-rich/ (https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/07/exclusive-report-witness-prepared-to-identify-two-killers-of-seth-rich/)
“We believe that we have reached the beginning of the end of the Seth Rich murder investigation,” Burkman told The Gateway Pundit in an exclusive interview Sunday. “After two long hard years of work, we have a witness who is prepared to identify the two killers of Seth Rich. One is reportedly a current DEA (Drug Enforcement Administration) agent, the other is reportedly a current ATF (Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives) agent”
The witness, who “fears for his life,” will be accompanied by armed guards and disguise his identity as he details how two employees of the United States government killed Seth in a press conference slated for Tuesday.
Watch him suicide himself w the knife to the back tonight.