Your arrogant ethnocentricity also agrees with my retort from earlier.
So I like it. you call it arrogance, i call it stating facts
You still didn't answer my question; only avoided it. In fact you're admitting that Hogan was a better character, and since Hogan made a ton more money and had more fans, then you're also supporting my notion that - through his success - HE was a better performer.i get the impression you don't know the difference between in ring performance and playing to the crowd and fit finlay and those other guys you listed were not on the same level as bret and shawn, nobody talks about any of their matches today
That’s far weaker and much stupider than the "asses in seat argument argument."
Why?
Because it’s non-sequitur and taken completely out of context.
That means you’re desperate and out of valid arguments my friend.
This debate is over. it's weak in your mind only because it hurts your lame argument, your argument this whole time has been about money and floyd will make far more than any other wrestler and according to you that defines "greatness"
regarding floyd did you know that oscar made more money on their fight even though he lost? with your logic oscar is the better fighter hahahaha
floyd put on a better fight which makes him a BETTER PERFORMER but with your logic oscar is a better performer because he made more money on the fight by being more well known
and this debate is only over because you are out of responses
and i agree if you are going to respond again quit using the stupid green font
E