« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down

Author Topic: Ronnie Coleman 1996 Florida  (Read 15133 times)

Hulkster

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 22968
  • ND ran away from me
Re: Ronnie Coleman 1996 Florida
« Reply #50 on: July 23, 2010, 02:47:27 PM »
alright, time to end this incredible guy stupidity that a 1997 ronnie was even REMOTELY close to 1999 ronnie:

watch both vids.

its not even close, for a million reasons:

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1eyvt_ronnie-coleman-1997-olympia_sport



ronnie is noticably bigger, fuller, more cut and complete than in 97.

fuck, his legs are skinny and tiny compared to 99. its like Arnold 80 all over again in 97..

so this 97 vs 99 bullshit stops now.

I ended it like I always do.
Logged
Flower Boy Ran Away

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79396
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Ronnie Coleman 1996 Florida
« Reply #51 on: July 23, 2010, 02:55:47 PM »
Quote from: Hulkster on July 23, 2010, 02:47:27 PM
alright, time to end this incredible guy stupidity that a 1997 ronnie was even REMOTELY close to 1999 ronnie:

watch both vids.

its not even close, for a million reasons:

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1eyvt_ronnie-coleman-1997-olympia_sport



ronnie is noticably bigger, fuller, more cut and complete than in 97.

fuck, his legs are skinny and tiny compared to 99. its like Arnold 80 all over again in 97..

so this 97 vs 99 bullshit stops now.

I ended it like I always do.

How the fuck is he more ' complete ' ? you with these dumb ass blanket statements.  ::) his quads were bigger sure that's obvious his delts are bigger too but aren't as striated or separated either , his midsection is a such lot ' fuller ' too

and FYI dummy I have both videos  ;) was Ronnie the exact same as 99? NO was he eons off ? NO the difference between 97 and 98 is less than 97 and 99

but like I've said before in some areas he improved , quads , etc , but some he digressed midsection , delts , etc

Logged

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Ronnie Coleman 1996 Florida
« Reply #52 on: July 23, 2010, 02:58:11 PM »
Quote from: Hulkster on July 23, 2010, 02:47:27 PM
alright, time to end this incredible guy stupidity that a 1997 ronnie was even REMOTELY close to 1999 ronnie:

watch both vids.

its not even close, for a million reasons:

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x1eyvt_ronnie-coleman-1997-olympia_sport



ronnie is noticably bigger, fuller, more cut and complete than in 97.

fuck, his legs are skinny and tiny compared to 99. its like Arnold 80 all over again in 97..

so this 97 vs 99 bullshit stops now.

I ended it like I always do.

Hey fuckhead, you ended nothing. Same size with better conditioning = He put more muscle on his frame you idiot. No one was debating that.  ::)
Logged

James28

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4347
  • toilet roll of peace
Re: Ronnie Coleman 1996 Florida
« Reply #53 on: July 23, 2010, 03:07:08 PM »
Quote from: Hulkster on July 23, 2010, 01:48:15 PM
dorian isn't very thick in the rear double bi pose- looks like thin paper.  we have all noticed this for years!:

 :P



Oh brother. You expect people to take you serious after what you just said? Here I thought Goodrum was the most delusional troll on this board. Arise troll Trollster.
Logged
*

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79396
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Ronnie Coleman 1996 Florida
« Reply #54 on: July 23, 2010, 03:07:20 PM »
Quote from: Shockwave on July 23, 2010, 02:58:11 PM
Hey fuckhead, you ended nothing. Same size with better conditioning = He put more muscle on his frame you idiot. No one was debating that.  ::)

lmfao I told you it's impossible for him to stop being stupid.  ;D

Logged

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Ronnie Coleman 1996 Florida
« Reply #55 on: July 23, 2010, 03:20:51 PM »
Lmao Hulkster. You really fucked yourself with this pic. Holy lack of thickness batman. And you continually try and say Ronnie is thicker than Dorian? Are you high?
I have come to the conclusion that Ronnies genetically deep seperations give him the illusion of having a lot of thickness front to back. But its only an illusion.
heres a lesson Hulkster. This is thick.

This isnt.  ::)

Logged

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79396
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Ronnie Coleman 1996 Florida
« Reply #56 on: July 23, 2010, 03:28:58 PM »
Quote from: Shockwave on July 23, 2010, 03:20:51 PM
Lmao Hulkster. You really fucked yourself with this pic. Holy lack of thickness batman. And you continually try and say Ronnie is thicker than Dorian? Are you high?
I have come to the conclusion that Ronnies genetically deep seperations give him the illusion of having a lot of thickness front to back. But its only an illusion.
heres a lesson Hulkster. This is thick.

This isnt.  ::)



There really is a difference in thickness however Ronnie is lighter to his credit , his condition in 01 is top-notch but not on Dorian's level
Logged

Mr. Magoo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9808
  • THE most mistaken identity on getbig
Re: Ronnie Coleman 1996 Florida
« Reply #57 on: July 23, 2010, 03:29:19 PM »
I dont think ND takes into consideration how much more ronnie weighed than dorian, I don't think he scales the pictures right taking bodyweight into consideration

just my two cents
Logged

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Ronnie Coleman 1996 Florida
« Reply #58 on: July 23, 2010, 03:34:00 PM »
Quote from: Mr. Magoo on July 23, 2010, 03:29:19 PM
I dont think ND takes into consideration how much more ronnie weighed than dorian, I don't think he scales the pictures right taking bodyweight into consideration

just my two cents
You do understand that Ronnie was LIGHTER than dorian up until around 03 right? His 98 and 99 showing he was both lighter than 95 Dorian was. Not sure what Dorian weighed in 93 but I think it was more than the Ronster.
Logged

Mr. Magoo

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9808
  • THE most mistaken identity on getbig
Re: Ronnie Coleman 1996 Florida
« Reply #59 on: July 23, 2010, 03:35:59 PM »
Quote from: Shockwave on July 23, 2010, 03:34:00 PM
You do understand that Ronnie was LIGHTER than dorian up until around 03 right? His 98 and 99 showing he was both lighter than 95 Dorian was. Not sure what Dorian weighed in 93 but I think it was more than the Ronster.

I thought ronnie was heavier than dorian in 01?
Logged

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Ronnie Coleman 1996 Florida
« Reply #60 on: July 23, 2010, 03:41:07 PM »
Quote from: Mr. Magoo on July 23, 2010, 03:35:59 PM
I thought ronnie was heavier than dorian in 01?
If he was it was only a couple pounds. For some reason the weight 257 and 249 sticks in my head, not sure which, I think Doz was around 250-something in 93-95. But only ND would be sure.
Logged

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79396
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Ronnie Coleman 1996 Florida
« Reply #61 on: July 23, 2010, 03:44:10 PM »
Quote from: Mr. Magoo on July 23, 2010, 03:29:19 PM
I dont think ND takes into consideration how much more ronnie weighed than dorian, I don't think he scales the pictures right taking bodyweight into consideration

just my two cents

Well that's all depends on the year and the weight doesn't mean much if it's not backed by the conditioning.

Dorian 1995 was 260lbs , Ronnie 1998 was 249lbs , 1999 257lbs , 2000 , 264lbs , 2001 I believe he was 264lbs at the Olympia and 247lbs at the Arnold Classic , 2002 he was really down in size

Dorian was 260lbs will being hard as nails and arid as the desert , Ronnie was 264 in 2000 but soft & holding some water

the above pics were NOT scaled for accuracy just two similar poses , I tried my hand at scaled it's it's next to impossible to get it right so I don't even try anymore
Logged

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79396
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Ronnie Coleman 1996 Florida
« Reply #62 on: July 23, 2010, 03:46:08 PM »
Quote from: Shockwave on July 23, 2010, 03:41:07 PM
If he was it was only a couple pounds. For some reason the weight 257 and 249 sticks in my head, not sure which, I think Doz was around 250-something in 93-95. But only ND would be sure.

Ronnie 2001 was anywhere from 244-247lbs from the quotes I've seen. Dorian 1993 was 257lbs and in 1995 Haney introduced him at the 95 O at 260lbs

Logged

Shockwave

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20807
  • Decepticons! Scramble!
Re: Ronnie Coleman 1996 Florida
« Reply #63 on: July 23, 2010, 03:46:41 PM »
Quote from: Mr. Magoo on July 23, 2010, 03:35:59 PM
I thought ronnie was heavier than dorian in 01?
So the answer is yes, Ronnie was much lighter than Dorian at the 01 ASC.
Logged

kiwiol

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 18393
  • Who is John Galt?
Re: Ronnie Coleman 1996 Florida
« Reply #64 on: July 23, 2010, 03:56:04 PM »
Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on July 23, 2010, 02:19:51 PM
looks more like Ronnie and his man-tits  :-X  :-\

Word is that he's still trying to wean Hulkster off, with little to no success.
Logged

NarcissisticDeity

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 79396
  • Go back to making jewelry and cakes with your girl
Re: Ronnie Coleman 1996 Florida
« Reply #65 on: July 23, 2010, 04:00:22 PM »
Quote from: kiwiol on July 23, 2010, 03:56:04 PM
Word is that he's still trying to wean Hulkster off, with little to no success.

lmfao Hulkster like that 8 year old in the UK still nursing  :-X  :-X
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
« previous next »