Author Topic: "Why is [Osama] at large? Because we haven't got him yet"  (Read 1569 times)

ribonucleic

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5158
  • I bring you ultimate reality!
"Why is [Osama] at large? Because we haven't got him yet"
« on: May 24, 2007, 11:25:51 AM »
"Why is he at large? Because we haven't got him yet" - May 24, 2007

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/05/20070524.html



"You know, I just don't spend that much time on him" - March 13, 2002

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020313-8.html

The Enigma

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1486
  • Porsche 911 Turbo Carerra. My reality, your dream.
Re: "Why is [Osama] at large? Because we haven't got him yet"
« Reply #1 on: May 24, 2007, 01:22:11 PM »
"Why is he at large? Because we haven't got him yet" - May 24, 2007

"You know, I just don't spend that much time on him" - March 13, 2002


People are dying for this fvcken retard in the White House.

Kinda sad for a great country like America.  :(

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Re: "Why is [Osama] at large? Because we haven't got him yet"
« Reply #2 on: May 24, 2007, 01:25:28 PM »
Task Force 19..the special unit designed to go after him was disbanded a while ago. Maybe they got him. Maybe he's in pakistan...either way they are rolling up his organization.
L

The Enigma

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1486
  • Porsche 911 Turbo Carerra. My reality, your dream.
Re: "Why is [Osama] at large? Because we haven't got him yet"
« Reply #3 on: May 24, 2007, 01:29:49 PM »
Task Force 19..the special unit designed to go after him was disbanded a while ago. Maybe they got him. Maybe he's in pakistan...either way they are rolling up his organization.

I believe he died in Pakistan.

Decker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5782
Re: "Why is [Osama] at large? Because we haven't got him yet"
« Reply #4 on: May 24, 2007, 01:31:44 PM »
"Why is he at large? Because we haven't got him yet" - May 24, 2007

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/05/20070524.html



"You know, I just don't spend that much time on him" - March 13, 2002

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020313-8.html
This just illustrates that Bush is not presidential material.  Keeping the story straight in a reasoned articulate manner is important to being a leader.

At least Reagan could read his cue cards.  This guy Bush. . .

I think his incompetence is obvious to anyone looking.

Decker

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5782
Re: "Why is [Osama] at large? Because we haven't got him yet"
« Reply #5 on: May 24, 2007, 01:34:39 PM »
I believe he died in Pakistan.
I think it is very likely that he is dead.  It could be from renal failure.  He needed dialysis like 3 times a week.  That's a tall order to fill on the run.

headhuntersix

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17271
  • Our forefathers would be shooting by now
Re: "Why is [Osama] at large? Because we haven't got him yet"
« Reply #6 on: May 24, 2007, 01:34:45 PM »
I believe he died in Pakistan.



Yeah i kinda got that feeling when I was in Afghanistan.
L

The Enigma

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1486
  • Porsche 911 Turbo Carerra. My reality, your dream.
Re: "Why is [Osama] at large? Because we haven't got him yet"
« Reply #7 on: May 24, 2007, 01:37:10 PM »


Yeah i kinda got that feeling when I was in Afghanistan.

A good source says the above statement is correct.

The Enigma

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1486
  • Porsche 911 Turbo Carerra. My reality, your dream.
Re: "Why is [Osama] at large? Because we haven't got him yet"
« Reply #8 on: May 24, 2007, 01:45:05 PM »
Being on the run and needing dialysis is a deadly combination.

Camel Jockey

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16711
  • Mel Gibson and Bob Sly World Domination
Re: "Why is [Osama] at large? Because we haven't got him yet"
« Reply #9 on: May 24, 2007, 02:01:31 PM »
There hasn't been a video in a while.

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: "Why is [Osama] at large? Because we haven't got him yet"
« Reply #10 on: May 24, 2007, 02:32:03 PM »
osama left tora bora ala the unguarded and unbombed northen route.  made his way to jalalabad and flew with hundreds of his friends on repeated plane trips to egypt, where it was widely believed he died in jan or feb 2002 of renal failure.  in the december video, he was gaunt, left side paralysis, in late stages of disease. 

Then, suddenly he turns up THREE YEARS LATER in the same outfit looking plump with a new nose, endorsing John Kerry for president.

Then, nothing ever again. 

You know, for a man who made a dozen videos a week, even after the invasion into afghanistan, to stop altogether is *weird*.  And the fact that the only other video he made kept bush in office...



well, if you buy it, you have pigshit for brains.

Camel Jockey

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 16711
  • Mel Gibson and Bob Sly World Domination
Re: "Why is [Osama] at large? Because we haven't got him yet"
« Reply #11 on: May 24, 2007, 02:55:59 PM »
osama left tora bora ala the unguarded and unbombed northen route.  made his way to jalalabad and flew with hundreds of his friends on repeated plane trips to egypt, where it was widely believed he died in jan or feb 2002 of renal failure.  in the december video, he was gaunt, left side paralysis, in late stages of disease. 

Then, suddenly he turns up THREE YEARS LATER in the same outfit looking plump with a new nose, endorsing John Kerry for president.

Then, nothing ever again. 

You know, for a man who made a dozen videos a week, even after the invasion into afghanistan, to stop altogether is *weird*.  And the fact that the only other video he made kept bush in office...



well, if you buy it, you have pigshit for brains.

it's shady, no doubt about that. But I wouldn't go as far as to say he's a puppet of the CIA and what not. I do think the US milked him and 9/11 as a means of emotional blackmail against the american people.

Eyeball Chambers

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14344
  • Would you hold still? You're making me fuck up...
Re: "Why is [Osama] at large? Because we haven't got him yet"
« Reply #12 on: May 24, 2007, 03:30:06 PM »
I do think the US milked him and 9/11 as a means of emotional blackmail against the american people.

No doubting that.  :P
S

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: "Why is [Osama] at large? Because we haven't got him yet"
« Reply #13 on: May 24, 2007, 03:35:42 PM »
it's shady, no doubt about that. But I wouldn't go as far as to say he's a puppet of the CIA and what not. I do think the US milked him and 9/11 as a means of emotional blackmail against the american people.

yeah, i don't have a clue how much he's an asset and how much he's uncontrolled.

we do know the us gave him lots of money in the 80s (only cause the russians told the world).
we don't know when we severed ties with him.  Or if.

Either way, OBL dies and the war on terror - in iraq and afghanistan - loses support.  Would killing osama be a huge problem for Bush?  You betcha.  If white house would lie about pat tillman, you think they'd lie about / postpone OBL's death to reach their goals.  You fvcking bet.

The Enigma

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1486
  • Porsche 911 Turbo Carerra. My reality, your dream.
Re: "Why is [Osama] at large? Because we haven't got him yet"
« Reply #14 on: May 24, 2007, 04:59:59 PM »
Bush uses Bin Laden as the boogie man. If Saddam and Bin Laden were both dead, who would Bush be fighting then? Bush needs B.L. alive in our minds to continue his wars.

Make no mistake, Bin Laden is "stone cold" dead.

ribonucleic

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 5158
  • I bring you ultimate reality!
Re: "Why is [Osama] at large? Because we haven't got him yet"
« Reply #15 on: May 24, 2007, 05:38:01 PM »
The video of Bush's 2002 statement is even more appalling than the transcript. It's his utter worthlessness as a President and a human being laid bare in 90 seconds.

Watch how his eyes glaze over with boredom as his mind becomes overtaxed by a multi-part question.

See his irritation at being challenged.

Listen to the stammering as he struggles to complete a simple sentence.

Watch the defensive smirking.

Listen to the cartoon thinking. ("ultimate parasite")

Listen to the fake macho bluster. ("met his match")

Listen to the naked hypocrisy. ("willing to send youngsters to their deaths")

http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2007/05/bush_on_bin_lad.html

The Enigma

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1486
  • Porsche 911 Turbo Carerra. My reality, your dream.
Re: "Why is [Osama] at large? Because we haven't got him yet"
« Reply #16 on: May 25, 2007, 02:56:29 AM »
The video of Bush's 2002 statement is even more appalling than the transcript. It's his utter worthlessness as a President and a human being laid bare in 90 seconds.

Watch how his eyes glaze over with boredom as his mind becomes overtaxed by a multi-part question.

See his irritation at being challenged.

Listen to the stammering as he struggles to complete a simple sentence.

Watch the defensive smirking.

Listen to the cartoon thinking. ("ultimate parasite")

Listen to the fake macho bluster. ("met his match")

Listen to the naked hypocrisy. ("willing to send youngsters to their deaths")

http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2007/05/bush_on_bin_lad.html


The video clearly shows that Bush is LYING about the demise of Bin Laden.

Bin Laden is DEAD.........period.