Author Topic: BNP on Question Time - Who is watching?  (Read 4253 times)

Fatpanda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9676
  • One getbigger to rule them all.
Re: BNP on Question Time - Who is watching?
« Reply #50 on: October 23, 2009, 01:59:34 PM »
Looks like it will never be on then.... :D

rangers 1-4 Unirea Urziceni

need i say more ?  :-*
175lbs by 31st July

wordy

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 625
Re: BNP on Question Time - Who is watching?
« Reply #51 on: October 23, 2009, 04:14:45 PM »
I thought question time was a complete farce last night, a complete waste of time watching it.

They could've used that hour to ask pertinent political questions but instead decided to have a firing squad of where all the panelists and audience ganged up on Griffin. We couldv'e had the chance to see what his views on todays political issues are, instead of people just throwing insults, aqusations and statements at him. I feel this program has left people none the wiser about who he is.

The only person who didn't come across as a complete moron was Huhne.

Baroness Warsi was opposing Nick Griffin quite vhermently but she holds quite an outspoken opinion against homosexual civil partenerships, that was convieniently forgotten while she ripped Nick Griffin apart for his biggotry. Quite the hypocrite I thought, and if you think about that she didn't come across that well at all.

Jack Straw put an awful performance in, he couldn't answer a question if his life depeneded on it.

Nick Griffin his inexpirience and nervousness shone through for all to see but with such a loaded audience that should be expected. He was completly unable to give a straight answer on his views until asked direct questions that he's been asked before why is "islam a wicked vicious faith"? where he was able to give a well rehearsed set piece answer. But other than that was on the defensive and totaly unable to put together a free flowing arguement like the others.

Bonnie Greer came across as a sterotypical American in my eyes, she was perfectly fothright with her views but whe Griffin was speaking she'd say things like "don't go there!" which if sh'ed let him speak then take apart his arguments like she should have been able to she'd have made herrself look alot better.

All in all, a wasted opportunity in my view.

uberman09

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1667
Re: BNP on Question Time - Who is watching?
« Reply #52 on: October 23, 2009, 07:22:51 PM »
it was a trial, an ambush, even the host was partial... it was like a live execution. He couldnt do shit and this shows what the so called democracy is: people with power breaking other people without giving em any fair way to express themselves. A complete mascarade.

These blacks arabs muslims indians etc will lead the UK in some decades, and white minorities will be considered as second zone citizen, if not slaves.There is no mixing , it's all about population replacement, they dont even want to integrate/assimilate, they just re-create their own communities in their hosts countries, and just came to benefit from the improved materialistic life of the west. Governements encouraged this phenomenon to get a dumber, less paid  world middle/poor class. Reverse colonialism, reverse slavery. As the number of white people will decrease, all these colored people will get more and more violent and will murder white people just because they re white, their blatant racism will show off ultimately. It will get nasty and bloody. The lower white classes of societies all over the occident will be the ones who will face this invasion firs thand and who will pay the highest price. Their life's quality will return to the middle age as the violence , ethnic urban wars will spread.
The last white people will have to choose communautarism if they want to survive.
Congrats to all of those who participated in this.

The end of the west.

crownshep

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3256
  • Getbig!
Re: BNP on Question Time - Who is watching?
« Reply #53 on: October 24, 2009, 03:51:30 AM »
Looks like Nick Griffin and the BNP have been right all along.

Huge increases in immigration over the past decade were a deliberate attempt to engineer a more multicultural Britain, a former Government adviser said yesterday.
Andrew Neather, a speechwriter who worked in Downing Street for Tony Blair and in the Home Office for Jack Straw and David Blunkett, said Labour's relaxation of controls was a plan to 'open up the UK to mass migration'.
As well as bringing in hundreds of thousands to plug labour market gaps, there was also a 'driving political purpose' behind immigration policy, he claimed.

Official policy: Huge increases in immigration over the past decade were 'a deliberate attempt to engineer a more multicultural Britain'
Ministers hoped to change the country radically and 'rub the Right's nose in diversity'. But Mr Neather said senior Labour figures were reluctant to discuss the policy, fearing it would alienate its 'core working-class vote'.
On Question Time, Mr Straw was repeatedly quizzed about whether Labour's immigration policies had left the door open for the BNP.
Writing in the Evening Standard, Mr Neather revealed the 'major shift' in immigration policy came after the publication of a policy paper from the Performance and Innovation Unit, a Downing Street think tank based in the Cabinet Office.

The published version promoted the labour-market case for immigration but Mr Neather said unpublished versions contained additional reasons.
'Earlier drafts I saw also included a driving political purpose: that mass immigration was the way that the Government was going to make the UK truly multicultural.
'I remember coming away from some discussions with the clear sense that the policy was intended - even if this wasn't its main purpose - to rub the Right's nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date.' The 'deliberate policy', from late 2000 until 'at least February last year', when the new points-based system was introduced, was to open up the UK to mass migration, he said.
Mr Neather defended the policy, saying mass immigration has 'enriched' Britain and made London a more attractive and cosmopolitan place.
Sir Andrew Green, chairman of the Migrationwatch think tank, said: 'Now at least the truth is out, and it's dynamite. Many have long suspected that mass immigration under Labour was not just a cock-up but a conspiracy. They were right.
'This Government has admitted three million immigrants for cynical political reasons concealed by dodgy economic camouflage.'
The chairmen of the cross-party Group for Balanced Migration, MPs Frank Field and Nicholas Soames, said: 'We welcome this statement which the whole country knows to be true.
'It is the first beam of truth that has officially been shone on the immigration issue in Britain.'

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-....l#ixzz0UqKYFbUY

Mars

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 27707
Re: BNP on Question Time - Who is watching?
« Reply #54 on: October 24, 2009, 04:09:10 AM »
its evident something need to be done but i dont think we should want people like griffin in power, hes not a real "clean" individual and most of his followers even less.

BIG AL MCKECHNIE

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1696
Re: BNP on Question Time - Who is watching?
« Reply #55 on: October 24, 2009, 04:30:15 AM »
This is all beginning to backfire big time for the folk who organised this farce including the BBC and Labour.
Crownsheps link isn't working now so here it is

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1222613/Labour-let-migrants-engineer-multicultural-UK.html  

Jack Straw made a complete arse of himself by going on about the people of every colour who fought the Nazis during the war (yes that was because the Nazis were trying to slaughter all races!!!) but now everyone knows that Straw's dad was in jail during WW2 for refusing to fight. Just as well Nick didn't point out that Straw's brother is a convicted Paedofile and his son is a convicted drug dealer.  People who live in glass houses (or Straw houses in this case) should be bcareful about casting the first stone.
Check out Jack Straw getting the owning of the century.
 




Magnus Greel

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 89
Re: BNP on Question Time - Who is watching?
« Reply #56 on: October 24, 2009, 04:44:24 AM »

One writer summed it up perfectly when they said the BNP is the sypmtom of the problem, Labour are the cause! People in the question time audience should have been attacking Jack "Straw man" for his governments policies which has led to the sucess of far right parties such as the BNP.

Democracy and free speech has been well and truly obliterated by Labour who base their ideologies and manifesto on communism and George Orwell's 1984. ;D

We can now look forward to the possibility of an EU president in the form of Tony Blair, who no doubt in conjunction with Obamamania will look to create some kind of western socialist empire which results in an "epic fail"!
In the meantime China and India unhindered by socialism, policitcal correctness and general allround mediocrity will be ruling the world as superpowers.

local hero

  • Competitors
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8714
  • mma finance warrior of peace
Re: BNP on Question Time - Who is watching?
« Reply #57 on: October 24, 2009, 05:24:28 AM »
i think every working class man and woman in the uk said the same thing at work the next day...


i agree with most the things he stands for!!!!!!


if this debate was held in the north east, or north west i know for a fact the audience would have handled it very differently... but when you cram the audience full of puffs, jews, blacks and muslims then round the rest of with students, what do you thinks going to happen, and in all fairness this was by no means a fair representation of the uk....

us working class whites still do make up the majority of the country, i just wish there was a party that took our concerns on, i do think the tories will be a lot harder on imigration, but as a shipyard worker, id rather chop me cock off than vote for them pack of girls..





Matt C

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 12752
  • The White Vince Goodrum
Re: BNP on Question Time - Who is watching?
« Reply #58 on: October 24, 2009, 08:52:53 AM »
it was a trial, an ambush, even the host was partial... it was like a live execution. He couldnt do shit and this shows what the so called democracy is: people with power breaking other people without giving em any fair way to express themselves. A complete mascarade.

These blacks arabs muslims indians etc will lead the UK in some decades, and white minorities will be considered as second zone citizen, if not slaves.There is no mixing , it's all about population replacement, they dont even want to integrate/assimilate, they just re-create their own communities in their hosts countries, and just came to benefit from the improved materialistic life of the west. Governements encouraged this phenomenon to get a dumber, less paid  world middle/poor class. Reverse colonialism, reverse slavery. As the number of white people will decrease, all these colored people will get more and more violent and will murder white people just because they re white, their blatant racism will show off ultimately. It will get nasty and bloody. The lower white classes of societies all over the occident will be the ones who will face this invasion firs thand and who will pay the highest price. Their life's quality will return to the middle age as the violence , ethnic urban wars will spread.
The last white people will have to choose communautarism if they want to survive.
Congrats to all of those who participated in this.

The end of the west.

Wow, absolutely incredible post.  When did the white man lose his balls?
Bodybuilding Pro.com

Mars

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 27707
Re: BNP on Question Time - Who is watching?
« Reply #59 on: October 24, 2009, 09:20:02 AM »
all good and well but those good black and arab people who did assimulate with their families will suffer greatly from a rascist like that in power.
i encourage deporting the scum back to africa though.

Mars

  • Time Out
  • Getbig V
  • *
  • Posts: 27707
Re: BNP on Question Time - Who is watching?
« Reply #60 on: October 24, 2009, 10:22:41 AM »
There was once a king who was mad about new clothes and one day two swindlers came to sell him some magic clothes. They held up a particular garment and said, Your Majesty, this is a magic suit. The truth was, there was no suit at all. The swindlers were smart, and said, "Your Majesty, to a wise man this is a beautiful suit, but to a fool it is absolutely invisible." Naturally, the King not wanting to appear a fool, said, "Isn't it grand! Isn't it fine

uberman09

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1667
Re: BNP on Question Time - Who is watching?
« Reply #61 on: October 24, 2009, 11:02:58 AM »
the major problem is that immigration was Ok as long as most immigrants were assimilated, integrated, and were importing their qualities, were imported in small quantities.

Now it's all about quantity to dumb down the new globalized/world middle and poor class. There is an obvious will of the elites to make people dumber.

Nowadays 9 out of 10 immigrants who come from the third world to the occidental world, just come  to benefit from the improved material life. They come together in great numbers with a plan to settle and replace the natives.  Only  1 out of ten come to assimilate, integrate, work. This is the problem of the current process of immigration. This is reality. And this is what politics and medias dont want the popular masses of occident to see or understand.They dont even want or need to integrate, they just recreate their countries inside their hosts countries. It's openly demonstrated, it is obvious.

Where it's getting really nasty, is that those who promote all of this, the elites, medias, journalists, politics, show bizz stars etc ALL KNOW WHATS GOING ON, they know there s no mixing, there s no sharing, there s only massive replacement and communautarism growing everywhere in occident.

YET THEY KEEP PUSHING THE PROCESS FURTHER. They know where it's heading, dont be fooled, but they dont give a fuck,they re rich and preserved from what s goign to happen to the lower classes, white middle and poor classes everywhere in occident will be forced to embrass "multiculturalism" even if multiculturalism is a myth: it doesnt work as it is protrayed, it's a covered replacement of populations by people who have a higher and faster rate of breeding than their hosts, and who have a deep anger, a will to have their revenge against the "old white colonialist/ dominating" man.

White people's ethnic disapearing is orchestrated by our own elites worldwide. They are the ones giving the opportunities to the third world invaders to replace the white middle and poor classes. Usefull white idiots dont even know that when they promote multiculturalism, which wil lead em and their sons and grandsons into oblivion, they are playing the game of the elites they despise so much, what an irony. Elites want a  dumb , "mixed" giant poor world class.
And we are their guinea pigs. They laugh at us, as they always did.

The next centuries will see massive globalized ethnic urban wars all over occident.



uberman09

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1667
Re: BNP on Question Time - Who is watching?
« Reply #62 on: October 24, 2009, 04:41:06 PM »
Quote
David Duke: Some Comments on Nick Griffin
I do think that Nick will get some sympathy for the ambush on him at the BBC, but I don’t think that such is the best scenario. I would much rather be reading media attacks how “effective he is for his terrible ideas,” etc.
The show was a setup from the beginning. A trap. The way you defeat such a trap is to expose it. You don’t clap for an African American woman who is essentially saying that you are an ignorant fool. You don’t remain silent as the moderator goes to person after person, each saying outrageous things about you.
You Stop everything, stand up and you expose to the viewing audience that this is a con job from the beginning. When they let people in the audience supposedly ask questions that are just attacks, you demand to answer those questions, one at time, and respond to them. You may defend yourself and correct inaccuracies, but then you immediately go on the attack righteously.
Such as, to the attack of being a racist you might say, ” I am no racist for simply defending my heritage, but you are the true racist for trying to destroy my heritage in my own homeland. You are the racist with your so-called affirmative discrimination that racially discriminates against Britons in jobs and promotions and scholarships and the like. You are the racist in constantly attacking White people for colonialism and racism, but then support the Third World colonization of Britain. You are the racist for creating a situation where tens of thousands of innocent  Britons are now victims of crime and violence.”
Or, he might say:
“You keep saying that I represent hate, or am motivated by hatred. Look at the sneering and vicious character of my opponents and you will see the real hate. I am motivated by a deep love of Britain and the wonderful heritage of the English, and Welsh, and Scots, and Irish that built the nation that has given the world so much literature, science, art and beauty!”
You don’t keep your head down in your notes, but hold your head up high, unflinching amidst the attacks on you, and then demand the right to respond to the nasty attacks on you character.
You don’t weasel, you go on the attack, not in a nasty, gratuitous way, but in a forthright way. Such as,
“Mr. Straw, you talk of your Jewish heritage and lineage and you ardently support the Israeli terrorist, apartheid state. Why do you support Israel as a Jewish State, support their terrorist suppression of the Palestinian indigenous people, but then try to destroy the heritage of Britain and the British people? Why are you so much for preserving Jewish heritage but so opposed to preserving British heritage?”
Nick said some good things in  pointing out that unlike Straw he opposed the Iraq war, but then ruined it all by supporting the Zionist murder in Gaza! He should have stuck the rhetorical knife in Straw and pointed out that he did not speak out forcefully against the Israeli mass murder and maiming in Gaza. Of course, how could he, because he had already tried to ingratiate himself with the Jewish extremists by defending their murder in Gaza.
If he would have done things, been more aggressive in his defense, stood up from his chair, and showed the hypocrisy of his enemies, the show, despite its trap, would have been a great victory.
For instance, why didn’t he point out to the attacking audience, that there are thousands of organizations in Britain which specifically support non-Whites and the non-White social and political agenda, and many are supported by the government. Many of  them openly proclaim that they are activists for the interests of their group, so how dare they say that Britain can’t even have one party that defends the founding people of Britain. What hypocrisy!
“You are right,” he could say, “we have a real problem with racism in Britain, racism against the people who created and sustain this great country!”
I wish Nick Griffin the best of luck, but I hope that he will learn how to play the hardball one must play when combating these hypocrites. If so, he will move from the EU Parlament to #10 Downing Street.
Just a few notes for you…
david duke

Fatpanda

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9676
  • One getbigger to rule them all.
Re: BNP on Question Time - Who is watching?
« Reply #63 on: October 25, 2009, 04:28:07 AM »


great post !

if david duke ran the bnp and was on that show instead of griffin perhaps there would be real change on the way.

its amazing - that post sums up everything griffin has been saying to a tee, but says it without offending anyone.
175lbs by 31st July