There is when using statistics to determine which group is more likely to commit violent crimes.
If you find that one race is 5x more likely to murder than another race, logically you should pay more attention to the group committing a the crimes.
Whethef its inherent in their race IMO is irrelevant. .. the facts say that 'x' grouo commits the murders, you focus on 'x'.
Ignoring a major point of that. I dont think most people that are educated on race are anywhere stupid enough to suggest discriminating doesnt work.
You can apply that same logic into who you will rent to, who you will higher, and who you will believe, as I think its a fact that is exactly what 99 percent of the population does.
What your not admitting to is the fallout from your math.
If blacks are 5 x more likely to commit a crime they should be searched 5 times more often.
Your ignoring the fact that there are collateral crimes detected in a bust, that may have crime rates that are equal proportion with white folk.
I.E. just as many white pot smokers as black pot smokers.
And yet those profile searches dont ignore 80 percent of pot smokers to make the number fair.
So you have passive black potheads, getting busted at a rate that is five times higher than their white passive counterparts.
That may just seem like collateral damage but that shit adds up and will fuck someone over economically.
This is the part yall seem to skip over like it has absolutely no relevance to the situation.