Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Misc Discussion Boards => Wrestling Board => Topic started by: littleguns on May 07, 2014, 03:25:31 PM

Title: New IC and US Champs - right move?
Post by: littleguns on May 07, 2014, 03:25:31 PM
Was Barrett and Sheamus the right move?

Will there now be some focus on both belts or will this be a low card belt where back in the day the IC meant more than the Heavyweight belt.
Title: Re: New IC and US Champs - right move?
Post by: Thin Lizzy on May 07, 2014, 06:03:41 PM
Until they lose the Authority figures, HHH and Steph, the titles are meaningless, as the Authority Figure can just set up any silly stip he pleases where the champ or challenger has no chance.
Title: Re: New IC and US Champs - right move?
Post by: leonp1981 on May 07, 2014, 09:10:17 PM
Barrett's doing good work at the moment and the crowd seem to be liking his gimmick.  Plus, that elbow he's using as a finisher looks like it'd do some legitimate damage.  Too many finishers these days don't look any different to a regular move.
Title: Re: New IC and US Champs - right move?
Post by: littleguns on May 08, 2014, 05:48:16 AM
I feel like they keep repackaging Barrett trying to find his character, hope this is it.

Truthfully I wish they did more with Big E, aside from mic skills, he has what Vince likes, big, strong cartoonish type guy.

I think Sheamus has passed his calling. He was better as a heel, which right now WWE is lacking.

Aside from Evolution there are no strong heels.

One might say Wyatt's but they are tweeners in my mind..
Title: Re: New IC and US Champs - right move?
Post by: MCWAY on May 10, 2014, 10:02:21 PM
Was Barrett and Sheamus the right move?

Will there now be some focus on both belts or will this be a low card belt where back in the day the IC meant more than the Heavyweight belt.

NO! Those belts should be used as stepping stones for the new guys. Why does Sheamus need to be US champion again, after being WWE champ twice and World champion?

And what does another IC run do for Barrett? He's been there three times before. I say the US champ should have been....yes.....FAAAAAAA N-DAAAAAAAN-GOOOOOO!!! Give him a long, goofy run, Honky-style.

As for the IC belt, I'd have gone with Cesaro, as he was the only guy in the tournament who hadn't been IC champ or higher (I don't consider the US title as the equivalent of the Intercontinental championship; your mileage may vary).
Title: Re: New IC and US Champs - right move?
Post by: littleguns on May 12, 2014, 05:16:05 AM
NO! Those belts should be used as stepping stones for the new guys. Why does Sheamus need to be US champion again, after being WWE champ twice and World champion?

And what does another IC run do for Barrett? He's been there three times before. I say the US champ should have been....yes.....FAAAAAAA N-DAAAAAAAN-GOOOOOO!!! Give him a long, goofy run, Honky-style.

As for the IC belt, I'd have gone with Cesaro, as he was the only guy in the tournament who hadn't been IC champ or higher (I don't consider the US title as the equivalent of the Intercontinental championship; your mileage may vary).

I think Caesaro would have been a great choice grooming him for a later World Title Feud. Back in the day the IC title was just as Prestigious as the Heavyweight......it was the working man's belt. Think of some of the people it elevated, Hart, Savage and should have meant more for Henning....
Title: Re: New IC and US Champs - right move?
Post by: Montague on May 12, 2014, 04:39:21 PM
I think Caesaro would have been a great choice grooming him for a later World Title Feud. Back in the day the IC title was just as Prestigious as the Heavyweight......it was the working man's belt. Think of some of the people it elevated, Hart, Savage and should have meant more for Henning....


I suspect Hennig would have kept going had it not been for his back injury.
Title: Re: New IC and US Champs - right move?
Post by: MCWAY on May 13, 2014, 06:55:01 PM
I think Caesaro would have been a great choice grooming him for a later World Title Feud. Back in the day the IC title was just as Prestigious as the Heavyweight......it was the working man's belt. Think of some of the people it elevated, Hart, Savage and should have meant more for Henning....

I wouldn't say it was just as prestigious. I certainly didn't think it elevated the likes of Marc Mero or Goldust. I thought back in '98 it would have given Ken Shamrock a push. But, that didn't quite happen.

When he lost to Val Venis, that pretty much watered it down from there: Road Dogg, Goldust (again), Godfather, Jeff Jarrett, D'Lo Brown, Chyna.......
Title: Re: New IC and US Champs - right move?
Post by: littleguns on May 14, 2014, 05:52:03 AM
I wouldn't say it was just as prestigious. I certainly didn't think it elevated the likes of Marc Mero or Goldust. I thought back in '98 it would have given Ken Shamrock a push. But, that didn't quite happen.

When he lost to Val Venis, that pretty much watered it down from there: Road Dogg, Goldust (again), Godfather, Jeff Jarrett, D'Lo Brown, Chyna.......

Good point but I guess I was referencing old school 80's and early 90's. IC Champs were fighting champs...Chico Santana, Muraco, Valentine etc back when wrestlers were men and not swim suit models
Title: Re: New IC and US Champs - right move?
Post by: MCWAY on May 14, 2014, 05:50:45 PM
Good point but I guess I was referencing old school 80's and early 90's. IC Champs were fighting champs...Chico Santana, Muraco, Valentine etc back when wrestlers were men and not swim suit models

Ummm....how would you categorize former IC champ, Ravishing Rick Rude?
Title: Re: New IC and US Champs - right move?
Post by: Montague on May 14, 2014, 06:24:43 PM
Good point but I guess I was referencing old school 80's and early 90's. IC Champs were fighting champs...Chico Santana, Muraco, Valentine etc back when wrestlers were men and not swim suit models


Yes!
Not always, but often, the I-C belt was a prelude to either a run with the big belt, working a program with the champ, or engaging in some high-profile feuds.

I enjoyed many of the I-C champs from that period. I'm still surprised that they never gave Paul Ordnorff that belt. He always struck me as a good candidate.
Title: Re: New IC and US Champs - right move?
Post by: MCWAY on May 15, 2014, 09:01:02 PM

Yes!
Not always, but often, the I-C belt was a prelude to either a run with the big belt, working a program with the champ, or engaging in some high-profile feuds.

I enjoyed many of the I-C champs from that period. I'm still surprised that they never gave Paul Ordnorff that belt. He always struck me as a good candidate.

Does that include THE GREATEST INTERCONTINENTAL CHAMPION OF ALL TIME, THE HONKY TONK MAN??

 ;D ;D
Title: Re: New IC and US Champs - right move?
Post by: littleguns on May 16, 2014, 05:30:17 AM
Ummm....how would you categorize former IC champ, Ravishing Rick Rude?

Rude came across as a legitimate bad ass whether he really was or not. That Magnum PI stache just gave him the heel look. Many of his promos started the same, all you fat, out of shape etc etc but he had the crowd in the palm of his hand and of course with Heenan by his side, icing on the cake.

Speaking of Rude, is he in the HOF? If not, I am sure Vince is still holding a grudge for Rude being on Nitro and Raw on the same night.
Title: Re: New IC and US Champs - right move?
Post by: Montague on May 16, 2014, 10:33:54 AM
Rude has not been inducted.
Title: Re: New IC and US Champs - right move?
Post by: littleguns on May 17, 2014, 06:40:24 AM
Rude has not been inducted.

So Rude and Savage next year (LOL)?? 2 deceased individuals in 1 year?
Title: Re: New IC and US Champs - right move?
Post by: Montague on May 17, 2014, 09:34:48 AM
So Rude and Savage next year (LOL)?? 2 deceased individuals in 1 year?


If not next year, then eventually.
They all do. And, when they wave enough green in front of Martha Hart, Owen will go in, too.

The only one who will never, EVER make it in is Benoit.
Title: Re: New IC and US Champs - right move?
Post by: littleguns on May 20, 2014, 05:29:26 AM
What am I missing here; Barrett wins a tourney and beats Big E. Now instead of Big E using his "rematch clause", they have another tourney that he wins and he is now facing Barrett again. HUH??

I always hear...why are Hollywood or wrestling "marks" writing the shows? Lets go back to the old days of having 2-3 bookers that are current/former wrestlers that know the biz, lets get Sullivan, Dusty and 1 or 2 more......

Title: Re: New IC and US Champs - right move?
Post by: MCWAY on May 20, 2014, 10:04:44 AM
What am I missing here; Barrett wins a tourney and beats Big E. Now instead of Big E using his "rematch clause", they have another tourney that he wins and he is now facing Barrett again. HUH??

I always hear...why are Hollywood or wrestling "marks" writing the shows? Lets go back to the old days of having 2-3 bookers that are current/former wrestlers that know the biz, lets get Sullivan, Dusty and 1 or 2 more......



Big E used his rematch clause on Raw, the night after Extreme Rules. Barrett beat him again.

Plus, I thought RVD just won a "Beat-The-Clock" challenge series of matches on RAW to face Barrett at "Payback" for the title.

As for Big E Langston, it appears they're setting up a feud between him and Alexander Rusev, after Big E stopped Rusev from ripping Hacksaw Jim Duggan apart.
Title: Re: New IC and US Champs - right move?
Post by: MCWAY on May 20, 2014, 10:21:47 AM

If not next year, then eventually.
They all do. And, when they wave enough green in front of Martha Hart, Owen will go in, too.

The only one who will never, EVER make it in is Benoit.


Two other guys who should be in the Hall of Fame, in my view, are the longest reigning WWF Tag champs of all time....

Title: Re: New IC and US Champs - right move?
Post by: littleguns on May 20, 2014, 02:42:40 PM
Two other guys who should be in the Hall of Fame, in my view, are the longest reigning WWF Tag champs of all time....



Ahh Barry Darsow....I think he wins the most gimmicks award
Title: Re: New IC and US Champs - right move?
Post by: Montague on May 20, 2014, 06:19:57 PM
Demolition deserves to go in, they deserve a DVD, etc.
But, both Darsow and (especially) Eadie have such an extensive history beyond the Fed. Both men deserve mention of that history.
Title: Re: New IC and US Champs - right move?
Post by: littleguns on May 21, 2014, 03:13:44 PM
Masked Superstar then later Super Machine
Title: Re: New IC and US Champs - right move?
Post by: Montague on May 22, 2014, 06:04:09 PM
Masked Superstar then later Super Machine


I always overlook his stint with the Machines.
Title: Re: New IC and US Champs - right move?
Post by: littleguns on May 24, 2014, 05:52:38 AM

I always overlook his stint with the Machines.

Gawd I miss the 80's as I think this was the best time to be a wrestling fan then the Attitude era came which was decent.

I remember watching on Saturdays WWF from 11-12, all squash matches then NWA TBS from 6:05-8:05 and if I was awake, WWF again at 11 or 12 pm on WWOR

I know wrestling is cyclical and goes through highs and lows but it has been 10+ yrs since attitude era, something has to change.

Soo much hype behind Jeff Jarrett's new promotion, hope he backs all this shit up.
Title: Re: New IC and US Champs - right move?
Post by: gmflex on May 24, 2014, 07:27:51 AM
I like Sandow..
He can get under people skin..
Too bad they use him poorly.. comic relief..
Title: Re: New IC and US Champs - right move?
Post by: Montague on May 25, 2014, 11:10:02 AM
I know wrestling is cyclical and goes through highs and lows but it has been 10+ yrs since attitude era, something has to change.


I honestly don't expect professional wrestling to hit another peak that rivals any of it's greatest past ones.
Title: Re: New IC and US Champs - right move?
Post by: MCWAY on May 26, 2014, 11:16:11 AM

If not next year, then eventually.
They all do. And, when they wave enough green in front of Martha Hart, Owen will go in, too.

The only one who will never, EVER make it in is Benoit.

"The Genius" Lanny Poffo claims that he won't do it, based on Savage's wishes that the whole Poffo wrestling family get inducted, ala the Von Erichs.

Genius claimed that while he can't stop WWE from putting Savage in to the Hall against his wishes (pockets ain't deep enough to wage a legal fight with McMahon), he said that (if WWE goes that route) he doesn't want to be invited to the event or paid.

Per his little brother, Savage really got rubbed raw by that whole "Huckster" and "Nacho Man" thing. You may recall that Savage left for WCW because he still wanted to wrestle, while McMahon wanted him behind the desk doing commentary to make room for the "New Generation" guys. The "Nacho Man" thing just reinforced McMahon's belief that Savage was too long in the tooth. Savage's multiple runs as WCW champion proved differently.

Savage supposedly even proposed a storyline to run about two years with him and Shawn Michaels, where he would ultimately put Michaels over and then retire. He and Michaels had some great matches in the UK back in '92, when Savage was champion.
Title: Re: New IC and US Champs - right move?
Post by: littleguns on May 27, 2014, 05:17:49 AM


Per his little brother, Savage really got rubbed raw by that whole "Huckster" and "Nacho Man" thing. You may recall that Savage left for WCW because he still wanted to wrestle, while McMahon wanted him behind the desk doing commentary to make room for the "New Generation" guys. The "Nacho Man" thing just reinforced McMahon's belief that Savage was too long in the tooth. Savage's multiple runs as WCW champion proved differently.


Not sure I entirely believe this. Yes Macho was doing some commentary BUT he could still draw, make Vinny Mac $$$ etc. I have had emails back and forth with Lanny and yes he wants the whole family in but if the myth that Macho hit on/slept with Steph and also MM taking slim jim to WCW.........He may never go in unless HHH steps in like he did with Warrior.
Title: Re: New IC and US Champs - right move?
Post by: MCWAY on May 27, 2014, 10:45:39 AM
Not sure I entirely believe this. Yes Macho was doing some commentary BUT he could still draw, make Vinny Mac $$$ etc. I have had emails back and forth with Lanny and yes he wants the whole family in but if the myth that Macho hit on/slept with Steph and also MM taking slim jim to WCW.........He may never go in unless HHH steps in like he did with Warrior.

I made that statement, based on a podcast that Genius did on Youtube. But, you make the call.



Again, he states that he really can't stop WWE from inducting Savage alone. But, if they do that, he wants no part of it: no money, no invite, NOTHING. Otherwise, he'd be selling his brother for 30 pieces of silver ala Judas.

Here's Savage, discussing briefly why he left WWE for WCW.

Title: Re: New IC and US Champs - right move?
Post by: Montague on May 27, 2014, 06:20:50 PM
I expect the fallout would have been much harsher had Randy actually done "anything" with an underage Stephanie. Of course, that is just pure conjecture on my part.
Title: Re: New IC and US Champs - right move?
Post by: MCWAY on May 27, 2014, 07:47:50 PM
I expect the fallout would have been much harsher had Randy actually done "anything" with an underage Stephanie. Of course, that is just pure conjecture on my part.

To me, this Savage boning Stephanie McMahon rumor ranks up there with the Ultimate Warrior dying in '92, after Helwig came back 20-25 lb lighter and smoother with shorter hair.
Title: Re: New IC and US Champs - right move?
Post by: Montague on May 28, 2014, 02:44:37 AM
To me, this Savage boning Stephanie McMahon rumor ranks up there with the Ultimate Warrior dying in '92, after Helwig came back 20-25 lb lighter and smoother with shorter hair.


Yeah, and I don't think the old man would have given Savage a public "fare thee well" on air, either, when he jumped.
Title: Re: New IC and US Champs - right move?
Post by: littleguns on May 28, 2014, 05:26:17 AM

Yeah, and I don't think the old man would have given Savage a public "fare thee well" on air, either, when he jumped.

Great point!