donīt know if you can read this but each lift was measured and DECLINE press was shown to give best OVERALL development... makes you think.... however did Guys like Arnold do inclines for no reason??
Is that EMS studies where the pulse is read via monitors
- Arnold is not your genetic average, he had huge upper pecs from benching before he looked more at Incline work
Ken waller from the same era did countless Incline based work and had no upper chest
, a new study done on the very movements I talk of done in Australia last year shows reverse flat is still 30 % more effective than Inclines for developing upper pec size.
I put a guy onto these movements - he was doing nothing but incline work and had no upper pecs - 6 months of reverse benching on the flat plus incline cable flyes (he dropped all other incline work) pec minor dips he now has upper pecs popping over the top of his tank top and there was nothing there before from doing incline work
And what is this measuring in your study ? chest development or upper pec activation ?