Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Bluto on August 18, 2008, 09:37:56 AM

Title: tall = big - but a short guy need a lot of weight to be considered big
Post by: Bluto on August 18, 2008, 09:37:56 AM
through history tall people automatically been considered big even though they have not weigh much.

clint eastwood never carried a lot of muscle, yet he's refered to as a "big guy" in magnum force from 1973. clint is 6' 2"

snoop dog is known as "big snoop" he's 6' 3½"

but for a short guy to be considered big, he needs a lot of weight doesnt he? or maybe some guys never are considered big, no matter how much they weigh just because theyre too short?

discuss
Title: Re: tall = big - but a short guy need a lot of weight to be considered big
Post by: m8 on August 18, 2008, 09:47:28 AM
yes isn't that amazing?
Title: Re: tall = big - but a short guy need a lot of weight to be considered big
Post by: bigmc on August 18, 2008, 09:48:53 AM
great thread  ::)
Title: Re: tall = big - but a short guy need a lot of weight to be considered big
Post by: affeman on August 18, 2008, 09:49:18 AM
Quote from: Bluto on August 18, 2008, 09:37:56 AM
snoop dog is known as "big snoop" he's 6' 3½"

(http://us.ent2.yimg.com/musicfinder.yahoo.com/images/yahoo/priority/snoopdogg/1102_snoop_dogg_a.jpg)
Title: Re: tall = big - but a short guy need a lot of weight to be considered big
Post by: m8 on August 18, 2008, 09:53:32 AM
Quote from: affeman on August 18, 2008, 09:49:18 AM
(http://us.ent2.yimg.com/musicfinder.yahoo.com/images/yahoo/priority/snoopdogg/1102_snoop_dogg_a.jpg)

ripped to shreds
Title: Re: tall = big - but a short guy need a lot of weight to be considered big
Post by: Bluto on August 18, 2008, 09:58:50 AM
thats big snoop! sliced and diced and dialed in without spilling over
Title: Re: tall = big - but a short guy need a lot of weight to be considered big
Post by: Stavios on August 18, 2008, 10:19:06 AM
Quote from: Bluto on August 18, 2008, 09:58:50 AM
thats big snoop! sliced and diced and dialed in without spilling over

 ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: tall = big - but a short guy need a lot of weight to be considered big
Post by: affeman on August 18, 2008, 10:28:05 AM
On conditioning he can hold his own against Beckham, but Beckham dwarfs him on size. :o

(http://www.online-artikel.de/editor/assets/gallery1/snoop-dogg-and-beckham.jpg)
Title: Re: tall = big - but a short guy need a lot of weight to be considered big
Post by: m8 on August 18, 2008, 10:34:08 AM
Quote from: affeman on August 18, 2008, 10:28:05 AM
On conditioning he can hold his own against Beckham, but Beckham dwarfs him on size. :o

(http://www.online-artikel.de/editor/assets/gallery1/snoop-dogg-and-beckham.jpg)

Synthol biceps on Beckham.
Title: Re: tall = big - but a short guy need a lot of weight to be considered big
Post by: Jeffro on August 18, 2008, 10:36:42 AM
Quote from: affeman on August 18, 2008, 10:28:05 AM
On conditioning he can hold his own against Beckham, but Beckham dwarfs him on size. :o

(http://www.online-artikel.de/editor/assets/gallery1/snoop-dogg-and-beckham.jpg)
Brutal 4 inch wrists on "Big" Snoop.  :-\
Title: Re: tall = big - but a short guy need a lot of weight to be considered big
Post by: m8 on August 18, 2008, 10:42:07 AM
Quote from: Jeffro on August 18, 2008, 10:36:42 AM
Brutal 4 inch wrists on "Big" Snoop.  :-\

all drugs.
Title: Re: tall = big - but a short guy need a lot of weight to be considered big
Post by: Earl1972 on August 18, 2008, 10:46:42 AM
bluto seems to be obsessed with height

are you a short guy or a tall guy that feels your height is all you have going for yourself?

E
Title: Re: tall = big - but a short guy need a lot of weight to be considered big
Post by: Bluto on August 18, 2008, 11:08:09 AM
they dont ever say "big beckham" though

Title: Re: tall = big - but a short guy need a lot of weight to be considered big
Post by: Eric2 on August 18, 2008, 02:38:40 PM
Quote from: Bluto on August 18, 2008, 09:37:56 AM
through history tall people automatically been considered big even though they have not weigh much.

clint eastwood never carried a lot of muscle, yet he's refered to as a "big guy" in magnum force from 1973. clint is 6' 2"

snoop dog is known as "big snoop" he's 6' 3½"

but for a short guy to be considered big, he needs a lot of weight doesnt he? or maybe some guys never are considered big, no matter how much they weigh just because theyre too short?

discuss



Clint Was 6'4. He had more muscle than most hollywood guys at this height and era.

(http://www.movieactors.com/photos-clint/clint41.jpeg)
Title: Re: tall = big - but a short guy need a lot of weight to be considered big
Post by: dan18 on August 18, 2008, 02:45:14 PM
Quote from: Bluto on August 18, 2008, 09:37:56 AM
through history tall people automatically been considered big even though they have not weigh much.

clint eastwood never carried a lot of muscle, yet he's refered to as a "big guy" in magnum force from 1973. clint is 6' 2"

snoop dog is known as "big snoop" he's 6' 3½"

but for a short guy to be considered big, he needs a lot of weight doesnt he? or maybe some guys never are considered big, no matter how much they weigh just because theyre too short?

discuss

They call you big dickhead around theses parts and no ones ever seen a pic of you..
So why are you complaining
Title: Re: tall = big - but a short guy need a lot of weight to be considered big
Post by: Bluto on August 18, 2008, 04:09:54 PM