I highlighted the areas where Ronnie beats Dorian. Ronnie has greater overall muscular bulk - larger delts, pecs, arms, and quads. Don't confuse equal weight with meaning they are the same size. Ronnie also displays greater muscle definition. He has more separations and striations from head to toe. I've explained before why they tie in balanced development (as many others have already done), and Dorian wins in density. Thus, Ronnie has the advantage usuing the IFBB judging criteria.
You posted a picture of a 244 pound Ronnie Coleman and you have the balls to say he has more overall muscular bulk than a 260 pound Dorian Yates? am I mistaken ? what school of mathematics did you go to? lol Ronnie at 5'11" and 244 pounds carries more overall muscular bulk than Dorian Yates at 5'10" 260 pounds?
And you also claim Ronnie has larger delts , pecs , arms and quads , how would you know? unless the two were side-by-side , Ronnie despite your claim that he was almost as big as 99 Olympia wasn't extremely big in 01 whenever Ronnie gets extremely dry he gets relatively small , 1998 249 pounds , 2001 244 pounds , anything over 250 pounds his dryness suffers , so for you to claim these parts are all larger is not accurate in all probability his biceps/tricpes might be but I posted the comparison of Yates 95 and Ronnie 01 in the most muscular and Yates clearly has the thicker pecs
01 ASC perhaps matches Yates 1995 in terms of overall conditioning and dryness , however he still lags behind in terms of muscular bulk , muscular density , and muscular balance . balance isn't debateable Dorian's arms were HUGE in 1995 so your claim of calves canceling out arms in fantasy , Dorian's arms biceps/triceps/forearms are all in much better balance & proportion vs Ronnie's calves , and I've proved this point about balance a while back Ronnie doesn't have better balance its not even comparable
forearms are not in proportion with his biceps/triceps
biceps/triceps in the back double biceps dwarf his delts
overdeveloped front & side delts dominate his pecs in the sidechest
calves much to small for his quads
glutes overdeveloped and can be seen from the front and stick out from the back
You don't find these problems with Dorian , I've provided plenty of proof to but this dream back to sleep
Separations & Striations - lets pick apart that one Dorian has better separation in his abdominals , side head of his triceps , intercostals , obliques , serattus , thigh-rod , gastrocnimeus inner & outter head , soleus , traps , lower lats , erector spinae
equal in terms of hams , glutes , delts
Ronnie has better delt-pec tie-ins , upper quad separation , biceps
Dorian meets more of the criteria than Ronnie