Author Topic: Johnnie JAckson Gyno question...  (Read 5174 times)

jaejonna

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14944
  • Head Asian of Getbig
Johnnie JAckson Gyno question...
« on: March 06, 2006, 07:23:11 AM »
The pics on flexonline seem to show that the gyno from JJ has been reduced, it is still evident but they somehow made it look better. Do you guys agree or is it just selective photography because he is a Weider athlete? I thought he had the best back Dbl Bi shot of the show.
L

240 is Back

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 102396
  • Complete website for only $300- www.300website.com
Re: Johnnie JAckson Gyno question...
« Reply #1 on: March 06, 2006, 07:24:07 AM »
My guess is that he had it fixed.  He signed with Weider this year, got a FLEX cover, after they dropped Cook.  Perhaps they paid for the surgery.

Dan-O

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 9729
Re: Johnnie JAckson Gyno question...
« Reply #2 on: March 06, 2006, 07:30:18 AM »
My guess is that he had it fixed.  He signed with Weider this year, got a FLEX cover, after they dropped Cook.  Perhaps they paid for the surgery.

If he had it fixed, the surgeon did a piss poor job!  It's still right there, hanging for all the world to see.


DEFCON

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2061
  • LSD, 100 µg, i.m.
Re: Johnnie JAckson Gyno question...
« Reply #3 on: March 06, 2006, 07:42:24 AM »
I'm sure he's been popping Nolvadex like it's going out of style

bigdumbbell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17468
  • Bon Voyage !
Re: Johnnie JAckson Gyno question...
« Reply #4 on: March 06, 2006, 07:43:52 AM »
dr navarro could fix that problem fast

BroadStreetBruiser

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 8574
  • "In Falcon We Trust"
Re: Johnnie JAckson Gyno question...
« Reply #5 on: March 06, 2006, 07:49:05 AM »
Shame he has no calfs but that doesn't seem to hurt anybody these days
$

robocop

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 877
Re: Johnnie JAckson Gyno question...
« Reply #6 on: March 06, 2006, 08:07:06 AM »
nice bitch tits

Rich2

  • Getbig III
  • ***
  • Posts: 690
  • Getbig!
Re: Johnnie JAckson Gyno question...
« Reply #7 on: March 06, 2006, 08:38:17 AM »
it was definitely better than before.  i probably wouldn't have noticed if i hadnt been looking for it.  if you see the BFTO '05, his gyno is real bad there.  big difference. 

DEFCON

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2061
  • LSD, 100 µg, i.m.
Re: Johnnie JAckson Gyno question...
« Reply #8 on: March 06, 2006, 09:35:10 AM »
Shame he has no calfs but that doesn't seem to hurt anybody these days
they really do suck

Cool Black Clyde

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 217
  • Getbig!
Re: Johnnie JAckson Gyno question...
« Reply #9 on: March 06, 2006, 10:58:24 AM »
Preparation H is a lot cheaper than surgery.

bigdumbbell

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 17468
  • Bon Voyage !
Re: Johnnie JAckson Gyno question...
« Reply #10 on: March 06, 2006, 11:03:07 AM »
Preparation H is a lot cheaper than surgery.
:)
oh yeah  around the eyes   i agree 

ether

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2314
Re: Johnnie JAckson Gyno question...
« Reply #11 on: March 06, 2006, 11:41:42 AM »
On another note,

Why did JJ chose those posing trunks? It seriously looks like he is wearing fruit of the loom up there!

Jr. Yates

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4646
Re: Johnnie JAckson Gyno question...
« Reply #12 on: March 06, 2006, 12:08:51 PM »
wow i never noticed the calves were soo bad before! are those old pics?
bodybuildersreality.com

body88

  • Guest
Re: Johnnie JAckson Gyno question...
« Reply #13 on: March 06, 2006, 12:10:55 PM »
I dont think it gets much worse than that calf wise

Thick ass chest

MisterGX

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1002
  • Getbig!
Re: Johnnie JAckson Gyno question...
« Reply #14 on: March 06, 2006, 12:58:21 PM »
wow i never noticed the calves were soo bad before! are those old pics?

Old as this past Saturday at the ASC.

Adam Empire

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2370
  • Gobias Industries
Re: Johnnie JAckson Gyno question...
« Reply #15 on: March 06, 2006, 05:53:26 PM »
Isn't he a Muscletech athlete too?  Must have enough cash to fix this.
Motherboy (the band).

YoungBlood

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6777
  • Weee!
Re: Johnnie JAckson Gyno question...
« Reply #16 on: March 06, 2006, 06:05:26 PM »
nice bitch tits

No no no no...you have it all wrong.
The standard line is....


Monster Bitch Tits.

Get it Right!!!  :P

DEFCON

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2061
  • LSD, 100 µg, i.m.
Re: Johnnie JAckson Gyno question...
« Reply #17 on: March 06, 2006, 06:27:02 PM »
Isn't he a Muscletech athlete too?  Must have enough cash to fix this.
his tits or his calves?

candidate2025

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3281
  • chillin out relaxing
Re: Johnnie JAckson Gyno question...
« Reply #18 on: March 06, 2006, 06:35:06 PM »
The pics on flexonline seem to show that the gyno from JJ has been reduced, it is still evident but they somehow made it look better. Do you guys agree or is it just selective photography because he is a Weider athlete? I thought he had the best back Dbl Bi shot of the show.
:o :o :o :o :o :o :o :o
d[-_-]b actin all cool

Jr. Yates

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4646
Re: Johnnie JAckson Gyno question...
« Reply #19 on: March 06, 2006, 08:20:43 PM »
Old as this past Saturday at the ASC.
wow! Well in that pic its ridicoulsly noticable!
bodybuildersreality.com