they're not judging on calves, but it's pretty obvious that the other guys with poor calves already have a better overall package than King's. King should consider this 6th place his early Christmas gift.
Why? how were there overall packages better??
King was the hardest, driest guy on stage, and OWNED everyone from the back. His RLS and back double bicep killed everyone. His glutes were shredded, his hams were ripped, and his lower back was lean as can be.
From the front he needs more quad sweep and a lil' more seperation in his thighs, his waist is a tad bigger, but its much improved.
Tell me how Melvin was overall better, when his butt was soft, he was not hard at all, and he has no calves or back width???
Or better yet, Joel Stubbs, who is missing half of his body ( His legs are toothpicks ) place 5th in a bodybuilding show?