Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Soul Crusher on July 18, 2014, 07:56:29 AM

Title: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 18, 2014, 07:56:29 AM
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 18, 2014, 08:19:06 AM
Bump for the libfags who voted for Otwink
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: OzmO on July 18, 2014, 08:25:55 AM
What difference does it make?

The GOP served up a turd and we got OB for the next 4 years.

thanks Repubs.
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 18, 2014, 08:28:52 AM
What difference does it make?

The GOP served up a turd and we got OB for the next 4 years.

thanks Repubs.

Relative to Obama - Romney was not a turd. 

Romney was 10000% CORRECT on this and other issues and look what we got because of the low info idiot voter in this country? 

Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: OzmO on July 18, 2014, 08:39:23 AM
Relative to Obama - Romney was not a turd. 

Romney was 10000% CORRECT on this and other issues and look what we got because of the low info idiot voter in this country? 



Relative to getting elected Romeny was a landsliding shit pile.

If voters are so low info, then the GOP are idiots.   They painted themselves in a corner and fragmented.  OB should have been a 1 termer, but they dropped the ball and whiners continue to cry over thing that don't mean DICK.  Like your youtube vid. 
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: pedro01 on July 18, 2014, 08:45:41 AM
Relative to Obama - Romney was not a turd. 

Romney was 10000% CORRECT on this and other issues and look what we got because of the low info idiot voter in this country? 



Yet you could do nothing to convince your fellow voters of this at the time.

Hence Romney lost.

So why not just shut the fuck up now and practice opening bottles of water? Because quite obviously, your efforts here are wasted... I think on the  bottle opening you have room for improvement but politically, you are pissing in the wind.
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Coach is Back! on July 18, 2014, 09:00:04 AM
What difference does it make?

The GOP served up a turd and we got OB for the next 4 years.

thanks Repubs.

I still don't get how you or anyone would say the repubs served up a turd. It just shows naive "voters" chose personality over substance. If voters would actually start thinking and doing a little research before voting the choose the better candidate. Voting for someone based solely based on race, personality or otherwise is rediculous. Vote on the issues not the bullshit. This would have bee a totally different turn out if based on the issues.
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: LurkerNoMore on July 18, 2014, 09:02:31 AM
Yet you could do nothing to convince your fellow voters of this at the time.

Hence Romney lost.

So why not just shut the fuck up now and practice opening bottles of water? Because quite obviously, your efforts here are wasted... I think on the  bottle opening you have room for improvement but politically, you are pissing in the wind.

LOL!!!
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: whork on July 18, 2014, 09:13:52 AM
Yet you could do nothing to convince your fellow voters of this at the time.

Hence Romney lost.

So why not just shut the fuck up now and practice opening bottles of water? Because quite obviously, your efforts here are wasted... I think on the  bottle opening you have room for improvement but politically, you are pissing in the wind.


 ;D
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: OzmO on July 18, 2014, 09:18:40 AM
I still don't get how you or anyone would say the repubs served up a turd. It just shows naive "voters" chose personality over substance. If voters would actually start thinking and doing a little research before voting the choose the better candidate. Voting for someone based solely based on race, personality or otherwise is rediculous. Vote on the issues not the bullshit. This would have bee a totally different turn out if based on the issues.

I agree, when you say:  "It just shows naive "voters" chose personality over substance."  

And it doesn't take a genius to see that does it?

And I don't think the GOP think tank needed to be geniuses to see that either don't you think?

Yet they served up a corporate big wig with the personality and charisma of a turd.  He may have been far more capable, smarter, better etc., and i would tend to agree, to a point, but he wasn't electable over someone who should have lost by a landslide.  Which speaks volumes of the TURD Romney was.
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 18, 2014, 09:26:27 AM
Yet you could do nothing to convince your fellow voters of this at the time.

Hence Romney lost.

So why not just shut the fuck up now and practice opening bottles of water? Because quite obviously, your efforts here are wasted... I think on the  bottle opening you have room for improvement but politically, you are pissing in the wind.


I cant help it if people were more taken w abortion gay marriage and birth control and getting free shit.  That's on them no me. 
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 18, 2014, 09:28:26 AM
I agree, when you say:  "It just shows naive "voters" chose personality over substance."  

And it doesn't take a genius to see that does it?

And I don't think the GOP think tank needed to be geniuses to see that either don't you think?

Yet they served up a corporate big wig with the personality and charisma of a turd.  He may have been far more capable, smarter, better etc., and i would tend to agree, to a point, but he wasn't electable over someone who should have lost by a landslide.  Which speaks volumes of the TURD Romney was.


No matter who the repubs put up its the same idiotic shit from liberal morons.   Focused on flimsy bs and nothing whatsoever of substance
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 18, 2014, 09:35:31 AM
Again - not one of you leftist clowns dares refutes the clip itself.  B/C you cant and wont bring yourselves to admit what idiots your worship and vote for 
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: OzmO on July 18, 2014, 09:38:59 AM

No matter who the repubs put up its the same idiotic shit from liberal morons.   Focused on flimsy bs and nothing whatsoever of substance

Morons will be morons.  so what?   That hasn't changed since the start of time.  The farther side of each end will always vote there side no matter what.

It's swing voters who decided it and that TURD didn't swing any.
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 18, 2014, 09:42:19 AM
Morons will be morons.  so what?   That hasn't changed since the start of time.  The farther side of each end will always vote there side no matter what.

It's swing voters who decided it and that TURD didn't swing any.

Romney was not my first choice , not even close - but after 4 years of proven failures , lies, scandal corruption etc from Obama, even a random plumber or roofer from the yellow pages would have been worth taking a chance on. 
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: OzmO on July 18, 2014, 09:49:49 AM
Romney was not my first choice , not even close - but after 4 years of proven failures , lies, scandal corruption etc from Obama, even a random plumber or roofer from the yellow pages would have been worth taking a chance on.  

Evidently most didn't think Romney was a good bet.  

And you can blame the fragmentation of the GOP, the constant hate, crying, whining etc. over OB for it.

And OB's political think tank was smart enough to exploit it, yet the right, still even now, WON'T QUIT IT CRYING.    you guys are like a pack if annoying bitches who won't shut up about OB and instead start doing something productive.
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 18, 2014, 09:53:00 AM
Evidently most didn't think Romney was a good bet.  

And you can blame the fragmentation of the GOP, the constant hate, crying, whining etc. over OB for it.

And OB's political think tank was smart enough to exploit it, yet the right, still even now, WON'T QUIT IT CRYING.    you guys are like a pack if annoying bitches who won't shut up about OB and instead start doing something productive.

So long as Reid and Obama are holding office there is nothing productive that can be accomplished. 
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: OzmO on July 18, 2014, 10:19:48 AM
So long as Reid and Obama are holding office there is nothing productive that can be accomplished. 

So long as the right whines like bitches the dems will stay in power.
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: 240 is Back on July 18, 2014, 10:19:52 AM
Relative to Obama - Romney was not a turd.  

actually, romney was a turd next to obama in terms of GETTING ELECTED.

I could go into how romney would have been that much better of a president, but he was the worst kind of liberal - the kind that puts an (R) next to his name.  People chose obama (twice) by wide margins, KNOWING he was the most liberal member of the senate.  

With Romney, let's be honest, they never knew what they were getting.
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 18, 2014, 10:21:37 AM
So long as the right whines like bitches the dems will stay in power.


Not for much longer.  GOP on track to get back the Senate in Nov and hold the house of reps.  Then the fun will start up and Obama will be even more hobbled
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: LurkerNoMore on July 18, 2014, 10:28:11 AM
Romney was not my first choice , not even close - but after 4 years of proven failures , lies, scandal corruption etc from Obama, even a random plumber or roofer from the yellow pages would have been worth taking a chance on. 

Yeah, you were the head cheerleader for Trump.  Then Bachmann.  Then Newt.  Then Cain.   Romney was no means a turd compared to the ones you were rooting for in the beginning.   ::)
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: OzmO on July 18, 2014, 10:51:43 AM
Not for much longer.  GOP on track to get back the Senate in Nov and hold the house of reps.  Then the fun will start up and Obama will be even more hobbled

I  hope so.  Maybe then they can make good on their promises and get something done.
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: whork on July 18, 2014, 04:13:58 PM

I cant help it if people were more taken w abortion gay marriage and birth control and getting free shit.  That's on them no me. 


Yeah that was the only reasons Romney lost.

To many married gay men on free birth control.

Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 21, 2014, 06:52:21 AM
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2014/07/20/feinstein-u-s-russia-relationship-is-at-cold-war-levels


 :D
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Coach is Back! on July 21, 2014, 08:25:40 AM
Yet you could do nothing to convince your fellow voters of this at the time.

Hence Romney lost.


So why not just shut the fuck up now and practice opening bottles of water? Because quite obviously, your efforts here are wasted... I think on the  bottle opening you have room for improvement but politically, you are pissing in the wind.

Wouldn't have to convince anyone if Obama wasn't black. Not racist but the absolute truth. They saw skin and free shit that wasn't really free. Ask Vince why he voted for him, he can't give a viable answer.
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 21, 2014, 08:28:28 AM
Wouldn't have to convince anyone if Obama wasn't black. Not racist but the absolute truth. They saw skin and free shit that wasn't really free. Ask Vince why he voted for him, he can't give a viable answer.

Obama is gay and black  -  do the math  ;)
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: OzmO on July 21, 2014, 08:29:07 AM
Wouldn't have to convince anyone if Obama wasn't black. Not racist but the absolute truth. They saw skin and free shit that wasn't really free. Ask Vince why he voted for him, he can't give a viable answer.

What a racist post.

ROMNEY FAILED.   He was fucking turd.  The GOP song and dance was revolting.

Get over it already.  
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 21, 2014, 08:30:52 AM
What a racist post.

ROMNEY FAILED.   He was fucking turd.  The GOP song and dance was revolting.

Get over it already.  

And Obama was better why?   Tell me why?  Give one reason why Obama was better that does not blame Romney, W, palin, fox, etc. 
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Coach is Back! on July 21, 2014, 08:31:21 AM
What a racist post.

ROMNEY FAILED.   He was fucking turd.  The GOP song and dance was revolting.

Get over it already.  

That wasn't racist in any way shape or form. I was stating a fact.
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Coach is Back! on July 21, 2014, 08:32:25 AM
What a racist post.

ROMNEY FAILED.   He was fucking turd.  The GOP song and dance was revolting.

Get over it already.  

How did Romney fail? He destroyed him on all issues.
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: OzmO on July 21, 2014, 08:35:40 AM
That wasn't racist in any way shape or form. I was stating a fact.

You wouldn't know what a fact was if it slapped you in the face.

How did Romney fail? He destroyed him on all issues.

How did he fail?

HE FAILED TO GET THE VOTES NEEDED TO WIN THE FUCKING ELECTION!!!!!!!!!

That's how he failed!

 ::)

Jesus H Christ, you people are so fucking stupid. 

 :)
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: OzmO on July 21, 2014, 08:36:53 AM
And Obama was better why?   Tell me why?  Give one reason why Obama was better that does not blame Romney, W, palin, fox, etc. 

He got the votes,  Romeny didn't when it should have been a LANDSLIDE.

Doesn't matter who is better, it matters who actually wins.  Because as you can see, all the losers do is cry like little baby bitches.
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 21, 2014, 08:38:20 AM
He got the votes,  Romeny didn't when it should have been a LANDSLIDE.

Doesn't matter who is better, it matters who actually wins.  Because as you can see, all the losers do is cry like little baby bitches.


We have a dumbed down population - that is not Romeny's fault.  Obama benefitted from an idiot voting base, offering free stuff to lazy slugs, etc a media in the tank etc
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: OzmO on July 21, 2014, 08:50:56 AM

We have a dumbed down population - that is not Romeny's fault.  Obama benefitted from an idiot voting base, offering free stuff to lazy slugs, etc a media in the tank etc

And Romany didn't attract the swing voters making it HIS FAULT

Also, yes we have a dumbed down population compounded by talking head polarity. 
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: LurkerNoMore on July 21, 2014, 08:51:14 AM
You wouldn't know what a fact was if it slapped you in the face.

How did he fail?

HE FAILED TO GET THE VOTES NEEDED TO WIN THE FUCKING ELECTION!!!!!!!!!

That's how he failed!

 ::)

Jesus H Christ, you people are so fucking stupid. 

 :)


HAHAHAHAHA.  Hell, Romney barely convinced his own party to support him.  He was simply the last candidate left after all the others had the lime light and self destructed in it.
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 21, 2014, 08:57:15 AM

HAHAHAHAHA.  Hell, Romney barely convinced his own party to support him.  He was simply the last candidate left after all the others had the lime light and self destructed in it.

Funny how despite obamas horrendous record of lies failures scandal hypocrisy cover ups broken promises deceit etc he had no problem doing the same for the radical libs and leftists who still would march off a cliff for their messiah
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: OzmO on July 21, 2014, 09:00:02 AM
Funny how despite obamas horrendous record of lies failures scandal hypocrisy cover ups broken promises deceit etc he had no problem doing the same for the radical libs and leftists who still would march off a cliff for their messiah

Why is that so funny?

Was it any surprise that many vote their party no matter what?

EVERYONE KNOWS THAT!

But you dumb fucks are still acting as if that why OB won.
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Dos Equis on July 21, 2014, 09:53:50 AM
Meh.  Saul Alinksy's Rules for Radicals played as much of a role as anything.  Media bias helped a great deal.  The only thing I'd really fault Romney for is having a pretty bad ground game on election day. 

There are some who think he should have gotten in the mud more, and it probably would have helped him, but he stayed true to he was.  Not necessarily a recipe for success against a corrupt Chicago politician, but I like the fact he didn't get wrapped up in the sleaze. 

And he was right about Russia (and many other things). 
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 21, 2014, 10:38:33 AM
http://twitchy.com/2014/07/21/thanks-for-admitting-romney-was-right-david-axelrods-memory-jogged-after-putin-criticism/?utm_source=autotweet&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=twitter



LMFAO!@!!!!

OWNED
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: OzmO on July 21, 2014, 11:01:39 AM
Meh.  Saul Alinksy's Rules for Radicals played as much of a role as anything.  Media bias helped a great deal.  The only thing I'd really fault Romney for is having a pretty bad ground game on election day. 

There are some who think he should have gotten in the mud more, and it probably would have helped him, but he stayed true to he was.  Not necessarily a recipe for success against a corrupt Chicago politician, but I like the fact he didn't get wrapped up in the sleaze. 

And he was right about Russia (and many other things). 

Its about winning the election.  You can't confuse efforts with results.  Everything else is a bull shit excuse.

He was a turd.
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Straw Man on July 21, 2014, 11:13:36 AM
Obama is gay and black  -  do the math  ;)

just thought I would check in and make sure you were doing the same thing you've done every other day for the last 6 years

when I do the math you look like a pathetic self loathing closet queen



Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Dos Equis on July 21, 2014, 11:15:32 AM
Its about winning the election.  You can't confuse efforts with results.  Everything else is a bull shit excuse.

He was a turd.

It's not an excuse to explain why he lost. 
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 21, 2014, 11:18:55 AM
just thought I would check in and make sure you were doing the same thing you've done every other day for the last 6 years

when I do the math you look like a pathetic self loathing closet queen





Vince is gay and black - you think he is going to give up the chance to vote for another gay black guy - probably the only in his lifetime? 
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 21, 2014, 11:30:09 AM
It's not an excuse to explain why he lost. 

someone who voted for free shit in voting for ofag is not going be swayed by logic or reason for the other guy no matter what.  Liberal layabouts and locusts care about few things - lgbt, welfare, free stuff, stealing from others, and leeching off the others. 
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Coach is Back! on July 21, 2014, 11:31:05 AM
Its about winning the election.  You can't confuse efforts with results.  Everything else is a bull shit excuse.

He was a turd.


Even though Obama KNEW he couldn't do the job he still ran on knowing that fact. It's all about the power of having that position to not better the country but rather having a constant fundraising platform. But here's the kicker, there was proven massive voter fraud orchestrated by the left, the left media, the black panthers and everyone on the inside. This is conspiracy no theory Ozmo. You don't win 100% of the vote in multiple precincts no matter who you are. Just because he won by a "landslide" doesn't mean he could do the job...OBVIOUSLY!
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Coach is Back! on July 21, 2014, 11:33:25 AM
Vince is gay and black - you think he is going to give up the chance to vote for another gay black LIBERAL guy - probably the only in his lifetime? 

Fixed..


You'll never see Vince or any other black liberal vote for MEN like Allen West or Dr. Ben Carson.
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: LurkerNoMore on July 21, 2014, 11:43:30 AM
Fixed..


You'll never see Vince or any other black liberal vote for MEN like Allen West or Dr. Ben Carson.


Two fucking kooks.  Won't see anyone else vote for them either except fellow idiots.
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 21, 2014, 11:44:28 AM

Two fucking kooks.  Won't see anyone else vote for them either except fellow idiots.

LMFAO!!!!

One is a war hero

One is a world famous surgeoun



Yes you worship the communist stooge.  You are the kook and the perv
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: OzmO on July 21, 2014, 11:49:12 AM

Even though Obama KNEW he couldn't do the job he still ran on knowing that fact.

Sorry Coach, that's just a dumb statement.

Quote
It's all about the power of having that position to not better the country but rather having a constant fundraising platform. But here's the kicker, there was proven massive voter fraud orchestrated by the left, the left media, the black panthers and everyone on the inside. This is conspiracy no theory Ozmo. You don't win 100% of the vote in multiple precincts no matter who you are. Just because he won by a "landslide" doesn't mean he could do the job...OBVIOUSLY!

So now you think OB winning was massive a CT?

Its not about who could or could not do the job.  Its about who did what it took to get the job.  Romney=FAIL
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Coach is Back! on July 21, 2014, 12:00:03 PM
Sorry Coach, that's just a dumb statement.

I don't think so. He hasn't had any experience or success even as a community organizer. If fact it was a disaster. He knew going in he was over his head and he still has to think this. If he rational in anyway, he knows this.

So now you think OB winning was massive a CT?

Its not about who could or could not do the job.  Its about who did what it took to get the job.  Romney=FAIL

No, I'm not saying he would not have enough votes, he would have. But I think it's the "landslide" everyone thinks it is.


Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 21, 2014, 12:07:31 PM
Sorry Coach, that's just a dumb statement.

So now you think OB winning was massive a CT?

Its not about who could or could not do the job.  Its about who did what it took to get the job.  Romney=FAIL


uummmmm   no - Obama admitted he was not ready for the job



Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: OzmO on July 21, 2014, 12:09:12 PM


Coach you can't argue with results.  He got elected to highest office twice.  The second time, after fucking up as bad as you say....and if that's the case, by getting elected again, even against such as "good  capable" candidate as you all seem to say Romney was, Makes OB fucking brilliant and capable. Or it just makes you and the GOP the biggest bunch of inept buffoons ever to walk the earth.
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: James28 on July 21, 2014, 12:12:14 PM
Wouldn't have to convince anyone if Obama wasn't black. Not racist but the absolute truth. They saw skin and free shit that wasn't really free. Ask Vince why he voted for him, he can't give a viable answer.

Off course Vince voted on skin color.

Do you always vote Republican on impulse or do you research? If not, how does it make you any different?
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 21, 2014, 12:16:46 PM
Coach you can't argue with results.  He got elected to highest office twice.  The second time, after fucking up as bad as you say....and if that's the case, by getting elected again, even against such as "good  capable" candidate as you all seem to say Romney was, Makes OB fucking brilliant and capable. Or it just makes you and the GOP the biggest bunch of inept buffoons ever to walk the earth.

Charlie Rangle got elected for decades as did Marion Barry and other worthless criminals. 
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: OzmO on July 21, 2014, 12:18:24 PM
Charlie Rangle got elected for decades as did Marion Barry and other worthless criminals. 

I know, worthless, but smarter, more and more savvy then those who ran against them.

Or...  you might conclude that our population now matches that of DC when Marion got elected. 
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Coach is Back! on July 21, 2014, 12:43:19 PM
Off course Vince voted on skin color.

Do you always vote Republican on impulse or do you research? If not, how does it make you any different?

I research as well as follow certain candidates. I don't vote based on color, race or gender. I try to vote for the best candidate. Liberals/Dems vote on emotion not on the facts of an issue. If Killary becomes President, it be solely because she's a women. Nothing else.
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 21, 2014, 12:45:05 PM
I know, worthless, but smarter, more and more savvy then those who ran against them.

Or...  you might conclude that our population now matches that of DC when Marion got elected. 

In many distrcts - it is so gerrymandered that winning the primary is harder than the general
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Coach is Back! on July 21, 2014, 12:46:36 PM
I know, worthless, but smarter, more and more savvy then those who ran against them.

Or...  you might conclude that our population now matches that of DC when Marion got elected. 

They're good politicians but horrible, corrupt public servants.
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: whork on July 21, 2014, 12:59:07 PM
Wouldn't have to convince anyone if Obama wasn't black. Not racist but the absolute truth. They saw skin and free shit that wasn't really free. Ask Vince why he voted for him, he can't give a viable answer.

Some voted for him just because he is black.

But then again some DID NOT vote for him because he was black.

So what is your point?
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: whork on July 21, 2014, 01:02:16 PM
I research as well as follow certain candidates. I don't vote based on color, race or gender. I try to vote for the best candidate. Liberals/Dems vote on emotion not on the facts of an issue. If Killary becomes President, it be solely because she's a women. Nothing else.


So Obama only won because he is black.

And if Hillary wins its only because she is woman.

Does anybody take you seriously IRL Coach?

You seem a little "off" are you the same person in your everyday life as the one you presume to be here?
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: OzmO on July 21, 2014, 01:08:09 PM

So Obama only won because he is black.

And if Hillary wins its only because she is woman.

Does anybody take you seriously IRL Coach?

You seem a little "off" are you the same person in your everyday life as the one you presume to be here?


the real question is:  when will your party accept ownership of their failures?
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: LurkerNoMore on July 21, 2014, 01:12:24 PM
LMFAO!!!!

One is a war hero

One is a world famous surgeoun



Yes you worship the communist stooge.  You are the kook and the perv

McCain was a war hero too.  And white.  Didn't help him too much.

But don't worry, I am sure you will be cheerleading for the bottom of the barrel again.  It will be amusing to watch.
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: LurkerNoMore on July 21, 2014, 01:14:14 PM
I research as well as follow certain candidates. I don't vote based on color, race or gender. I try to vote for the best candidate. Liberals/Dems vote on emotion not on the facts of an issue. If Killary becomes President, it be solely because she's a women. Nothing else.

Translation : "I vote how Rush tells me to".
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 21, 2014, 01:21:35 PM
McCain was a war hero too.  And white.  Didn't help him too much.

But don't worry, I am sure you will be cheerleading for the bottom of the barrel again.  It will be amusing to watch.

LOL - bottom of the barrel?

Tell me how the gay black homo you worship is better than West or Carson on any level at all? 
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: James28 on July 21, 2014, 01:49:21 PM
I research as well as follow certain candidates. I don't vote based on color, race or gender. I try to vote for the best candidate. Liberals/Dems vote on emotion not on the facts of an issue. If Killary becomes President, it be solely because she's a women. Nothing else.

But you presumably ALWAYS vote Republican?
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Dos Equis on July 21, 2014, 01:50:40 PM
uummmmm   no - Obama admitted he was not ready for the job





We should have listened to him.   :-\
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: LurkerNoMore on July 21, 2014, 02:39:10 PM
LOL - bottom of the barrel?

Tell me how the gay black homo you worship is better than West or Carson on any level at all? 

Gay?  Are you projecting again? 

Quote
Projecting false assumptions onto other people you don't even know
helps you with your BBC obsession?  Is that it?  Life is difficult
enough being a midget and living in the ghetto.  Rather than seeking meds
for the mental instability you have given yourself with your self loathing,
you instead attempt to feel better with projections.
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Coach is Back! on July 21, 2014, 04:15:35 PM
But you presumably ALWAYS vote Republican?

Yes, but that has really nothing to do with what we're discussing. We're talking about voting just for the sake of color. Not even Lurker can tell you why he voted for Obama other than the fact he jumped on the "because he's black" bandwagon.
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: 240 is Back on July 21, 2014, 05:06:27 PM
Yes, but that has really nothing to do with what we're discussing. We're talking about voting just for the sake of color. Not even Lurker can tell you why he voted for Obama other than the fact he jumped on the "because he's black" bandwagon.

Obama won because he won the swing vote both time, there is no arguing that.   If you're saying swing voters will vote any african-american or woman candidate, why dont you call up reince priebus and the RNC, and tell them!   Cain/Palin can WIN WIN WIN the 2016 election!

tough to blame 'libs' when SWING VOTERS are the ones that decide EVERY election.  If you're saying they only voted obama due to color, and would have given it to hilary due to gender - I think you just solved the GOP issue for 2016.   Right?
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: 240 is Back on July 21, 2014, 05:09:30 PM
47% are gonna vote dem every time.
47% are gonna vote repub every time.

This is undeniable.  You can always count on this.  It's the middle 5-6% that decides every election.  Who they like, if they bother showing up, etc.   It's tough to blame race/gender on them, then not use that strategy yourself.  Swing voters chose a black president in 2008.  So why didn't the repubs nominate a black candidate in 2012?  They were just too fcking stupid to pick Cain.  WHY?  If you are correct that SWING VOTERS only care about skin color/gender, why didn't Cain/Bachmann whoop the shit out of Obama in 2012?
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Straw Man on July 21, 2014, 05:50:30 PM
47% are gonna vote dem every time.
47% are gonna vote repub every time.

This is undeniable.  You can always count on this.  It's the middle 5-6% that decides every election.  Who they like, if they bother showing up, etc.   It's tough to blame race/gender on them, then not use that strategy yourself.  Swing voters chose a black president in 2008.  So why didn't the repubs nominate a black candidate in 2012?  They were just too fcking stupid to pick Cain.  WHY?  If you are correct that SWING VOTERS only care about skin color/gender, why didn't Cain/Bachmann whoop the shit out of Obama in 2012?

Obama is half black so maybe, according to your theory, the swing voters voted for the white half of Obama.

or

Maybe they couldn't vote for an old man who had a public meltdown on the campaign trail or maybe they were worried he would croak in office and we'd be stuck with Bible Spice as POTUS
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: LurkerNoMore on July 21, 2014, 06:19:15 PM
HAHAHA the last three posts contain undeniable facts and logic.  And if you try to argue otherwise, you are just an idiot.
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: OzmO on July 21, 2014, 08:17:32 PM
HAHAHA the last three posts contain undeniable facts and logic.  And if you try to argue otherwise, you are just an idiot.

Hence...Romney was a turd lol
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Straw Man on July 21, 2014, 08:28:09 PM
Hence...Romney was a turd lol

or the simple fact that a majority of voters preferred to keep Obama for a second term than replace him with Romney

Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: 240 is Back on July 21, 2014, 08:34:49 PM
or the simple fact that a majority of voters preferred to keep Obama for a second term than replace him with Romney

that is too difficult for many on the right to face.   Cause it means 1) the majority of the nation is actually liberal, and/or 2) Romney really was a horrible candidate, representative of a party that doesn't know if it is RINO or tea party.

So instead of trying to change mindset of a liberal majority, to shift them to conservatism...
So instead of trying to narrow down party platform to a more united set of beliefs (as the pissy liberals have)
So instead of admitting "we have shit luck with RINO canddiates but conservatives do well"...

Instead of these things (which could very much lead to a win), they will probably continue the trend of
1) shitting on libs without telling swing voters why conservatism is actually better
2) Try to please all with "we love amnesty" and "we love locking the border" simultaneously lol
3) Pick another rino and shit all over Cruz
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: LurkerNoMore on July 21, 2014, 09:01:32 PM
Hence...Romney was a turd lol

Yes.  He was.  He was the best turd of that whole bunch and did better than anyone else could have and yet, still LOST.

Suck it up.  Deal with it.  Get over it.  Or just put your head in the sand and keep whining.  Either way, that little game plan has proven it doesn't work.
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Mr.1derful on July 21, 2014, 09:07:03 PM


Republican or Democrat, it's the same shit, just a different pile.  They both answer to the same people.  Romney may not have been any worse, but he would not have been any better.
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: LurkerNoMore on July 22, 2014, 05:37:03 AM
Republican or Democrat, it's the same shit, just a different pile.  They both answer to the same people.  Romney may not have been any worse, but he would not have been any better.


QFT!
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Dos Equis on July 22, 2014, 01:30:21 PM
Republican or Democrat, it's the same shit, just a different pile.  They both answer to the same people.  Romney may not have been any worse, but he would not have been any better.

He would have been much better.  The Obamacare disaster, or at least parts of it, would have been avoided.  He would not have funded terrorists.  He would have done a much better job running the country, and he has the track record to prove it.  No on-the-job training for him, unlike President Obama. 
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Straw Man on July 22, 2014, 02:21:42 PM
He would have been much better.  The Obamacare disaster, or at least parts of it, would have been avoided.  He would not have funded terrorists.  He would have done a much better job running the country, and he has the track record to prove it.  No on-the-job training for him, unlike President Obama. 

LOL - nice imagination but you know full well you have no clue how Romney would have handled ANYTHING

Given the history of Republican POTUS's it's much more likely he would have been an unmitigated disaster for the country fiscally, socially and with foreign policy (I see you've already forgotten disastrous mid campaign tour of Europe in 2012)

Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 22, 2014, 02:25:57 PM
LOL - nice imagination but you know full well you have no clue how Romney would have handled ANYTHING

Given the history of Republican POTUS's it's much more likely he would have been an unmitigated disaster for the country fiscally, socially and with foreign policy (I see you've already forgotten disastrous mid campaign tour of Europe in 2012)




LOL!!!!  LOL!!!

Fuck you moron.    Your ghetto pos messiah is DONE 

The debate clip I posted proved wo a shadow of a doubt how ignorant and clueless he is
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Straw Man on July 22, 2014, 03:09:26 PM

LOL!!!!  LOL!!!

Fuck you moron.    Your ghetto pos messiah is DONE 

The debate clip I posted proved wo a shadow of a doubt how ignorant and clueless he is

Is that the best you can do queer?

I assume by "done" you mean that after he completes his second term he will no longer be allowed to run for POTUS again

great job making this board the piece of shit that it is (same goes for the Mods who allow this crap)
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: LurkerNoMore on July 22, 2014, 05:00:26 PM
He would have been much better.  The Obamacare disaster, or at least parts of it, would have been avoided.  He would not have funded terrorists.  He would have done a much better job running the country, and he has the track record to prove it.  No on-the-job training for him, unlike President Obama. 

Speculation does not equate into facts.  At least not for the average person.  It takes a special kind of stupid to try to pass a "what if" and "maybe" off as facts.
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Dos Equis on July 22, 2014, 05:14:09 PM
Speculation does not equate into facts.  At least not for the average person.  It takes a special kind of stupid to try to pass a "what if" and "maybe" off as facts.

It takes a pretty creepy stalker to keep pictures of internet strangers on your computer hard drive. 

Also, you don't understand the difference between opinion and fact.  Try Google.  It's awesome. 
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: LurkerNoMore on July 22, 2014, 06:09:13 PM
It takes a pretty creepy stalker to keep pictures of internet strangers on your computer hard drive. 

Also, you don't understand the difference between opinion and fact.  Try Google.  It's awesome. 

It's takes a pretty stupid person to attempt a piss poor deflection (which is completely untrue) because they have no other argument.  Which as we have learned, you certainly qualify for. 

Apparently, I do understand the difference between opinion and fact as I am not the one that is trying to pass a flawed opinion and outright speculation off as factual evidence of what "maybe" have happened if the GOP turd got elected.

Come back with more deflection and speculation.  It's not like we haven't seen it all from you before.
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Dos Equis on July 22, 2014, 06:23:59 PM
It's takes a pretty stupid person to attempt a piss poor deflection (which is completely untrue) because they have no other argument.  Which as we have learned, you certainly qualify for. 

Apparently, I do understand the difference between opinion and fact as I am not the one that is trying to pass a flawed opinion and outright speculation off as factual evidence of what "maybe" have happened if the GOP turd got elected.

Come back with more deflection and speculation.  It's not like we haven't seen it all from you before.

Creepy stalker, did get your Soul Crusher fix in today?  Did you ever actually go visit him in New York?  And how many pictures of Soul Crusher do you have on your hard drive?  Enquiring minds want to know . . . .

No, you do't know the difference between fact and opinion.  Saying someone would have been a better leader is an opinion.  Not a fact.  You are free to disagree with my opinion . . . in between gazing at pictures of Soul Crusher, while you simultaneously repeatedly call him gay. 
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: LurkerNoMore on July 22, 2014, 06:26:57 PM
Creepy stalker, did get your Soul Crusher fix in today?  Did you ever actually go visit him in New York?  And how many pictures of Soul Crusher do you have on your hard drive?  Enquiring minds want to know . . . .

No, you do't know the difference between fact and opinion.  Saying someone would have been a better leader is an opinion.  Not a fact.  You are free to disagree with my opinion . . . in between gazing at pictures of Soul Crusher, while you simultaneously repeatedly call him gay. 


MELTDOWN!!!

Here's a fact :   You have revealed yourself to be one of the biggest idiots on this board in the past week. 
Here's an opinion : Maybe they will discover a cure for stupidity one day.  For your sake, I hope so.
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Dos Equis on July 22, 2014, 06:30:56 PM

MELTDOWN!!!

Here's a fact :   You have revealed yourself to be one of the biggest idiots on this board in the past week. 
Here's an opinion : Maybe they will discover a cure for stupidity one day.  For your sake, I hope so.

LOL!  You know what, I'm not willing to pay money to fly and see you (like you wanted to do with Soul Crusher), but I am willing to buy you a dictionary.  My expense.  I'll ask Soul Crusher for his address, mail it to him, and you can pick it up from him.  Kill two birds with one stone:  learn the meaning of words, which you really struggle with, and satisfy your Soul Crusher obsession.  See how helpful I can be?   :)

But focus:  an opinion is not a fact. 
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 22, 2014, 06:36:40 PM
LOL!  You know what, I'm not willing to pay money to fly and see you (like you wanted to do with Soul Crusher), but I am willing to buy you a dictionary.  My expense.  I'll ask Soul Crusher for his address, mail it to him, and you can pick it up from him.  Kill two birds with one stone:  learn the meaning of words, which you really struggle with, and satisfy your Soul Crusher obsession.  See how helpful I can be?   :)

But focus:  an opinion is not a fact. 

I have said many times - anyone on this site is welcome to train w me any time at NYSC.   
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: LurkerNoMore on July 22, 2014, 06:42:22 PM
LOL!  You know what, I'm not willing to pay money to fly and see you (like you wanted to do with Soul Crusher), but I am willing to buy you a dictionary.  My expense.  I'll ask Soul Crusher for his address, mail it to him, and you can pick it up from him.  Kill two birds with one stone:  learn the meaning of words, which you really struggle with, and satisfy your Soul Crusher obsession.  See how helpful I can be?   :)

But focus:  an opinion is not a fact. 

You really are stupid aren't you?  I don't mean in a Can't Help It kind of way.  I mean it in a Mama Dropped Me On My Head As A Child kind of way. 

Hint :  I never said an opinion is a fact.  I said :

Quote
Speculation does not equate into facts.

You may want to keep that dictionary for yourself.  True to form, your next post will be back pedaling or deflection. 

Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Dos Equis on July 22, 2014, 06:52:05 PM
I have said many times - anyone on this site is welcome to train w me any time at NYSC.   

Careful now.  You already have two groupies. 
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Straw Man on July 22, 2014, 07:23:43 PM
I have said many times - anyone on this site is welcome to train w me any time at NYSC.   

LOL - closet queen is now trolling this board for dates?

Why do you think anyone here would want to train with you.
You were a fat pile a shit a few years ago and all you learned to do was stop shoving food down your pie hole and suddenly you think you're some kind of guru?

Also, how can you find time to train when you spend 24 hours a day on this board reminding us all about your gay fantasies regarding Obama.
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Skip8282 on July 22, 2014, 07:46:02 PM
Careful now.  You already have two groupies. 



33 must be slacking.  I think he used to have like 6 stalkers at one point.

Gotta step up the pace, lol.
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Straw Man on July 22, 2014, 08:01:49 PM


33 must be slacking.  I think he used to have like 6 stalkers at one point.

Gotta step up the pace, lol.

you and Beach Bunny should go find a dictionary and look up the words groupie and stalker

this is a message board and 333 begs for attention and even starts threads about himself

his "groupies" would be people like you and Bum and a few others

he has no stalkers because you can't stalk someone who literally begs for attention, even doing so by name

If he has anything on this board it would be bullies, but even that is not a fair label given his daily plea for attention

come on Skippy, I expected a bit more intelligence from you
 
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Dos Equis on July 22, 2014, 08:05:27 PM


33 must be slacking.  I think he used to have like 6 stalkers at one point.

Gotta step up the pace, lol.

Right?  But I think Lurker and the Village Idiot stalk him so much it's like have six groupies.  lol   :)
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Straw Man on July 22, 2014, 08:08:31 PM
Right?  But I think Lurker and the Village Idiot stalk him so much it's like have six groupies.  lol   :)

you are his groupie

unless you're just making up your own definition of the word groupie

You, of course, are my bitch

It would be nice if you and the other mods would actually do your job and stop this mental patient from ruining this board so that we could actually have a political debate

you know.....just follow your own rules
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: LurkerNoMore on July 23, 2014, 05:35:36 AM
Right?  But I think Lurker and the Village Idiot stalk him so much it's like have six groupies.  lol   :)

The only groupie he has that I see is you.  Seeing how you are constantly running around trying to protect him and delete posts that expose him for the mental case he truly is.  You certainly put a lot of time and effort into that. 

You certainly decided to see how high your STUPID level would go it appears.
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 23, 2014, 05:40:53 AM
The only groupie he has that I see is you.  Seeing how you are constantly running around trying to protect him and delete posts that expose him for the mental case he truly is.  You certainly put a lot of time and effort into that. 

You certainly decided to see how high your STUPID level would go it appears.


You are one creepy perv -

At least Straw didn't offer to fly me to his house like you did
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: LurkerNoMore on July 23, 2014, 05:57:51 AM

You are one creepy perv -

At least Straw didn't offer to fly me to his house like you did

Boo Hoo.  I didn't offer you to come my house.  I don't bring gays or midgets to my house.  Keep trying though.

Creepy is waking up every day of your life for the past eight years thinking about Obama and projecting your lust for his BBC on this board for everyone else to see. 

8.
Eight.
Ocho.
VIII.
7+1
9-1

^^^ That many years of everyday meltdowns and gay projections. 
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Dos Equis on July 23, 2014, 08:56:01 AM
Boo Hoo.  I didn't offer you to come my house.  I don't bring gays or midgets to my house.  Keep trying though.


Quote
No internet photos.  Why?  Because I already said you were a fake.

Don't want to wait until June?  How about this.  Check airfare and get a ticket, I will send half the price of the ticket to whoever you want me to on this board to cover my share of you flying down to Ft Lauderdale and showing me drivers license and proof. 

You want a bet.  That's the bet.  None of this bullshit internet crap.  Hell, wasn't even too long ago you were claiming you couldn't post a copy of a simple (but fake) letter about Obama raising your insurance rates.  Why would I expect you to be capable of doing any better now?

You got a choice, I will be there end of June, or I will cover half the expense for your fat ass to come here and show it.  You want to make a deal, there is your option.  If you can't deliver proof in real life I am not interested in your bullshit.

So little bitch... what's it going to be?  We got a deal or you just got more excuses?

Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: Soul Crusher on July 23, 2014, 08:57:51 AM


No that's not creepy or perverted at all.   :D  :D  :D
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: LurkerNoMore on July 23, 2014, 11:31:34 AM


What part of that is about coming to my house?   ::)

We already know you are stupid. That is documented and proven right here on this board.  But if you are under a misconception of what I said being anything other than a chance for him to prove his claims, well... you are stupider than I thought.  Which I have to admit is pretty fucking stupid in the first place.

But don't let the truth interfere with your salvation.  Every time you get your ass handed to you - which is happening more and more frequently - you have to run back to this post and cling to it like a drowning man hugging a life preserver. 
Title: Re: Romney v Obama debate - LMFAO x 1,000,000 how wrong O-twink was
Post by: LurkerNoMore on July 23, 2014, 11:32:17 AM
No that's not creepy or perverted at all.   :D  :D  :D

Nowhere near as creepy as a ghetto dwelling midget lusting after a black man to the point he can't keep his gay fantasies to himself.