1
shame you dont have a friend to get you a six pack you bloated fuck
who's the bitch on the bottom row left hand side with the
Enormous Bolt on's ??
Yes. My dad rip.
I would say if someone doesn't ever train to failure they aren't really training almost. While not hitting failure on say squats when you are an experienced lifter can be very prudent, if someone doesn't hit failure on say cable tricep extensions or bicep curls, they aren't really training hard enough. Because you have to do work in that failure zone a lot, first as newbie to learn effort and where the failure point lies, and then as advanced to get enough stimulus. I would bet you hit failure too on these small exercises, no?
I always say that many peoole say they hit failure every working set on quads but here almost no one actually does, because on the angled leg press how often do we actually see someone actually fail and have to hit the bottom stoppers and squeezy out of the machine? Lol. Almost never, most don't even use a spotter so even hard trainers are mostly 1-2-3 reps from failure when they abort. Anyone here disagree? And like I said, if those study subjects of Schoenfeld actually hit failure they are not doing more than 2 sets, let alone 10 sets of squats or 45 sets a week for legs, or whatever is claimed.
Drugs are often the most dramatic for guys with meager physiques, not that I recommend starting to anyone, never have, because it almost always ends up being for life as you mostly "can't" train without them once you start.
The hero to the caulk suckers...i=FZStOq_DmbmrEogu
Prime writes for Pub Med now...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11453517/
Good, expensive, foods(meat, eggs, raw cream) and hefty volume(without failure) seems to work "best". There's also a delicious overlap with the right amount of intensity required which can only be gauged by doing an exercise and setting adequate base points.
Never took "drugs" as it would be a waste on my meager physique.