Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Gossip & Opinions / Re: Random Bodybuilding Pics
« Last post by NarcissisticDeity on Today at 04:55:32 AM »
 :)
2
Gossip & Opinions / Re: Tyson vs. Paul
« Last post by bhank on Today at 04:55:24 AM »
shame you dont have a friend to get you a six pack you bloated fuck

Well I don't drink so I don't have any desire for a 6 pack of beer
3
Gossip & Opinions / Re: Your 2024 NY Pro Champ !!
« Last post by Rambone on Today at 04:54:46 AM »
who's the bitch on the bottom row left hand side with the
Enormous Bolt on's ??   ;D

The girl next to her looks mighty fine
4
Gossip & Opinions / Re: Hormones and intense excercise builds muscle
« Last post by bhank on Today at 04:49:18 AM »
You guys also need to remember carbs and fats are protein sparring. Too many guys eat a ton of protein and not enough carbs and fats well guess what you just wasted all that protein as it will be used inefficiently for energy instead of muscle growth.

And 200 calories extra a day lol your body doesn't pump out the exact same amount of hormones everyday. You don't have the exact amount of activity everyday. It is ok to eat more calories on days you have more hunger. Listen to your body if it is telling you to eat more there is a reason. Look at children they don't grow in a linear fashion the exact same amount everyday they go through growth spurts. The body will stay at the same weight forever then put 10lbs on in a week. When your body wants to grow feed it.
5
Gossip & Opinions / Re: Cancer Mortality After Vaccine Dose
« Last post by illuminati on Today at 04:42:24 AM »
Yes. My dad rip.


Same - it certainly didn't help my Dad either.

Bastards
6
Gossip & Opinions / Re: Hormones and intense excercise builds muscle
« Last post by bhank on Today at 04:39:24 AM »
I would say if someone doesn't ever train to failure they aren't really training almost. While not hitting failure on say squats when you are an experienced lifter can be very prudent, if someone doesn't hit failure on say cable tricep extensions or bicep curls, they aren't really training hard enough. Because you have to do work in that failure zone a lot, first as newbie to learn effort and where the failure point lies, and then as advanced to get enough stimulus. I would bet you hit failure too on these small exercises, no?

I always say that many peoole say they hit failure every working set on quads but here almost no one actually does, because on the angled leg press how often do we actually see someone actually fail and have to hit the bottom stoppers and squeezy out of the machine? Lol. Almost never, most don't even use a spotter so even hard trainers are mostly 1-2-3 reps from failure when they abort. Anyone here disagree? And like I said, if those study subjects of Schoenfeld actually hit failure they are not doing more than 2 sets, let alone 10 sets of squats or 45 sets a week for legs, or whatever is claimed.

Drugs are often the most dramatic for guys with meager physiques, not that I recommend starting to anyone, never have, because it almost always ends up being for life as you mostly "can't" train without them once you start.

I am going to disagree and let me explain why. I do a warmup set to "failure" at the beginning of every workout. Pretty much just a lactic acid burn for example I managed 39 reps on leg extensions as my warmup set yesterday. I then banged out heavier sets of around 15-20 reps. Was I hitting absolute failure no I could have gotten another rep or 2 if I had wanted. However I do feel a couple heavy working sets is better than one light set to failure.

I mean just think about it what is better one light set to absolute failure or 5 heavy sets close to failure? The idea is to get a pump and blood and nutrients into the muscle not just to hit failure. If you hit complete failure warming up you don't have neough to hit working sets hard. Those hard working sets are better than just one set to failure.
7
The hero to the caulk suckers...

i=FZStOq_DmbmrEogu


Forks stick a pork in him he's done  :D ;D ;D :D
9

Good, expensive, foods(meat, eggs, raw cream) and hefty volume(without failure) seems to work "best". There's also a delicious overlap with the right amount of intensity required which can only be gauged by doing an exercise and setting adequate base points.

Never took "drugs" as it would be a waste on my meager physique.

I would say if someone doesn't ever train to failure they aren't really training almost. While not hitting failure on say squats when you are an experienced lifter can be very prudent, if someone doesn't hit failure on say cable tricep extensions or bicep curls, they aren't really training hard enough. Because you have to do work in that failure zone a lot, first as newbie to learn effort and where the failure point lies, and then as advanced to get enough stimulus. I would bet you hit failure too on these small exercises, no?

I always say that many peoole say they hit failure every working set on quads but here almost no one actually does, because on the angled leg press how often do we actually see someone actually fail and have to hit the bottom stoppers and squeezy out of the machine? Lol. Almost never, most don't even use a spotter so even hard trainers are mostly 1-2-3 reps from failure when they abort. Anyone here disagree? And like I said, if those study subjects of Schoenfeld actually hit failure they are not doing more than 2 sets, let alone 10 sets of squats or 45 sets a week for legs, or whatever is claimed.

Drugs are often the most dramatic for guys with meager physiques, not that I recommend starting to anyone, never have, because it almost always ends up being for life as you mostly "can't" train without them once you start.
10
Gossip & Opinions / Re: Your 2024 NY Pro Champ !!
« Last post by illuminati on Today at 04:18:31 AM »
who's the bitch on the bottom row left hand side with the
Enormous Bolt on's ??   ;D
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10