hold on - you made ridiculous claims like dorian has better hams, traps and chest than Ronnie, and commented that Dorian crushes Ronnie on back detail when in fact his entire upper back was, and has never been, as detailed as guys like ronnie and flex..
That is not "explaining Dorian's superiority".
That is being retarded!
Ronnie's chest is wider than Dorian's, but not as thick. Furhtermore, it is overpowered by Ronnie's shoulders-traps complex. Ronnie has matched Dorian for lat width, but not thickness; even at 296 lbs, on the 2004 O, Ronnie loses to Dorian in lats and vastus medialis thickness. Dorian's hams are MUCH superior than that of Ronnie, with more striations, separation and overrall development. There is no comparison. The fact, that you disputed this claim, goes to show you know nothing about bodybuilding. Dorian's calves are the best in the history of bodybuilding, in size, separation and straitions. Ronnie has superior quads that Dorian; I'll give you that. However, Dorian presented his thigh mass, as well as all his other mass, with a much higher level of dryness and density, that Ronnie ever could. As for upper back detail, please...ever single muscle clearly separated, dryed and delineated! Ronnie also has awesome detail there, but Dorian's thickness and dryness, in that area, crushes Ronnie.Peter McGough, of Flex Magazine, has said that Dorian's density, and the conditioning that he presented such density, remain even today the gold-standard, hich every pro aspires to but has never been able to replicate. They say that a woman in love will refuse to see the flas of her man and defend him no matter what; this is clearly true, in your case. Idiot.
SUCKMYMUSCLE
