me supposedly being 'busted' has nothing to do with the discussion of best backs. The only reason you keep bringing up irrelevant crap is b/c you have nothing better to work with. You already lost the truce thread and every other thread that turned into Ronnie vs. Dorian. So now you're desperately trying to turn the focus onto me when this topic is about Flex mag's 20 best backs of all-time. I'm simply returning the favor. 
wrong, I explained why your post doesn't prove anything. Harder or drier =/= conditioning. Ronnie could have the same dryness but lower body fat than Dorian, which would mean he surpassed Dorian's conditioning. You repeating yourself doesn't make you correct.
me supposedly being 'busted' has nothing to do with the discussion of best backs. The only reason you keep bringing up irrelevant crap is b/c you have nothing better to work with. You already lost the truce thread and every other thread that turned into Ronnie vs. Dorian. So now you're desperately trying to turn the focus onto me when this topic is about Flex mag's 20 best backs of all-time. I'm simply returning the favor.
So let's see... me ( not ) supposedly busting you has nothing to do with the discussion of best backs . Where should I begin? One I was on topic discussing backs with Hulkster , I was on this thread long before YOU showed up ( common trend ) you posted your 03 pics ( fine ) I posted a comment directed at Hulkster and guess what little puppy barked for MY attention? YOU did
and then I pointed out the obvious ...you follow me around.
You committed to a lie and I called you on and you've been trying every diversionary tactic to deflect me owing the shit out of you . and you still are bringing up everything totally unrelated to the topic. And I didn't lose any thread I ended the Truce Thread with the words of Ronnie Coleman lol that's the best part , I beat you using your own hero by posting multiple quotes from Ronnie admitting he could not beat Dorian
....now seeing I alone stopped posting in the truce thread , you dummies follow me into every thread looking to equal the score lol even on this topic once again I crush your bullshit using your own hero
wrong, I explained why your post doesn't prove anything. Harder or drier =/= conditioning. Ronnie could have the same dryness but lower body fat than Dorian, which would mean he surpassed Dorian's conditioning. You repeating yourself doesn't make you correct.
lmfao you should heed your own advice by not repeating your own bull shit . my post proves you're a liar period. and again you're making a claim PROVE YOUR CLAIM don't tell me he could have the same dryness but lower bodyfat prove it . follow my lead once again boy , this is how it's done
While I’m on record as saying that the best physique I ever saw was Ronnie’s at the 2001 Arnold, he was never drier or harder than Dorian. In fact now that – 14 years after it happened – I recently for the first time saw the video of Dorian posing before the 1993 Olympia I have cause to rethink. I’m now not sure that Ronnie at 245 pounds would beat Dorian at 269 pounds. At a bigger bodyweight I think Ronnie would look soft next to an in-shape rock-hard Dorian.
On the subject of conditioning, no-one did it better than Dorian. He achieved a hardness and dryness (without losing fullness) that nobody has ever matched. In the flesh he looked even harder than he did in photos. It was like a statue made of granite was standing in front of you.
now supplement that with Dorian when asked the question flat out said he had better conditioning than Ronnie and he's an IFBB judge , so now you were busted flat out saying McGough is wrong and as well as an IFBB judge lol
First, I didn't disagree with Peter McGough's claim that Ronnie was never harder or drier than Dorian.
again your quote
I'm sorry but Peter McGough is an idiot if he thinks 01 ASC Ronnie never surpassed Dorian's conditioning.This is how we roll kid . now that you got all butt-hurt for being exposed as a liar you want out , run puppy run it's all you can do.
