OzmO, the truth cannot be pursued while departed from what can be reasonably known. It can't be done.
Yet you use what "should have" been done or lack of in your argument even though its unrealistic.
What is? The concept of initiating any order or any action under such circumstance?
Do you believe everyone was just standing around waiting for Rumsfeld to order something?
I know that Rumsfeld personally instructed his assistants to wait for him in the Crisis Management room, where he did not appear until approximately one hour later, after the destruction had taken place.
Do you believe that if his 2 assistants were waiting for him, (on his instructions), that everyone else also was waiting for him to issue orders and therefore were doing nothing?
So you claim 'everyone else' behaved in a manner that would be expected, except Donald Rumsfeld.
What should this tell me?
A lot of COINTELPRO techniques being used in this thread
Again, let me help.The answer, is no. He did not.
If he did...
No, I will not read 14 pages of posts
, especially since it is exceedingly obvious what I'm driving at despite my not having done so. Let me reformulate my previous post so that its larger point cannot be dodged by any further obstructionism: "If your favored theory regarding what happened on 9/11 were correct, what would you do about it?"
Please become at least passingly familiar with the discussion itself, including the opposition to the thread title, which you should know was changed mid-conversation.
Lol how is that?
The question remains: what will you do if your theory about Rumsfeld's behavior - with its rather serious implications and all - ends up being correct?
Not sure what 'that' you mean.
Lol, this guy is on a different wavelength than us, and I don't think he is acting like this just to troll. His reading comprehension is shot or otherwise he will ignore half the points you make and focus on a single phrase you say. It's liike talking with a malfunctioning robot, or rather, getting talked at by a malfunctioning robot (since it doesn't recognize anything you say)!
How was opposition to the thread title changed mid conversation?
Worry not, I'll not be 'passively hanging' any longer. The reason I posted at all was to posit a sensible question, one that I see you refuse to address. So, you can now remain here all by yourself and mull over your amazing theory into old age, free from interference. Best of luck!
I'm a government operative sent to these boards (and others) to downplay foolproof, obviously true theories like your own. But you have managed to outwit me and I'm admitting this now because I'm extremely impressed by your logical rigor and analytical abilities. Just know that we are now monitoring your communications and tracking your movements because of what you're saying. Notice any vehicles with tinted windows lately? For you and your loved ones' safety, try not to talk about this theory (which is obviously true) in public venues too overtly.Thanks for playing.
Your logic and knowledge of politics has single-handedly trumped all the relevant experts and witnesses of the events in question, so of course I'm jealous and hence frustrated! You need to get started on your book and not limit your insights to internet message boards; this could be a big deal if it ever gets out.