« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down

Author Topic: big deal about Vic?  (Read 4239 times)

tleilaxutank

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 2006
  • If it feels good twitter it
Re: big deal about Vic?
« Reply #50 on: December 09, 2007, 09:47:34 AM »
Quote from: affeman on December 09, 2007, 09:37:10 AM
No wonder you can't speak anymore with Squadfathers balls in your mouth....

His name is Robert Paulson
Logged

The Squadfather

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 25840
Re: big deal about Vic?
« Reply #51 on: December 09, 2007, 09:48:42 AM »
Quote from: tleilaxutank on December 09, 2007, 09:47:34 AM
His name is Robert Paulson
epic taking the internet too seriously.
Logged

Darth Muscle

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig III
  • *****
  • Posts: 702
  • Remember 01/31/07
Re: big deal about Vic?
« Reply #52 on: December 09, 2007, 10:29:39 AM »
Quote from: The Squadfather on December 09, 2007, 09:48:42 AM
epic taking the internet too seriously.

Epic deflection of the original question with over 18000 post ::)
Logged

musclehedz

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 1840
Re: big deal about Vic?
« Reply #53 on: December 09, 2007, 10:31:09 AM »
Quote from: theworm on December 09, 2007, 07:21:00 AM
I just don't see all the hype?  To me, he always looks smooth, like he has a thin film of fat over all his muscles.  At least Jay comes in a lot more conditioned.
see pic below, he just does not look "crisp."  I think Dex should have placed above him.



Sorry, but this guy looks huge, ripped with everything in proportion.
Logged

theworm

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4019
  • Getbig!
Re: big deal about Vic?
« Reply #54 on: December 09, 2007, 10:39:01 AM »
I agree he looks huge, but it looks like he has a film covering his muscles, does not look as defined as a Jay or Dex.
Logged
you are gay.

OneMoreRep

  • Moderator
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14077
Re: big deal about Vic?
« Reply #55 on: December 09, 2007, 10:45:35 AM »
Quote from: theworm on December 09, 2007, 10:39:01 AM
I agree he looks huge, but it looks like he has a film covering his muscles, does not look as defined as a Jay or Dex.

Where you at the Olympia?  If not, you are 2 months late with regards to arguing this point.  Besides, at prejudging (WHERE IT COUNTS) Victor was the most shredded and most impressive on stage.  For every 1 picture you can post of Victor looking as if he is "covered" with a film of fat, there are 10 that make him look insane with regards to conditioning. 

Yet, since you are so well-versed in said matters, post a picture or SHUT THE FUCK UP!
Logged

theworm

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4019
  • Getbig!
Re: big deal about Vic?
« Reply #56 on: December 09, 2007, 10:48:33 AM »
post a pic of him lookin shredded.
Logged
you are gay.

theworm

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4019
  • Getbig!
Re: big deal about Vic?
« Reply #57 on: December 09, 2007, 10:50:05 AM »
Quote from: OneMoreRep on December 09, 2007, 10:45:35 AM
Where you at the Olympia?  If not, you are 2 months late with regards to arguing this point.  Besides, at prejudging (WHERE IT COUNTS) Victor was the most shredded and most impressive on stage.  For every 1 picture you can post of Victor looking as if he is "covered" with a film of fat, there are 10 that make him look insane with regards to conditioning. 

Yet, since you are so well-versed in said matters, post a picture or SHUT THE FUCK UP!

post these 10 pics then.....vic.
Logged
you are gay.

Archer77

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 14174
  • Team Shizzo
Re: big deal about Vic?
« Reply #58 on: December 09, 2007, 10:50:39 AM »
I don't see the big deal either. Wolf looks way better.   I think like most things its hype generated by the media (MD).  If you say something enough people start to believe it.   
Logged
A

theworm

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 4019
  • Getbig!
Re: big deal about Vic?
« Reply #59 on: December 09, 2007, 10:53:28 AM »
plus, it looks like he is using synthol in his arms,,,no striations at all.
Logged
you are gay.

shiftedShapes

  • Getbig IV
  • ****
  • Posts: 3828
Re: big deal about Vic?
« Reply #60 on: December 09, 2007, 11:04:29 AM »
Quote from: The Squadfather on December 09, 2007, 08:16:59 AM
you're judging the mans physique so it's only fair that we should see a picture of you.

so it was unfair for you to judge the physiques of others all those years you wouldn't post a pic (and still haven't posted a clear pic)?  Jesus, have some integrity.
Logged

tommywishbone

  • Competitors II
  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 20501
  • Biscuit
Re: big deal about Vic?
« Reply #61 on: December 09, 2007, 11:06:43 AM »
Other than displaying the most obvious use of synthol, of any curent IFBB pro... sure, dude looks great.
Logged
a

aleksandr1974

  • Getbig II
  • **
  • Posts: 56
Re: big deal about Vic?
« Reply #62 on: December 09, 2007, 12:42:00 PM »
Quote from: theworm on December 09, 2007, 10:53:28 AM
plus, it looks like he is using synthol in his arms,,,no striations at all.


 Arnold  used synthol as well ?  ( he also didnt have a lot of striations in his arms).
Logged

Rudee

  • Getbig V
  • *****
  • Posts: 6088
Re: big deal about Vic?
« Reply #63 on: December 09, 2007, 08:09:48 PM »
The skinny ankles and high calves ruin that pose.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
« previous next »