Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Wiggs on January 01, 2013, 06:41:47 PM

Title: Can't start the year off right without one of these.
Post by: Wiggs on January 01, 2013, 06:41:47 PM
 :D ;D

Title: Re: Can't start the year of right without one of these.
Post by: SF1900 on January 01, 2013, 06:42:34 PM
And now we have phil heath  :-\ :-\
Title: Re: Can't start the year of right without one of these.
Post by: tommywishbone on January 01, 2013, 06:44:08 PM
Dorian.
Title: Re: Can't start the year of right without one of these.
Post by: Wiggs on January 01, 2013, 06:48:07 PM
Ronnie but not by much.
Title: Re: Can't start the year of right without one of these.
Post by: bigjim on January 01, 2013, 06:48:58 PM
Dorian wins this hands down he looks so much harder.

But both ronnie or dorian look better than heath. And dorian is 17 years ago. BBing is going backwards.
Title: Re: Can't start the year of right without one of these.
Post by: Wiggs on January 01, 2013, 06:55:21 PM
Dorian wins this hands down he looks so much harder.

But both ronnie or dorian look better than heath. And dorian is 17 years ago. BBing is going backwards.

Harder is not the end all be all. Dorian's biceps are shit, and he's built like a barrel compared to Ron there. Ronnie's calves are crappy and I've never liked his abs. But He embodies the ideal much more than Yates. Yes, Yates was hard. Ok. And he had more flaws than Coleman. Ronnie is raping him here no doubt about it and its only a 2 year difference between these shows.
Title: Re: Can't start the year of right without one of these.
Post by: Schnauzer on January 01, 2013, 06:56:25 PM
Dorian wins this hands down he looks so much harder.

But both ronnie or dorian look better than heath. And dorian is 17 years ago. BBing is going backwards.

Yep
Title: Re: Can't start the year of right without one of these.
Post by: Shockwave on January 01, 2013, 06:56:42 PM
Harder is not the end all be all. Dorian's biceps are shit, and he's built like a barrel compared to Ron there. Ronnie's calves are crappy and I've never liked his abs. But He embodies the ideal much more than Yates. Yes, Yates was hard. Ok. And he had more flaws than Coleman. Ronnie is raping him here no doubt about it and its only a 2 year difference between these shows.
2 different kinds of physiques IMHO, Dorian has the more herculean type physique, looks like a tank.
Ronnie has the more artistic, aesthetic type of physique.

Apples and oranges IMHO.

Dorian ftw, because he's white awesome.
Title: Re: Can't start the year of right without one of these.
Post by: Wiggs on January 01, 2013, 07:00:33 PM
2 different kinds of physiques IMHO, Dorian has the more herculean type physique, looks like a tank.
Ronnie has the more artistic, aesthetic type of physique.

Apples and oranges IMHO.

Dorian ftw, because he's white awesome.

Correct they are different but Ronnies physique there, embodies the IFBB and Joe Weider's ideal. Aesthetic muscle. Ronnie is better cause he's black and it's a sport.
Title: Re: Can't start the year of right without one of these.
Post by: trapz101 on January 01, 2013, 07:02:15 PM
dorian..if i wanna go 'holy shit' on bodybuilding i will watch that video...
Title: Re: Can't start the year off right without one of these.
Post by: WOOO on January 01, 2013, 07:03:50 PM
drugs are the real winners here
Title: Re: Can't start the year of right without one of these.
Post by: che on January 01, 2013, 07:09:10 PM


dorian look better than heath. And dorian is 17 years ago. BBing is going backwards.

I agree

Title: Re: Can't start the year off right without one of these.
Post by: nicorulez on January 01, 2013, 07:09:19 PM
Dorian is thick as fuck there. Damn, except for the screewed bicep he is da man.However, Ronnie 2003 shits on the Dorianis 996 version. He is thirty pounds heavier and has equivalent hardness. Dorian's gut looks like shit too, but I kind of appreciate his look over this version of Ronnie.
Title: Re: Can't start the year of right without one of these.
Post by: nicorulez on January 01, 2013, 07:10:44 PM
I agree


[/quote

Che,

I tend to agree that DY better overall, but Heath shits on him in this pic
Title: Re: Can't start the year of right without one of these.
Post by: Wiggs on January 01, 2013, 07:11:01 PM
I agree



lolz. Heaths lack of width throws everything off, otherwise, I'd put him up there.
Title: Re: Can't start the year off right without one of these.
Post by: njflex on January 01, 2013, 07:16:09 PM
midsection size aside,,,yates looks ridiculous,,,front to back,,,his leg biceps hang of his leg from side shots sick,hard from front quads different kind of leg seperation he had ,,long legs,narrow hips structure with calves that were sick diamonds hanging of knee,,,back enough said,,his front most muscular was a bit weak due to decent biceps they weren't hard/seperated as his tri's got,,,delts didn't pop unless he did crab shot instead.
Title: Re: Can't start the year off right without one of these.
Post by: nicorulez on January 01, 2013, 07:33:08 PM


Suck this bitches. Ronnie in his prime shits on Yates. Yates and Haney number 2 alltime.
Title: Re: Can't start the year off right without one of these.
Post by: nicorulez on January 01, 2013, 07:34:49 PM
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="
" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Title: Re: Can't start the year off right without one of these.
Post by: syntaxmachine on January 01, 2013, 07:41:44 PM
Philosophical reflection is the only antidote to such bickering.

The answers to most questions we posit are dependent upon human interests, to the extent that such questions are coherent at all. For the prototypical human question Q, a specific configuration of intentions, desires, and (especially) goals figures into the determination of Q's answer. There is no objectively correct answer to Q, i.e., the universe don't give a fuck.

SO, to the topic at hand: if you prefer that a Black Anaconda slither its way up your rectum and into your innards with varying degrees of force and friction, you answer "Ronnie"; if you prefer a cockney accent bellowing down at you as you get throat fucked, you answer "Dorian"; if you intend to be a lucky Pierre between the two, you answer "They are equal" (or some such).

In all instances everyone involved is a fag.

HTH
Title: Re: Can't start the year off right without one of these.
Post by: WillGrant on January 01, 2013, 07:42:38 PM
Philosophical reflection is the only antidote to such bickering.

The answers to most questions we posit are dependent upon human interests, to the extent that such questions are coherent at all. For the prototypical human question Q, a specific configuration of intentions, desires, and (especially) goals figures into the determination of Q's answer. There is no objectively correct answer to Q, i.e., the universe don't give a fuck.

SO, to the topic at hand: if you prefer that a Black Anaconda slither its way up your rectum and into your innards with varying degrees of force and friction, you answer "Ronnie"; if you prefer a cockney accent bellowing down at you as you get throat fucked, you answer "Dorian"; if you intend to be a lucky Pierre between the two, you answer "They are equal" (or some such).

In all instances everyone involved is a fag.

HTH
;D
Title: Re: Can't start the year off right without one of these.
Post by: Pottsy on January 01, 2013, 08:14:33 PM
That is one big Skinhead Yatsey.
Title: Re: Can't start the year off right without one of these.
Post by: arce1988 on January 01, 2013, 10:33:54 PM
 Ronnie
 Dorian
 Phil
Title: Re: Can't start the year off right without one of these.
Post by: Wiggs on January 01, 2013, 10:36:19 PM
Phil does look awesome in that pic.
Title: Re: Can't start the year off right without one of these.
Post by: TrueBB93 on January 01, 2013, 10:38:25 PM
can anyone tell me why people compare Coleman and Yates? i mean come on...besides a blind fan-boy how can any think yates beat coleman?

bigger-coleman
proportions-coleman
freak factor-coleman
strenght-coleman
dryness-yates


 ??? ??? ???
Title: Re: Can't start the year off right without one of these.
Post by: Wiggs on January 01, 2013, 10:56:47 PM
can anyone tell me why people compare Coleman and Yates? i mean come on...besides a blind fan-boy how can any think yates beat coleman?

bigger-coleman
proportions-coleman
freak factor-coleman
strenght-coleman
dryness-yates


 ??? ??? ???


Because before Coleman there was Yates and they never competed against each other in their primes. Dorian beat him every time they competed. But the same can be said of everyone that beat Ronnie prior to 1998. Then after the Olympia, no one was beating except Gunther at the GNC show and of course Jay in 06. They're both have freaky physiques but are very different until you get to the 03 very of Ronnie. Yates is great no doubt but his biceps and overall arms size for his body bothers me. His chest isn't all that either onstage. He's not really boxy just a rugged physique that's proportioned (except for arms). Ronnies calves aren't even on the same planet as Yates and while Ronnie had a tiny waistline then, his abs suck. They're ugly. But overall Ronnie is better than Dorian. The 98-99 version. 03 was chemical warfare between he and Jay.

Title: Re: Can't start the year off right without one of these.
Post by: TrueBB93 on January 01, 2013, 11:10:15 PM
Because before Coleman there was Yates and they never competed against each other in their primes. Dorian beat him every time they competed. But the same can be said of everyone that beat Ronnie prior to 1998. Then after the Olympia, no one was beating except Gunther at the GNC show and of course Jay in 06. They're both have freaky physiques but are very different until you get to the 03 very of Ronnie. Yates is great no doubt but his biceps and overall arms size for his body bothers me. His chest isn't all that either onstage. He's not really boxy just a rugged physique that's proportioned (except for arms). Ronnies calves aren't even on the same planet as Yates and while Ronnie had a tiny waistline then, his abs suck. They're ugly. But overall Ronnie is better than Dorian. The 98-99 version. 03 was chemical warfare between he and Jay.


agree man  8)
Title: Re: Can't start the year off right without one of these.
Post by: njflex on January 02, 2013, 04:40:51 AM
Because before Coleman there was Yates and they never competed against each other in their primes. Dorian beat him every time they competed. But the same can be said of everyone that beat Ronnie prior to 1998. Then after the Olympia, no one was beating except Gunther at the GNC show and of course Jay in 06. They're both have freaky physiques but are very different until you get to the 03 very of Ronnie. Yates is great no doubt but his biceps and overall arms size for his body bothers me. His chest isn't all that either onstage. He's not really boxy just a rugged physique that's proportioned (except for arms). Ronnies calves aren't even on the same planet as Yates and while Ronnie had a tiny waistline then, his abs suck. They're ugly. But overall Ronnie is better than Dorian. The 98-99 version. 03 was chemical warfare between he and Jay.


right on wiggs really.....yates had a nice structure,,,coleman as u can see now is narrow by nature sloped droopy shoulders,,,he packed on a ton of mass aroundit ,on it so illussion greatened.