Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Method101 on July 31, 2014, 11:29:02 AM

Title: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: Method101 on July 31, 2014, 11:29:02 AM


So that would mean he was drug free in the video below... LOL I guess he must be one of those "genetic freaks".  ::)

Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: thegamechanger on July 31, 2014, 11:33:52 AM
he is a genetic freak.
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: Complex Carbs on July 31, 2014, 11:35:12 AM
Why would he still lie?

So you don't think the people who make it to the olympia stage are the genetic wonders?

You believe it's impossible there are some guys who respond to gear extremly well?

Do you think if you took the same as he did, you'd roughly look the same?

Do you think if he took what you take, you'd look roughly the same?

Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: Complex Carbs on July 31, 2014, 11:37:27 AM
he is a genetic freak.
Yes, as simple as that.

No matter what, to even look like that at that age, means genetic freak.

I don't see dwarf saying they would be the next Michael Jordan if only they had the same shoes.

Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: thegamechanger on July 31, 2014, 11:39:12 AM
Yes, as simple as that.

No matter what, to even look like that at that age, means genetic freak.

I don't see dwarf saying they would be the next Michael Jordan if only they had the same shoes.



Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: thegamechanger on July 31, 2014, 11:39:57 AM
chest looks pretty much the same as when he was 13 though  ;)
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: Natural Man on July 31, 2014, 11:41:18 AM
he is a genetic freak.

Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: the trainer on July 31, 2014, 11:43:27 AM


Not everbody is a twink who is stuck at 175 pounds and cant seem to get any bigger.
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: Max on July 31, 2014, 11:44:04 AM
Look at his mums arms.  said shed been training 6 months there. The both have good genes.  Beyond that who cares?
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: thegamechanger on July 31, 2014, 11:44:10 AM
lee priest is one in a million, even after all those years theres nobody out there with a similair physique
even today people are afraid of his comeback
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: WannaBePro on July 31, 2014, 11:44:17 AM
I can believe it. I have a friend who's family are all genetic monsters. My buddy is 215lbs at 10%bf, his brother is 240lbs at sub 15% bf (I'm not 100% sure what his actual BF is) and their youngest brother went from being a skinny 17yr old to a blown up 19yr old (I'd say probably went from 160lbs to 190lbs at the same leanness). He played basketball in high school and decided to hit the weights when he started college. I doubt they're all juicing, including the parents who don't train but work physical jobs and have incredible builds.
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: Skeletor on July 31, 2014, 11:59:32 AM
So he was using until he was 12 and then took a 7 year break?
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: Method101 on July 31, 2014, 12:03:04 PM



 ;D ;D

There are some people who admit to using juice but play down it's effects and claim it's "Just the finishing touch". The most pathetic group of people who do this are the schmoes.
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: Jizmo on July 31, 2014, 12:14:47 PM
didnt lee say he stepped on the olympia stage on just 400 deca and some winny or some shit? lol.

his mom probably sprinkled dbol in his kellogs from age 12 on
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: thegamechanger on July 31, 2014, 12:18:32 PM
i can think of no topic less interesting than the drug use of bodybuilders.
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: disco_stu on July 31, 2014, 01:17:08 PM
lee priest started GH at 12-13 years old. that is known.

there are long threads about it stating that he was very short and due to his family being short, there was a therapeutic reason to use it, for psychological reasons.

seriously, if you believe anything from this guy, you are the fool.

i saw him do an outback show in 1990 and he was 17-18, and had probably 19-20" arms on a midget frame. guy was huge.

no way was he drug free then, and word on the street was that he used- plenty. his mum was in the sport and knew others in the sport.

i dont know how long he'd been using by then, but he'd been on GH for 4-5 years, and i dont know what dose...but definitely a dose to try to promote growth for medical reasons.

he grew rapidly from about 15, and by 17 was Mr.A. So you do the math.

Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: milone79 on July 31, 2014, 01:19:02 PM


So that would mean he was drug free in the video below... LOL I guess he must be one of those "genetic freaks".  ::)



Lee's Mother's neck in this video.....da fuq????
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: orion on July 31, 2014, 02:18:27 PM



who is this estrogen laden crybaby?
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: Lustral on July 31, 2014, 02:49:46 PM
lee priest started GH at 12-13 years old. that is known.

there are long threads about it stating that he was very short and due to his family being short, there was a therapeutic reason to use it, for psychological reasons.

seriously, if you believe anything from this guy, you are the fool.

i saw him do an outback show in 1990 and he was 17-18, and had probably 19-20" arms on a midget frame. guy was huge.

no way was he drug free then, and word on the street was that he used- plenty. his mum was in the sport and knew others in the sport.

i dont know how long he'd been using by then, but he'd been on GH for 4-5 years, and i dont know what dose...but definitely a dose to try to promote growth for medical reasons.

he grew rapidly from about 15, and by 17 was Mr.A. So you do the math.



Lionel messi was on gh from about the age of 12 and he is a midget shrimp. You would have to take steroids to get any decent gains gh stacks with anabolics it doesn't work well, in that sense, on its own.

Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: Army of One on July 31, 2014, 02:54:09 PM
Why would he still lie?

So you don't think the people who make it to the olympia stage are the genetic wonders?

You believe it's impossible there are some guys who respond to gear extremly well?

Do you think if you took the same as he did, you'd roughly look the same?

Do you think if he took what you take, you'd look roughly the same?



Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: MAXX on July 31, 2014, 03:01:21 PM
well Lee is a bullshitter

btw. his arms starting to look abit funky no  ???
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: bears on July 31, 2014, 03:03:14 PM
anyone who stands on the Mr. Olympia stage is a genetic freak.  with ZERO steroids those guys will look like they're on juice.  that's the sad reality.  I always chuckle to myself when I hear guys say,

"yeah well if I took that many steroids I would look like that too"

um no you wouldn't.

if you think that the only thing between you and the Olympia stage is a trip to Mexico you're a fucking idiot.
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: Nails on July 31, 2014, 03:03:58 PM
LOL 13yrs old and deca dick
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: The Grim Lifter on July 31, 2014, 03:24:13 PM
lee priest started GH at 12-13 years old. that is known.

there are long threads about it stating that he was very short and due to his family being short, there was a therapeutic reason to use it, for psychological reasons.

seriously, if you believe anything from this guy, you are the fool.

i saw him do an outback show in 1990 and he was 17-18, and had probably 19-20" arms on a midget frame. guy was huge.

no way was he drug free then, and word on the street was that he used- plenty. his mum was in the sport and knew others in the sport.

i dont know how long he'd been using by then, but he'd been on GH for 4-5 years, and i dont know what dose...but definitely a dose to try to promote growth for medical reasons.

he grew rapidly from about 15, and by 17 was Mr.A. So you do the math.



Exactly. He won the Mr Australia at 17....drug free?  :D
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: Bevo on July 31, 2014, 03:28:38 PM
lee priest is one in a million, even after all those years theres nobody out there with a similair physique
even today people are afraid of his comeback


Please! Flex lewis passed him a long time ago

Get real no one is afraid of his comeback , any top 212 guy would beat him now David Henry, Lewis, Clark, correa, etc.. If he's in the open class even worse

His time has come and gone
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: Bevo on July 31, 2014, 03:30:23 PM
Why would he still lie?

So you don't think the people who make it to the olympia stage are the genetic wonders?

You believe it's impossible there are some guys who respond to gear extremly well?

Do you think if you took the same as he did, you'd roughly look the same?

Do you think if he took what you take, you'd look roughly the same?



Jeez let me see "why would he lie"  ::)

Cause he's a bber, an insecure person, addicted to PED's....
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: thebrink on July 31, 2014, 03:34:02 PM
he is a genetic freak.

Yup. Why people cannot understand this is beyond me , they must be jealous genetic junk.
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: Nails on July 31, 2014, 03:35:06 PM
how can anyone take his shit  :-\
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: Bevo on July 31, 2014, 03:42:03 PM
how can anyone take his shit  :-\

 :D ;D
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: Method101 on July 31, 2014, 04:11:25 PM
Yup. Why people cannot understand this is beyond me , they must be jealous genetic junk.
drugs are just the finishing touch and you don't lose muscle when you come off drugs right? It's just for the recovery and energy.

 :D
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: Natural Man on July 31, 2014, 04:13:26 PM
lee will still be injecting shit on his death bed. Junkies, all of them.
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: SuperTed on August 01, 2014, 02:30:06 AM
Of course he was using during his teens. Was probably on a fair amount too.

Anyway, BB's aren't genetic freaks. They are just guys with naturally good, lean and symmetrical physiques who respond well to gear. That requires having good genes no doubt but certainly nothing freakish.

Genetic freaks are men like Bolt and Phelps, not some oiled up guy posing in a thong.
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: The Grim Lifter on August 01, 2014, 03:55:32 AM
Of course he was using during his teens. Was probably on a fair amount too.

Anyway, BB's aren't genetic freaks. They are just guys with naturally good, lean and symmetrical physiques who respond well to gear. That requires having good genes no doubt but certainly nothing freakish.

Genetic freaks are men like Bolt and Phelps, not some oiled up guy posing in a thong.


Then what's the difference between Bolt and say Ronnie Coleman? Both would be great at their chosen sport naturally but never competiting at the highest level without PEDs?

The best bodybuilders have the best genetic structure, ability to get ripped, tolerance to drugs and build enough muscle. Not everyone has that.
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: crownshep on August 01, 2014, 04:20:29 AM
lee priest started GH at 12-13 years old. that is known.

there are long threads about it stating that he was very short and due to his family being short, there was a therapeutic reason to use it, for psychological reasons.

seriously, if you believe anything from this guy, you are the fool.

i saw him do an outback show in 1990 and he was 17-18, and had probably 19-20" arms on a midget frame. guy was huge.

no way was he drug free then, and word on the street was that he used- plenty. his mum was in the sport and knew others in the sport.

i dont know how long he'd been using by then, but he'd been on GH for 4-5 years, and i dont know what dose...but definitely a dose to try to promote growth for medical reasons.

he grew rapidly from about 15, and by 17 was Mr.A. So you do the math.



Good post,Lee himself said the exact same thing to an ex training partner of mine.He seems to have selective memory as well,he didn`t place 2nd in the universe at age 17,he placed 4th.
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: Wolfox on August 01, 2014, 04:22:46 AM
Wait...dude was on gh as a teen yet is still a midget ? Brutal.
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: SuperTed on August 01, 2014, 04:45:28 AM
Then what's the difference between Bolt and say Ronnie Coleman? Both would be great at their chosen sport naturally but never competiting at the highest level without PEDs?

The best bodybuilders have the best genetic structure, ability to get ripped, tolerance to drugs and build enough muscle. Not everyone has that.

Of course not everyone has great BB genetics (I certainly don’t :D) but I don’t believe that the amount of people who do are all that rare. Pretty sure there are plenty of West Africans that would fit the criteria of having great BB genetics. The issue is that most of them don’t even work out, let alone mega dose on AAS so never amount to anything. The top pro’s have the best genetics but out of a tiny percentile of the world’s population as very few people “bodybuild” to any serious degree.

On the other hand, events like swimming and sprinting are sports that almost everyone on this planet has tried during their lives. Therefore, the talent pool is far larger and the guys at the very top like Bolt are far more freakish in their genetic makeup than someone like Coleman. 
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: The Grim Lifter on August 01, 2014, 05:05:32 AM
Of course not everyone has great BB genetics (I certainly don’t :D) but I don’t believe that the amount of people who do are all that rare. Pretty sure there are plenty of West Africans that would fit the criteria of having great BB genetics. The issue is that most of them don’t even work out, let alone mega dose on AAS so never amount to anything. The top pro’s have the best genetics but out of a tiny percentile of the world’s population as very few people “bodybuild” to any serious degree.

On the other hand, events like swimming and sprinting are sports that almost everyone on this planet has tried during their lives. Therefore, the talent pool is far larger and the guys at the very top like Bolt are far more freakish in their genetic makeup than someone like Coleman. 

I agree with that 100% but Ronnie is a freak. He was muscular before even lifting at 13-14. There could be people out there as good as Bolt or better who weren't given the same opportunities. Ben Johnson's coach said Ben was nothing at 15 and took until about 18 to start showing how good he was (drug free then).
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: I ETA PI on August 01, 2014, 05:08:17 AM
lee priest started GH at 12-13 years old. that is known.

there are long threads about it stating that he was very short and due to his family being short, there was a therapeutic reason to use it, for psychological reasons.

seriously, if you believe anything from this guy, you are the fool.

i saw him do an outback show in 1990 and he was 17-18, and had probably 19-20" arms on a midget frame. guy was huge.

no way was he drug free then, and word on the street was that he used- plenty. his mum was in the sport and knew others in the sport.

i dont know how long he'd been using by then, but he'd been on GH for 4-5 years, and i dont know what dose...but definitely a dose to try to promote growth for medical reasons.

he grew rapidly from about 15, and by 17 was Mr.A. So you do the math.




There were long threads on it? 

Well, case closed then. 
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: I ETA PI on August 01, 2014, 05:11:20 AM
Then what's the difference between Bolt and say Ronnie Coleman? Both would be great at their chosen sport naturally but never competiting at the highest level without PEDs?

The best bodybuilders have the best genetic structure, ability to get ripped, tolerance to drugs and build enough muscle. Not everyone has that.

You seem to be missing the point. 

Genetics are a factor on other sports, not in bodybuilding.  I could never beat Lebron James in basketball, play offensive tackle for the Patriots, or outrun Usain bolt on the track, but that's because they're genetic freaks.  This isn't the case in bodybuilding. 
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: SuperTed on August 01, 2014, 05:22:28 AM
I agree with that 100% but Ronnie is a freak. He was muscular before even lifting at 13-14. There could be people out there as good as Bolt or better who weren't given the same opportunities. Ben Johnson's coach said Ben was nothing at 15 and took until about 18 to start showing how good he was (drug free then).

Would you call Lee Priest a genetic freak though?

Coleman was probably the closest thing BB has had to a genetic freak. However, even with Coleman, you mentioned that he was muscular at 13-14 but even that isn't particularly uncommon with boys of West African heritage.
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: Donny on August 01, 2014, 05:23:19 AM
Lee Priest had the foundation right from the word go. Who cares if he juiced early on. i like him. quick witted and funny.
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: deceiver on August 01, 2014, 05:45:15 AM
His face is so bloated he looks like an old fat woman.
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: milone79 on August 01, 2014, 09:04:18 AM
anyone who stands on the Mr. Olympia stage is a genetic freak.  with ZERO steroids those guys will look like they're on juice.  that's the sad reality.  I always chuckle to myself when I hear guys say,

"yeah well if I took that many steroids I would look like that too"

um no you wouldn't.

if you think that the only thing between you and the Olympia stage is a trip to Mexico you're a fucking idiot.

GTFO with this stupid arguement...you are a fool....its all drugs you retard!!!  genetics my ass!! maybe the genetic potential to have good drug receptors...I will leave this pic here to put your feeble arguement to rest.
(http://i1118.photobucket.com/albums/k619/milone79/thCAOJB47N.jpg) (http://s1118.photobucket.com/user/milone79/media/thCAOJB47N.jpg.html)
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: The Abdominal Snoman on August 01, 2014, 09:36:58 AM
lee priest started GH at 12-13 years old. that is known.

there are long threads about it stating that he was very short and due to his family being short, there was a therapeutic reason to use it, for psychological reasons.

seriously, if you believe anything from this guy, you are the fool.

i saw him do an outback show in 1990 and he was 17-18, and had probably 19-20" arms on a midget frame. guy was huge.

no way was he drug free then, and word on the street was that he used- plenty. his mum was in the sport and knew others in the sport.

i dont know how long he'd been using by then, but he'd been on GH for 4-5 years, and i dont know what dose...but definitely a dose to try to promote growth for medical reasons.

he grew rapidly from about 15, and by 17 was Mr.A. So you do the math.



This^^^
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: The Abdominal Snoman on August 01, 2014, 09:40:03 AM
Many kids with a homosexual parent tend not to be truthful about a lot of things. It's a coping mechanism they learn early on in life...I'm sure it's easier now for kids than it was 30 years ago when Lee was a kid...Many become pathological liars as adults...One sign of a pathological liar is that they talk very fast and talk about many different subjects in what seems like never taking a breath...Oh and some tattoo their face :-\
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: Radical Plato on August 01, 2014, 10:45:04 AM
As a teen he was on government sponsored growth hormone given to him by a trial program for undersized kids.  True story.

The program has long since been disbanded.
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: IronMeister on August 01, 2014, 10:50:49 AM
(http://i58.tinypic.com/242fvur.jpg)
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: Method101 on August 01, 2014, 01:05:13 PM
GTFO with this stupid arguement...you are a fool....its all drugs you retard!!!  genetics my ass!! maybe the genetic potential to have good drug receptors...I will leave this pic here to put your feeble arguement to rest.
(http://i1118.photobucket.com/albums/k619/milone79/thCAOJB47N.jpg) (http://s1118.photobucket.com/user/milone79/media/thCAOJB47N.jpg.html)

Well said.

Fuck anyone who underplays the effect of steroids unless you consider finishing touches to be 80lbs of muscle.
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: Danimal77 on August 01, 2014, 01:37:47 PM


So that would mean he was drug free in the video below... LOL I guess he must be one of those "genetic freaks".  ::)



Wonder if all the shit he took stunted his growth. Was he his adult height (5'3") when he was 13 years old?
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: FermiDirac on August 01, 2014, 01:45:13 PM


You, sir, killed me.

Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: The Grim Lifter on August 01, 2014, 04:19:15 PM
You seem to be missing the point. 

Genetics are a factor on other sports, not in bodybuilding.  I could never beat Lebron James in basketball, play offensive tackle for the Patriots, or outrun Usain bolt on the track, but that's because they're genetic freaks.  This isn't the case in bodybuilding. 

I have the point exactly right. You are saying that in bodybuilding genetics arn't a factor. So why can't anyone just inject enough drugs and train for long enough and look like Ronnie.

Bolt is exactly like Ronnie. Great genetics for his sport, but without drugs, he's not running under 10 seconds, maybe not even 10.2. Ronnie would still be a big guy without drugs, but with them, he's the greatest freak ever. The problem is we all know bodybuilders use drugs, people still believe they arn't as prevalent in other sports as they are.

You can get a lot bigger with the juice. Just like if you trained for running and were running 11 seconds then trained your ass off and juiced you could probably get that down to 10.4 or something. But Bolt is starting at 10.2 without juice and 9.58 with it. Same with building muscle, Ronnie, Heath, Cutler, are ahead of the rest of us before we even start, it's maybe not as obvious early on but it's there.
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: Radical Plato on August 01, 2014, 06:20:43 PM
Wonder if all the shit he took stunted his growth. Was he his adult height (5'3") when he was 13 years old?
No, he was given growth hormone by the government because he was undersized in an experimental trial program. Obviously this is what built him so much muscle at a young age.  You had to be fairly undersized to be approved for the program,so Lee was always short.
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: gib on August 01, 2014, 06:22:07 PM
He was on Gh from a very young age. That's a know fact.
Title: Re: Lee Priest claims he was drug free from the age of 13-19 in new video
Post by: thebrink on August 01, 2014, 07:13:32 PM
drugs are just the finishing touch and you don't lose muscle when you come off drugs right? It's just for the recovery and energy.

 :D

big difference between Lee's physique at 16 compared to his heyday as an IFBB pro.