Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: slayer on October 06, 2006, 01:02:09 PM

Title: poor ron colemen!
Post by: slayer on October 06, 2006, 01:02:09 PM
looks like shit and all his fans thought the 03 ronnie would show up in europe, but the old fart came instead! ;D
Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: anvil on October 06, 2006, 01:06:00 PM
Do you mean Ron COLEMAN?
Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: Carsasm on October 06, 2006, 01:24:56 PM
No, I think he is refering to poor miners named Ron.
Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: SWOLETRAIN on October 06, 2006, 01:36:02 PM
Maybe its time to consider doing the masters show. Chick vs. Ronnie ;D
Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: affeman on October 06, 2006, 01:40:53 PM
Show sum respect to the best BB of all tim ya fools!!! He's got 8 sandows, and nobody can take them away.

(http://www.ronniecoleman.net/6xo28.jpg)
Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: Playboy on October 06, 2006, 01:59:57 PM
Show sum respect to the best BB of all tim ya fools!!! He's got 8 sandows, and nobody can take them away.

(http://www.ronniecoleman.net/6xo28.jpg)
Exactly. These idiots think his physique will drastically change in a couple of days. He'll be back next year. Jay won...a well deserved win but do not count out Coleman. He was legitimatly injured at the olyimpia.

PB
Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: slayer on October 06, 2006, 02:59:25 PM
Exactly. These idiots think his physique will drastically change in a couple of days. He'll be back next year. Jay won...a well deserved win but do not count out Coleman. He was legitimatly injured at the olyimpia.

PB
great pic , but those days are long gone! haney and yates new when to hang em up this baffoon doesnt!
Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: vein-x on October 06, 2006, 03:02:06 PM
great pic , but those days are long gone! haney and yates new when to hang em up this baffoon doesnt!

Arnold came back and won it.. so why can't Ronnie?
Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: Jr. Yates on October 06, 2006, 03:03:35 PM
Arnold came back and won it.. so why can't Ronnie?
exactly.
Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: divcom on October 06, 2006, 03:09:23 PM
We all know he isnt going to make Superman changes in one week.  But he looks better than Jay this time around.  IFBB needs new blood.  The first Euro is Ronnie's.  I guess the IFBB is looking for yet another dull yr.
   
Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: ozman on October 06, 2006, 03:10:58 PM
Arnold came back and won it.. so why can't Ronnie?



FIXED ?
Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: slayer on October 06, 2006, 03:18:41 PM
Arnold came back and won it.. so why can't Ronnie?
what part of ronnie will be 43 , not 33 arent you guys getting? its over , move on! we all will age , including ronnie.....
Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: Miss Karen on October 06, 2006, 03:21:39 PM
Stop all the smack talk on Ronnie he is and was the equal greatest BB of all times you Idiots and as for Arnold he never won in 1980, that was a gift from the promoter and the IFBB judges that 20k cheque was never cashed.A win win for Arnold and Promoter Paul Graham google that name and open a huge can of worms.
Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: Miss Demeanor on October 06, 2006, 03:39:03 PM
Stop all the smack talk on Ronnie he is and was the equal greatest BB of all times you Idiots and as for Arnold he never won in 1980, that was a gift from the promoter and the IFBB judges that 20k cheque was never cashed.A win win for Arnold and Promoter Paul Graham google that name and open a huge can of worms.

I hear you doll but I can't agree about the 1980 Olympia.  My boyfriend, who was good friends with Mike Mentzer, says the same thing.  Arnold was way off, but still had enough to beat the other top men imo.
Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: hipolito mejia on October 06, 2006, 03:40:32 PM
Stop all the smack talk on Ronnie he is and was the equal greatest BB of all times you Idiots and as for Arnold he never won in 1980, that was a gift from the promoter and the IFBB judges that 20k cheque was never cashed.A win win for Arnold and Promoter Paul Graham google that name and open a huge can of worms.

can of warm...LOL

Arnold had 50% of the first place.

the other  50%, was spreaded between Dickerson,Mentzer,Zane,Boyer....
  do the math....

and get over it!!!
Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: hipolito mejia on October 06, 2006, 03:44:50 PM
I hear you doll but I can't agree about the 1980 Olympia.  My boyfriend, who was good friends with Mike Mentzer, says the same thing.  Arnold was way off, but still had enough to beat the other top men imo.

Mike is a good old friend of mine too. ;D 
Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: Miss Karen on October 06, 2006, 04:02:51 PM
You mean Mike WAS a good friend of mine past tense.As for 1980 anyone who thinks Arnold won was not there.Biggest Fix same as Franco and Dickerson 82.
Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: pumpster on October 06, 2006, 04:17:12 PM
Quote
As for 1980 anyone who thinks Arnold won was not there.Biggest Fix same as Franco and Dickerson 82.
Of course; the fixes are as plain as day, except to those dumb enough to misspell COLEMAN.
Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: slayer on October 06, 2006, 04:22:15 PM
Of course; the fixes are as plain as day, except to those dumb enough to misspell COLEMAN.
when your runner up , you get used to people mispelling has beens names!
Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: pumpster on October 06, 2006, 04:33:37 PM
Quote
when your runner up , you get used to people mispelling has beens names!
Ya it's a complicated name and he's barely known in BB.  ::)
Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: the shadow on October 07, 2006, 02:55:33 AM
looks like shit and all his fans thought the 03 ronnie would show up in europe, but the old fart came instead! ;D
hahahah nice post man...i like that 'old fart came instead' statement....hahhaahhaha ahahah
Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: the shadow on October 07, 2006, 03:11:17 AM
when your runner up , you get used to people mispelling has beens names!
AGREED
Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: David Shaw on October 07, 2006, 03:50:40 AM
Show sum respect to the best BB of all tim ya fools!!! He's got 8 sandows, and nobody can take them away.


8 sandows which shouldnt really be... maybe 2 or 3 if the judging wasn't rigged.
Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: Bear on October 07, 2006, 04:10:45 AM
8 sandows which shouldnt really be... maybe 2 or 3 if the judging wasn't rigged.

you are a c*nt

lol loser
Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: jammer on October 07, 2006, 07:01:27 AM
what part of ronnie will be 43 , not 33 arent you guys getting? its over , move on! we all will age , including ronnie.....

sad but true
Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: GHGut on October 07, 2006, 07:05:01 AM
I think if Ronnie could have nailed his conditioning, he would have.

I believe we have seen the last of Ronnie's killer physique and I hope he retires now instead of spiraling downwards in contest placings in years to come.

He will always be remembered as one of the best. Some consider him THE best.
Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: sandstone on October 07, 2006, 07:15:15 AM
You mean Mike WAS a good friend of mine past tense.As for 1980 anyone who thinks Arnold won was not there.Biggest Fix same as Franco and Dickerson 82.

So you will admit Colemans win in 01 was a fix??? its pretty damn obvious he dosent deserve 8 sandows, only 7
Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: Parker on October 07, 2006, 07:16:51 AM
I think if Ronnie could have nailed his conditioning, he would have.

I believe we have seen the last of Ronnie's killer physique and I hope he retires now instead of spiraling downwards in contest placings in years to come.

He will always be remembered as one of the best. Some consider him THE best.


He needs to hang it up for a year, let his injuries heal. Train and come back at 275-280 pounds ripped, like his 2001 Arnold condition. Jay won, but is too beatable, has too many flaws, and the public knows it, he knows it.
Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on October 07, 2006, 07:19:30 AM
So you will admit Colemans win in 01 was a fix??? its pretty damn obvious he dosent deserve 8 sandows, only 7

2001 and 2002 were contests Ronnie could have easily lost add in 1998 and 2004 and you'll see that Ronnie being unbeatbale is just a myth .
Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: Parker on October 07, 2006, 07:21:56 AM
And it is pretty obvious Dorian only deserved three of his six.
Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on October 07, 2006, 07:35:14 AM
And it is pretty obvious Dorian only deserved three of his six.

Not according to the judges ,it was never close on paper I personally thought he should have lost in 97 but the judges didn't ! 92 clear winner , 93 set the standard , 94 off especially from 93 but still won without controversy , 95 replicated his 93 dominance , 96 againeasy win not his best but a clear winner ,97 should have lost but recieved straight firsts .
Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: sandstone on October 07, 2006, 08:08:23 AM
Not according to the judges ,it was never close on paper I personally thought he should have lost in 97 but the judges didn't ! 92 clear winner , 93 set the standard , 94 off especially from 93 but still won without controversy , 95 replicated his 93 dominance , 96 againeasy win not his best but a clear winner ,97 should have lost but recieved straight firsts .

Very nice.
Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: divcom on October 07, 2006, 08:16:02 AM
Joke.  The man was unbeatable for 8....as was Haney and Dorain for 6.  Father time may have caught up with him.  Kevin didnt beat because he didnt have a back and legs.  Jay got DQed just like Shaw did at the Arnold...so how the hell he beat Ronnie?  It would be better to drop the Euro shows, rest up and try in 2007 if father time will allow him.  If anything...age has beaten Ronnie...not Culter who will enjoy gifts greater than Yates...because you can question his wins against the likes of Cormier and Dexter.  I'm assuming Heath will probably bring a package better than Jay in 07 but he'll probably still be MrO...so he'll get the call from the judges....as it has always been and will. 

Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: Ex Coelis on October 07, 2006, 09:07:12 AM
damn you Chad Nichols
Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: Parker on October 08, 2006, 02:12:34 PM
Not according to the judges ,it was never close on paper I personally thought he should have lost in 97 but the judges didn't ! 92 clear winner , 93 set the standard , 94 off especially from 93 but still won without controversy , 95 replicated his 93 dominance , 96 againeasy win not his best but a clear winner ,97 should have lost but recieved straight firsts .

Before you posted this, I was watching the 93 Olympia.  Where they had Shawn, Dorian, and Flex in callouts. They did A back double Bi. All three of them had backs that would have put the top 3 this yr to shame.

That being said, in 1993 I believe Flex should have won, even though he was off his Arnold peak, but he almost replicated the conditioning. Dorian had a wide ass waist. But I'll say toss up
1994 should have gone to Kevin or Shawn.
1995 a toss up, but I give it  Dorian, by a squeaker.
1996 Shawn
1997, Shawn

So, actually it was his 1992-93, and 1995 where I believe he won. 
Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on October 08, 2006, 02:18:32 PM
Before you posted this, I was watching the 93 Olympia.  Where they had Shawn, Dorian, and Flex in callouts. They did A back double Bi. All three of them had backs that would have put the top 3 this yr to shame.

That being said, in 1993 I believe Flex should have won, even though he was off his Arnold peak, but he almost replicated the conditioning. Dorian had a wide ass waist. But I'll say toss up
1994 should have gone to Kevin or Shawn.
1995 a toss up, but I give it  Dorian, by a squeaker.
1996 Shawn
1997, Shawn

So, actually it was his 1992-93, and 1995 where I believe he won. 

I gave your opinion an objective look until you said Flex should have won the 93 Olympia I would have prefered Flex to win but he didn't and Flex himself said he was lucky to place 2nd over Shawn .
Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: Parker on October 08, 2006, 02:41:44 PM
Flex himself said he was lucky to place 2nd over Shawn .

That is because Flex never believed that he could be Mr. O, Shawn did. Shoot, shawn had more beleif in Flex being Mr. O, than Fle himself.  Flex's enemy was himself. Hell, Flex had a smaller waist than Shawn at the 93 O, almost as small as Lee Labrada's. Look at the call out of Lee, Shawn and Flex, and look at the front Double Bi, un-believable.

On another note, at the 93 O, is it me or does Levrone look odd? Like he is missing chunks of muscle in critcal places, like he was incomplete. And for someone who was taking almost the whole supply of Escileine off the market (according to Flex ::)), Levrone's delts looked small, and his tris don't have that "out of this world" look to them, as they did in later years.

But one one thing you have to give ND, is that both Dorian and Ronnie are un-matched when it comes to work ethic, both are equal in this department.
Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on October 08, 2006, 04:22:16 PM
That is because Flex never believed that he could be Mr. O, Shawn did. Shoot, shawn had more beleif in Flex being Mr. O, than Fle himself.  Flex's enemy was himself. Hell, Flex had a smaller waist than Shawn at the 93 O, almost as small as Lee Labrada's. Look at the call out of Lee, Shawn and Flex, and look at the front Double Bi, un-believable.

On another note, at the 93 O, is it me or does Levrone look odd? Like he is missing chunks of muscle in critcal places, like he was incomplete. And for someone who was taking almost the whole supply of Escileine off the market (according to Flex ::)), Levrone's delts looked small, and his tris don't have that "out of this world" look to them, as they did in later years.

But one one thing you have to give ND, is that both Dorian and Ronnie are un-matched when it comes to work ethic, both are equal in this department.

Flex was the victimof to many contests in 1993 which he won 3 straight and thats why he was off just a tad at the Olympia , trying to peak to many times , and you can't blame him he just got his pro card and started to make money but to say he should have won his nonsense , Samir summed it up best when he said Dorian was 1st , 2nd and 3rd. !

And I do agree with you Ronnie and Dorian being work horses , both are known for their work ethtic which if Flex had he would beat Dorian not as his game but beat him with his game.
Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: Sean-DeMarco on October 08, 2006, 05:01:58 PM
Show sum respect to the best BB of all tim ya fools!!! He's got 8 sandows, and nobody can take them away.

(http://www.ronniecoleman.net/6xo28.jpg)


...Word.~ 8)
Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: IceCold on October 08, 2006, 08:18:08 PM

...Word.~ 8)

i agree.

but its still fun to say shit to certain people on this board who have a very strong fetish for large, muscular black men. 
Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: Sean-DeMarco on October 09, 2006, 11:37:46 AM
who have a very strong fetish for large, muscular black men. 

....I didn't know it was like that! Yecch!~ :-X
Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: DK II on October 09, 2006, 11:40:20 AM
Ron Colemen???

How many are there of him?
Title: Re: poor ron colemen!
Post by: pobrecito on October 09, 2006, 11:50:06 AM
Before you posted this, I was watching the 93 Olympia.  Where they had Shawn, Dorian, and Flex in callouts. They did A back double Bi. All three of them had backs that would have put the top 3 this yr to shame.

That being said, in 1993 I believe Flex should have won, even though he was off his Arnold peak, but he almost replicated the conditioning. Dorian had a wide ass waist. But I'll say toss up
1994 should have gone to Kevin or Shawn.
1995 a toss up, but I give it  Dorian, by a squeaker.
1996 Shawn
1997, Shawn

So, actually it was his 1992-93, and 1995 where I believe he won. 

A former mr. O, Samir, stated that Yates won 1st, 2nd, and 3rd in 1993. THat tells you just how dominant he was and nobody else was ever in the picture.