Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: The Viking on October 08, 2006, 03:20:47 PM
-
I saw the pictures from the first grand-prix and I think he looked the best.
Coleman looked small when compared with Ruhl, the biceps, lats and shoulders. Cutler also looks small when compared with Ruhl.
Most bodybuilding fans whould like the biggest man too win, Ruhl was, without a doubt.
Am I wrong?
I must say that Coleman looked better than Cutler at the Dutch grand-prix, so he would be second at the Olympia.
-
another picture.
-
well if the guy works on his overall espect maybe, but not now!
-
I saw the pictures from the first grand-prix and I think he looked the best.
Coleman looked small when compared with Ruhl, the biceps, lats and shoulders. Cutler also looks small when compared with Ruhl.
Most bodybuilding fans whould like the biggest man too win, Ruhl was, without a doubt.
Am I wrong?
I must say that Coleman looked better than Cutler at the Dutch grand-prix, so he would be second at the Olympia.
Since when is the Olympia judged on how the bodybuilders looks at the Grand Prixs?
YIP
Zack
-
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=100648.0;attach=108695;image)
Rockel looks better than both of them.
-
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=100648.0;attach=108695;image)
Rockel looks better than both of them.
A good example of a bad photo for comparison. Rhul and Ronnie has are not yet fully into their front lat spread pose, hence this photo is not good for a comparison.