Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Vince B on October 09, 2006, 06:38:07 PM

Title: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: Vince B on October 09, 2006, 06:38:07 PM
We now know that God no longer wants Ronnie Coleman to win. Neither did the judges. Just shows that we do not know what God's plan is for us. Ronnie was convinced his purpose was to be Mr Olympia. Now what is he supposed to believe? I just wish people would stop mentioning God in public announcements. Surely Ron cannot blame God for his placing?!

The IFBB judges can award the title to a non-reigning competitor. Apparently the judges did the right thing this year. Is that a miracle or the new IFBB criteria in force? The IFBB remains consistent in that they do not award first place to a person who does not present with the necessary condition. That applies now to former champions.

Injuries can make a difference to condition. Diet can also be important. If you tear a triceps or lat or both you are unlikely to be able to train hard enough. Those injuries will be obvious to the judges. Lifting heavy weights is dangerous. No bodybuilder should do really heavy deadlifts.

If you set a certain standard and then show up below that standard you cannot expect the same placing as previously.

Short men do not place high in the Olympia. They stuggle to make the top 10 and are more or less overlooked. Ronnie Rockel is another example of this bias.

Black men have small calves. Those with small calves have little or no chance of winning the Olympia. Few of the black bodybuilders who competed showed much in the way of cuts in their calves. Exceptions are Vince Taylor and Victor Martinez. If you are a no calves bodybuilder you really cannot expect to win the Olympia.

Black bodybuilders are bigger and better than white guys. A generalization, of course.

Joe Weider was not present at the awards which is sad. The end of an era, perhaps.
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: SUBTRACTION on October 09, 2006, 06:41:14 PM
We now know that God no longer wants Ronnie Coleman to win. Neither did the judges. Just shows that we do not know what God's plan is for us. Ronnie was convinced his purpose was to be Mr Olympia. Now what is he supposed to believe? I just wish people would stop mentioning God in public announcements. Surely Ron cannot blame God for his placing?!


I blame God.

Ronnie should too!  >:(
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: TheAnimal on October 09, 2006, 06:43:16 PM
Lifting heavy weights is dangerous. No bodybuilder should do really heavy deadlifts.

No way! heavy deads all the way!
without mixed grip of course
Mixed grip is asking to rip that bicep of it's tendon
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: AVBG on October 09, 2006, 06:44:18 PM
We now know that God no longer wants Ronnie Coleman to win. Neither did the judges. Just shows that we do not know what God's plan is for us. Ronnie was convinced his purpose was to be Mr Olympia. Now what is he supposed to believe? I just wish people would stop mentioning God in public announcements. Surely Ron cannot blame God for his placing?!

The IFBB judges can award the title to a non-reigning competitor. Apparently the judges did the right thing this year. Is that a miracle or the new IFBB criteria in force? The IFBB remains consistent in that they do not award first place to a person who does not present with the necessary condition. That applies now to former champions.

Injuries can make a difference to condition. Diet can also be important. If you tear a triceps or lat or both you are unlikely to be able to train hard enough. Those injuries will be obvious to the judges. Lifting heavy weights is dangerous. No bodybuilder should do really heavy deadlifts.  
If you set a certain standard and then show up below that standard you cannot expect the same placing as previously.

Short men do not place high in the Olympia. They stuggle to make the top 10 and are more or less overlooked. Ronnie Rockel is another example of this bias.

Black men have small calves. Those with small calves have little or no chance of winning the Olympia. Few of the black bodybuilders who competed showed much in the way of cuts in their calves. Exceptions are Vince Taylor and Victor Martinez. If you are a no calves bodybuilder you really cannot expect to win the Olympia.

Black bodybuilders are bigger and better than white guys. A generalization, of course.

Joe Weider was not present at the awards which is sad. The end of an era, perhaps.

Hey Vince,

Where did you pick this up? Was that in the telecast too?
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: Hulkster on October 09, 2006, 06:44:30 PM
we also learned that one olympia win can transform a mediocre back into a "its the best ever fantastic oh my fucking god!" back, in that of Jay Cutler 8)
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: ARMZ on October 09, 2006, 06:46:52 PM
The lord loves Jay more..
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: Vince B on October 09, 2006, 06:52:06 PM
If you look at the images from the European Grand Prix contests it is clear Ronnie has torn his left lat. What a disaster that is. How the heck did he do that? Well, steroids and heavy deadlifts could combine to blow something eventually. Just my theory. His left triceps looks shorter than the right one. Sergio Oliva had that problem later in his career. I am not sure what causes that. Lots of bodybuilders are tearing muscles. Biceps, pecs, lats, you name it. Arthur Jones was right when he said we should not demonstrate our strength. Doing sets with 10 reps is still the way to go. All those heavy sets for a few reps is insanity.

Deadlifts have NO place in a bodybuilders program. That many do silly things doesn't surprize me. Collectively we are all dopes who lift weights because we believe so much nonsense and embrace a lot of crap from the past. For example, why does anyone still use free weights? Beat me, but there you are. Knuckleheaditis is almost universal among bodybuilders.
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: Vince B on October 09, 2006, 06:53:35 PM
Cutler has to learn how to pose better and not lean back so that his back is in shadows. We learned that the best back did win again. That tradition remains.
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: ARMZ on October 09, 2006, 06:57:10 PM
The lord made iron for a reason..  We must lift free weights for the lord..
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: Heywood on October 09, 2006, 07:04:28 PM
Good points, Vince.  I remember the IFBB stating that there would be criteria imposed this year, and that proportion and symmetry would (once again) be important.  I think the waistlines were what they were alluding to.  What would have happened if Ronny came in at "only" 250 lbs?   Muscle vs. proportions.  

Regarding injuries, the judges may have also sensed that Ronny was going down the same path that hurt Dorian's physique.  That is, serious injuries (tears) would begin to mount and do more harm than good to let him continue to win.  I'm not sure why bodybuilders think that doing rows with 400 lbs is a good idea.  I remember Boyer saying (in the 1970's) that he used less than 200 lbs, but did them very strictly.  Talk about longevity...





Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: McFarland on October 09, 2006, 07:22:29 PM
All very interesting points, gentlemen. 
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: McFarland on October 09, 2006, 07:38:33 PM
I'm still waiting to hear all the behind-the-scenes info regarding Ronnie and what's going on in his life, contract negotiations, etc.  Something changed way up top's all I know, because things just aren't the same anymore.  Everybody's acting all weird, and what the hell is Steve Blechman up to, and does that fit in anywhere?  Chad's also out of the loop it seems.  Ha ha ha shit this is gonna be good when it finally all comes to light...   
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: McFarland on October 09, 2006, 07:40:23 PM
I honestly think Blechman's plotting to take over every damn thing right about now... 
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: McFarland on October 09, 2006, 07:49:00 PM
He's the youngest of all the powers that be right now.  Everybody else's gotta be getting close to retirement.  Kennedy of Musclemag, that guy behind Ironman...everybody, even Peter McGough looks to be about done with all this nonsense here pretty soon.  This industry needs to keep an eye on Blechman...he's a clever one and still young enough to get diabolically power-hungry if he gets on a good enough roll...ha ha ha...and we all know that's required at some point if you're gonna make a mogul of yourself in this industry.  I think Chad Nicholls knew his gig was up, oh, about 2 and a half years ago and feels lucky to have gotten out of shit when he did unscathed, so he's not about to make any huge push for anything.  These are all just observations from a very far, BTW...I have very little access anymore to much inside stuff nor have I cared enough to ask anyone in a long time.  I guess I just thought I'd throw this out to see what came back.   ;D 
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: The True Adonis on October 09, 2006, 07:54:02 PM
This industry just hit another iceberg and the hull is seeping in water.  Pretty soon the HMS IFBB will see a watery grave, deep in the abyss.  Like a good captain, Weider will go down with the ship and Arnold will jump off in a lifeboat never to sail again on the big ship. 
The only question remains is how far will the ship sink and will anyone care that its capsized?
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: AVBG on October 09, 2006, 07:54:54 PM
This industry just hit another iceberg and the hull is seeping in water.  Pretty soon the HMS IFBB will see a watery grave, deep in the abyss.  Like a good captain, Weider will go down with the ship and Arnold will jump off in a lifeboat never to sail again on the big ship. 
The only question remains is how far will the ship sink and will anyone care that its capsized?

As if Arnold gives a shit?
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: McFarland on October 09, 2006, 08:09:50 PM
I think I'm most concerned because Blechman makes sure that every single picture used in his magazine is altered to make the guys all look 15-30 pounds heavier and he does something to the friggin resolution of the pics to make the physiques in there look artificially drier/crisper than what they actually are.  Now this is just my observation...but I think there really is something else he has done with the pics that makes them look better than they actually are.  This fucks everything up because it leaves us all chasing ideals that aren't possible without fucking your end-result conditioning up.  Guys need to stop eating so fucking much protein, leave the insulin alone, and spend more time posing.  You know how you spend more time posing?  You fucking drop all the water-retentive shit at the start of the diet so that you've got something fun to look at in the mirror throughout the entire diet.  Trust me...if you look good as hell you WANT to "practice posing."  Nowadays, in order to weigh as absolutely much as possible on contest day, guys do multiple grams of test right until the VERY end and then diuretic their kidneys out right before the show.  Physiques are going to shit this way.         
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: Marty Champions on October 09, 2006, 08:24:12 PM
i say we let adonis control everything!! ill be his bodyguard
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: McFarland on October 09, 2006, 08:31:38 PM
i say we let adonis control everything!! ill be his bodyguard

I think you're right.  But I also think Bast has a crush on you, so be prepared to deal with that, too.   
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: The True Adonis on October 09, 2006, 08:33:33 PM
I think I'm most concerned because Blechman makes sure that every single picture used in his magazine is altered to make the guys all look 15-30 pounds heavier and he does something to the friggin resolution of the pics to make the physiques in there look artificially drier/crisper than what they actually are.  Now this is just my observation...but I think there really is something else he has done with the pics that makes them look better than they actually are.  This fucks everything up because it leaves us all chasing ideals that aren't possible without fucking your end-result conditioning up.  Guys need to stop eating so fucking much protein, leave the insulin alone, and spend more time posing.  You know how you spend more time posing?  You fucking drop all the water-retentive shit at the start of the diet so that you've got something fun to look at in the mirror throughout the entire diet.  Trust me...if you look good as hell you WANT to "practice posing."  Nowadays, in order to weigh as absolutely much as possible on contest day, guys do multiple grams of test right until the VERY end and then diuretic their kidneys out right before the show.  Physiques are going to shit this way.         

Now that is some bodybuilding knowledge you won`t find in the magazines. 
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: Marty Champions on October 09, 2006, 08:40:37 PM
I think you're right.  But I also think Bast has a crush on you, so be prepared to deal with that, too.   

most humans envy me
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: McFarland on October 09, 2006, 08:47:32 PM
Now that is some bodybuilding knowledge you won`t find in the magazines. 

Well that's the best I can make of the information I've had available to me.  The only other alternative I can think of is that the sort of gh or maybe gear they had in the mid-to-late 80's up until about 2000 was of a much higher quality or there was some small change in the manufacturing process of the gh that makes a real difference in the way it works in the body...but if you look at all the physiques from the late 80's, they were all posing, posing, posing...not just posing for pictures...but the pictures were taken of the guys POSING FOR POSING'S SAKE.  Guys back then idolized their own bodies and were obsessed with them.  They were in shape for a longer period of time throughout the year, and their detail was greater.  I've been considering this theory for a really long time now, but yesterday I took about 10 minutes to really look at alot of the little random pictures gracing the walls of Gold's Venice again...there are many more than probably any of you realize hung there...I mean, there are all these 8x10's comprising basically the whole wall next to the stairs leading up to the upstairs locker rooms, and they are ALL from right around the time Gold's took up that location from the original one, so around 1981 or 2 or 3...somebody help me here...but what you get when you see all of them together is an overwhelming sense that something in the base-level mentality of the sport has deteriorated.  Back then, guys sat around and tried to see how fucking beautifully awesome they could get their bodies to look...the competition was just as much with themselves as it was with each other, too.  I don't know...you've just gotta see it.  Maybe I'll take my camera in there and try to capture some of what I'm talking about.  These pictures aren't to be found on the net anywhere and they are a virtual treasure...each one of them will eventually be seen as an irreplaceable piece of bodybuilding history when they are gone...someone needs to get this stuff while it's still there, seriously.      
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: McFarland on October 09, 2006, 08:55:39 PM
most humans envy me

Actually, Daddywaddy, listen to me...you embody alot of the traits that I saw in those photos.  I know you sit around and look at yourself all day and this shit you talk isn't made up.  There is an ability that the mind has to take whatever you give the body and turn it into pure perfection through sheer intention and a true passion/love/appreciation of the form that you are sculpting.  when you have learned to visualize the end product, and face your current one with enough imagination, you influence your phenotypic development.  I am convinced of this and the type of muscle shape/detail you have in some of your bodyparts really does demonstrate this to me.  My point is that back in the day, before all the bullshit, when guys were still figuring out what was possible with God's help and not through forced and unjustified training/dieting/supplementing techniques, bodybuilding was something magical.  There is no soul left in this sport.  In it's current state, it is dead and devoid of passion for itself.   
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: pobrecito on October 09, 2006, 08:58:39 PM


Deadlifts have NO place in a bodybuilders program.

Right, becuase the men with the two greatest backs in history didnt do deadlifts :-\
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: Palpatine Q on October 09, 2006, 09:01:03 PM
Actually, Daddywaddy, listen to me...you embody alot of the traits that I saw in those photos.  I know you sit around and look at yourself all day and this shit you talk isn't made up.  There is an ability that the mind has to take whatever you give the body and turn it into pure perfection through sheer intention and a true passion/love/appreciation of the form that you are sculpting.  when you have learned to visualize the end product, and face your current one with enough imagination, you influence your phenotypic development.  I am convinced of this and the type of muscle shape/detail you have in some of your bodyparts really does demonstrate this to me.  My point is that back in the day, before all the bullshit, when guys were still figuring out what was possible with God's help and not through forced and unjustified training/dieting/supplementing techniques, bodybuilding was something magical.  There is no soul left in this sport.  In it's current state, it is dead and devoid of passion for itself.   

I am of this mind as well. If you have the ability, you will yourself into what you want to be. This can be done positively or negatively.
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: delta9mda on October 09, 2006, 09:07:29 PM
Actually, Daddywaddy, listen to me...you embody alot of the traits that I saw in those photos.  I know you sit around and look at yourself all day and this shit you talk isn't made up.  There is an ability that the mind has to take whatever you give the body and turn it into pure perfection through sheer intention and a true passion/love/appreciation of the form that you are sculpting.  when you have learned to visualize the end product, and face your current one with enough imagination, you influence your phenotypic development.  I am convinced of this and the type of muscle shape/detail you have in some of your bodyparts really does demonstrate this to me.  My point is that back in the day, before all the bullshit, when guys were still figuring out what was possible with God's help and not through forced and unjustified training/dieting/supplementing techniques, bodybuilding was something magical.  There is no soul left in this sport.  In it's current state, it is dead and devoid of passion for itself.   
yo Mc, why you riding dw's nuts?
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: McFarland on October 09, 2006, 09:10:41 PM
Even the fucking exercises they performed back in the day were chosen based on their ability to bask in the grace of it's execution, especially when the machines were in front of a mirror.  Seriously, they felt their physiques, they felt the exercises that created them.  The exercises were not merely performed to induce hypertrophy.  There are many levels of hypertrophy, IMO, and the types you trigger are as much a result of how you choose to feel the fibers and structures involved.  Everything went to hell when Dorian made it cool to get covered up and grow a beard when you trained.  Think about it.  That's when physiques went to shit.  There was no more appreciation of the physique in it's everyday form...only in the final days before competition was the physical form ever contemplated from anything other than an entirely objective standpoint.  How much do I weigh?  How much did I lift on that last set and how many reps did I get last time, how much longer do I have until it's time for carbs again and then how much longer til the insulin's most active, blah blah blah...I'm telling you...those guys just sat around and TRAINED.  Squeezed...found a new angle or arc through which to move a weight to feel the area they knew needed something else.  Then when they got hungry, they ate...if they didn't crave 75 grams of fucking protein 5 times a day, they sure as hell didn't EAT 75 grams of protein 5 times a day.  They appreciated every bite that entered their mouths and even took time to consider how perfectly those nutrients were for their needs...ha ha ha  Man it's just a mentality that you have to work into like this, but I hope you get my point.  The best physiques our kind have witnessed have been a direct product of an equally appreciable MINDSET that inevitably accompanied them.    
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: McFarland on October 09, 2006, 09:14:03 PM
yo Mc, why you riding dw's nuts?

I like to encourage him to take seriously alot of the points he speaks about in a trivial manner...he has a much more free way of thinking than most and through that very valid ideas flow.  If he took himself more seriously he'd come to expect more of himself than he currently does, which he is more than capable of achieving.  I don't think God would have given us dreams we weren't capable of actualizing.  I'll die believing either that, or that I just didn't want my dreams bad enough.  At any rate, I'm off the hook.  See how that works?  I encourage and am a true fan of any passion that I can identify, in any sport, place, genre, etc.  It's the only thing that's real, and there are many places in this little subculture of ours that true passion can indeed be found.      
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: Jerryme7 on October 09, 2006, 09:28:08 PM
Maybe God has better things in store for Ronnie and is teaching Ronnie humilty and humbleness.....

Remember the story of Job?
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: AVBG on October 09, 2006, 09:48:52 PM
Maybe God has better things in store for Ronnie and is teaching Ronnie humilty and humbleness.....

Remember the story of Job?

Amen.
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: The True Adonis on October 09, 2006, 09:58:11 PM
Even the fucking exercises they performed back in the day were chosen based on their ability to bask in the grace of it's execution, especially when the machines were in front of a mirror.  Seriously, they felt their physiques, they felt the exercises that created them.  The exercises were not merely performed to induce hypertrophy.  There are many levels of hypertrophy, IMO, and the types you trigger are as much a result of how you choose to feel the fibers and structures involved.  Everything went to hell when Dorian made it cool to get covered up and grow a beard when you trained.  Think about it.  That's when physiques went to shit.  There was no more appreciation of the physique in it's everyday form...only in the final days before competition was the physical form ever contemplated from anything other than an entirely objective standpoint.  How much do I weigh?  How much did I lift on that last set and how many reps did I get last time, how much longer do I have until it's time for carbs again and then how much longer til the insulin's most active, blah blah blah...I'm telling you...those guys just sat around and TRAINED.  Squeezed...found a new angle or arc through which to move a weight to feel the area they knew needed something else.  Then when they got hungry, they ate...if they didn't crave 75 grams of fucking protein 5 times a day, they sure as hell didn't EAT 75 grams of protein 5 times a day.  They appreciated every bite that entered their mouths and even took time to consider how perfectly those nutrients were for their needs...ha ha ha  Man it's just a mentality that you have to work into like this, but I hope you get my point.  The best physiques our kind have witnessed have been a direct product of an equally appreciable MINDSET that inevitably accompanied them.    

Great post!

Totally embodies The Adonis Principles to a degree!
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: McFarland on October 09, 2006, 10:05:43 PM
Great post!

Totally embodies The Adonis Principles to a degree!

Well sure it does.  I never said you weren't onto something...I think there's a few of us here onto some things that may yet add up to what we're all looking for, it's just a matter of putting all the pieces together.  Bodybuilding is at a very critical point...we all need to examine our motives and why we are here.  We need to examine the sport's past...we need to examine our sport's past's influences and what THEY were thinking.  I think there's been a certain amount of shame unjustifiably ascribed to what it is that we're all trying to do here.  Perhaps it's a case of trying to remedy the perceived sins of the fathers when all that's required is rectifying our own errors.  Maybe it's about accountability?  I don't know, but this sport's gone to hell as it is currently being portrayed.  Whatever, I'm done for tonight and had fun putting this out there so fuck it.   ;D   
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: Vince B on October 09, 2006, 10:23:49 PM
I think McFarland is suggesting that modern bodybuilding has gone too far with the drugs and the long term use of such dosages and variety of drugs affects the physiques. Not mentioned was the practice of using substances injected into target muscles to get them bigger. I suppose the paradigm beliefs have changed. No longer do bodybuilders believe they can fashion their physiques in the gym. They require the services of guys who fool around with substances to both affect hypertrophy and definition. It is so bad now that reputations can be made just assisting guys to prepare for contests.

I think Dorian set a standard for physiques in that precontest photo back in 93 and no one has presented in that condition before or since. Many champs look amazing before contests but appear less than stellar on stage. Something drastic and impacting is happening in the bodies of bodybuilders in the last weeks before a contest. Sure they still train and many do heaps of aerobics, but many lose a lot of size so that they can appear cut on stage. It is as if some philospher's stone is required to get everything right. Knuckleheads on their own cannot get everything right. What we have now is proxy bodybuilding where champions rely on others and substances for success instead of finding how to effect changes by training in the gym.  
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: McFarland on October 09, 2006, 10:51:04 PM
Yeah man what happened to THIS SHIT!  ha ha ha
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: McFarland on October 09, 2006, 11:05:09 PM
Oh shit remember these?   :D
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: McFarland on October 09, 2006, 11:10:29 PM
Notice that even Achim Albrecht above, known at the height of his popularity as his day's most representative "mass monster," STILL had a level of conditioning that was better than what most of our current day's most aesthetically-regarded are bringing to the stage.  Seriously.  Was Victor Martinez or Melvin Anthony's arms that lean at the Olympia?  
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: LASTREP72 on October 10, 2006, 12:02:07 AM
We now know that God no longer wants Ronnie Coleman to win. Neither did the judges. Just shows that we do not know what God's plan is for us. Ronnie was convinced his purpose was to be Mr Olympia. Now what is he supposed to believe? I just wish people would stop mentioning God in public announcements. Surely Ron cannot blame God for his placing?!

The IFBB judges can award the title to a non-reigning competitor. Apparently the judges did the right thing this year. Is that a miracle or the new IFBB criteria in force? The IFBB remains consistent in that they do not award first place to a person who does not present with the necessary condition. That applies now to former champions.

Injuries can make a difference to condition. Diet can also be important. If you tear a triceps or lat or both you are unlikely to be able to train hard enough. Those injuries will be obvious to the judges. Lifting heavy weights is dangerous. No bodybuilder should do really heavy deadlifts.

If you set a certain standard and then show up below that standard you cannot expect the same placing as previously.

Short men do not place high in the Olympia. They stuggle to make the top 10 and are more or less overlooked. Ronnie Rockel is another example of this bias.

Black men have small calves. Those with small calves have little or no chance of winning the Olympia. Few of the black bodybuilders who competed showed much in the way of cuts in their calves. Exceptions are Vince Taylor and Victor Martinez. If you are a no calves bodybuilder you really cannot expect to win the Olympia.

Black bodybuilders are bigger and better than white guys. A generalization, of course.

Joe Weider was not present at the awards which is sad. The end of an era, perhaps.
At one point I accually thought Jay knock Ronnie off his thrown in a lagit way - but after watching the webcast re-plays I thought otherwise. What we learned is that the fix was in due to pressure from the PDI - if the judges based everything on size alone - Ruhl or Ronnie should have one - if their decision was based on the total package Dex should be Mr.O 8)
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: Vince B on October 10, 2006, 12:06:26 AM
This year some sites offered a way to compare each competitor in all the compulsory poses. If you do that objectively then Jay wins here and Ronnie is somewhere down the line. If you look at all the comparisons and view the videos then it is clear that Ronnie has seen his day. With his injured lat and tricep he is unlikely to be able to get to the top again. I think retiring would be best for all concerned. We have seen this happen in other sports and gone are the days when guys like Dorian could win with one full biceps.  
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: LASTREP72 on October 10, 2006, 12:13:14 AM
This year some sites offered a way to compare each competitor in all the compulsory poses. If you do that objectively then Jay wins here and Ronnie is somewhere down the line. If you look at all the comparisons and view the videos then it is clear that Ronnie has seen his day. With his injured lat and tricep he is unlikely to be able to get to the top again. I think retiring would be best for all concerned. We have seen this happen in other sports and gone are the days when guys like Dorian could win with one full biceps.  
Are they gone - have you checked out Culter's right bicep - it's losing the race with the left one ??? And let's not forget about Toney Freeman who won a show this year with just a pec and a half ;D
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: Cableguy on October 10, 2006, 01:04:07 AM
I think McFarland has a good point regarding the power of the mind and what can be
acheived. I'm still making gains at 44 (though I am by no means genetically superior in any way)
because I REFUSE to let it be any other way!
I also beleive that mindset can be applied to other aspects as well. For instance, most people
beleive me to be 10 years younger, and to be completely honest with myself, I do look about 34.
Now, some of that can probably be attributed to living a somewhat healthy lifestyle, and maybe
some of it to having "good Italian genes", but I think it's due in large part to my mindset.
I made up my mind awhile ago that aging was not for me and that I would not accept it as an option!
I figure if I fool myself enough, it will become reality! When I see my "skinny fat" friends falling
apart before my eyes, it gives me a lot of inspiration, let me tell you!
What you truly beleive has the power to become a self-fulfilling prophecy, be it good or bad!
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: Vince B on October 10, 2006, 01:34:48 AM
What does a 34 year old look like? Anyway, perhaps continually growing helps keep you young. That and having the genetics to look okay as you get older. If you attend school reunions in the future you will see that some people age far more than others. It really is quite scary. Training is not sufficient because that can actually wear the body down. Growing is the key. Train to keep part of your body growing at all times and you have a chance at staying younger for far longer than your mates.  
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: Cableguy on October 10, 2006, 02:45:56 AM
Unfortunitely, no one put together a 20 nor 25 year reunion. I would have loved to have gone!
As for relative age, I guess that can be hard to guage. I guess I can say I hardly look different
agewise from photos of myself 10 years ago.
As far as training wearing the body down, you do have a point, as my rotators will attest!
Anyway my piont is, you don't have to accept "getting old" as it is traditionally viewed.
I see so many people change the way they behave to fit their chronological age. Also, when you start
whining about "I'm too old" for this or that, your'e just talking yourself into it.
I'm still the same guy I always was. I'd like to think I picked up a little knowledge and wisdom
along the way, but I don't see myself any differently than I ever did. I just keep doing what
I've always done, and don't even think about it. I'm older than a lot of guys at work and at my
gym, but I don't feel out of place at all amongst those guys. I feel more out of place usually with my own peer group! We may have more shared experiences, but that's about it! 
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: venom gang.bronze on October 10, 2006, 03:01:13 AM
We now know that God no longer wants Ronnie Coleman to win. Neither did the judges. Just shows that we do not know what God's plan is for us. Ronnie was convinced his purpose was to be Mr Olympia. Now what is he supposed to believe? I just wish people would stop mentioning God in public announcements. Surely Ron cannot blame God for his placing?!

The IFBB judges can award the title to a non-reigning competitor. Apparently the judges did the right thing this year. Is that a miracle or the new IFBB criteria in force? The IFBB remains consistent in that they do not award first place to a person who does not present with the necessary condition. That applies now to former champions.

Injuries can make a difference to condition. Diet can also be important. If you tear a triceps or lat or both you are unlikely to be able to train hard enough. Those injuries will be obvious to the judges. Lifting heavy weights is dangerous. No bodybuilder should do really heavy deadlifts.

If you set a certain standard and then show up below that standard you cannot expect the same placing as previously.

Short men do not place high in the Olympia. They stuggle to make the top 10 and are more or less overlooked. Ronnie Rockel is another example of this bias.

Black men have small calves. Those with small calves have little or no chance of winning the Olympia. Few of the black bodybuilders who competed showed much in the way of cuts in their calves. Exceptions are Vince Taylor and Victor Martinez. If you are a no calves bodybuilder you really cannot expect to win the Olympia.

Black bodybuilders are bigger and better than white guys. A generalization, of course.

Joe Weider was not present at the awards which is sad. The end of an era, perhaps.
there is no god, no devil, no nothing. when will people wake up? we are our own gods!
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: Hurricane Beef ! on October 10, 2006, 03:20:03 AM

" Joe Weider was not present at the awards which is sad. The end of an era, perhaps. "

I thought Joe was at the Olympia.

The Beef
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: pumpster on October 10, 2006, 04:47:18 AM
From experience I concur with Vince on the need to train smart for longevity, to avoid injury-keep the reps moderate, the weights fairly heavy but not overwhelming and use machines when they're good rather than blindly following the free-weights mantra just because others do. Heavy deads are out of the question, as is heavy lifting in general, with age.

The only thing i don't agree with is Yates as any paragon of BB. Quite the contrary in fact; he was one of the first to stray from the old days regimens, to embark on newfound drug cocktails and to get that bigger waist to go with the bloated unnatural looking physique. I don't find those black and white shots appealing. Something Schwarzenegger noticed and remarked on in the 90s as i recall; Oliva also was never impressed by Yates-neither feels Yates embodies BB ideals, nor do I.

What i'd like to know but will probably never hear about is why Coleman wasn't told by either Weider or one of his own circle prior to the show that he no longer had it and should retire prior to the show, or was he told and chose to disregard it? Especially in the face of multiple injuries it should've been clear to all concerned that this was a turning point. And why Yates in the same situation was permitted to go out on top; what were the dynamics then and now and why the difference?
Title: Re: What we learned from the Mr Olympia results.
Post by: Palpatine Q on October 10, 2006, 08:13:30 PM
From experience I concur with Vince on the need to train smart for longevity, to avoid injury-keep the reps moderate, the weights fairly heavy but not overwhelming and use machines when they're good rather than blindly following the free-weights mantra just because others do. Heavy deads are out of the question, as is heavy lifting in general, with age.

The only thing i don't agree with is Yates as any paragon of BB. Quite the contrary in fact; he was one of the first to stray from the old days regimens, to embark on newfound drug cocktails and to get that bigger waist to go with the bloated unnatural looking physique. I don't find those black and white shots appealing. Something Schwarzenegger noticed and remarked on in the 90s as i recall; Oliva also was never impressed by Yates-neither feels Yates embodies BB ideals, nor do I.

What i'd like to know but will probably never hear about is why Coleman wasn't told by either Weider or one of his own circle prior to the show that he no longer had it and should retire prior to the show, or was he told and chose to disregard it? Especially in the face of multiple injuries it should've been clear to all concerned that this was a turning point. And why Yates in the same situation was permitted to go out on top; what were the dynamics then and now and why the difference?


Excellent post. I lost a lot of respect for pro BBing when having a thick waist became acceptable. When people say how huge Cutler is and how much he weighs My response is "so what....look at size of his waist." It just doesn't add up to me, BBers should have a trim waistline  NO EXCEPTIONS.

I think the reason Ronnie went out like he did is his own arrogance. Yates was realistic enough to know he was done, Ronnie wasn't.