Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: the shadow on October 10, 2006, 01:33:40 AM

Title: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: the shadow on October 10, 2006, 01:33:40 AM
JAY PWNS RONNIE HERE!!!!!!LOOK AT JAYS TRAPS,LATS,CALFS..NO FUGGIN CONTEST
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: IFBBwannaB on October 10, 2006, 01:46:59 AM
JAY PWNS RONNIE HERE!!!!!!LOOK AT JAYS TRAPS,LATS,CALFS..NO FUGGIN CONTEST

LOL you are seriously blind,Coleman owns him on all these photos.
Get a life..or at least a set of working eyes.
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: David Shaw on October 10, 2006, 02:09:00 AM
LOL you are seriously blind,Coleman owns him on all these photos.
Get a life..or at least a set of working eyes.

So ahhh why is Ronnie's right side bigger than his left side (delts in particular).
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: the shadow on October 10, 2006, 02:40:50 AM
LOL you are seriously blind,Coleman owns him on all these photos.
Get a life..or at least a set of working eyes.
i think so your the blind guy...cutler easily makes ronnie look likea lil bitch
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: Bluto on October 10, 2006, 02:52:21 AM
Looks to me that Ronnie hasn't extended fully in the last picture and if so it's worthless to compare with
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: the shadow on October 10, 2006, 03:03:38 AM
Looks to me that Ronnie hasn't extended fully in the last picture and if so it's worthless to compare with
ok then show me a pic where he fully extends....ronnie is crap and admit it jay pwns ronnie in these pics
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: krazee on October 10, 2006, 03:10:08 AM
What is pwns him in these pictures? You mean own him? As far as the back spread, I will admit Jay is wider this year. But as far as the other points you decided to clarify for all of us I don't see it, and look at Ronnie's legs, admit it they are huge compared to Cutlers. IMO, neither of them should have won this year....Dexter or Victor looked much sharper...just my 2 cents.
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: Hurricane Beef ! on October 10, 2006, 03:15:41 AM
JAY PWNS RONNIE HERE!!!!!!LOOK AT JAYS TRAPS,LATS,CALFS..NO FUGGIN CONTEST

Traps??? Are you crazy bro?

Ronnie happens to be one of the few guys out there with trap development. Anyone can hit a most muscular and show trap development from the front, hell even non bb's can hit that shot. But, look at the rear lat spread. Ronnie's traps make the others look like school girls.

Dante ( DoggCrap ) says Ronnie and JJ are the two boys with traps and have developed them through deadlifting. I am inclined to agree.

The Beef
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: delta9mda on October 10, 2006, 03:16:02 AM
LOL you are seriously blind,Coleman owns him on all these photos.
Get a life..or at least a set of working eyes.
uhhh, ronnie is getting killed in the back shots. look at the lat spread pic, that aint the old ronnie, that is old ronnie.
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: the shadow on October 10, 2006, 03:20:48 AM
uhhh, ronnie is getting killed in the back shots. look at the lat spread pic, that aint the old ronnie, that is old ronnie.
nice post man...i like people like you who are realistic for a while
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: DVSGOD on October 10, 2006, 03:22:15 AM
The only thing Ronnie has Jay on in those pics is traps from the rear ,  other than that all bodyparts and poses belong to Jay.
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: IFBBwannaB on October 10, 2006, 03:37:37 AM
Jay have no back thickness,look at the depth Coleman got to his back.
Jay is flat and not seperated from the back.

Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: BM OUT on October 10, 2006, 03:46:18 AM
Ronnie kills him in every shot on here.
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: The_Hammer on October 10, 2006, 03:58:40 AM
That back double bi of Hide reminds me of that pic of Gaspari.
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: adipo8 on October 10, 2006, 04:14:31 AM
Funny - I do not think some of you people have not even went to the show. At the O ... Ronnie was the only person that thought he looked good. Saturday night - he was in way better condition than friday. Prejudging is when the show is judged.

As far as the Europe shows I was not there so - YOU CAN NOT JUDGE - EVER FROM A PICTURE...EVER!

Only Ronnie knows why he lost, he is the only person that knows why he thought 300 would be a good weight , he is the only person that would think that midsections was not apart of bodybuilding anymore

Ronnie is the only person that knows....
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: Vince B on October 10, 2006, 04:32:23 AM
Yes, bodybuilders can be judged from photos. However, that does not mean the live process was identical. Often pictures do not portray each bodybuilder at his best. Most of the photographers took several photos of group poses so that they captured everyone doing the same pose at the same time. The individual comparison poses probably allow us to judge the men better than can be done in person. Especially if the photos are taken from the right position and not looking up as the judges usually do.
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: adipo8 on October 10, 2006, 04:38:47 AM
Yes, bodybuilders can be judged from photos. However, that does not mean the live process was identical. Often pictures do not portray each bodybuilder at his best. Most of the photographers took several photos of group poses so that they captured everyone doing the same pose at the same time. The individual comparison poses probably allow us to judge the men better than can be done in person. Especially if the photos are taken from the right position and not looking up as the judges usually do.

the live process is the one that wins the show. Love the conversation but sometimes the comments just do not make sense.
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: the shadow on October 10, 2006, 05:36:15 AM
Jay have no back thickness,look at the depth Coleman got to his back.
Jay is flat and not seperated from the back.


dude on some poses coleman kicks jays ass and on other poses its vice-versa..i think so jay owns ronnie is more poses.ronnie beats him in front double bi and side chest poses..jay has him on back double bi and back lat spreads..in the front lat spread jay is better..they both have equaly good most muscular pose..jay takes the winner on ab and thigh poses....they both have their weaknesses and their strengths..i would say jay is better in 1 or 2 poses on the whole..jay still wins with a good margin..
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: IFBBwannaB on October 10, 2006, 06:13:39 AM
Hmm...anyone else noticed Ronnie calves look really big and good in these pics?  :o
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: jaejonna on October 10, 2006, 06:15:14 AM
Hmm...anyone else noticed Ronnie calves look really big and good in these pics?  :o
No, only your gay ass does
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: HUGEPECS on October 10, 2006, 06:16:34 AM
they just pick somebody new this year to give it to
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: IFBBwannaB on October 10, 2006, 06:45:29 AM
No, only your gay ass does

A gay comment from a guy who keep saying "yes TA you look amazing ,you rock! do me hard"  ::)
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: nder98 on October 10, 2006, 06:48:41 AM
JAY PWNS RONNIE HERE!!!!!!LOOK AT JAYS TRAPS,LATS,CALFS..NO FUGGIN CONTEST

U smoken crack??
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: slayer on October 10, 2006, 08:43:11 AM
JAY PWNS RONNIE HERE!!!!!!LOOK AT JAYS TRAPS,LATS,CALFS..NO FUGGIN CONTEST
agreed , ronnie is a joke as the scorecards also said!
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: the shadow on October 10, 2006, 08:45:09 AM
U smoken crack??
did you get fucked by some guys....i think they must have inserted some crack up your ass biatch
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: Dorian 01 on October 10, 2006, 08:56:51 AM
Hmm...anyone else noticed Ronnie calves look really big and good in these pics?  :o
Yeah, sweet implants. Too bad he can't flex them.
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: body88 on October 10, 2006, 09:12:09 AM
A gay comment from a guy who keep saying "yes TA you look amazing ,you rock! do me hard"  ::)

Haha this could be the worst comeback ever seen.
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: Royalty on October 10, 2006, 10:32:18 AM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=100860.0;attach=109106;image)

jay looks like he takes up more space than ronnie here. Ronnie let Jay catch up and pass him.
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: XXXII/LX on October 10, 2006, 10:38:04 AM
Jays arms are baby smooth. Ron's detail has him by a mile.
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: nder98 on October 10, 2006, 10:40:50 AM
did you get fucked by some guys....i think they must have inserted some crack up your ass biatch

Nahhhh, I just usually get it despenced from your mama's rancid gaping twat :-*
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: nder98 on October 10, 2006, 10:42:29 AM
Jays arms are baby smooth. Ron's detail has him by a mile.

Exactly, whoever doesn't think so, is more thank likely f*&king retarded...
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: Alex23 on October 10, 2006, 10:55:09 AM
No, only your gay ass does

What was that for? You're pretty quick at calling racism on your ass but can't help to gay everybody out... pretty inconsistent..
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: pumpster on October 10, 2006, 10:58:01 AM
Another reminder of the uneven IFBB politics. This won, despite the fact the he along with Haney had one of the worst MMs ever. It's like a bad joke:
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: sinbad on October 10, 2006, 12:12:19 PM
Wow, Coleman not winning is almost criminal. Bodybuilding took a wrong turn somewhere, and is now so far from the mainstream it will be hard to come back. These guys look amazing, but they look like chemical lab experiments, I would take a Sergio, Robinson, or even Haney over these guys. Cutlers win may be seen as a right step in the PR department, mainstream looks and Slightly less freakish looking. The influx of drugs into other sports has clearly not helped matters much for bodybuilding which rewards it's participants for massive drug use. Mass monsters appeal to a small hardcore population, but the money is with appeal to the mainstream audience. Any way I am preaching to the choir ;D
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: IFBBwannaB on October 10, 2006, 12:28:25 PM
What was that for? You're pretty quick at calling racism on your ass but can't help to gay everybody out... pretty inconsistent..

He is a litle cry baby...they usualy act like that.

But its ok,by his pics we can clearly see he have down syndrom.
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: IceCold on October 10, 2006, 12:52:09 PM
Another reminder of the uneven IFBB politics. This won, despite the fact the he along with Haney had one of the worst MMs ever. It's like a bad joke:

so now the Mr. Olympia contest is decided on one pose - the most muscular pose.

just so happens that its one of dorian's worst poses and yet you keep bringing it up.

i dont see you posting pics of a side triceps or abs and thigh pose.  a

nd we wont even get into how coleman looked this year and how he got dominated by jay cutler (22-38) and even worse in the grand prix shows. 
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: stomper on October 10, 2006, 12:52:46 PM
no offense to ronnie but by those pics jay beat the hell outta him
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: Naked4Jesus on October 10, 2006, 12:54:44 PM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=100860.0;attach=109106;image)

jay looks like he takes up more space than ronnie here. Ronnie let Jay catch up and pass him.

Jay's closer to the camera in that pic and Ronnie is slightly behind.  If you've seen shots of them taken from a distance you'd see that Ronnie is much bigger than Jay at every angle. 
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: Naked4Jesus on October 10, 2006, 12:57:27 PM
See what I mean?

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=100775.0;attach=109013;image)
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: Naked4Jesus on October 10, 2006, 01:00:50 PM
Another example:

(http://i60.photobucket.com/albums/h29/NeoSeminole/2006%20Dutch%20GP/Prejudging6.jpg)

Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: Alex23 on October 11, 2006, 01:03:20 AM
See what I mean?

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=100775.0;attach=109013;image)

Yep, you're right... but Jay's conditioning still slightly better..
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: sculpture on October 11, 2006, 05:17:26 AM
Yep, you're right... but Jay's conditioning still slightly better..

What gave that away?

Jays obvious edge on detail, sliced hamstrings and delineated lower back.

Think before you type
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: GoneAway on October 11, 2006, 07:27:31 AM
Ronnie has Jay from the front upperbody. Jay has Ronnie from the back upperbody.
Jay has Ronnie on legs, period.

Jay wins IMO.
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: Alex23 on October 11, 2006, 08:57:00 AM
What gave that away?
Jays obvious edge on detail, sliced hamstrings and delineated lower back.
Think before you type

Here we go...  ::)
Title: Re: this is why RONNIE COLEMAN lost...
Post by: nycbull on October 11, 2006, 09:19:15 AM
Looks to me that Ronnie hasn't extended fully in the last picture and if so it's worthless to compare with

True, as are most photo comparison but most of your obsessive drolls will continue to compare still shots one after the other after the other until your eyeballs fall out. Its all mute unless the competitors are in the same exact stage of executing their pose, both inhaling or exhaling at the same point and under the standing under the same exact lighting conditions.

And any shot of two or more competitors at an angle is innaccurate as to which competitor is bigger, the one closest to the camera will always appear larger.

Stop the Insanity >:(