see for yourself ::)dude stop posting pics of big ron from his glorious years..i hate to say but in 2006 he looked really bad..this ain't 1998 dude..its 2006.so come back on the ground
This seems to be a recurring theme. I'll say it for the tenth million time. Jay beat Ronnie at the Olympia NOT the rest of the field. Dexter, Melvin, and VICTOR were all better than both of them. Jays back is definitely better than years past but it wasnt best onstage. Widest maybe. His rear double bi is pretty sick Ill give him that but Victor blew him and Ronnie off the stage from the rear. We will see next year if Jay is the real deal.
JAY'S WAIST WILL BE BIGGER THAN EVER NEXT YEAR.....BELIEVE IT
hahahahahaha.... flawless victory.... from the back even ronnies calves and tri's look outta controlwhat calves?
ronnie makes jay look like an amatur in the above pictures.
You but are you saying that he should be awarded the olympia every year because he looked that good then?
Yes, that is what History has dictated. The second the Horton took those b/w shots of Dorian in 93 that sealed his crown for the next 5 years. Coleman has won many of his titles based on his 98/99 form as well, with the exception of 2003.
soft and water logged
(http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/big/2006/2006olympia_pre_men237.jpg)
Mini Coleman in the middle has the best back.
GTFO. Winning the Mr. Olympia is not about beating Ronnie, it's about living up to the standard of a Mr. Olympia. If you can't beat it, then the reigning Mr. Olympia retains the crown.When all you have to do is show up, the "crown" loses a lot of prestige. Imagine the yankees winning every year just because 15-30 years ago they set a standard nobody has surpassed (I don't follow baseball). The best man should always win. Even if it's a new guy who only looks a shade better than the long time champ. That's balls. That's accountability. Just like the rule they used to have of nobody outside of the top 10 getting any money, show up in shape or go home with less money than the guy sweeping the stage.
Cutler was softer than a pancake with a 40" waist :-\
Jay should enter the masters Mr. O.
After all, he beat a masters competitor in 2006 - thats the only reason he won! ;D
Thats just it, would cutler of 06 beat ronnie of 98? NOPE thats why ronnie is the KING and is a better bber then Jay will ever be! end of story!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
umm...ronnie was at his best 8-10 years ago (96-98). cutler aint in ronnies league...not saying ronnie should have won the mr o...but neither should have cutler.
ronnie who? ???
you know....Big Bubba
Who this pregnant chick?
Who this pregnant chick?
I remember Jay was in an ad for some exercise equipment and in it he said "Do you want a body like this?"
Uhh, no. I don't think anyone wants to have a physique like that of most pros. Now if you were to put Frank Zane or Bob Paris in that commercial or maybe a pro like Darrem Charles who isn't as massive, people would agree they want to look like that. I don't think a lot of young bucks in the gym ever aspire to look like Jay, Ronnie, Markus, etc.
AGREED.
GTFO. Winning the Mr. Olympia is not about beating Ronnie, it's about living up to the standard of a Mr. Olympia. If you can't beat it, then the reigning Mr. Olympia retains the crown.
Cutler was softer than a pancake with a 40" waist :-\