I think Novacek is pretty underrated, Aikman somewhat overrated. Look for the Cowboys to repeat this year.
Jimmy is a mastermind.
YIP
Zack
I think Novacek is pretty underrated, Aikman somewhat overrated. Look for the Cowboys to repeat this year.
Jimmy is a mastermind.
YIP
Zack
Anytime the Cowboys lose it's a good thing. And this time they lost quite ugly. ;D
I think Novacek is pretty underrated, Aikman somewhat overrated. Look for the Cowboys to repeat this year.
Jimmy is a mastermind.
YIP
Zack
Yeah, but where would Emmit be without Moose blocking? Probably on some stupid dancing show.Nice stereotype, even though he lives up to it beautifully. ;)
There just might be a giant schit storm brewing in Cowboy country. Drew bitched about being benched to a reporter. His replacement stunk up the joint and Owens isn't happy.
The Cowboys are not far from imploding the whole season.
Can you believe Michael Irvin picked the them to win the Superbowl? How could you pick any team that has Bledsoe at QB?
Take a look at Drew's career numbers. They are very good. The guy is not mobile. Does not help the his offensive line is absolutely awful and cannot block anyone. The cowboys are going nowhere. Irvin is a fucking idiot. Most likely railed a few lines before that prediction. Drew can stink up the joint. But he is taking all the blame while the offensive line deserves at least 50 percent of it.
Both deserve the blame. Drew makes lots of dumb throws. Done it his whole career. He is a statue thats for sure. He can't evade any kind of a pass rush. The Cowboys offensive line is terrible. Where is nate Newton? Shit, forgot he was in jail. It wasn't Irvin's crack they found in his car!
Both deserve the blame. Drew makes lots of dumb throws. Done it his whole career. He is a statue thats for sure. He can't evade any kind of a pass rush. The Cowboys offensive line is terrible. Where is nate Newton? Shit, forgot he was in jail. It wasn't Irvin's crack they found in his car!
Sad to hear about Tiki retiring after this season. :(
I dunno why Parcells benched Bledsoe, not like Romo did jack shit.
Parcels is done. That was a dick move. I know Bledsoe can make some bonehead throws. But if you look at his career numbers they show he can be a very good QB. When you have a young kid Like Romo you stick with the vet. The offensive line was the reason Drew was sacked so many times last night. Yes, he is not mobile. But if the O line is not going to block at all what is the guy going to do? I do not care how shitty Dew was playing. Guy was getting NO help from that garbage O line. Romo showed you all why he should not be playing.
If I remember correctly Carson Palmer was sacked 5 times in one quarter when my Pats went out to Cicni and blew them out. Why would they put a immobile QB behind a O line that cannot block for shit? Then rip him when he gets sacked. Drew makes mistakes. but he is clearly the scapegoat for a bad, bad situation in Dallas ::)
f**k TO and f**k Parcells.
Starting a young QB like Romo sends a message to the whole team that you're not intending to do shit this season, that's fucked up considering some people had Dallas going to the Superbowl. A QB is gonna struggle, and it's not like the Giants are nobody. Bledsoe may have struggled, but the Cowboys were still close, but then Parcells had to go and put Romo in and who ended up making stupid rookie mistakes.
You y said it perfectly. The Giants are a damn good football team. Drew made some mistakes. Compounded by the Offensive line not doing there job at all. Romo starting will kill any chance the Cowboys had to make the playoffs.
What would be cool is if they would disband as a team and forfiet their remaining games.
What would be cool is if they would disband as a team and forfiet their remaining games.
Nah. I'd rather see them get pounded every week, and eek out a win every once in a while, so they can finish 8-8 or 9-7 and draft right in the middle of the first round.
Yeah maybe you are right. On second thought they lose all there remaining games by a margin of 2 points and Jerry, Bill and TO have nervous breakdowns.
Nate Newton! The biggest dope dealer in the history of mankind.
Can you believe Michael Irvin picked the them to win the Superbowl? How could you pick any team that has Bledsoe at QB?many teams picked Bledsoe to lead them to the promise land Buffalo,New England and Dallas. he was a number one draft pick, has been a NFL starting QB for more than ten years. yea he isnt mobile but the fact that he has been immobile for his entire career but yet is continually accepted by owners and coaches to start for their team speaks more about his ability to lead a team. any quarterback behind that line would be unsuccessful, two sacks last night were completely unimpeded. im no Bledsoe fan he throws to many interceptions in the red zone however people who dismiss him as an efective quarterback with out looking at the entire picture easily come to the conclusion that its always the quarterbacks fault. the offensive line needs to step it up until they do i dont care who they have under center.
I dunno why Parcells benched Bledsoe, not like Romo did jack shit.Can't agree, only prob with replacing him was not doing it sooner, something Parcells has done before. They have to elevate the play of the QB, so it's inevitable that someone else had to go in, the earlier the better so as to get reps in practice and game experience. If he can eliminate the mistakes he's physically an improvement over Bledsoe. Also gets the ball to TO more, which will only help the team overall.
Parcels is done. That was a dick move.
many teams picked Bledsoe to lead them to the promise land Buffalo,New England and Dallas. he was a number one draft pick, has been a NFL starting QB for more than ten years. yea he isnt mobile but the fact that he has been immobile for his entire career but yet is continually accepted by owners and coaches to start for their team speaks more about his ability to lead a team.Few think he was ever a great QB, rather the perception is that he was a good one. Thus it's a little unfair to assume he was supposed to be a savior. He played well on a weak team in Buffalo, now he's too old, doesn't have consistent velocity or accuracy anymore AND looks shelf-shocked. Which is why Romo's an upgrade if he can eliminate the mistakes through game exposure and practice reps given that he's much better physically. He should've been in sooner but Bledsoe's deterioration might not have been evident sooner and/or Parcells tends to favor veteran QBs even if it sometimes hurts the team.
many teams picked Bledsoe to lead them to the promise land Buffalo,New England and Dallas. he was a number one draft pick, has been a NFL starting QB for more than ten years. yea he isnt mobile but the fact that he has been immobile for his entire career but yet is continually accepted by owners and coaches to start for their team speaks more about his ability to lead a team. any quarterback behind that line would be unsuccessful, two sacks last night were completely unimpeded. im no Bledsoe fan he throws to many interceptions in the red zone however people who dismiss him as an efective quarterback with out looking at the entire picture easily come to the conclusion that its always the quarterbacks fault. the offensive line needs to step it up until they do i dont care who they have under center.
But he can be VERY effective also. That line is garbage and anyone who blames Bledsoe for the Cowboys meltdown is in Denial.Only effective some of the time, now. The team's not that good overall, didn't deserve the hype. Romo's physically an improvement at QB IF he can get the game experience and reps and understands how to minimize mistakes.
Can't agree, should've been done closer to the beginning of the season. They have to elevate the play of the QB, so it's inevitable that someone else had to go in, the earlier the better so as to get reps in practice and game experience. If he can eliminate the mistakes that way, he's definitely an improvement over Bledsoe. Also gets the ball to TO more, which will only help the team overall.-if he was a definite improvement over Bledsoe he would have been the starter at the beginning of the season.
Few think he was ever a great QB, rather the perception is that he was a good one. Thus it's a little unfair to blame him for some of the problems-he played well with a weak team in Buffalo, now he's too old, doesn't have consistent velocity or accuracy anymore, which is why Romo's an upgrade if he can eliminate the mistakes through game exposure and practice reps.
-if he was a definite improvement over Bledsoe he would have been the starter at the beginning of the season.Then you haven't followed Parcels long enough; he favors veterans, sometimes too long.
-you dont need to be considered a great QB to lead your team to the Super Bowl ask Dilfer, Brad Johnson, Jeff Hostetler, Doug Williams and that is only in a span of 10 or so years. many average or below average QB's have won Super Bowls.Obviously; here in NY we saw that first-hand with Hostetler. However, the weaker the overall team the more the onus is on the QB. Since you brought up Hostetler you should know that Parcels didn't want to play him, in the same way he didn't want to play Romo-Hostetler only got in because of injury, not because of Parcels' wisdom. The rest, including the fact that Hotetler was more mobile, was good fortune-If Simms hadn't gotten injured it's unlikely they'd have gotten past SF that year IMO; they'd been unable to beat them with Simms standing there.
-he may be immobile but there is nothing wrong with his velocity, that is insane. he will have NFL velocity at the age of fifty. he can throw the ball through a brick wall. im not saying you need a rocket to be successful.I said velocity and accuracy. Second, he does not consistently throw the ball on a line anymore the way Romo did last night. Third, mobility. Romo's got the mechanics, only needs the experience to understand what to avoid. If Bledsoe wasn't such a jerk he'd be speaking with Romo, helping him understand the game.
oh yeah , everyone thought Pitt was going to beat Rutgers.... hhmmmmmmm
RUTGERS will be playing for a shot at the National Championship on the last week of the season vs. West Virginia!!!!
haha you're actually a rutgers fan, i wonder if you would've admitted to that 5 years ago
or did you just jump on the bandwagon ::)
E
-Then you haven't followed Parcels long enough; he favors veterans, sometimes too long.- on the contrary i have been following football in general for a while now, and being that Parcells has been a fixture in the NFL i have been following him. stating that Parcells favors verterans isnt saying much, that is well known even by people who dont follow Parcells.
-Obviously; here in NY we saw that first-hand with Hostetler. However, the weaker the overall team the more the onus is on the QB. Since you brought up Hostetler you should know that Parcels didn't want to play him, in the same way he didn't want to play Romo-Hostetler only got in because of injury, not because of Parcels' wisdom. The rest, including the fact that Hotetler was more mobile, was good fortune-If Simms hadn't gotten injured it's unlikely they'd have gotten past SF that year IMO; they'd been unable to beat them with Simms standing there.
-I said velocity and accuracy. Second, he does not consistently throw the ball on a line anymore the way Romo did last night. Third, mobility. Romo's got the mechanics, only needs the experience to understand what to avoid. If Bledsoe wasn't such a jerk he'd be speaking with Romo, helping him understand the game.
- on the contrary i have been following football in general for a while now, and being that Parcells has been a fixture in the NFL i have been following him. stating that Parcells favors verterans isnt saying much, that is well known even by people who dont follow Parcells.
- i think everyone on the east coast or anyone watching football at the time knew that Hoss only played because Simms was injured. again youre stating something w/out actually saying anything. and yes its is entirely your opinion that you feel the Giants wouldnt have gotten past the Niners with Simms. yes they did lose to the Niners earlier that year but they finished the season 13-3 i believe.
- your saying that Bledsoe doesnt consistantly throw the ball on a line any more than Romo does? i could easily argue the opposite.
Then you haven't followed Parcels long enough; he favors veterans, sometimes too long.funny you should say that cause....
Obviously; here in NY we saw that first-hand with Hostetler. However, the weaker the overall team the more the onus is on the QB. Since you brought up Hostetler you should know that Parcels didn't want to play him, in the same way he didn't want to play Romo-Hostetler only got in because of injury, not because of Parcels' wisdom. The rest, including the fact that Hotetler was more mobile, was good fortune-If Simms hadn't gotten injured it's unlikely they'd have gotten past SF that year IMO; they'd been unable to beat them with Simms standing there.
I said velocity and accuracy. Second, he does not consistently throw the ball on a line anymore the way Romo did last night. Third, mobility. Romo's got the mechanics, only needs the experience to understand what to avoid. If Bledsoe wasn't such a jerk he'd be speaking with Romo, helping him understand the game.