Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Tom on November 05, 2006, 05:10:46 PM

Title: which pro/top amateur bb would still be huge if......
Post by: Tom on November 05, 2006, 05:10:46 PM

just curious as to which pro bb and top amateurs would still be gigantic without all the "gear"?


the mass monsters: coleman, ruhl, and the new mr.o, cutler what is everyone's best guesses as far as how much they would weight, what their measurements would be, ectera.

surely, cutler would still be gigantic, yes?

Title: Re: which pro/top amateur bb would still be huge if......
Post by: whitewidow on November 05, 2006, 05:12:42 PM

heres one guy - who is a mass monster with or without drugs

Title: Re: which pro/top amateur bb would still be huge if......
Post by: the choad on November 05, 2006, 06:32:12 PM

Lee Priest would still be huge without gear...Just IMO

Title: Re: which pro/top amateur bb would still be huge if......
Post by: Miss Karen on November 05, 2006, 07:13:23 PM

AGREED.

Title: Re: which pro/top amateur bb would still be huge if......
Post by: UpTheDosage on November 05, 2006, 07:16:41 PM

Nobody is HUGE without gear. I'm sure all of them would be big or in better shape than the average gym rat if they still trained and ate the same way they do with gear. They just wouldn't have that "wow" factor.

Except for Billy Guns. He's the only exception to that rule. That guy is just a genetic freak with the most dramatic v-taper i've ever seen.

Title: Re: which pro/top amateur bb would still be huge if......
Post by: Hunter86 on November 05, 2006, 07:44:30 PM

all the talk of Cutler and Ronnie at next years O, everyone is gonna be in for the shock of their life when Billy Guns steals the Sandow

Title: Re: which pro/top amateur bb would still be huge if......
Post by: TheGoldenPrince on November 05, 2006, 07:55:03 PM

Billy rules! ;)