Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Figo on November 16, 2006, 06:53:06 AM
-
Dillet or Ronnie? Who's the one with most impact?
Who had the bigger arms? Both have/had freaky huge guns.
(http://students.ukdw.ac.id/~22992157/dillet.gif)
(http://www.bbcenter.sk/images/gallery/arnolds_classic/ronnie_coleman/coleman03.jpg)
-
you mean you cant tell from the photos? stick to football figo
-
you mean you cant tell from the photos? stick to football figo
hahahahahahahahaah.... ;D
-
If Dillet had a back he could have been better then Ronnie IMO but that's something that can't be changed.
-
If Dillet had a back he could have been better then Ronnie IMO but that's something that can't be changed.
correct mikethaasshole
-
you mean you cant tell from the photos? stick to football figo
;D Maybe I should...
Good one, but they're not comparison pics.
Have these 2 ever stood side-by-side in comparison shots on stage?
-
correct mikethaasshole
You get laid yet Shadow?
-
You get laid yet Shadow?
Fuck no, you should see all the pent up anger he has released towards me today, if it wasn't for me and others like me he would have no way to release the anger from within.
-
f**k no, you should see all the pent up anger he has released towards me today, if it wasn't for me and others like me he would have no way to release the anger from within.
Poor Shadow, you are a good man for putting up with his virgin angst Mike.
-
Modified the Coleman pic so he's not showing anything more than Dillett:
-
Poor Shadow, you are a good man for putting up with his virgin angst Mike.
just get your head out of mikes asshole!!!!..
-
ronnie was more complete, but if you a comic book illustrator draw a huge muscled freak it would look like dillet.
-
huh, huh ??? ???
-
ronnie at his best is the greatest of all time.
dillet shouldnt even be mentioned in the same sentence as ronnie.
-
ronnie at his best is the greatest of all time.
dillet shouldnt even be mentioned in the same sentence as ronnie.
agreed.
(http://body.builder.hu/imagebank/pictures/976994014.jpg)
-
(http://body.builder.hu/imagebank/pictures/977754641.jpg)
-
agreed.
(http://body.builder.hu/imagebank/pictures/976994014.jpg)
Really I always thought you were a Dorian Yates kinda guy ???
-
lol
-
ronnie for sure..
-
Nowadays Dillets arms are better, since Ronnie has lost his triceps at a poker tournament.
-
dillet has better arms.
he has triceps and full biceps.
ronnie has very short biceps.
-
dillet has better arms.
he has triceps and full biceps.
ronnie has very short biceps.
please
::)
Dillett's arms as good as they were were never ever this good:
-
No question.. Ronnie.
-
Biceps: Coleman
Quads: Coleman
Chest: Coleman
Back: Coleman
Shoulders: Dillet
Triceps: Dillet
Forearms: Dillet
Hams: Dillet
Calves: Dillet
Abs: Dillet
-
Biceps: Coleman
Quads: Coleman
Chest: Coleman
Back: Coleman
Shoulders: Dillet
Triceps: Dillet
Forearms: Dillet
Hams: Dillet
Calves: Dillet
Abs: Dillet
no way for shoulders. Pauls shoulders were famous for being huge but lacking any discernible definition what so ever:
(http://body.builder.hu/imagebank/pictures/977754248.jpg)
(http://www.ronniecoleman.net/bluecoleman8599f7c9.jpg)
-
Dillet or Ronnie? Who's the one with most impact?
Who had the bigger arms? Both have/had freaky huge guns.
(http://students.ukdw.ac.id/~22992157/dillet.gif)
(http://www.bbcenter.sk/images/gallery/arnolds_classic/ronnie_coleman/coleman03.jpg)
Dillet is larger and has a larger, wider frame.....
He epitomizes the word "freak".
Ronnie is huge, but not comicbook hero huge....
DIV
-
Combined structure with size, Dillet has an advantage. Weak lats in comparison but way ahead on shoulder width, height, waist size, calves and thighs that were in balance, at comparable bodyweights.
Coleman had more size and refinement but Dillet had a structural advantage.
-
cool comparison
(http://students.ukdw.ac.id/~22992157/dillet.gif)
-
:)
-
IMO, Ronnie blows Dillet out of the water.I do belive he is bigger, and I like his physique much more.I think he has much beter seperation as well as a more vascular physique.Dr. Carlon Colker pointed out that Dillet ussually came in with a shit load of muscle and mass wanting to please the crowd, inadvertently sacrificing conditioning and attention to detail.I agree with his assesment.Its funny, the more pics of Coleman I see now that he's not Mr. O, the more I realize how great he realy was.Cutler is a step backwards, not a step closer.
-
Its funny, the more pics of Coleman I see now that he's not Mr. O, the more I realize how great he realy was.Cutler is a step backwards, not a step closer.
true. its hard to be excited about Jay when you see how good Coleman 99 was.
no one has ever been better than that
-
dillet has him in
veins, height and sucking the towel
-
wow that pic from 99 is one of the craziest pics ive ever seen. that and the 03 splits double bi. the detail he has is unmatched. ronnie at the 04 grand prix was bigger then dillet for muscle size, but paul has the structure, wider frame. but imo ronnie has more muscle mass.
-
by the time they announce the winner, Dillett was leaving the stage on a strecher dying with Cramps.. ;D ;D
-
wow that pic from 99 is one of the craziest pics ive ever seen.
agreed. Ronnie in 99 shape is unbeatable onstage. Too many strengths, too few flaws. Even his calves didn't stick out as a flaw in 99 - they were that detailed. Only glaring flaw was his four pack.
-
.