Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: The Viking on November 17, 2006, 03:39:48 PM

Title: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: The Viking on November 17, 2006, 03:39:48 PM
Just saw this pictures and I think he keeps getting worse. He looked better than Cutler at the Amsterdam Grand-prix, but this is bad.
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: The Viking on November 17, 2006, 03:42:09 PM
more pictures.
His biceps become small compared too his old form.
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: MattT on November 17, 2006, 03:43:09 PM
That hair makes him look totally different!, IMO he needs to take a break, re- group and come back next year and kick jays ass.
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: HERACLES on November 17, 2006, 03:44:19 PM
Hes offseason man!

Geeez
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: MattT on November 17, 2006, 03:45:03 PM
the angle of the camera is messed up to..
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: youandme on November 17, 2006, 03:45:20 PM
Maybe you can hook him up with your Dubai connection
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: MattT on November 17, 2006, 03:46:15 PM
Maybe you can hook him up with your Dubai connection

I'll holla..
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: body88 on November 17, 2006, 03:46:58 PM
Looks much better in these shots from the second gp  ::) (few days after the O)
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: Tigerman on November 17, 2006, 03:47:04 PM
Guys why are you surprised?
It's offseason and I bet Ronnie is taking a break from the sauce training as every year. Check the video, it's not too bad for being 1 month and a half after the O.
Is it me or there is a scar on his arm? Recent surgery?
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: saucetradomous on November 17, 2006, 03:57:10 PM
Why are these pics dated the 16th of November when this is the 3rd thread with the same pics from days ago?
anywho... when did Chris Cormier actually start training?
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=107471.0;attach=119632;image)
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: Dipadidu on November 17, 2006, 04:16:35 PM
He is OFF-season. He still looks HUGE and his arms are still dry.

And his hair gives him a different look, my first thought when i saw this picture: cormier is looking huge ;)
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: JKDMan on November 17, 2006, 05:25:06 PM
He's offseason. He looks pretty damn good to me in those pics.

Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: rocket on November 17, 2006, 05:27:36 PM
Guys why are you surprised?
It's offseason and I bet Ronnie is taking a break from the sauce training as every year. Check the video, it's not too bad for being 1 month and a half after the O.
Is it me or there is a scar on his arm? Recent surgery?

He said he's not taking an extended break this time.  Only a few weeks.

And to me he looks pretty good but it will be a few months before he can really get his shit back up to scratch to challenge for the O.
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: Rami on November 17, 2006, 05:29:36 PM
Maybe it's just the photos but how is it even possible to look grainy and watery, soft at the same time!?? Must be the photos or something weird with the posing oil.
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: gymguy on November 17, 2006, 07:03:26 PM
Looks fantastic for offseason.  Not sure why anyone would criticize that physique.
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: Spike on November 17, 2006, 07:09:18 PM
He is OFF-season. He still looks HUGE and his arms are still dry.

And his hair gives him a different look, my first thought when i saw this picture: cormier is looking huge ;)

exactly the same thought - Cormier is coming up!!
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: Deadpool on November 17, 2006, 07:11:11 PM
there is a resembalance
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: civello_06 on November 17, 2006, 07:23:43 PM
Like I said, I would love to see Coleman come back better than ever and knock Jay off.I firmly dont belive it will happen.The more I've thought about it the more I dont like Jay as Mr. O.If anyone can answer this question, please help me out:How is Jay Cutler a step forward towards advancement in physique after Ronnie?Someone said in a thread that each Mr. O has been an improvement on the previous Mr O and Cutler is not an improvement on Ronnie.I agree with this.Answer this question please.
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: GoneAway on November 17, 2006, 08:02:04 PM
Come on. It's offseason.. He's still freaking huge and with way more cuts than he'd normally have right now. You guys should just wait until next year before jumping on his back. I feel he has one last shot, and next year is it.
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: JKDMan on November 17, 2006, 08:03:33 PM
Like I said, I would love to see Coleman come back better than ever and knock Jay off.I firmly dont belive it will happen.The more I've thought about it the more I dont like Jay as Mr. O.If anyone can answer this question, please help me out:How is Jay Cutler a step forward towards advancement in physique after Ronnie?Someone said in a thread that each Mr. O has been an improvement on the previous Mr O and Cutler is not an improvement on Ronnie.I agree with this.Answer this question please.
Each Mr. O has been an improvement in size, until Jay overtook Ronnie. I don't think bodybuilders have gotton better, however. That is unless you prefer bloated waists.
I think Ronnie has what it takes to beat Jay, but politics will have the final say.
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: GoneAway on November 17, 2006, 08:05:31 PM
Each Mr. O has been an improvement in size, until Jay overtook Ronnie.

Gotta call you on this one. Frank Zane.
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: siouxcountry on November 17, 2006, 08:14:46 PM
Looks like Vince Taylor.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=107471.0;attach=119632;image)
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: MADMAX6 on November 17, 2006, 08:35:28 PM
11-11-06

Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: thisiskeith12 on November 17, 2006, 08:47:49 PM
Jay continues to be wider than Ronnie. Of course, Ronnie isn't injured, remember?
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: JKDMan on November 17, 2006, 09:12:21 PM
Gotta call you on this one. Frank Zane.
True. With the exception of Zane. I am basically looking at the Arnold-to-Haney-to-Dorian-to-Ronnie progression. I mean between those few guys you're talking 29 Olympias. I think that's what the previous poster meant about there being a progression with each successive Mr. O.
And besides, with Zane you had the judges selecting a bodybuilder with aesthetic appeal. They went in a completely different direction. With Jay they are still rewarding mass, because he is essentially built like a fridge. However, in rewarding that mass you can say Jay has not progressed the sport to a new level because his mass has already been surpassed by a previous Mr. Olympia...Ronnie Coleman.
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: arce377 on November 18, 2006, 02:43:30 AM
 TAKE A LAY OFF RON!
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: TDK on November 18, 2006, 04:43:31 AM
In the twisting back shot he looks like a super jacked Melvin Anthony.
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: pumpster on November 18, 2006, 08:01:38 AM
Quote
Someone said in a thread that each Mr. O has been an improvement on the previous Mr O and Cutler is not an improvement on Ronnie

You believe everything posted? There's are plenty of exceptions, basically guys who win in off-years when a dominant BB is missing. Cutler's the fill-in, just as Columbu, Dickerson & Bannout were, and arguably Zane & Schwarzenegger '80.
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: FreshMintBlue on November 18, 2006, 08:44:47 AM
Cutler better be in tip top shap is all I'm going to say.
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: civello_06 on November 18, 2006, 09:58:18 AM
You believe everything posted? There's are plenty of exceptions, basically guys who win in off-years when a dominant BB is missing. Cutler's the fill-in, just as Columbu, Dickerson & Bannout were, and arguably Zane & Schwarzenegger '80.
Did I say I belived everything that is posted? No I didnt, you misquoted me.I said that this was one post i agree with in the very next sentence.As for you post yes, I agree with you partly.I just dot see how Cutler is the best "fill-in" guy.Is it simply because he has been second the past few years?If that is the case he's a joke as Mr. O and is certainly not worthy of the same acclaim as Ronnie.
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: the shadow on November 18, 2006, 10:00:27 AM
You believe everything posted? There's are plenty of exceptions, basically guys who win in off-years when a dominant BB is missing. Cutler's the fill-in, just as Columbu, Dickerson & Bannout were, and arguably Zane & Schwarzenegger '80.
KEEP WHINING DUMPSTER
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: D_1000 on November 18, 2006, 11:10:28 AM
Looks amazing to me. Best off-season pictures I have ever seen of Ronnie.
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: the shadow on November 18, 2006, 11:11:43 AM
Looks amazing to me. Best off-season pictures I have ever seen of Ronnie.
ARE YOU BLIND..HE LOOKS LIKE A PILE OF POOP
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: Debussey on November 18, 2006, 11:12:26 AM
ARE YOU BLIND..HE LOOKS LIKE A PILE OF POOP

So do you. Poop with black hair everywhere.
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: the shadow on November 18, 2006, 11:14:03 AM
So do you. Poop with black hair everywhere.
OHH LEAVE ME ALONE homo...
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: Debussey on November 18, 2006, 11:15:24 AM
OHH LEAVE ME ALONE homo...

Gotten any pussy with a mustache yet?  ;D

Ohh, Debussey forgot, you are a virgin, and you worship both men and women.

;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: the shadow on November 18, 2006, 11:16:20 AM
Gotten any pussy with a mustache yet?  ;D

Ohh, Debussey forgot, you are a virgin, and you worship both men and women.

;D ;D ;D
YOUR MOM WORSHIIPS MY DICK..JUST ASK HER
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: Debussey on November 18, 2006, 11:18:03 AM
YOUR MOM WORSHIIPS MY DICK..JUST ASK HER

Meltdown 6006.

You are a virgin, you look like poop, you worship men, you are gay, women laugh of you, you melt down on a messageboard for 2 hours straight.

LOL

 :)
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: Bast000 on November 18, 2006, 11:19:15 AM
Meltdown 6006.

You are a virgin, you look like poop, you worship men, you are gay, women laugh of you, you melt down on a messageboard for 2 hours straight.

LOL

 :)



damn, shadowboy just got owned  :o
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: the shadow on November 18, 2006, 11:20:11 AM
Meltdown 6006.

You are a virgin, you look like poop, you worship men, you are gay, women laugh of you, you melt down on a messageboard for 2 hours straight.

LOL

 :)

ok retard boy..we all know you lick gary buseys white rotting ass with cream on it....
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: Debussey on November 18, 2006, 11:20:23 AM

damn, shadowboy just got owned  :o

Check this thread:

http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?topic=107568.0

Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: Debussey on November 18, 2006, 11:21:07 AM
ok retard boy..we all know you lick gary buseys white rotting ass with cream on it....

So easy.

 ;D
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: 240 is Back on November 18, 2006, 11:51:05 AM
Meltdown 6006.

You are a virgin, you look like poop, you worship men, you are gay, women laugh of you, you melt down on a messageboard for 2 hours straight.

owned.  Shadow couldn't get laid in a women's prison with a fistful of pardons.
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: JKDMan on November 18, 2006, 03:58:04 PM
owned.  Shadow couldn't get laid in a women's prison with a fistful of pardons.
Ouch.  :D
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: pumpster on November 18, 2006, 04:02:58 PM
Quote
ARE YOU BLIND..HE LOOKS LIKE A PILE OF POOP
TAKES ONE TO KNOW ONE.
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: civello_06 on November 18, 2006, 04:20:55 PM
Gotta call you on this one. Frank Zane.
Good point.I agree with the fact that the bigger man is not always the better man and comend thos ewho recognize that fact as well.
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: civello_06 on November 18, 2006, 04:22:39 PM
Are we still talking about Coleman or have the internat bad asses moved in to destroy the thread?
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: The Master on November 18, 2006, 04:25:03 PM
Are we still talking about Coleman or have the internat bad asses moved in to destroy the thread?

You obviously don't understand much about this board, do ya kid?
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: Alex23 on November 18, 2006, 04:37:48 PM
Guys why are you surprised?
It's offseason and I bet Ronnie is taking a break from the sauce training as every year. Check the video, it's not too bad for being 1 month and a half after the O.
Is it me or there is a scar on his arm? Recent surgery?

Inner left tricep and elbow? Yea I see something too..
Title: Re: Coleman 16-11 looking bad!!!
Post by: civello_06 on November 19, 2006, 11:33:11 AM
You obviously don't understand much about this board, do ya kid?
Kid?I understand this board perfectly.There are some inteleigent people on this board who have good things to say until dipshits, probably such as yourself, show up and fill intelligent posts with 12 year old middle shool shit talking.Thats all kid.