Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => General Topics => Topic started by: Nordic Superman on November 27, 2006, 01:31:17 PM
-
Summary:
Muslim critisizes Al-Qaeda, Osama etc, result: thrown out of the mosque he attends in Oklahoma, US.
Read this:
http://www.westernresistance.com/blog/archives/003411.html
240, Berserker and co, didn't you say the US was free from jihadists?
-
Allah Akbar you infidel
-
Allah Akbar you infidel
Looks like the mosques in the US are just like the mosques in Bradford eh Chesney?
-
Mike Tyson is American.
And, he is a Muslim.
Infact, he is an Muslim African-American.
-
Infact, he's a rapist :-*
-
Your sarcastic use of smilies can't diminsh my warm, smug P.C glow, Manni!
(P.S, he was framed. Ask 240)
-
nordic, islamic jihadists are very much real. they need to be found and fucking bombed back to the stone age. I think we agree on this :)
-
nordic, islamic jihadists are very much real. they need to be found and fucking bombed back to the stone age. I think we agree on this :)
Yes, but I forgot who it was who said islamism wasn't an issue in the US. Was it you, or was it Ms. Berserker cock slurpa?
-
Looks like the mosques in the US are just like the mosques in Bradford eh Chesney?
The mosque in bradistan are 10,000 times more radical than they would ever dare to be in the US.
-
Yes, but I forgot who it was who said islamism wasn't an issue in the US. Was it you, or was it Ms. Berserker cock slurpa?
there are wannabees, and i'm sure there are some real ones here. But you gotta understand: Al Q was funded with ISI dollars from the US. You gotta realize that. White House transcripts scrubbed the ISI general from the record, but CNBC didn't. ISI, our big ally, and they sent $100k to Atta three days before 9/11. Was this incredibly fucking huge point examined in the 911 commission? No.
When you start to see the connections that lie underneath, you take jihadists with a grain of salt, as there is always a % chance they are fucking tools of the us, used to elicit fear. Man, I really need to find a forum where people read about this shit. I feel like I'm trying to teach a turtle to run hurdles here.
-
there are wannabees, and i'm sure there are some real ones here. But you gotta understand: Al Q was funded with ISI dollars from the US. You gotta realize that. White House transcripts scrubbed the ISI general from the record, but CNBC didn't. ISI, our big ally, and they sent $100k to Atta three days before 9/11. Was this incredibly fucking huge point examined in the 911 commission? No.
When you start to see the connections that lie underneath, you take jihadists with a grain of salt, as there is always a % chance they are fucking tools of the us, used to elicit fear. Man, I really need to find a forum where people read about this shit. I feel like I'm trying to teach a turtle to run hurdles here.
So, when you gonna find your mind? Do you know where you lost it? ???
I understand some US dollars help Al-Qaeda. There are however too many holes in what you're suggesting is reality.
-
So, when you gonna find your mind? Do you know where you lost it? ???
I understand some US dollars help Al-Qaeda. There are however too many holes in what you're suggesting is reality.
Dude, research it. Find the name of the General whose name was removed from every US transcript, citing "technical difficulties" in which the camera, the recording, AND the transcript lady all missed the name, but cable TV picked it up just fine.
See who that General had breakfast with on 9/11. I think you'll be surprised.
Look up the $100 grand that same general sent to Atta a few days before 9/11.
Come on, this is 9/11 basics here.
-
Dude, research it. Find the name of the General whose name was removed from every US transcript, citing "technical difficulties" in which the camera, the recording, AND the transcript lady all missed the name, but cable TV picked it up just fine.
See who that General had breakfast with on 9/11. I think you'll be surprised.
Look up the $100 grand that same general sent to Atta a few days before 9/11.
Come on, this is 9/11 basics here.
Too lazy mate... do your fucking job and link me >:(
-
Too lazy mate... do your fucking job and link me >:(
LOL....
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO308C.html
Here's a decent summary. I have books with more details explanations. The 911 timeline website can be used to verify any individual point you wish to challenge here. (I know if it's not on CNN.com, many here will challenge it - but media reports verify the meeting - they certainly didn't hide it.
The 911 Widows took great issue with this general and his ties to CIA and Bush1. They also were kinda pissed that his bank records showed he wired $100,000 to Atta right before 9/11.
This aspect was overlooked in the 911 commission - which I think even the biggest Official story supporter would be a little upset about... think about it. Guys sends $100k to lead hijacker right before 911... why? Guy has breakfast with future heads of CIA on 9/11... why? And the name being scrubbed from white house transcripts... why?
Come on guys - even if you believe it was all 19 pricks who did it all... don't you wonder a bit why the bastard gave Atta cash?
-
The chairmen of the Joint Inquiry on 9/11 Sen Bob Graham and Future CIA boss Porter Goss have breakfast with the guy who paid $100k to Atta, just days before 911.
Is this a conflict of interest?
-
The chairmen of the Joint Inquiry on 9/11 Sen Bob Graham and Future CIA boss Porter Goss have breakfast with the guy who paid $100k to Atta, just days before 911.
Is this a conflict of interest?
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO206A.html (http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO206A.html)
"When the news [of the attacks on the World Trade Center] came, the two Florida lawmakers who lead the House and Senate intelligence committees were having breakfast with the head of the Pakistani intelligence service. Rep. Porter Goss, R-Sanibel, Sen. Bob Graham and other members of the House Intelligence Committee were talking about terrorism issues with the Pakistani official when a member of Goss' staff handed a note to Goss, who handed it to Graham. "We were talking about terrorism, specifically terrorism generated from Afghanistan," Graham said.
(...)
I would be questioning Pakistan's involvement more than the CIA.
But then again I am not a conspiracy theorist.
-
While the Washington Post scores in on the "notoriously close" links between General Ahmad and Osama bin Laden, it fails to dwell on the more important question: what were Rep. Porter Goss and Senator Bob Graham and other members of the Senate and House intelligence committees doing together with the alleged 9/11 "money-man" at breakfast on the morning of 9/11. In other words, the Washington Post report does not go one inch further in begging the real question: Was this mysterious breakfast venue a "political lapse", an intelligence failure or something far more serious? How come the very same individuals (Goss and Graham) who had developed a personal rapport with General Ahmad, had been entrusted under the joint committee inquiry "to reveal the truth on 9-11."(see p. )
-
I would be questioning Pakistan's involvement more than the CIA.
But then again I am not a conspiracy theorist.
You're not?
So you see nothing at all fishy about the general sending $100k to Atta right before 9/11?
-
Ask Pakistan, that is where the money came from.
Pakistan is the biggest problem in all of this, Where are the Taliban camps? Where is Osama?
All links point to Pakistan, yet no one dares say anything.
These are the same dudes that support the war in Kashmir and has been one of the leading training grounds for Religious fundamentalists.
Why would the CIA know that the head of Pakistan's secret service gave Atta 100k?
-
Ask Pakistan, that is where the money came from.
Pakistan is the biggest problem in all of this, Where are the Taliban camps? Where is Osama?
All links point to Pakistan, yet no one dares say anything.
These are the same dudes that support the war in Kashmir and has been one of the leading training grounds for Religious fundamentalists.
Why would the CIA know that the head of Pakistan's secret service gave Atta 100k?
Why wouldn't we investigate it?
That's the beef that the 911 Skeptics have. The people that funded Atta are as guilty as he is, in conspiring to kill 3000 Americans. And the inability of our investigators to properly investigate it shows either incompetence or a cover-up.
Whichever the case, a second 9/11 invstigation could get this General on the stand.
-
Ask Pakistan, that is where the money came from.
Pakistan is the biggest problem in all of this, Where are the Taliban camps? Where is Osama?
All links point to Pakistan, yet no one dares say anything.
These are the same dudes that support the war in Kashmir and has been one of the leading training grounds for Religious fundamentalists.
Why would the CIA know that the head of Pakistan's secret service gave Atta 100k?
I am really concerned that you wouldn't want to ask Goss or Graham to explain their connection to the 911 money man that morning. It's either investigative incompetence on your part, or you "don't want to know".
-
The head of the CIA was talking to the Head of Pakistani intelligence.
The link is already there.
I want to know why the CIA didn't question Pakistan on the money given to a terrorist organization.
What the CIA is doing to help fight terror in Pakistan.
The CIA wouldn't know that the Pakistani government was giving money to Atta before 9-11 unless Pakistan has a real crappy secret service. I highly doubt that there secret service is crappy since they have been funding terrorist organizations for years and would easily be able to hide these payments.
-
Summary:
Muslim critisizes Al-Qaeda, Osama etc, result: thrown out of the mosque he attends in Oklahoma, US.
Read this:
http://www.westernresistance.com/blog/archives/003411.html
240, Berserker and co, didn't you say the US was free from jihadists?
Allah Akbar you infidel
-
I want to know why the CIA didn't question Pakistan on the money given to a terrorist organization.
What the CIA is doing to help fight terror in Pakistan.
Me too!!!
(http://240fm.com/gb/cheers.gif)
-
Yeah, most muslims aren't willing to accept criticism. I debated with this pakistani dude about the point of fasting and he got all pissed off at me.
But saying tha all muslims are pro-terror is fucking stupid.
-
Nordic, have you ever talked to a "mainstream" muslim, or a moderate? I just want to know?
-
Yeah, most muslims aren't willing to accept criticism. I debated with this pakistani dude about the point of fasting and he got all pissed off at me.
But saying tha all muslims are pro-terror is fucking stupid.
Wups, maybe my title gave you the impression that I thought ALL muslims are pro terror - even I don't think that.
-
bump
-
All muslims are pro-terror.
-
YESSSS!!!! 8)
-
All muslims are pro-terror.
Nonsense. There are decent moderates out there. The thing that pisses me off is that they don't / won't integrate into western society - very few of them. They follow their religion blindly and don't give a fuck about what non-believers think. I've known a few muslims in my time and about 99% of them are like this.