According to 240, the US government murdered 3000 Americans on 9/11 so they could justify starting wars in Iraq in Afghanistan. If this is true, why didn't the Bush administration plant fake WMD's in Iraq after the US military invaded? Such an operation would be infinitely easier to carry out than a massive coordinated attack involving remotely controlled commercial planes, cruise missiles, and the controlled demolition of half a dozen buildings. As everyone knows, the failure to find WMD's in Iraq has been a huge embarrassment for the Bush administration.
240 = OWNED!!!
According to 240, the US government murdered 3000 Americans on 9/11 so they could justify starting wars in Iraq in Afghanistan. If this is true, why didn't the Bush administration plant fake WMD's in Iraq after the US military invaded? Such an operation would be infinitely easier to carry out than a massive coordinated attack involving remotely controlled commercial planes, cruise missiles, and the controlled demolition of half a dozen buildings. As everyone knows, the failure to find WMD's in Iraq has been a huge embarrassment for the Bush administration.
240 = OWNED!!!
if we wanted to invade iraq, shouldnt they have used iraqi terrorists?
your premise that "if" we didn't find WMD's in Iraq "therefore" there is no mystery to the events of 9-11 is well, let's just say flawed logic. I'd call it a straw man argument but it's not even good enough to be considered as such
BTW - what were the other 3 buildings in the "half dozen" that you're talking about?
Yeah, I'm still trying to figure out why they used Saudi terrorists. It might have been somewhat easier to blame Saddam for 9/11 if they used Iraqi terrorists.
Yeah, I'm still trying to figure out why they used Saudi terrorists. It might have been somewhat easier to blame Saddam for 9/11 if they used Iraqi terrorists.
Actually, that's not a straw-man argument. Your lack of education is really shining through.
Maybe because Hussein was the last iraqi terrorist they had on the payroll, ...and we all know that relationship abruptly ended with Gulf War I, ...sides OBL's guys were already on the payroll and had been in Afghanistan for years.
Straw man is right... stupid argument.
We sell weapons to dozens of governments thoughout the world, you idiot. That doesn't mean any of them are on our "payroll". We propped up Saddam to counter the influence of Iran. There was nothing else to it.
Please quit repeating the bogus claim that the CIA funded bin Laden. The CIA never gave weapons to the Arab Afghans, and nobody has ever produced a shred of evidence that they did.
Please quit repeating the bogus claim that the CIA funded bin Laden. The CIA never gave weapons to the Arab Afghans, and nobody has ever produced a shred of evidence that they did.
ummm... how do I say this politely... ummm... maybe it would be prudent for you to sort out your facts just a wee bit more before diving head first into the deep end of Get Big self pwnage. :-[
yer a dumb f**k. hope this assists you in your journey.
240 is a twat and jag is annoying, but brian, you are ignorant.
YOU are the dumb fuck. Please cite credible evidence that Al Qaeda was funded by the CIA, or shut the fuck up.