Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: ether on December 06, 2006, 11:41:20 AM

Title: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: ether on December 06, 2006, 11:41:20 AM
Seriously, how could he be so shredded but not have one fucking vein showing?

(http://fallshineband.com/f/jfr.jpg)

How thick is his skin?

Maybe Ronnie can lend him some?

(http://www.ronniecoleman.net/6xo28.jpg)

Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: body88 on December 06, 2006, 11:45:06 AM
If you are going to campare pictures at least be fair boss. Posting a picture of Jay so dark you cannot even see the detail in his lats? Then post a picture of Ronnie in perfect lighting? ::) Not to mention, the picture of Ronnie is shot much closer, Ronnie is in a most muscular,the lighting is perfect and he has the favorable angle. Never ceases to amaze me the lengths you go to.


Jay is ob not as vascular as Ronnie. But at least post a fair comparison ::)
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: pumpster on December 06, 2006, 11:53:19 AM
What's worse-no veins and a healthy look, or just a few varicose veins?
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: body88 on December 06, 2006, 11:54:20 AM
Yates was not vascular at all. He did look like he was carved from stone tho.
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: 20inch calves on December 06, 2006, 12:00:25 PM
who cares. nobody ever won a bbing show by more vascular then the next guy. besides vascualrity is a genetic factor
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: ether on December 06, 2006, 12:07:39 PM
If you are going to campare pictures at least be fair boss.

Jay is ob not as vascular as Ronnie. But at least post a fair comparison ::)

These are pictures from the 2003 Mr. Olympia, Same Stage, Same lighting.

Cutler, not one vein showing....not even the cephalic vein on the bicep.

(http://www.flexonline.com/mro/final_men_bb/images/ddd0665.jpg)

Coleman

(http://www.flexonline.com/mro/final_men_bb/images/ddd0670.jpg)

who cares. nobody ever won a bbing show by more vascular then the next guy. besides vascualrity is a genetic factor

How is it being a genetic factor important. Bicep Peak is a genetic factor is that not important?
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: Weightpit on December 06, 2006, 12:09:45 PM
These are pictures from the 2003 Mr. Olympia, Same Stage, Same lighting.

Cutler, not one vein showing....not even the cephalic vein on the bicep.

(http://www.flexonline.com/mro/final_men_bb/images/ddd0665.jpg)

Coleman

(http://www.flexonline.com/mro/final_men_bb/images/ddd0670.jpg)

How is it being a genetic factor important. Bicep Peak is a genetic factor is that not important?

Is this a bicep peak??

Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: ether on December 06, 2006, 12:12:55 PM
Is this a bicep peak??



(http://fallshineband.com/f/jfdb.jpg)

No, This is.

(http://fallshineband.com/f/rfdb.jpg)
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: DK II on December 06, 2006, 12:15:16 PM
both look like shit, from an aesthetic point of view.  :-X :-X :-X
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: MikeThaMachine on December 06, 2006, 12:15:38 PM
Is this a bicep peak??



Now show a picture of his other arm ::)
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: body88 on December 06, 2006, 12:20:13 PM
Now show a picture of his other arm ::)


Show me a picture of Ronnies left lat comapred to his right. Whoops,torn. Show me a picture of Ronnies torn tri? Maybe a shot of his right lower quad?  :-[ Let's check out his stirations and detail in his quads. Shit, none. How about his fantastic condition? Err, ummm, not that night. Lets go to the back. He dominates from the back right? Nope, not anymore. Last but not least. Let's take a look at those calves compared to those massive quads. Shit, um, err forget it!

Ronnie was off. Jay made him pay. We all know Ronnie at 100 percent beats Jay. Just did not go his way this time. Lets not hate on jay for that!
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: MikeThaMachine on December 06, 2006, 12:23:01 PM

Show me a picture of Ronnies left lat comapred to his right. Whoops,torn. Show me a picture of Ronnies torn tri. Maybe a shoot of his right lower quad  :-[

How bout Jay's right leg also, anyway I am not the one putting up pics saying Ronnie is great so why don't you focus your attention on ether and not me.
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: body88 on December 06, 2006, 12:24:20 PM
How bout jays right leg also, anyway I am not the one putting up pics saying Ronnie is great so why don't you focus your attention on ether and not me.

Ok, sorry about that then.
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: ether on December 06, 2006, 12:26:55 PM
I never said anything about his bicep peaks, or his lats or legs....only about his lack of vascularity.

(http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/big/2004oly_mt_men41.jpg)


Seriously, how could he have such a lack of any vascularity in the most muscular pose.
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: body88 on December 06, 2006, 12:30:16 PM
I never said anything about his bicep peaks, or his lats or legs....only about his lack of vascularity.

(http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/big/2004oly_mt_men41.jpg)


Seriously, how could he have such a lack of any vascularity in the most muscular pose.



That picture is fair. Yes, you make your point with that picture, Ronnie is much more vascular. Agree with you 100 percent. While Jay does have some vascularity. It is not close to what Ronnie can display.
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: pobrecito on December 06, 2006, 12:32:40 PM
I never said anything about his bicep peaks, or his lats or legs....only about his lack of vascularity.

(http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/big/2004oly_mt_men41.jpg)


Seriously, how could he have such a lack of any vascularity in the most muscular pose.

The depth of the veins is genetic. Get over it. It doesn't make one bit of difference in the outcome of the show.
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: Weightpit on December 06, 2006, 12:34:05 PM
I never said anything about his bicep peaks, or his lats or legs....only about his lack of vascularity.

(http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/big/2004oly_mt_men41.jpg)


Seriously, how could he have such a lack of any vascularity in the most muscular pose.

I'm a huge Cutler fan, but I do have to agree - what could it be??  The dude is incredible but he came in smoother this year than last. I still think he beat Coleman, but he was definitely smooth at the Mr.O pre-judging.

Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: IceCold on December 06, 2006, 12:34:33 PM
some of the most asethetics guys ever have little or no vascualrity.

flex wheeler (except for midback)
melvin anthony
bob paris
ahmad haidar


just to name a few
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: IceCold on December 06, 2006, 12:35:04 PM
What's worse-no veins and a healthy look, or just a few varicose veins?


so you have more vascularity from using your bowflex?
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: body88 on December 06, 2006, 12:38:08 PM
I'm a huge Cutler fan, but I do have to agree - what could it be??  The dude is incredible but he came in smoother this year than last. I still think he beat Coleman, but he was definitely smooth at the Mr.O pre-judging.




I disagree. In the comparison shots, you can see a big difference in the detail in Cutlers legs and midsection against Ronnie. Much better detail in the quads and striations in the abs. I think Cutler's problem was the tan. Way to dark.

Ronnie is def more vascular than Jay. But like nd said. Flex wasent vascular either.
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: Weightpit on December 06, 2006, 12:41:07 PM

I disagree. In the comparison shots, you can see a big difference in the detail in Cutlers legs and midsection against Ronnie. Much better detail in the quads and striations in the abs. I think Cutler's problem was the tan. Way to dark.

Ronnie is def more vascular than Jay. But like nd said. Flex wasent vascular either.

You're right too....he never did explain about why or how his tan was soooooo dark......I was shocked at how dark it was.
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: body88 on December 06, 2006, 12:42:57 PM
You're right too....he never did explain about why or how his tan was soooooo dark......I was shocked at how dark it was.


If Jay could get the tan he had in 2001, he would be in business.


(http://www.fitsir.com/content/images/bodybuilding/ronnie_coleman_jay_cutler_2001MrO_prejudging_0010.JPG)
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: Weightpit on December 06, 2006, 12:55:42 PM

If Jay could get the tan he had in 2001, he would be in business.


(http://www.fitsir.com/content/images/bodybuilding/ronnie_coleman_jay_cutler_2001MrO_prejudging_0010.JPG)

Man...he smoked Ronnie in 2001. How the hell did they not give it to him??  He looked incredible......
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: dr.chimps on December 06, 2006, 01:02:29 PM
Seriously, how could he be so shredded but not have one fucking vein showing?

How thick is his skin?

Maybe Ronnie can lend him some?

(http://www.ronniecoleman.net/6xo28.jpg)
Meh. Ronnie's hands are so ashy, he could be a mummy. 
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: Alex Velickovic on December 06, 2006, 01:46:22 PM
Veins are overated, IMO they take away from the aethsetics of the physique.

 ;)
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: carvedoutofwood on December 06, 2006, 01:49:08 PM
Veins are overated, IMO they take away from the aethsetics of the physique.

 ;)

any distraction from Cutlers physique would probably help
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: JasonH on December 06, 2006, 01:52:55 PM
More veins does not equate to being better in shape - vascularity is genetic and as long as you've got the cuts to back up the mass then there shouldn't be a problem. It was never a problem for Flex.
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: Debussey on December 06, 2006, 01:58:23 PM
Gay GUTler is HOT!
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: nycbull on December 06, 2006, 02:32:35 PM
Veins are overrated, IMO they take away from the aesthetics of the physique.

 ;)

agreed plus veins show up more as you age. Your skin gets looser. Like burlap around a sack of potatoes, the loser it gets the more you can see the potatoes. Jay probably has very good skin since he doesn't abuse it by going up and down in weight. This is what loosens the skin.
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: Sergio Rules 77 on December 06, 2006, 02:41:16 PM
(http://www.fitsir.com/content/images/bodybuilding/ronnie_coleman_jay_cutler_2001MrO_prejudging_0010.JPG)

Man...he smoked Ronnie in 2001. How the hell did they not give it to him??  He looked incredible......


He lost the all important "POSEDOWN". As we all know that counts for 98% of the score, making the previous rounds a complete waste, as Duffman would say. It's amazing how important the posedown is, when Weider's Boyz want it to be ;D

(http://www.thesimpsonsquotes.com/images/duffman.gif)


SERGIO!!!!
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: carvedoutofwood on December 06, 2006, 02:50:55 PM
(http://celebrity-photos.elliottback.com/wp-content/_jessica-biel-02.jpg)
(http://solaris.pnt.net/images/jessica_biel_08.jpg)
(http://jbiel.com/images/jessica_biel8.jpg)

biel over simpson for my money
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: nycbull on December 06, 2006, 02:52:08 PM
(http://celebrity-photos.elliottback.com/wp-content/_jessica-biel-02.jpg)
(http://solaris.pnt.net/images/jessica_biel_08.jpg)
(http://jbiel.com/images/jessica_biel8.jpg)

biel over simpson for my money

she is beautiful, too bad she has such a boring personality and her acting blows.
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: ether on December 06, 2006, 02:52:32 PM
More veins does not equate to being better in shape - vascularity is genetic and as long as you've got the cuts to back up the mass then there shouldn't be a problem. It was never a problem for Flex.

The thing is, you would wonder how his skin is thin enough to show striations in his quads he would have some vasculature.

I wonder if he is so dry (aka vascularly depleted) that is veins are flat. Could it be an indicator of lasix use?

Flex had no veins either, and we know what happened to his kidneys.

 
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: bmacsys on December 06, 2006, 02:54:26 PM
The guy is a terrible bodybuilder. He is huge but how on earth can anyone honestly say he has a better build than a 190 pound Frank Zane?
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: bmacsys on December 06, 2006, 02:56:13 PM
Yates was not vascular at all. He did look like he was carved from stone tho.

Dorian isn't pleasing to the eye but I think he is worlds ahead of Jay. Yates did look like a block of granite.
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: Hulkster on December 06, 2006, 02:57:58 PM
any distraction from Cutlers physique would probably help

LOL

vascularity adds impressiveness in my opinion.  I am sure the judges would agree.
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: bmacsys on December 06, 2006, 03:03:21 PM
The depth of the veins is genetic.

Pobre, everything about the human body is genetics.
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: realkarateblackbelt on December 06, 2006, 03:12:39 PM
Pobre, everything about the human body is genetics.

hahaha
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: ether on December 06, 2006, 03:17:34 PM
Pobre, everything about the human body is genetics.

Monster truth.


Meh, Ronnie won 8 sandows...but its all genetics, would everyone get over it already???
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: ether on December 06, 2006, 03:21:18 PM
Yates was not vascular at all.

 ::)
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=69359.0;attach=124700;image)
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: body88 on December 06, 2006, 03:35:01 PM
You are incorrect. While Doz was ripped like no other, he was not very vascular at all. Post a most muscular shot of him ::) I think he was a great Mr O. But, to claim he was vascular is baised and lies. You posted a picture on the side of his only veins.

(http://www.fitwise.com/dorianyates2.jpg)
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 06, 2006, 03:37:13 PM
Yates was vascular to an extent
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: ether on December 06, 2006, 03:38:46 PM
(http://i60.photobucket.com/albums/h29/NeoSeminole/Dorian%20vs%20Ronnie/DorianvsRonnie5.jpg)

Both Former Mr. O's handing it to cutler.

Dorian was no where near as vascular as Ronnie, but Jay has no veins showing whatsoever....not even along the biceps (the cephalic vein) which most people have just standing around.


Not vascular.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=69359.0;attach=124523;image)
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: Daddison on December 06, 2006, 04:19:50 PM
Dorian was no where near as vascular as Ronnie, but Jay has no veins showing whatsoever....not even along the biceps (the cephalic vein) which most people have just standing around.

So what is that crawling up the outside of Jay's right bicep?  He's not very vascular in that shot, but he does show SOME veins.  You don't need the hyperbole to make your point.



Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: ether on December 06, 2006, 04:22:50 PM
You need a frickin' magnifying glass to see it.

He litterally has none on his right arm in that shot.
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: tommywishbone on December 06, 2006, 04:30:23 PM
To the op... yes.
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: Adam Empire on December 06, 2006, 05:22:33 PM
Man...he smoked Ronnie in 2001. How the hell did they not give it to him??  He looked incredible......

Completely agree.  Does anybody have the pic of Ronnie holding up two fingers that year - indicating he thought he was second when the placings were being read?
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: eastcoastbbman on December 06, 2006, 05:31:04 PM
does this qualify as vascular???
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: Hulkster on December 06, 2006, 05:45:22 PM
check out this shot of Ronnie's vascularity:

(http://digilander.libero.it/gruppociak/rc153.jpg)
textbook gyno too 8)
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 06, 2006, 05:47:09 PM
Priest
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 06, 2006, 05:48:42 PM
Again
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: nder98 on December 06, 2006, 06:02:02 PM
Seriously, how could he be so shredded but not have one fucking vein showing?

(http://fallshineband.com/f/jfr.jpg)

How thick is his skin?

Maybe Ronnie can lend him some?

(http://www.ronniecoleman.net/6xo28.jpg)



His arms always look smooth to me... Always
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: nder98 on December 06, 2006, 06:05:26 PM
Priest

Lee's forearms are like a f*&KING cartoon! Shits amazing...
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 06, 2006, 06:12:03 PM
gaspari was vascular
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: nder98 on December 06, 2006, 06:13:54 PM
gaspari was vascular

Dry as a bone too... :o
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: realkarateblackbelt on December 06, 2006, 06:29:28 PM
(http://i77.photobucket.com/albums/j51/realkarateblackbelt/veinlegspal.jpg)

100% Natural
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: nder98 on December 06, 2006, 07:18:36 PM
(http://i77.photobucket.com/albums/j51/realkarateblackbelt/veinlegspal.jpg)

100% Natural

That glute looks like its been through hell..
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: Option D on December 06, 2006, 07:22:42 PM
Veins are overated, IMO they take away from the aethsetics of the physique.

 ;)

Right, who says "yeah man im going to the gym...trying to get them veins out.
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: eastcoastbbman on December 07, 2006, 07:40:02 AM
niacin anyone???
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: ether on December 07, 2006, 08:49:52 AM
Freaky Veins ::)
(To go along with his V Taper and Zane like aesthetics)

(http://www.ronnie.cz/_img/Clanky/268_4.jpg)
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: IceCold on December 07, 2006, 09:37:00 AM
does this qualify as vascular???


looks like mikey's arms.

sick vascularity.
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: buffbodz on December 07, 2006, 10:07:38 AM
LOL

vascularity adds impressiveness in my opinion.  I am sure the judges would agree.

While it's impressive, I don't think it's is the end all be all in the judges eye.  If that were the case Paul Dillett would of been Mr.O many times.  His vascularity is the sickest ever :o

http://www.muscletech.com/PROFILES/PAUL_DILLETT/Paul_Dillett_WallPaper1_1024.shtm
Title: Re: Does Cutler have the worst vascularity ever?
Post by: Mobil on December 07, 2006, 12:03:14 PM
flex wheeler had zero vascularity, while paul dilet was always smooth and was covered in veins... why? genetics, vascularity has to do with genetics.