Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => General Topics => Topic started by: blinky on December 11, 2006, 01:47:21 PM

Title: 64=65??
Post by: blinky on December 11, 2006, 01:47:21 PM
found this and thought it was interesting


anybody have an explanation....im no math wizard

Title: Re: 64=65??
Post by: Migs on December 11, 2006, 03:04:57 PM
It actually doesn't equal 65.  If you rearrange the triangles you get a parallelogram.  when you actually put it together there is a gap between the triangles with an area of 1.  this deviation is the cause for the 65. 
Title: Re: 64=65??
Post by: body88 on December 11, 2006, 03:06:47 PM
found this and thought it was interesting


anybody have an explanation....im no math wizard



Blinky, do you have a link to the video from your avatar!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!??
Title: Re: 64=65??
Post by: YoungBlood on December 11, 2006, 05:49:16 PM
Blinky, do you have a link to the video from your avatar!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!??


http://www.bigtitsroundasses.com/t1/pps=marcoola/free_movies_bigtitsroundasses/btra1138.htm
Title: Re: 64=65??
Post by: YoungBlood on December 11, 2006, 05:50:19 PM
8x8=64....5x13=65

8x8=64....plus the one giant square that holds all of the squares, total 65.
Title: Re: 64=65??
Post by: JOHN MATRIX on December 11, 2006, 07:30:44 PM
i discovered this during math time in elementary school and it blew my mind.
Title: Re: 64=65??
Post by: blinky on December 12, 2006, 12:00:36 AM
It actually doesn't equal 65.  If you rearrange the triangles you get a parallelogram.  when you actually put it together there is a gap between the triangles with an area of 1.  this deviation is the cause for the 65. 

i dont see a gap
Title: Re: 64=65??
Post by: 240 is Back on December 12, 2006, 12:14:46 AM
i dont see a gap


nice lil tight gap on those tittays in your avatar.
Title: Re: 64=65??
Post by: blinky on December 12, 2006, 01:31:36 AM

nice lil tight gap on those tittays in your avatar.


 ;D
lol
Title: Re: 64=65??
Post by: Migs on December 12, 2006, 07:15:08 AM
the gap lies in the borders inside the parralelagram.  If you actually redraw ti or better make cut out and rearrange them there is a gap.  The illusion works becuase the fact that the lineed interior borders are in place and hide the gap.  It can be disproven mathematicaly
Title: Re: 64=65??
Post by: sandycoosworth on December 12, 2006, 07:23:06 AM
at the very top of the second rectangle former(the 65 one) you can see its missing a couple of pixels (ie the right side corner is higher than hte left side corner) ... this is where the missing 1 went