Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => General Topics => Topic started by: blinky on December 11, 2006, 01:47:21 PM
-
found this and thought it was interesting
anybody have an explanation....im no math wizard
-
It actually doesn't equal 65. If you rearrange the triangles you get a parallelogram. when you actually put it together there is a gap between the triangles with an area of 1. this deviation is the cause for the 65.
-
found this and thought it was interesting
anybody have an explanation....im no math wizard
Blinky, do you have a link to the video from your avatar!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!??
-
Blinky, do you have a link to the video from your avatar!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!??
http://www.bigtitsroundasses.com/t1/pps=marcoola/free_movies_bigtitsroundasses/btra1138.htm
-
8x8=64....5x13=65
8x8=64....plus the one giant square that holds all of the squares, total 65.
-
i discovered this during math time in elementary school and it blew my mind.
-
It actually doesn't equal 65. If you rearrange the triangles you get a parallelogram. when you actually put it together there is a gap between the triangles with an area of 1. this deviation is the cause for the 65.
i dont see a gap
-
i dont see a gap
nice lil tight gap on those tittays in your avatar.
-
nice lil tight gap on those tittays in your avatar.
;D
lol
-
the gap lies in the borders inside the parralelagram. If you actually redraw ti or better make cut out and rearrange them there is a gap. The illusion works becuase the fact that the lineed interior borders are in place and hide the gap. It can be disproven mathematicaly
-
at the very top of the second rectangle former(the 65 one) you can see its missing a couple of pixels (ie the right side corner is higher than hte left side corner) ... this is where the missing 1 went