i know plenty of people who were there. i was 5 miles away. thousands of people have the opposite story of what the janitor has said. but everytime you see someone claiming what you believe in,, you automatically parade them on here like you just found the smoking gun. for every nutjob theres 50 people proving them wrong.. you guys are trying really hard, but 7 years later and you still got shit.
you haven't seen all the video's out there? you guys so far have 2. one is a senile army guy,,the other is a janitor. wow, you guys are closing in
240. your such a loser.. "im retiring from 911". i knew that was bullshit
you haven't seen all the video's out there? you guys so far have 2. one is a senile army guy,,the other is a janitor. wow, you guys are closing in
240. your such a loser.. "im retiring from 911". i knew that was bullshit
In all fairness, IMO 240, Sandy, & Co. are not losers. They are very passionate about what they believe even if it's mostly conjecture.
my best guess is 911 was an inside job, but i acknowledge it is simply a guess(albiet i think a much more plausible guess than the "official story") ... i try to never believe in anything because it implies you are saying something is a fact with no proof
theres 10x more evidence for the official story, then their is for the CT's..
for some people its juuuust not acceptable at all..at any cost...to think...it might just not have been brownies that did it...
their universe comes tumbling...
they lose that whole...'them people' security..
:-\
yep.
kh300 is a child here. no longer worth the time. he's on team beach bum.
were any of them 20 year employees?you're canadian
were any of them internationally recognized as heros?
where are the videos of their accounts?
i repeat, shut the f**k up
actually, there were many large plane parts recovered from the WTC, but none from the field in PA and next to nothing from the pentagonoh, really, you fucking moron? stop getting your info from 9/11 'truth' websites. . . stupid fucking canadian, get a life.
Delusional, herein lies the problem. Shown is less than 1000 pounds of debris- do you agree or disagree?to simplify the debate, you think the government planted those wrecked 757 parts at the pentagon, after they shot a missile into it?
The plane was 125 tons of steel and other materials.
Now, if we can accept that the plane shredded into dust upon impact (which we can see in many videos of plane crash tests), we cannot accept that the "landing gear" punched a perfect 16-foot diameter hole through 3 straight buildings. Just not logical. In the F16 videos, that plane turns to powder. No landing gear punch perfect holes. If the force is enough to vaporize the 6-tons engines, why not the wheels?
I coudl accept the lack of debris if not for the hole. And I could accept the hole if not for the lack of debris. But you're trying to sell a scenario where debris had the force to punch perfect big hole thru 3 reinforced buildings, but not enough to keep itself from turning to dust.
It's impossible.
to simplify the debate, you think the government planted those wrecked 757 parts at the pentagon, after they shot a missile into it?