Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: body88 on December 21, 2006, 11:16:55 AM

Title: What would you rather be?
Post by: body88 on December 21, 2006, 11:16:55 AM

Ultra tall, like 7 foot status. Or really short. When I say short, I mean really small. Normal proportions and all that. Just legit 4 foot 11. Both life expectancy's are the same.

I know what you are all thinking to make the descision. You both have a 10" hog. So pleasing women will not be an issue.



I would much rather be really tall.

Title: Re: What would you rather be?
Post by: Earl1972 on December 21, 2006, 11:19:00 AM

the life expectancy's can't be the same the 7 footer would never live as long

i've never seen anybody as tall as 6'5 make it to 70

E

Title: Re: What would you rather be?
Post by: figgs on December 21, 2006, 11:19:10 AM

Ultra tall while still bodybuilding so that I really look like a beast! But I'd rather be average than freakishly tall.

Title: Re: What would you rather be?
Post by: body88 on December 21, 2006, 11:21:02 AM

Quote from: Earl1972 on December 21, 2006, 11:19:00 AM

the life expectancy's can't be the same the 7 footer would never live as long

i've never seen anybody as tall as 6'5 make it to 70

E

True, But if all things where equal what would you pick?

Title: Re: What would you rather be?
Post by: Earl1972 on December 21, 2006, 11:22:44 AM

Quote from: body88 on December 21, 2006, 11:21:02 AM

True, But if all things where equal what would you pick?

the 7 footer

yeah you'd be a freak but atleast you'd get some respect and there will always be women (skanks) that would want to test out a freakishly tall guy

E

Title: Re: What would you rather be?
Post by: body88 on December 21, 2006, 11:26:55 AM

I wonder which would be a harder life to live. Extremley tall, or extremley short. Both have many limitations.

Title: Re: What would you rather be?
Post by: Earl1972 on December 21, 2006, 11:32:27 AM

you mean extremely tall?

the 4'11 guy would have it harder no doubt

what benefit is there for being 4'11?

I think smaller people live longer but what is the point to living to 100 when you are that short?

E

Title: Re: What would you rather be?
Post by: body88 on December 21, 2006, 11:35:43 AM

Quote from: Earl1972 on December 21, 2006, 11:32:27 AM

you mean extremely tall?

the 4'11 guy would have it harder no doubt

what benefit is there for being 4'11?

I think smaller people live longer but what is the point to living to 100 when you are that short?

E

I meant tall :-X  Imagine gettting pushed out of the way by kids? Forget this thread I should have just asked Mower.

Title: Re: What would you rather be?
Post by: gtbro1 on December 21, 2006, 11:36:51 AM

Quote from: body88 on December 21, 2006, 11:16:55 AM

I know what you are all thinking to make the descision. You both have a 10" hog. So pleasing women will not be an issue.

  lmao

Title: Re: What would you rather be?
Post by: Sir William Idol on December 21, 2006, 03:55:24 PM

Quote from: Earl1972 on December 21, 2006, 11:19:00 AM

the life expectancy's can't be the same the 7 footer would never live as long

i've never seen anybody as tall as 6'5 make it to 70

E

my great grandfather was 6'6" and made it to 95.  the year he died, when i was about 13, he could still crush my hand in a handshake despite his being in a wheelchair.  very strong dockyard worker for a large part of his life.

Title: Re: What would you rather be?
Post by: Devon97 on December 21, 2006, 07:27:48 PM

Definately TALL

Title: Re: What would you rather be?
Post by: king on December 21, 2006, 07:29:03 PM

tall.

Title: Re: What would you rather be?
Post by: Earl1972 on December 21, 2006, 08:28:17 PM

Quote from: Sir William Idol on December 21, 2006, 03:55:24 PM

my great grandfather was 6'6" and made it to 95.  the year he died, when i was about 13, he could still crush my hand in a handshake despite his being in a wheelchair.  very strong dockyard worker for a large part of his life.

he was one in a million

E

Title: Re: What would you rather be?
Post by: Shawn Ray on December 21, 2006, 08:48:09 PM

There are worse things than being short or poor. :-\

Title: Re: What would you rather be?
Post by: SS on December 21, 2006, 08:52:25 PM

Quote from: body88 on December 21, 2006, 11:26:55 AM

I wonder which would be a harder life to live. Extremley tall, or extremley short. Both have many limitations.

ask lee priest or david henry.

Title: Re: What would you rather be?
Post by: TheAnimal on December 21, 2006, 08:53:53 PM

I would rather be short I envy short man quads and triceps!! always look so thick