Getbig Bodybuilding, Figure and Fitness Forums

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: MassRuhlz on December 27, 2006, 06:44:59 PM

Title: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: MassRuhlz on December 27, 2006, 06:44:59 PM
How come Jay Cutler stood on stage for all his 2nd place finishes to Coleman and congratulated Ronnie year after  year, but when Cutler wins Coleman storms off stage? Is that the sign of a professional? I'm sure that is what Haney told him back stage, to get back out there and don't leave a sour taste in the mouthes of the fans and judges, just in case he competes next year. I'm not a Ronnie hater, just think he could have shown alittle more class.
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: dragonheart on December 27, 2006, 06:48:06 PM
He said someone backstage told him that he had lost before it was announced, hence his demeanor before Jay was announced as the winner.  You could tell by how he was standing there and not looking forward that he knew he had lost.  He wasnt the most graceful loser there, but ive seen far worse.
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: Purge_WTF on December 27, 2006, 06:53:23 PM
  Ronnie's a sore loser, pure and simple. Remember how he walked out of an interview alongside Gustavo Badell after Gustavo beat him for the Challenge Round money a year ago?
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: The Squadfather on December 27, 2006, 06:54:31 PM
black guys can't stand being beaten by a white man, plain and simple, it might not be PC but it's the truth.
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: Wiggs on December 27, 2006, 07:01:23 PM
That's because it rarely happens, not pc but it's the truth. ;D ;)
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: alexxx on December 27, 2006, 07:15:05 PM
That's because it rarely happens, not pc but it's the truth. ;D ;)

There is no black man with a better physique then me. Nor a white man for the matter of fact.
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: pobrecito on December 27, 2006, 07:25:42 PM
Coleman knows very well how to handle losing...what do you think he did between 92 and 97 the vast majority of the time ;)
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: MisterMagoo on December 27, 2006, 07:36:43 PM
Coleman knows very well how to handle losing...what do you think he did between 92 and 97 the vast majority of the time ;)

that was before he was "the undefeatable ronnie coleman". he bought into the hype that he was the greatest physique to ever step on stage. he pulled that dumb fucking dropping onto his knees stunt that worked in 1998 but not the seven goddamn times after that.

he wouldn't even shake jay's hand when he WON, let alone when he lost. ronnie's a poor sport on stage, plain and simple.
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: The Squadfather on December 27, 2006, 07:38:49 PM
That's because it rarely happens, not pc but it's the truth. ;D ;)
it can't happen that much, 75 percent of the male population of your race is in prison.
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: figgs on December 27, 2006, 07:43:06 PM
it can't happen that much, 75 percent of the male population of your race is in prison.

I sincerely hope that was just a tasteless joke.
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: Debussey on December 27, 2006, 07:44:15 PM
it can't happen that much, 75 percent of the male population of your race is in prison.

25% = the truth?
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: chaos on December 27, 2006, 07:44:59 PM
it can't happen that much, 75 percent of the male population of your race is in prison.
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHA ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: fathead on December 27, 2006, 08:18:41 PM
Ronnie should of headbutted Jay in the chest like that french guy did at the worldcup.
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: 240 is Back on December 27, 2006, 08:33:40 PM
Coleman might not be a good loser, but...
















...practice makes perfect!
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: pobrecito on December 27, 2006, 09:16:32 PM
that was before he was "the undefeatable ronnie coleman". he bought into the hype that he was the greatest physique to ever step on stage. he pulled that dumb fucking dropping onto his knees stunt that worked in 1998 but not the seven goddamn times after that.

he wouldn't even shake jay's hand when he WON, let alone when he lost. ronnie's a poor sport on stage, plain and simple.

Ronnie coleman was never "undefeatable".....he was never dominant like Yates or Haney was.
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: figgs on December 27, 2006, 09:22:52 PM
Ronnie coleman was never "undefeatable".....he was never dominant like Yates or Haney was.
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: chaos on December 27, 2006, 09:25:57 PM
Coleman might not be a good loser, but...
















...practice makes perfect!
funniest post you've done in a long time
but you forgot about a 9/11 shot...maybe like colemans not a good loser,but practice makes perfect ask the guys that flew the remote control airplanes into WTC on 9/11 ;D
 

hope this helps :P
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: pobrecito on December 27, 2006, 09:28:05 PM


And the point of this picture is what? To show the inferior competition Coleman faced?

Look at the legs of Coleman and Cutler, eventhough Coleman has superior quads it does NOTHING for him becuase overall, Cutler's legs are superior. Better balance throughout the lower body. Now put Yates' back on Cutler and Coleman loses, plain and simple.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=114873.0;attach=129675;image)
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: 240 is Back on December 27, 2006, 09:39:53 PM
funniest post you've done in a long time
but you forgot about a 9/11 shot...maybe like colemans not a good loser,but practice makes perfect ask the guys that flew the remote control airplanes into WTC on 9/11 ;D
 

LOL... I'm glad you mentioned that.  Did you see this "cockpit" jut out the back of the South Tower before exploding?

Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: MAXX on December 27, 2006, 11:57:57 PM
lol yes that ass i ginormous
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: growthfactor on December 28, 2006, 12:22:31 AM
How come Jay Cutler stood on stage for all his 2nd place finishes to Coleman and congratulated Ronnie year after  year, but when Cutler wins Coleman storms off stage? Is that the sign of a professional? I'm sure that is what Haney told him back stage, to get back out there and don't leave a sour taste in the mouthes of the fans and judges, just in case he competes next year. I'm not a Ronnie hater, just think he could have shown alittle more class.

i agree he has absolutely no class
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: growthfactor on December 28, 2006, 12:24:57 AM
There is no black man with a better physique then me. Nor a white man for the matter of fact.

why don't you give it a rest you stupid troll... your retarded comments are getting so old... its almost 2007, i hope your new years resolution is to kill yourself...

yeah yeah meltdown...

bitch
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: Rami on December 28, 2006, 01:02:29 AM
why don't you give it a rest you stupid troll... your retarded comments are getting so old... its almost 2007, i hope your new years resolution is to kill yourself...

yeah yeah meltdown...

bitch


meltdown
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: the shadow on December 28, 2006, 01:17:38 AM
ronnie coleman is a fuckin loser..that mutant toad is just an asswipe..i wish coleman comes in at 4th or 5th place at the next years olympia
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: columbusdude82 on December 28, 2006, 01:19:19 AM
I hope he doesn't place at all. I'd love to see his reaction then.
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: gtbro1 on December 28, 2006, 01:32:33 AM
it can't happen that much, 75 percent of the male population of your race is in prison.

  HAHAHAHAHAHA,,,Not politically correct but true.
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: freespirit on December 28, 2006, 01:42:17 AM
What will the no.1 Coleman guy Hulkster have to say about this?   ::)
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 28, 2006, 01:54:58 AM
Coleman didn't handle the loss very well at all , Haney had to talk him into going back onstage and he was supposed to attend the seminar the following day and bailed out on that , not professional at all . and since he won the Olympia he hasn't handled his losses well , Gustavo in the challenge round and Gunther 2002

THOUGHTS ON LOSING TO SCHLIERKAMP AT THE 2002 GNC SHOW OF STRENGTH:

It was nothing more than a way to create interest in the sport. No reigning Mr. Olympia had lost a show like this before. The goal was to shake things up, set the stage for a three-way battle [with Cutler and Schlierkamp] at the 2003 Mr. Olympia. There was no way in the world that I should have lost the GNC. Just look at the photos. I was victimized by the system



Just like in 2001 when he said Jay must be on crack to think he could ever beat him , he better be re-born with better genetics , despite losing the entire pre-judging . 
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: the shadow on December 28, 2006, 01:58:05 AM
What will the no.1 Coleman guy Hulkster have to say about this?   ::)
hulkster would say that ronnies stage presence with those huge legs,chest,arms where too big for jay..jay looked tighter but ronnie looked huge..ronnie was feeling that he lost,,but the striations on colemans face hinted that hat striations were on the losing side..so it was ronnies face striations that showed he lost
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: the shadow on December 28, 2006, 02:05:05 AM
Coleman didn't handle the loss very well at all , Haney had to talk him into going back onstage and he was supposed to attend the seminar the following day and bailed out on that , not professional at all . and since he won the Olympia he hasn't handled his losses well , Gustavo in the challenge round and Gunther 2002

THOUGHTS ON LOSING TO SCHLIERKAMP AT THE 2002 GNC SHOW OF STRENGTH:

It was nothing more than a way to create interest in the sport. No reigning Mr. Olympia had lost a show like this before. The goal was to shake things up, set the stage for a three-way battle [with Cutler and Schlierkamp] at the 2003 Mr. Olympia. There was no way in the world that I should have lost the GNC. Just look at the photos. I was victimized by the system



Just like in 2001 when he said Jay must be on crack to think he could ever beat him , he better be re-born with better genetics , despite losing the entire pre-judging . 
even jay cutler said on PBW that coleman did'nt show him any respect..jay kinda sounded pissed about this fact that after he was announced the winner coleman just walked out the stage..
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: rccs on December 28, 2006, 02:56:33 AM
How come Jay Cutler stood on stage for all his 2nd place finishes to Coleman and congratulated Ronnie year after  year, but when Cutler wins Coleman storms off stage? Is that the sign of a professional? I'm sure that is what Haney told him back stage, to get back out there and don't leave a sour taste in the mouthes of the fans and judges, just in case he competes next year. I'm not a Ronnie hater, just think he could have shown alittle more class.
Ronnie was never known for being an athlete with class...
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: ThaRealist on December 28, 2006, 03:06:08 AM
I would have to give the sportmanship quality to Cutler, because he stood up there on stage and whole-heartily congratulated Big Ron every year Ronnie beat him...That does show alot more respect than what Ronnie does when he loses...
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: Parker on December 28, 2006, 04:18:01 AM
When Ronnie beat Flex at the 96 Canadian Cup, Flex was astounded. And then when Flex beat Ronnie at the 96 NOC, Flex was happier than shadow losing his virginity. If you saw it, you wouldn't say Flex was a gracious winner, Ronnie congratulated him. I think Ronnie would have congratulated Jay if Jay beat Ronnie with a far superior body, Gunter as well, but they didn't. Ronnie was off, Jay has a weaker back, hence it was a sour grapes type of win.
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: Bear on December 28, 2006, 04:45:48 AM
even jay cutler said on PBW that coleman did'nt show him any respect..jay kinda sounded pissed about this fact that after he was announced the winner coleman just walked out the stage..

Well Jay only had to take his losses when he actually looked worse, Coleman beat Jay this year and had to take second and then watch Jay's shitty blurry back all over Flex touted as the great Olympia back, the best in the world etc.... Pure arse.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v503/robert1986/dutchgp/4.jpg)

Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: Bear on December 28, 2006, 04:47:23 AM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=100616.0;attach=109183;image)

I mean Christ just look at this from about a week later, would you be happy to lose to the Great White Hype?!?! Or is that Gunter's name?...
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: pumpster on December 28, 2006, 05:16:09 AM
Yates must've been really classly, considering the black eye he received for ducking money owed..LOL
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: Playboy on December 28, 2006, 05:43:51 AM

I agree with this particular comparison. Ronnie's back is way better then both Dorian's and Cutler's put together. Taking nothing away from Dorian or Jay. As for the previous post about Ronnie not being "unbeatable", how do you explain 8 Sandow's in a row??? That seems pretty dominating to me. The hate toward Ronnie utterly amazes me. 8 Sandow's and its still not good enough for people. Jay wins 1 little Sandow and everyone jumps the bandwagon and acts as if Jay walked on water. Joke.

PB
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: body88 on December 28, 2006, 06:01:12 AM
That's because it rarely happens, not pc but it's the truth. ;D ;)

Ha ha, yea ok. Who runs the world? Who has all the money? Btw, 3 names. Tom Brady, Payton Manning, Carson Palmer... All white men. 2 of the greatest qb's of all time in Brady and Manning with Palmer well on his way to being on that list. The best players at the hardest position in pro football are white my friend.


























Hope this helps.
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: pumpster on December 28, 2006, 06:05:32 AM
black guys can't stand being beaten by a white man, plain and simple, it might not be PC but it's the truth.

It's not only happened thanks to politics, those decisions are defended by getbig homos like ND, who admits to a preference to "handsome white BBs". :-X
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: pumpster on December 28, 2006, 06:06:49 AM
Ronnie coleman was never "undefeatable".....he was never dominant like Yates or Haney was.

Pubes trying to revise history again..Yates was one of the least dominant winners ever, clearly should've been beaten several times, as proven by numerous pics against a number of other deserving BBs.
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: ThaRealist on December 28, 2006, 06:14:53 AM
Ronnie coleman was never "undefeatable".....he was never dominant like Yates or Haney was.

Please.........I don't know who you were watching, but when Ronnie came to the Olympia at top condition there is no one in the world that holds a candle to him and everyone knows that...Now if you want to see a very defeatable and non-dominant Mr. Olympia look to this years winner....
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: the shadow on December 28, 2006, 06:56:06 AM
Please.........I don't know who you were watching, but when Ronnie came to the Olympia at top condition there is no one in the world that holds a candle to him and everyone knows that...Now if you want to see a very defeatable and non-dominant Mr. Olympia look to this years winner....
ahahah ok..jay is not that dominant but he did beat ronnie this year..nuff said
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: pumpster on December 28, 2006, 06:59:17 AM
Please.........I don't know who you were watching, but when Ronnie came to the Olympia at top condition there is no one in the world that holds a candle to him and everyone knows that...Now if you want to see a very defeatable and non-dominant Mr. Olympia look to this years winner....
This pubes exercises some of the lamest logic this side of ND. :-\
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: the shadow on December 28, 2006, 06:59:21 AM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=100616.0;attach=109183;image)

I mean Christ just look at this from about a week later, would you be happy to lose to the Great White Hype?!?! Or is that Gunter's name?...
christ just look at these pics from a day before the dutch grand prix... :-X
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: the shadow on December 28, 2006, 07:02:06 AM
Well Jay only had to take his losses when he actually looked worse, Coleman beat Jay this year and had to take second and then watch Jay's shitty blurry back all over Flex touted as the great Olympia back, the best in the world etc.... Pure arse.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v503/robert1986/dutchgp/4.jpg)


do you think jays back is weak???.your definetly a cutler hater
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: the shadow on December 28, 2006, 07:04:29 AM
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=100616.0;attach=109183;image)

I mean Christ just look at this from about a week later, would you be happy to lose to the Great White Hype?!?! Or is that Gunter's name?...
i mean christ these pics are from same show and from the same website..jay all the way
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 28, 2006, 09:54:39 AM
Yates must've been really classly, considering the black eye he received for ducking money owed..LOL

Yates was classy on the only TWO occasions he lost  ;) and stick to the topic moron.
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: freespirit on December 28, 2006, 10:00:58 AM
Yates was classy on the only TWO occasions he lost  ;) and stick to the topic moron.

So Pumpster & Hulkster are both Ronnie Coleman nuthuggers. Twins perhaps?   :D
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on December 28, 2006, 10:03:07 AM
So Pumpster & Hulkster are both Ronnie Coleman nuthuggers. Twins perhaps?   :D

Yes !! yes they are lol
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: xpac2 on December 28, 2006, 10:07:34 AM
Who the fuck cares?! The Olympia was 3 months ago and your doorknobs are still arguing about it  ???
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: freespirit on December 28, 2006, 10:10:04 AM
Yes !! yes they are lol


No I mean seriously, are they in any way related because of their resemblance in screen names and the combined delusional Coleman nut-hugging. Strange, very strange, no?
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: Parker on December 28, 2006, 04:07:09 PM
Who the f**k cares?! The Olympia was 3 months ago and your doorknobs are still arguing about it  ???

Think about the ones who are arguing about the Mr. Getbig.
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: Palpatine Q on December 28, 2006, 04:36:03 PM
And the point of this picture is what? To show the inferior competition Coleman faced?

Look at the legs of Coleman and Cutler, eventhough Coleman has superior quads it does NOTHING for him becuase overall, Cutler's legs are superior. Better balance throughout the lower body. Now put Yates' back on Cutler and Coleman loses, plain and simple.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=114873.0;attach=129675;image)


HAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAAHAH AAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHA HAHAAHAHAHAHAAHAAAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

THat has got to be the most ridiculous bunch of bullshit I v'e ever read.

You Anti-Coleman Penii  will go to any lengths to discredit him.

As to the original question.......yes he's a terrible sport.

The falling to the floor thing is retarded.........and a little faggy.

Your'e a MAN for chrissakes, maintain your composure and be a professional.
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: Hulkster on December 28, 2006, 04:49:55 PM
it can't happen that much, 75 percent of the male population of your race is in prison.

that was damn funny!
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: Slick Vic on December 28, 2006, 04:56:21 PM
How come Jay Cutler stood on stage for all his 2nd place finishes to Coleman and congratulated Ronnie year after  year, but when Cutler wins Coleman storms off stage? Is that the sign of a professional? I'm sure that is what Haney told him back stage, to get back out there and don't leave a sour taste in the mouthes of the fans and judges, just in case he competes next year. I'm not a Ronnie hater, just think he could have shown alittle more class.

You hit the nail right on the head.
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: mahg on December 28, 2006, 05:23:11 PM
It's funny that they have butterfly butts lol.
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: gtbro1 on December 29, 2006, 02:51:53 AM
That's because it rarely happens, not pc but it's the truth. ;D ;)

    Blacks used to be  beaten by whites all the time...usually with a whip for trying to escape. hahahaha
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: Bear on December 31, 2006, 05:37:17 AM
do you think jays back is weak???.your definetly a cutler hater

No it's not weak, but it's hardly the best back around.
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=100616.0;attach=109183;image)

There is zero lower back separation. How can this win the Olympia?!?!?
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: fearANDloathing on January 03, 2007, 10:36:52 AM
That's because it rarely happens, not pc but it's the truth. ;D ;)
;D
also Ronnie has YET to suffer a fair loss. Let's see how he reacts when that actually happens
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: the shadow on January 03, 2007, 10:43:39 AM
No it's not weak, but it's hardly the best back around.
(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=100616.0;attach=109183;image)

There is zero lower back separation. How can this win the Olympia?!?!?
on some poses jay looked better than him and on other poses coleman looked better than him.this is a pose by pose analysis that was posted on the flex blog

back lat spread-jay

back double biceps-jay

front relaxed-jay

side chest-ronnie

front double bi-ronnie

most muscular-ronnie

ab and thigh-jay

side triceps-jay

its easy to say that jay beat ronnie fair and square.ronnie did pwn him on some poses but jay was the victor..ronnie 3 jay 5..nuff said
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: pinchharmonic on January 03, 2007, 12:03:38 PM
yea if i was black i'd be pretty pissed. it's not like my people are superior in many other things aside from physical competition including sports , etc.
Title: Re: Coleman not a good loser?
Post by: Jr. Yates on January 03, 2007, 12:12:50 PM
anyone would have been pretty upset from that.