Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: the shadow on January 02, 2007, 04:44:07 AM
-
HOLY SHIT.. :o :o :o..JUST LOOK AT NASSERS LATS :o.
-
nasser lacked definiton/detail in the back.
-
nasser lacked definiton/detail in the back.
yep but size wise nasser is holding his own.fuckin awesome
-
They look a bit bigger because he's closer to the camera, but they are indeed great.
-
They look a bit bigger because he's closer to the camera, but they are indeed great.
Just what I tought...
-
Looking at the pics, I deduce that big calves were in style in the mid 90's
-
nasser had some of the best legs of the 90s.
-
nasser had some of the best legs of the 90s.
judging from the pic i posted whos calves do you think are bigger..nassers or dorian.i would say dorians calves were awesome
-
For a guy who was known for his calf development (Yates) the true mass monster Nasser really has him there.
-
nasser lacked definiton/detail in the back.
Hell yeah
-
nasser's lat spread was always pretty good, but lacked detail in the back double biceps pose.
-
nasser has amazing hamstrings there
-
but lacked detail in the back double biceps pose.
Not in either '96 or '97 Olympia; can't remember which one, but he was hard as nails from the back and that's saying something.
-
Check out Levrone's "Holy shit" expression.
-
Dorian nuthuggers claim dorian was "infinitely" wider than Nasser, hahahahaha ;D
-
nasser didnt train as hard as dorian at the gym!
-
damn
-
nasser had some of the best legs of the 90s.
Excellent quads/hams/glutes, but I think he put way too much synthol in his calves. In the end, his calves were as bad as Ernie Taylor's tris.