Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: Hugo Chavez on January 12, 2007, 06:08:46 PM

Title: If this is all Clinton's fault like Old Rooster says.
Post by: Hugo Chavez on January 12, 2007, 06:08:46 PM
Old Rooster says Clinton couldn't "sway attention away from him ramming his tiny cock in to monica's mouth in the oval office" and thus we're where we're at today thanks to Clinton and Monica...

WELL... Using this logic, folks, we're all screwed bigtime...

Bush's Monica moment is way way worse....

(http://www.imagedonkey.com/out.php?i=18711_bushkisshead1xx.jpg)

(http://www.imagedonkey.com/out.php?i=18708_bushgannonthumb.jpg)

(http://www.imagedonkey.com/out.php?i=18710_bushhugsgannon3x.jpg)

(http://www.imagedonkey.com/out.php?i=18712_bulldogjeffgannonpornsite.jpg)

(http://www.imagedonkey.com/out.php?i=18713_jeffgannondesktopR.jpg)
Title: Re: If this is all Clinton's fault like Old Rooster says.
Post by: MisterMagoo on January 12, 2007, 06:25:18 PM
couldn't sway attention? jeezus christ it was newt and the right-wing hawks who did nothing but try and launch investigations on clinton nonstop as long as they were in office. clinton was a rapist (juanita broderick), clinton was a murderer (vince foster, ron brown), clinton was "wagging the dog" (bosnia), clinton was giving out vital information (filegate).

the republican-led congress made it their mission to do anything they could to take clinton down. it's amazing he got anything done (such as foil a multitude of terrorist plots, something bush would have done if he'd listened to sandy berger and richard clarke sometime between january and august of 2001).
Title: Re: If this is all Clinton's fault like Old Rooster says.
Post by: MisterMagoo on January 12, 2007, 06:30:12 PM
it doesn't. the only reason they attempted to impeach him was for lying about it. the actual charge was perjury, but there was no actual substance to it. there's a reason he wasn't removed and it wasn't just because he was good at speaking.
Title: Re: If this is all Clinton's fault like Old Rooster says.
Post by: GroinkTropin on January 12, 2007, 08:54:19 PM
Clinton did far worse things than lie about monica lewinsky, and WHY ON EARTH do you have pics from what I can only guess is a gay porn site?! Trying to tell us something  ::)
Title: Re: If this is all Clinton's fault like Old Rooster says.
Post by: Mr. Intenseone on January 12, 2007, 08:57:35 PM
Quote from: Berserker on January 12, 2007, 06:08:46 PM
Old Rooster says Clinton couldn't "sway attention away from him ramming his tiny cock in to monica's mouth in the oval office" and thus we're where we're at today thanks to Clinton and Monica...

WELL... Using this logic, folks, we're all screwed bigtime...

Bush's Monica moment is way way worse....

(http://www.imagedonkey.com/out.php?i=18711_bushkisshead1xx.jpg)

(http://www.imagedonkey.com/out.php?i=18708_bushgannonthumb.jpg)

(http://www.imagedonkey.com/out.php?i=18710_bushhugsgannon3x.jpg)

(http://www.imagedonkey.com/out.php?i=18712_bulldogjeffgannonpornsite.jpg)

(http://www.imagedonkey.com/out.php?i=18713_jeffgannondesktopR.jpg)

Monster spin........Clinton sent troops to Bosnia and Kosovo and there was absolutly no security threat and no one even blinked.........Bush sends troops to Iraq and he's the bad guy..............go f**k yourself libs!!
Title: Re: If this is all Clinton's fault like Old Rooster says.
Post by: MisterMagoo on January 12, 2007, 09:07:17 PM
bwahahah, that's because hardly anyone knew about it. clinton sent what, 4000 troops or so into kosovo? there were no casualties and they were there for the blink of an eye. the total dead in that whole shebang was around 5,000.

iraq has over 3,000 american soldiers dead and iraqis dead in the hundreds of thousands. bush sent 250,000 soldiers over and still has 120,000 or so there nearly four years later. to even compare the two is simply retarded.

and it's absolute bullshit that no one cared about bosnia, the media went berzerk on him, with many accusing him of "wagging the dog" to take focus away from his sex scandals. fox news railed into him daily.
Title: Re: If this is all Clinton's fault like Old Rooster says.
Post by: Hugo Chavez on January 12, 2007, 09:37:07 PM
Quote from: Methyl Mike on January 12, 2007, 08:54:19 PM
Clinton did far worse things than lie about monica lewinsky, and WHY ON EARTH do you have pics from what I can only guess is a gay porn site?! Trying to tell us something  ::)
Put two and two together fool... All of those pics are of Jeff Gannon, the guy Bush had put in the pressroom to lob softball questions at the president.  Just search for images of Jeff Gannon, all this is on the first page.  He ran a gay escort site while he wasn't hooking the president up.   :-X If that's not worthy of bringing into a political forum after Clinton gets attacked for Monica, I don't know what is...

Just look at those googly eyes Bush is making at a gay male escort... WTF ;)
Title: Re: If this is all Clinton's fault like Old Rooster says.
Post by: Hugo Chavez on January 12, 2007, 09:37:50 PM
Quote from: Mr. Intenseone on January 12, 2007, 08:57:35 PM
Monster spin........Clinton sent troops to Bosnia and Kosovo and there was absolutly no security threat and no one even blinked.........Bush sends troops to Iraq and he's the bad guy..............go f**k yourself libs!!
meltdown :D
Title: Re: If this is all Clinton's fault like Old Rooster says.
Post by: Hugo Chavez on January 12, 2007, 09:40:23 PM
I think these pics just sent I-one over the edge :D  He's like, noooooooooo.... nooooooooooo...... :'(
Title: Re: If this is all Clinton's fault like Old Rooster says.
Post by: GroinkTropin on January 12, 2007, 10:52:15 PM
Quote from: Berserker on January 12, 2007, 09:40:23 PM
I think these pics just sent I-one over the edge :D  He's like, noooooooooo.... nooooooooooo...... :'(

Come on man, you don't really think bush is bi do you? Highly doubtful.
Title: Re: If this is all Clinton's fault like Old Rooster says.
Post by: Hugo Chavez on January 12, 2007, 11:13:05 PM
Quote from: Methyl Mike on January 12, 2007, 10:52:15 PM
Come on man, you don't really think bush is bi do you? Highly doubtful.

Take a look at the way he cradles the back of his neck, kisses his head, give him that evil smile... He clearly knows him well... A gay male escort.... the president knows well... You don't find anything daming with that ::) Of course I do... It runs in the Bush family...

(http://www.imagedonkey.com/out.php?i=18728_wtpage1small.gif) (http://www.imagedonkey.com/out.php?i=18728_wtpage1small.gif)

(http://www.imagedonkey.com/out.php?i=18729_15yearoldboy.gif) (http://www.imagedonkey.com/out.php?i=18729_15yearoldboy.gif)

(http://www.imagedonkey.com/out.php?i=18730_4articlesa.gif) (http://www.imagedonkey.com/out.php?i=18730_4articlesa.gif)

Title: Re: If this is all Clinton's fault like Old Rooster says.
Post by: Hugo Chavez on January 12, 2007, 11:19:10 PM
Conspiracy of Silence:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4946110250157218995&sourceid=searchfeed
Title: Re: If this is all Clinton's fault like Old Rooster says.
Post by: Hedgehog on January 14, 2007, 05:23:17 PM
Quote from: Methyl Mike on January 12, 2007, 10:52:15 PM
Come on man, you don't really think bush is bi do you? Highly doubtful.

Hahaha. From reading your post, it seems like you're starting to believe he might be.


For the record, I don't give a damn if GWB is a homo, bi or hetero or whatever. That's not what makes or breaks his ability to be a good president.

No, I don't think he's a gay, either. But it's just not an issue. It shouldn't be. A homo should be able to be the president as well.

-Hedge
Title: Re: If this is all Clinton's fault like Old Rooster says.
Post by: Mr. Intenseone on January 14, 2007, 05:57:17 PM
It's not all Clintons fault, but I'd say at least 70-80% is!
Title: Re: If this is all Clinton's fault like Old Rooster says.
Post by: Parker on January 15, 2007, 03:49:46 AM
Quote from: Hedgehog on January 14, 2007, 05:23:17 PM
Hahaha. From reading your post, it seems like you're starting to believe he might be.


For the record, I don't give a damn if GWB is a homo, bi or hetero or whatever. That's not what makes or breaks his ability to be a good president.

No, I don't think he's a gay, either. But it's just not an issue. It shouldn't be. A homo should be able to be the president as well.

-Hedge

It goes against GW Bush's Christian values
Title: Re: If this is all Clinton's fault like Old Rooster says.
Post by: Hugo Chavez on January 15, 2007, 04:36:47 AM
Quote from: Parker on January 15, 2007, 03:49:46 AM
It goes against GW Bush's Christian values
bingo, it's the hypocrisy more than gay bashing here and the infidelity alone.
Title: Re: If this is all Clinton's fault like Old Rooster says.
Post by: Hedgehog on January 15, 2007, 11:01:10 AM
Quote from: Mr. Intenseone on January 14, 2007, 05:57:17 PM
It's not all Clintons fault, but I'd say at least 70-80% is!

And the 20-30% remaining, who's fault is that?

-Hedge
Title: Re: If this is all Clinton's fault like Old Rooster says.
Post by: Hugo Chavez on November 28, 2007, 04:02:27 PM
bump