Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: ribonucleic on January 22, 2007, 07:08:56 AM
-
I originally wrote this as a response to Richard2004 in the Monica Brant thread. But I decided it was worth its own thread...
In the course of defending what he identifies as a non-perverted appreciation of muscular women, Richard wrote:
<< a "schmoe" is NOT just a fan/supporter/promoter/admirer of female bodybuilders, but RATHER someone who/hires pays muscular women to perform BDSM related activities with/for them. >>
To which I respond: Close, but not quite.
I say that the schmoe is the one honest/shameless enough to acknowledge the root of his interest in female muscle and brave/desperate enough to pursue it to its logical conclusion. That female competitors are - as Richard correctly observes - still somewhat clueless about his existence, I attribute to the fundamental sanity of their sex.
-
... the fundamental sanity of their sex.
hahahahaha! Priceless!
I've been mistaking you for a reasonably clever and observant guy this whole time.
-
I originally wrote this as a response to Richard2004 in the Monica Brant thread. But I decided it was worth its own thread...
I don't see the big deal.
Doesn't everyone do stiff-legged deadlifts wearing a tiny g-string riding up his/her ass?