Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: chainsaw on January 24, 2007, 07:09:02 AM

Title: Chick (fit show) Vs. Body by (Jake)
Post by: chainsaw on January 24, 2007, 07:09:02 AM
I have to say that Chick blows that guy out of the water.  Chick, have you ever been approached by these companies with these (I lost 8inches in one week) gigs?

They both have a similar likenesses, but Fitshow definately shows how it is.  It is too bad fitshow won't make as big an impact on the General Population since everyone is into a quick fix.

Jake is just a bag of bullshit.
Title: Re: Chick (fit show) Vs. Body by (Jake)
Post by: ribonucleic on January 24, 2007, 07:15:31 AM

Jake is just a bag of bullshit.

Yeah, but he's a marginally recognized bag of bullshit. Chick is just a nobody in an oversize meat suit. Although I suppose they're functionally interchangeable from a "mamaluke" [sp?] standpoint.
Title: Re: Chick (fit show) Vs. Body by (Jake)
Post by: The Squadfather on January 24, 2007, 07:18:13 AM
I have to say that Chick blows that guy out of the water.  Chick, have you ever been approached by these companies with these (I lost 8inches in one week) gigs?

They both have a similar likenesses, but Fitshow definately shows how it is.  It is too bad fitshow won't make as big an impact on the General Population since everyone is into a quick fix.

Jake is just a bag of bullshit.
you mean you're not impressed by the jewish Hercules Jake Steinfeld? aren't you impressed by the way he rolls the sleeves up on his short sleeved Polo shirts to reveal his massive 14 inch arms?
Title: Re: Chick (fit show) Vs. Body by (Jake)
Post by: onlyme on January 24, 2007, 01:20:10 PM
Yea well, CHic might be better but Jake has made 1000 times more money from his show and tapes.
Title: Re: Chick (fit show) Vs. Body by (Jake)
Post by: amoney86 on January 24, 2007, 02:27:02 PM
Bob isn't a sellout though he actually uses his products.(egg whites int. and bb.com)
Title: Re: Chick (fit show) Vs. Body by (Jake)
Post by: troponin on January 24, 2007, 02:59:30 PM
Yeah, but he's a marginally recognized bag of bullshit. Chick is just a nobody in an oversize meat suit. Although I suppose they're functionally interchangeable from a "mamaluke" [sp?] standpoint.

They're interchangeable from a slave soldier in the middle ages who converted to islam and served the muslim caliphate?
Title: Re: Chick (fit show) Vs. Body by (Jake)
Post by: ribonucleic on January 24, 2007, 03:23:00 PM
They're interchangeable from a slave soldier in the middle ages who converted to islam and served the muslim caliphate?

I never have been sure of the spelling of this. But you hear it in Scorsese films.

<< In general, mamaluke is an Italian-American slang term equivalent to "knucklehead" or "moron." >>

http://qwiki.caltech.edu/wiki/Mamaluke
Title: Re: Chick (fit show) Vs. Body by (Jake)
Post by: Bluto on January 24, 2007, 03:36:02 PM
(http://www.simonsays.com/assets/isbn/0743224779/C_0743224779.jpg)
Title: Re: Chick (fit show) Vs. Body by (Jake)
Post by: troponin on January 24, 2007, 03:52:33 PM
I never have been sure of the spelling of this. But you hear it in Scorsese films.

<< In general, mamaluke is an Italian-American slang term equivalent to "knucklehead" or "moron." >>

http://qwiki.caltech.edu/wiki/Mamaluke

Yeah, I was just joking.  Marmaluke, mamaluke, mamluk are all variations in spelling of the muslim slave soldiers.
Title: Re: Chick (fit show) Vs. Body by (Jake)
Post by: bigdumbbell on January 24, 2007, 06:07:18 PM
Yeah, I was just joking.  Marmaluke, mamaluke, mamluk are all variations in spelling of the muslim slave soldiers.

well then, who was mamalukefbi@aol.com ?   :)
Title: Re: Chick (fit show) Vs. Body by (Jake)
Post by: divcom on January 25, 2007, 08:04:00 AM
Isn't he backed by G. Ranker.  They pay that Tony A$$ for motivational tapes like $1M-$2M a yr and bank the other $180M.  If so...Jake is nothing but a front man.  That b###h Simons makes more money than him.
Title: Re: Chick (fit show) Vs. Body by (Jake)
Post by: chainsaw on January 25, 2007, 08:08:27 AM
Isn't he backed by G. Ranker.  They pay that Tony A$$ for motivational tapes like $1M-$2M a yr and bank the other $180M.  If so...Jake is nothing but a front man.  That b###h Simons makes more money than him.

Richard Simmons kicks ass though.  For what he does/is that is.  He's helped out some major obese people in his life.
Title: Re: Chick (fit show) Vs. Body by (Jake)
Post by: HUGEPECS on January 25, 2007, 08:09:22 AM
I'm sure Bob will be thinking about going INFOMERCIALS, soon.
Title: Re: Chick (fit show) Vs. Body by (Jake)
Post by: onlyme on January 25, 2007, 10:25:42 AM
Isn't he backed by G. Ranker.  They pay that Tony A$$ for motivational tapes like $1M-$2M a yr and bank the other $180M.  If so...Jake is nothing but a front man.  That b###h Simons makes more money than him.

If you have Renker behind you for a infocommercial you are pretty setup for life. 
Title: Re: Chick (fit show) Vs. Body by (Jake)
Post by: legbreaker on January 25, 2007, 10:38:52 AM
(http://www.simonsays.com/assets/isbn/0743224779/C_0743224779.jpg)

can you imagine being a teen age kid and actually buying that book?  Marketing!!!!  Financial success in this business is only about marketing........and you do not always get what you pay for.  Too bad there are people that still think that because something cost more it's better. I know boxing trainers in downtown Ny that will accept any money amount you can afford (15-20 etc) to train you and they are legit, very legit.  Then I also have seen these new "kickboxing" or regular trainers that charge 115 per session and absolutely have no right training people. 
Title: Re: Chick (fit show) Vs. Body by (Jake)
Post by: nycbull on January 25, 2007, 10:47:20 AM
you mean you're not impressed by the jewish Hercules Jake Steinfeld? aren't you impressed by the way he rolls the sleeves up on his short sleeved Polo shirts to reveal his massive 14 inch arms?


hahahahahahah, that is so true, the guy is all elbows.