Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: donrhummy on February 17, 2007, 02:20:17 PM

Title: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: donrhummy on February 17, 2007, 02:20:17 PM
Dugdale looks good but he actually looked better as an amateur.

Comparisons of his back:
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: alexxx on February 17, 2007, 02:21:28 PM
Looks like he has had a bad burn.
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: YoungBlood on February 17, 2007, 02:24:07 PM
What's your criteria for saying he looks "better?"  More detail, crispness?
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: Condor on February 17, 2007, 02:25:39 PM
his lats def look wider in the first pic.
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: donrhummy on February 17, 2007, 02:38:05 PM
What's your criteria for saying he looks "better?"  More detail, crispness?

Look in that first pic. He's just as striated in the lats as in 2007 but is thicker despite not pulling his arms back like in the 2007 pic. Sure, he doesn't have as dark a tan but he's just as cut. And in the 2nd comparison you can see he's just as cut (again not as dark which brings out the cuts better) but wider/thicker, especially in the lower lats.
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: SS on February 17, 2007, 02:39:14 PM
maybe he needs steroids.
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: 240 is Back on February 17, 2007, 03:00:18 PM
maybe he needs steroids.

sorry, bible dudn't allow it.
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: swilkins1984 on February 17, 2007, 03:01:48 PM
What? Dugdale clearly looks better in 2007 than 2003 in those pics IMO ???
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: Tigerman on February 17, 2007, 03:05:30 PM
In the 2007 pic he's still completing the pose. No way he looked better as an amateur.
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: XFACTOR on February 17, 2007, 03:07:43 PM

In the 2007 shot he has not completely extended out his lats.  He look way better in 07.  No comparison.
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: donrhummy on February 17, 2007, 03:08:39 PM
OK, here he's completed the pose. He still looks better in 2003.

(http://www.flexonline.com/07contests/07ironman/pre3/images/NR0M0460.jpg)
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: The_Hammer on February 17, 2007, 03:09:14 PM
His arms look better in 2003.
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: XFACTOR on February 17, 2007, 03:10:41 PM
Here is a pretty good comparison. Damn bottom one showed up shitty. my bad
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: ribonucleic on February 17, 2007, 03:14:36 PM
maybe he needs steroids.

He needs something.

PM me when he's gained 30 pound of mass, OK?
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: alexxx on February 17, 2007, 03:15:25 PM
He needs something.

PM me when he's gained 30 pound of mass, OK?

He needs to train for boybuilding.
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: ribonucleic on February 17, 2007, 03:17:36 PM
He needs to train for boybuilding.

Freudian slip?  ;D
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: alexxx on February 17, 2007, 03:21:18 PM
Freudian slip?  ;D

Yeah needs to get his head on straight.
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: ribonucleic on February 17, 2007, 03:22:23 PM
All his Flex articles talk about how he used to train for volume until his wife pussy-whipped him into spending less time in the gym so now he does HIT.

Unless he's content to leave as small a mark on the sport as Porter Cottrell, he needs to start keeping his woman in line like a true Cubano.
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: alexxx on February 17, 2007, 03:24:07 PM
All his Flex articles talk about how he used to train for volume until his wife pussy-whipped him into spending less time in the gym so now he does HIT.

Unless he's content to leave as small a mark on the sport as Porter Cottrell, he needs to start keeping his woman in line like a true Cubano.

Oh man not another one of those. I find it hilarious how women control the lives of their husbands. I wonder who is in control at the Dugdale residence.
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: Palpatine Q on February 17, 2007, 03:40:46 PM
Dugdale = vastly overrated.

The only reason he's a pro is his connections and nice-guy persona
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: alexxx on February 17, 2007, 03:41:52 PM
Dugdale = vastly overrated.

The only reason he's a pro is his connections and nice-guy persona

What about the poor caliber of proffesional bodybuilders?
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: Palpatine Q on February 17, 2007, 03:44:05 PM
What about the poor caliber of proffesional bodybuilders?
70% of them are unimpressive
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: ManBearPig... on February 17, 2007, 03:44:27 PM
Oh man not another one of those. I find it hilarious how women control the lives of their husbands. I wonder who is in control at the Dugdale residence.

Jesus?
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: alexxx on February 17, 2007, 03:46:16 PM
Jesus?

Let us hope so.
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: natural al on February 17, 2007, 03:47:46 PM
Dugdale = vastly overrated.

The only reason he's a pro is his connections and nice-guy persona

I'll respectfully disagree with ya on that.  He's not tall but he has everything a pro "should" have.  Only "poor" bodypart are his bi's, everything else is top notch, he has conditioning, no gut, symmetry, he know's how to pose, defined, seperated.....

why do you think he's overrated?
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: alexxx on February 17, 2007, 03:49:12 PM
I'll respectfully disagree with ya on that.  He's not tall but he has everything a pro "should" have.  Only "poor" bodypart are his bi's, everything else is top notch, he has conditioning, no gut, symmetry, he know's how to pose, defined, seperated.....

why do you think he's overrated?

knows no apostrophy gigerbread man.
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: natural al on February 17, 2007, 03:50:25 PM
knows no apostrophy gigerbread man.

what does that even mean?
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: alexxx on February 17, 2007, 03:51:07 PM
what does that even mean?

You can't spell on top of being out of shape permenantly.
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: natural al on February 17, 2007, 03:54:04 PM
You can't spell on top of being out of shape permenantly.

you're reading level is barely 6th grade, my 6 year old daughter can probably spell you under the table so stfu.  BTW you spelled the bolded word wrong.  Idiot.
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: ribonucleic on February 17, 2007, 03:54:47 PM
my 6 year old daughter can probably spell you under the table so stfu.

But she's not hotter than Oksana. So there.
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: alexxx on February 17, 2007, 03:55:55 PM
you're reading level is barely 6th grade, my 6 year old daughter can probably spell you under the table so stfu.  BTW you spelled the bolded word wrong.  Idiot.

I was testing your reading level jackass. Now go back to being a wimp.
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: natural al on February 17, 2007, 03:56:38 PM
But she's not hotter than Oksana. So there.

y'know it's funny.  If that's alexxx's sisters name, I've never said a bad word about her, stayed out of all the BS.  Alexxx and I were cool up until about 2 weeks ago and all of a sudden he wants to start shit with me again.

What's with the "tude" alexxx?  I had no beef with you but you keep trying to start shit with me....why?
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: natural al on February 17, 2007, 03:57:28 PM
I was testing your reading level jackass. Now go back to being a wimp.

you keep believing that, it'll make it easier to knock you the fuck out when I see ya ;D
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: ManBearPig... on February 17, 2007, 03:58:27 PM
you keep believing that, it'll make it easier to knock you the f**k out when I see ya ;D

aren't you morbidly obese?
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: alexxx on February 17, 2007, 03:59:10 PM
y'know it's funny.  If that's alexxx's sisters name, I've never said a bad word about her, stayed out of all the BS.  Alexxx and I were cool up until about 2 weeks ago and all of a sudden he wants to start shit with me again.

What's with the "tude" alexxx?  I had no beef with you but you keep trying to start shit with me....why?

Sorry a-dogg I didn't mean to make you cry just having some fun so maybe I did mean to make you cry or then again I didn't.... can some one say R O S?
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: ribonucleic on February 17, 2007, 04:00:30 PM
If that's alexxx's sisters name, I've never said a bad word about her, stayed out of all the BS.

Whereas I posted my fantasies about sexually degrading her so frequently there for a while that I got accused of being an alexxx stalker.

The moral of the story is: No good deed goes unpunished.
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: natural al on February 17, 2007, 04:04:18 PM
aren't you morbidly obese?

I'm 210lbs....with abs, not ripped....why do you ask?  My fist ain't fat :) :) :)

being obese is something that some guys like to throw around on here for no reason at all.  I fit in the same suit pants I did 6 years ago, waist is about 32ish...


Sorry a-dogg I didn't mean to make you cry just having some fun so maybe I did mean to make you cry or then again I didn't.... can some one say R O S?

it's a-dog and I ain't cryin, just don't get the hate...what's R O S mean?



Whereas I posted my fantasies about sexually degrading her so frequently there for a while that I got accused of being an alexxx stalker.

The moral of the story is: No good deed goes unpunished.

I got no reason to "fued" with him....I was just minding my own f'n business.
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: alexxx on February 17, 2007, 04:06:37 PM
I'm 210lbs....with abs, not ripped....why do you ask?  My fist ain't fat :) :) :)

being obese is something that some guys like to throw around on here for no reason at all.  I fit in the same suit pants I did 6 years ago, waist is about 32ish...


it's a-dog and I ain't cryin, just don't get the hate...what's R O S mean?



I got no reason to "fued" with him....I was just minding my own f'n business.

Ron On Sentence


I love you!
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: natural al on February 17, 2007, 04:09:13 PM
Ron On Sentence


I love you!


it's run on....I type my messages like this cause I type em like they go through my head, trust me, I've taken lots of english classes and have done fine in them.  I know how to write if I want to but this is a BB message board so I'm a little looser with my style of writing.  if it bothers you, I'll try to be better.  Just say the word.
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: alexxx on February 17, 2007, 04:15:52 PM

it's run on....I type my messages like this cause I type em like they go through my head, trust me, I've taken lots of english classes and have done fine in them.  I know how to write if I want to but this is a BB message board so I'm a little looser with my style of writing.  if it bothers you, I'll try to be better.  Just say the word.


Any new pictures a-dog I thought the old ones where top notch!
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: natural al on February 17, 2007, 04:20:08 PM

Any new pictures a-dog I thought the old ones where top notch!

thank you.  New ones will be coming in a few months, or maybe not since some of you "guys" on this site are only satisfied when other muscular men post pics. 

you know why I didn't post pics before and lets just say that the last 6 months werent' any easier than the previous 2 years.
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: finurface on February 17, 2007, 04:22:15 PM
basically he looks exactly the same.
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: alexxx on February 17, 2007, 04:22:35 PM
thank you.  New ones will be coming in a few months, or maybe not since some of you "guys" on this site are only satisfied when other muscular men post pics. 

you know why I didn't post pics before and lets just say that the last 6 months werent' any easier than the previous 2 years.

Can you show me the old ones?
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: Palpatine Q on February 17, 2007, 04:25:08 PM
I'll respectfully disagree with ya on that.  He's not tall but he has everything a pro "should" have.  Only "poor" bodypart are his bi's, everything else is top notch, he has conditioning, no gut, symmetry, he know's how to pose, defined, seperated.....

why do you think he's overrated?
\

To each his own Al.

I just don't find anything remarkable about him. A '"small" pro that I think is impressive is Dave Henry
Title: Re: Dugdale looked better as an amateur
Post by: natural al on February 17, 2007, 04:27:20 PM
Can you show me the old ones?

keep holding your breath.

basically he looks exactly the same.

nahhhh.  Calves are better, legs are a little better, chest still sucks but I'm working on it.

why's this thread about me?  I've made no moronic claims, I don't talk shit why's alexxx on my dick so bad?

\

To each his own Al.

I just don't find anything remarkable about him. A '"small" pro that I think is impressive is Dave Henry

I'm also a fan of Henry's but I still think dugdale's pretty damn good.  We'll agree to disagree.