Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Fletch on February 23, 2007, 05:55:13 AM

Title: arnolds back
Post by: Fletch on February 23, 2007, 05:55:13 AM: from the day. prolly wouldnt even make a good amatuer show now. But the calves are still the best ever.
Title: Re: arnolds back
Post by: jaejonna on February 23, 2007, 06:07:37 AM: Look at this comparison...
Title: Re: arnolds back
Post by: Theoak* on February 23, 2007, 06:15:07 AM: Quote from: jaejonna on February 23, 2007, 06:07:37 AM
Look at this comparison...

I think arnie was 20 in that pic too, amazing.
Title: Re: arnolds back
Post by: jaejonna on February 23, 2007, 06:17:46 AM: Quote from: Theoak* on February 23, 2007, 06:15:07 AM
I think arnie was 20 in that pic too, amazing.
yes I believe that is his best rear double back shot....
Title: Re: arnolds back
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on February 23, 2007, 06:23:28 AM: Some good clear shots of Arnold's back from 1975
Title: Re: arnolds back
Post by: Theoak* on February 23, 2007, 07:06:53 AM: Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on February 23, 2007, 06:23:28 AM
Some good clear shots of Arnold's back from 1975

It appears arnie did not add a great deal of size on back, delts and arms compared to he's pic in his 20's. Might be the camera angle though.
Title: Re: arnolds back
Post by: the shadow on February 23, 2007, 07:08:57 AM: Quote from: Fletch on February 23, 2007, 05:55:13 AM
from the day. prolly wouldnt even make a good amatuer show now. But the calves are still the best ever.
arnold is still ight years ahead of todays bodybuilders..arnold is god
Title: Re: arnolds back
Post by: Board_SHERIF on February 23, 2007, 07:11:18 AM: Quote from: Fletch on February 23, 2007, 05:55:13 AM
from the day. prolly wouldnt even make a good amatuer show now. But the calves are still the best ever.

Me thinks you have an eye problem.....any BB after 1990 sucks....
Title: Re: arnolds back
Post by: Buttsuck on February 23, 2007, 07:41:47 AM: Quote from: Board_SHERIF on February 23, 2007, 07:11:18 AM
Me thinks you have an eye problem.....any BB after 1990 sucks....
Credit that to Dorian Yates for introducing GH into the sport....
Title: Re: arnolds back
Post by: alexxx on February 23, 2007, 07:43:16 AM: Ahnold!
Title: Re: arnolds back
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on February 23, 2007, 07:44:18 AM: Quote from: Buttsuck on February 23, 2007, 07:41:47 AM
Credit that to Dorian Yates for introducing GH into the sport....

WRONG Momo had a GH gut in 1992 credit him ;)
Title: Re: arnolds back
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on February 23, 2007, 07:46:28 AM: Arnold again in 1975
Title: Re: arnolds back
Post by: Iceman1981 on February 23, 2007, 08:48:25 AM: ...
Title: Re: arnolds back
Post by: the shadow on February 23, 2007, 08:52:32 AM: Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on February 23, 2007, 07:46:28 AM
Arnold again in 1975
damn just look at francos back..insane :o
Title: Re: arnolds back
Post by: rccs on February 23, 2007, 09:08:09 AM: Quote from: Fletch on February 23, 2007, 05:55:13 AM
from the day. prolly wouldnt even make a good amatuer show now. But the calves are still the best ever.
About time you posted something decent...
Title: Re: arnolds back
Post by: GoneAway on February 23, 2007, 09:29:09 AM: Awesome back.
Title: Re: arnolds back
Post by: Pollux on February 23, 2007, 09:36:23 AM: Check out the fuckin' vein on Arnold's back. Now THAT'S muscularity.

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=129946.0;attach=144764;image)
Title: Re: arnolds back
Post by: rccs on February 23, 2007, 09:43:54 AM: Quote from: Fletch on February 23, 2007, 05:55:13 AM
from the day. prolly wouldnt even make a good amatuer show now. But the calves are still the best ever.
The second pic is fabulous! His legs never been better!
Title: Re: arnolds back
Post by: americanbulldog on February 23, 2007, 12:54:09 PM: Arnolds back lacked the density that Haney, Yates and Coleman had. And his calves are far from the greatest, Yates, Matarazzo, Viator, Mentzer all had better calves.
Title: Re: arnolds back
Post by: razzle on February 23, 2007, 01:20:49 PM: from the day. prolly wouldnt even make a good amatuer show now. But the calves are still the best ever.

prolly = what the f*() is that? It's not a word ass shoe!
Title: Re: arnolds back
Post by: jaejonna on February 23, 2007, 01:28:35 PM: Quote from: americanbulldog on February 23, 2007, 12:54:09 PM
Arnolds back lacked the density that Haney, Yates and Coleman had. And his calves are far from the greatest, Yates, Matarazzo, Viator, Mentzer all had better calves.
Dickerson and Platz
Title: Re: arnolds back
Post by: Rudee on February 23, 2007, 02:58:43 PM: Quote from: NarcissisticDeity on February 23, 2007, 07:44:18 AM
WRONG Momo had a GH gut in 1992 credit him ;)

Exactly! The very first GH Gut I ever saw on a pro bodybuilder was Mohammad Benaziza back in the early 90's.
Title: Re: arnolds back
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on February 23, 2007, 04:54:55 PM: Quote from: Matt C on February 23, 2007, 04:50:08 PM
It's not fair that some of you guys post pictures of Arnold's back taken at favourable angles and with great lighting or camera quality and compare espouse how great they are. In truth, all else equal, Arnold's back is not close to the majority of Mr. Olympia competitors today. Not to say he didn't have a great back, but to compare his back to Ronnie's for example is not realistic.

His back is better than Franks ! ;)
Title: Re: arnolds back
Post by: NarcissisticDeity on February 23, 2007, 05:00:25 PM: Quote from: Matt C on February 23, 2007, 04:57:37 PM
I can agree with that.

lol you can't deny it , unless you run the risk of being Hulsteresq