Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: natural al on February 25, 2007, 07:42:59 AM

Title: ? For Bob Chick
Post by: natural al on February 25, 2007, 07:42:59 AM
Bob,

I know you hit the national scene in about 86ish when you won either the junior or collegiate nationals.  Anyway, you were an amatuer for awhile so here's the question:

who was the most impressive amatuer you saw while coming up?

who were you sure was gonna do some damage that just never did a thing?

I remember reading about how when people saw Phil Hill's legs at the 87 nationals everyone in the class just gave up so that got me thinking.
Title: Re: ? For Bob Chick
Post by: ribonucleic on February 25, 2007, 07:47:51 AM
Quote from: natural al on February 25, 2007, 07:42:59 AM
who were you sure was gonna do some damage that just never did a thing?

(http://www.bodybuilders.com/king2.jpg)
Title: Re: ? For Bob Chick
Post by: natural al on February 25, 2007, 08:11:05 AM
Quote from: ribonucleic on February 25, 2007, 07:47:51 AM
(http://www.bodybuilders.com/king2.jpg)

classic physique right there, that's what BB is about.
Title: Re: ? For Bob Chick
Post by: Buttsuck on February 25, 2007, 08:44:34 AM
Quote from: natural al on February 25, 2007, 07:42:59 AM
Bob,

I know you hit the national scene in about 86ish when you won either the junior or collegiate nationals.  Anyway, you were an amatuer for awhile so here's the question:

who was the most impressive amatuer you saw while coming up?

who were you sure was gonna do some damage that just never did a thing?

I remember reading about how when people saw Phil Hill's legs at the 87 nationals everyone in the class just gave up so that got me thinking.
Hahahahha are you trying to make an inuendo that Bob never did anything in the pros?
Title: Re: ? For Bob Chick
Post by: natural al on February 25, 2007, 08:45:30 AM
Quote from: Buttsuck on February 25, 2007, 08:44:34 AM
Hahahahha are you trying to make an inuendo that Bob never did anything in the pros?

no
Title: Re: ? For Bob Chick
Post by: Chick on February 25, 2007, 04:21:25 PM
Most impressive rookie: Kevin Levrone

Most wasted talent: Matt Mendenhall
Title: Re: ? For Bob Chick
Post by: Mr. Intenseone on February 25, 2007, 05:27:00 PM
Matts a close second, Rory (with no bias intended) was the most wasted amature to not turn pro........


(http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e196/Intenseone/leidel34.jpg)

(http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e196/Intenseone/leidel25.jpg)
Title: Re: ? For Bob Chick
Post by: Buttsuck on February 25, 2007, 05:31:50 PM
Quote from: Chick on February 25, 2007, 04:21:25 PM
Most impressive rookie: Kevin Levrone

Most wasted talent: Matt Mendenhall
Matt Mendenhall was a waste of talent hahaha. I wonder why he quit. He could never bring the conditioning neccesary.
Title: Re: ? For Bob Chick
Post by: Max_Rep on February 26, 2007, 12:00:17 AM
Quote from: Mr. Intenseone on February 25, 2007, 05:27:00 PM
Matts a close second, Rory (with no bias intended) was the most wasted amature to not turn pro........


(http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e196/Intenseone/leidel34.jpg)

(http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e196/Intenseone/leidel25.jpg)

I've never seen that second shot of Rory Joe. I saw the studio run of the same shot probably the same year, but that looks like it was on-stage. And I agree with your comment.
Title: Re: ? For Bob Chick
Post by: onlyme on February 26, 2007, 12:05:12 AM
Quote from: Buttsuck on February 25, 2007, 05:31:50 PM
Matt Mendenhall was a waste of talent hahaha. I wonder why he quit. He could never bring the conditioning neccesary.

Hey Buttlick, don't speak on things you know nothing about.  Stick with petty insults and gay stuff.  The things you are used to hearing from your friends and family.  You look stupid trying to post to BB related stuff.  Hope this helps.  And go to bed it's past your bedtime