Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: donrhummy on February 27, 2007, 03:10:50 PM
-
Would you rather be a Paul Dillett (where you're friggin insane huge when standing there but when you pose, you don't looks so impressive) or Phil heath (where you look good standing there but your muscles pop and look more impressive when you pose)?
Just Standing there:
(http://www.darkwoods.com/bodybuilder/male/bb/gallery/fullsize/dillet07.jpg)
(http://www.darkwoods.com/bodybuilder/male/bb/gallery/fullsize/dillet19.jpg)
(http://www.darkwoods.com/bodybuilder/male/bb/gallery/fullsize/dillet48.jpg)
Posing:
(http://www.darkwoods.com/bodybuilder/male/bb/gallery/fullsize/dillet15.jpg)
(http://www.darkwoods.com/bodybuilder/male/bb/gallery/fullsize/dillet51.jpg)
Just Standing There:
(http://www.graphicmuscle.com/~photos/630/Men/IMG_8713.jpg)
(http://www.graphicmuscle.com/~photos/676/Men/IMG_8784.jpg)
Posing:
(http://www.graphicmuscle.com/~photos/630/Men/IMG_8437.jpg)
(http://www.graphicmuscle.com/~photos/676/Men/IMG_8583.jpg)
-
paul
E
-
Dillet by a mile.
I fail to see what is impressive at all about Heath.
He weighs about 215 with the clavicle width of a female.
-
Phil. More marketable and he can buy clothes in a normal store ;D
-
Paul, definitely.
-
Phil heath
-
paul's waist is the same size as phil's and he weighed 70 pounds more. no contest.