Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Gossip & Opinions => Topic started by: Vince G, CSN MFT on February 28, 2007, 09:29:53 PM

Title: Poll: Should Basile be designated as a pro because he owned a gym in 1971???
Post by: Vince G, CSN MFT on February 28, 2007, 09:29:53 PM: I say no :)
Title: Re: Poll: Should Basile be designated as a pro because he owned a gym in 1971???
Post by: G o a t b o y on February 28, 2007, 09:32:41 PM: I vote no.

However, on the question of "should Vince G, CSN MFT get blue competitor stars", I vote yes, mainly on the grounds that Arvilla has them.
Title: Re: Poll: Should Basile be designated as a pro because he owned a gym in 1971??
Post by: AVBG on February 28, 2007, 09:35:24 PM: Yes - For the fact that he won a National title in 1970
Title: Re: Poll: Should Basile be designated as a pro because he owned a gym in 1971???
Post by: The True Adonis on February 28, 2007, 09:38:14 PM: Yes.

He is within the rules.
Title: Re: Poll: Should Basile be designated as a pro because he owned a gym in 1971???
Post by: CARTEL on February 28, 2007, 09:44:10 PM: I say yes. It would match his fruity font. :-*
Title: Re: Poll: Should Basile be designated as a pro because he owned a gym in 1971??
Post by: wolfgang187 on February 28, 2007, 09:53:04 PM: Yes, he has the proper education, National title in 1970 and he should have blue stars.
Title: Re: Poll: Should Basile be designated as a pro because he owned a gym in 1971??
Post by: TheAnimal on February 28, 2007, 09:54:48 PM: Yes
Title: Re: Poll: Should Basile be designated as a pro because he owned a gym in 1971??
Post by: SLYY on February 28, 2007, 09:58:17 PM: Yes
Title: Re: Poll: Should Basile be designated as a pro because he owned a gym in 1971???
Post by: tu_holmes on February 28, 2007, 10:01:00 PM: Did he win a title? Or did he just own a gym? If he owned a gym... no... However, if he has a national title... yes.

And Vince G, should have competitor stars too... he has been on stage competing afterall.
Title: Re: Poll: Should Basile be designated as a pro because he owned a gym in 1971???
Post by: onlyme on February 28, 2007, 10:14:12 PM: Yes to Vince Basile. Cause finally itmake his posts shorter and less boring. ANd if Ron can get shit brown stars then give those to Goodrum. He deserves those.
Title: Re: Poll: Should Basile be designated as a pro because he owned a gym in 1971???
Post by: Vince B on February 28, 2007, 10:54:03 PM: Hey, I would prefer shit-stirring brown stars over those blue ones any day.
Title: Re: Poll: Should Basile be designated as a pro because he owned a gym in 1971???
Post by: jaejonna on March 01, 2007, 06:39:55 AM: We should give him special stars cause he is the oldest one here
Title: Re: Poll: Should Basile be designated as a pro because he owned a gym in 1971???
Post by: the shadow on March 01, 2007, 06:46:07 AM: Quote from: garraeth on February 28, 2007, 11:03:41 PM
Off topic: I'm really starting to wonder if Vince Basile is just a gimmick of Vince G. (or visa/versa)?
Kinda like a white bizarro version of Vince G.

I dunno...it's late and I'm not thinking straight...

wazz up 'willy bob' 'much help'..wallaaah wallaaah ;D ;D ;D
Title: Re: Poll: Should Basile be designated as a pro because he owned a gym in 1971??
Post by: Lord Humungous on March 01, 2007, 06:52:51 AM: Quote from: The Heckler on February 28, 2007, 10:25:40 PM
spider bite in the leg meltdown

Heckler is your name, blowin' dudes is your game huh?

Monster weak gimmick
Title: Re: Poll: Should Basile be designated as a pro because he owned a gym in 1971???
Post by: MikeThaMachine on March 01, 2007, 06:58:49 AM: Quote from: jaejonna on March 01, 2007, 06:39:55 AM
We should give him special stars cause he is the oldest one here

I second that.
Title: Re: Poll: Should Basile be designated as a pro because he owned a gym in 1971???
Post by: SteelePegasus on March 01, 2007, 06:59:57 AM: Vince competed and doesn't have stars..not fair..is Ron being a racist?
Title: Re: Poll: Should Basile be designated as a pro because he owned a gym in 1971???
Post by: Lord Humungous on March 01, 2007, 07:06:04 AM: Quote from: SteelePegasus on March 01, 2007, 06:59:57 AM
Vince competed and doesn't have stars..not fair..is Ron being a racist?

Rons a mega racist
Title: Re: Poll: Should Basile be designated as a pro because he owned a gym in 1971???
Post by: Vince B on March 01, 2007, 03:27:44 PM: You gotta love Melvin. He was upset that I mentioned him too much in my posts and even thought I was libelling him for calling him a nincompoop or whatever it was. Then he posts this thread which proved he was in the minority. Melvin is right about one thing, he does entertain the people whether on stage or here at Getbig.
Title: Re: Poll: Should Basile be designated as a pro because he owned a gym in 1971??
Post by: bmacsys on March 01, 2007, 03:46:24 PM: Quote from: tu_holmes on February 28, 2007, 10:01:00 PM
Did he win a title? Or did he just own a gym? If he owned a gym... no... However, if he has a national title... yes.

And Vince G, should have competitor stars too... he has been on stage competing afterall.

He actually won Mr. Canada 1970.
Title: Re: Poll: Should Basile be designated as a pro because he owned a gym in 1971??
Post by: AVBG on March 01, 2007, 03:54:26 PM: Quote from: bmacsys on March 01, 2007, 03:46:24 PM
He actually won Mr. Canada 1970.

Breaking news
....... In a PM received from our great leader Yaroni Avidan........If Vince Basile gets his stars - it means that he MUST do a Rocky Balboa style comeback to take on Jay Cutler!!!!
Title: Re: Poll: Should Basile be designated as a pro because he owned a gym in 1971???
Post by: Vince B on March 01, 2007, 04:53:56 PM: Heck, the guys today are absolutely huge. Especially on the legs and hams compared to the old days. If I can get into respectable shape that will be an achievement. Guys like Cutler are from another planet.
Title: Re: Poll: Should Basile be designated as a pro because he owned a gym in 1971???
Post by: bigdumbbell on March 01, 2007, 04:59:03 PM: yes
Title: Re: Poll: Should Basile be designated as a pro because he owned a gym in 1971??
Post by: ManBearPig... on March 01, 2007, 05:00:22 PM: Quote from: Vince Basile on March 01, 2007, 04:53:56 PM
Heck, the guys today are absolutely huge. Especially on the legs and hams compared to the old days. If I can get into respectable shape that will be an achievement. Guys like Cutler are from another planet.

take any pictures of teenage girls without their permission lately, Vincenzo?
Title: Re: Poll: Should Basile be designated as a pro because he owned a gym in 1971???
Post by: Vince B on March 02, 2007, 01:47:51 AM: Photographers are entitled to take pictures of anyone in public. Read the rules. Some guys get charged with behaving in an offensive manner and probably are too embarrassed to defend themselves in court. Look at what the paparazzi can do. I am confident they could win any charge brought against them. We don't have a right to privacy here in Australia except for data held by companies and computers. Again, this is an area that people know bugger all about but believe things via what the media report. I guess it would be too much to expect muscleheads to actually learn things from time to time beside how to turn on a blender and inject themselves with drugs.
Title: Re: Poll: Should Basile be designated as a pro because he owned a gym in 1971???
Post by: tu_holmes on March 02, 2007, 01:48:45 AM: Quote from: bmacsys on March 01, 2007, 03:46:24 PM
He actually won Mr. Canada 1970.

Then I'm gonna say yes... definitely so.