Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure

Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: 240 is Back on March 05, 2007, 10:38:41 AM

Title: Judging evidence without even looking at it
Post by: 240 is Back on March 05, 2007, 10:38:41 AM

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=130648.0;attach=145463;image)

(http://www.getbig.com/boards/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=130648.0;attach=145464;image)

Quote from: kh300 on February 25, 2007, 12:24:31 PM

just to let you know,, those 911 posters are photoshoped in there.. posters like that aren't allowed anywhere near a political rally

Quote from: Beach Bum on February 26, 2007, 09:44:33 AM

Yeah.  They do looked photo shopped. 

Quote from: ATHEIST on February 26, 2007, 04:31:29 PM

agreed. photo shopped

Here is video showing the pics they were doubting are definitely real:

Now for all the folks reading, these three getbig members criticized evidence they knew nothing about. 

This begs the question:  How credible are they when they criticize the OTHER 9/11 evidence?  We already know they will deny evidence when given several high quality pictures.  They all shit on it without doing any research. 

IMO, the next time you see something posted, don't just call bullshit.  Look at it yourself and do a little research.  We now clearly see that you 3 will criticize things you know nothing about.  I don't think anyone will put much stock in your opinions on future 9/11 evidence, as its obvious you will deny things you know nothing about.

Title: Re: Judging evidence without even looking at it
Post by: Hugo Chavez on March 05, 2007, 11:07:19 AM

I thought we covered this... They're not photoshoped and the people who said they are, are wrong.  I dare anybody to go to a political event in Austin TX and make it through the event without seeing signs of Alex Jones.  It's not going to happen... Here check out this video, it proves the signs are real because the same sign, exactly the same actual sign is held up when William Kristol tried to speak in Austin.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/October2006/061006Kristol.htm 

Title: Re: Judging evidence without even looking at it
Post by: 24KT on March 05, 2007, 01:48:02 PM

Is it just me, ...or did anyone else catch the fact Obama said "We fund both sides in the war on terror"

Anyone else catch that?

Title: Re: Judging evidence without even looking at it
Post by: BRUCE on March 05, 2007, 02:16:17 PM

To be fair, BB is guilty of nothing more than saying that the pictures appeared to be doctored.  I don't believe he actually accused anyone of posting false images.

Thanks for posting this informaiton, 240.

Title: Re: Judging evidence without even looking at it
Post by: Oldschool Flip on March 07, 2007, 10:49:45 AM

If you listen to Obama talk with out looking at him, he sounds just like Dwayne "the Rock" Johnson. I'll vote for him just to lay the Smackdown!

Title: Re: Judging evidence without even looking at it
Post by: Dos Equis on March 07, 2007, 10:53:30 AM

Quote from: BRUCE on March 05, 2007, 02:16:17 PM

To be fair, BB is guilty of nothing more than saying that the pictures appeared to be doctored.  I don't believe he actually accused anyone of posting false images.

Don't try and confuse people with the facts.   :)