Getbig.com: American Bodybuilding, Fitness and Figure
Getbig Main Boards => Politics and Political Issues Board => Topic started by: kh300 on March 10, 2007, 06:34:10 PM
-
sorry 240, but how are we going to belive your videos showing missles?
-
-
sorry 240, but how are we going to belive your videos showing missles?
So CNN faked its coverage of 911? Geeze Louise. How cooky is that? ::)
-
sorry 240, but how are we going to belive your videos showing missles?
You showed what *can* be done with film. Good job.
however, the video I posted was shown on 12 different media outlets, from CNN to VH1. it's very real. FOX and drudge reported it as a missile initially also.
kh300, it's obvious this 911 thing has you conflicted, cause the only person you're trying to convince here is yourself. Settle the fk down. I believe 911 was a self attack. You don't. Starting threads like this, "showing what CAN be done with video" is completely irrelevant, as my videos were multiple and from CNN. Hell, you can go to blockbuster if you want and rent the CNN video, it's on there too, i fyou want to pay $3.99 for blue and yellow self-ownage.
-
no, you show a lot of videos that show shit that were never seen before. like your hologram and your missiles ones. which explains why one video shows something that no other videos show. youtube clips are not very good evidence, unless you have multiples from multiple tv stations, not just one. so your next youtube clip better show this
-
no, you show a lot of videos that show shit that were never seen before. like your hologram and your missiles ones. which explains why one video shows something that no other videos show. youtube clips are not very good evidence, unless you have multiples from multiple tv stations, not just one. so your next youtube clip better show this
CBS - multiple views of the missile, clipping N Tower. Far, and zoomed in.
spanish NOS news - multiple views of the missile, clipping N Tower. Far, and zoomed in.
FOX news - multiple views of the missile, clipping N Tower. Far, and zoomed in.
Gamma Press - multiple views of the missile, clipping N Tower. Far, and zoomed in.
TLC - multiple views of the missile, clipping N Tower. Far, and zoomed in.
All identical. From afar, and zoomed in.
-
i said multiple videos. not the same video on different stations. why does only that video show this. wasnt there over 35 different official videos of the towers? that means all of the videos that show the crash would have also caught this object flying out. it so easy for you to call me a 'sheep'. but look how easy your fooled into believe something because you want to.
-
ABC released a documentary in which the footage from the ground, filmed by Evan Fairbanks, was altered to make the flying object (seen right above the reporter's head here) lighter.
watch the original, from 9/11, as he was interviewed by Dan Rather.
Then, watch the ABC documentary. They actually digitally lighten "whatever it is".
Nothing to hide, eh? ;)
-
FIIIGGGHHHHTTTT!!!!!!!! ;D ;D
-
kh300, if they have nothing to hide, why would they lighten that object and it's slight smoke trail?
It was shown on 9/11 but was digitally altered on the DVD version.
Please explain why they would do this? This is the object which looks like a missile in the other pics. It barrels down from the sky at probably 2000 mph, clips the N Tower, and leaves a smoke stream as it travels - coincidentally - to the place in WTC6 where they had the giant crater in the building.
-
i said multiple videos. not the same video on different stations. why does only that video show this. wasnt there over 35 different official videos of the towers? that means all of the videos that show the crash would have also caught this object flying out. it so easy for you to call me a 'sheep'. but look how easy your fooled into believe something because you want to.
I have not followed this nonsense closely, but is the contention that missiles hit the WTC and not planes, and that the coverage of the planes hitting the towers has been faked by the networks?
-
I have not followed this nonsense closely, but is the contention that missiles hit the WTC and not planes, and that the coverage of the planes hitting the towers has been faked by the networks?
Let's not use contentions. let's use what we know:
Approx 1 second after the plane hit the second tower, some object came from above, clipped the North Tower, then left a streak of smoke as it descended into world trade #6.
The video from multiple networks shows *something*
Also there was a very large crater in WTC6, where this object landed.
now, we don't know what it is. Some believe missile, some do not. FOXnews and drudge reported it was a missile right after 9/11. Also, the object and its trail was lightened on ABC and TLC documentaries released later.
-
Now, the contention is that a missile was fired from above to damage the WTC7 building, which was wired to fall later. The missile would have caused enough damage to justify the 47 story skyscraper falling later. No one looked at the giant hole (and huge smoke cloud) from WTC6 because the cameras were all pointed at WTC 1 and 2.
*IF* this very fast object had not clipped the north tower, it likely wouldn't have shown up on video due to its speed, and it would have traveled at a tad steeper angle to hit, which means it would have hit front and center, WTC7.
I have not followed this nonsense closely,
If you know it's nonsense, how about telling us what the object is then, if not a missile?
-
My goodness. This is thing is even more bizarre than I thought. So some believe that four planes were mysteriously landed and the passengers on all four planes were secretly killed, their bodies disposed of, and the planes secretly destroyed. All without a trace. And the news media has conspired to fake coverage of the planes hitting the WTC. Unbelievable.
-
My goodness. This is thing is even more bizarre than I thought. So some believe that four planes were mysteriously landed and the passengers on all four planes were secretly killed, their bodies disposed of, and the planes secretly destroyed. All without a trace. And the news media has conspired to fake coverage of the planes hitting the WTC. Unbelievable.
Beach Bum,
Why are you changing the subject? if it's nonsense, then tell us what the object is.
-
My goodness. This is thing is even more bizarre than I thought. So some believe that four planes were mysteriously landed and the passengers on all four planes were secretly killed, their bodies disposed of, and the planes secretly destroyed. All without a trace. And the news media has conspired to fake coverage of the planes hitting the WTC. Unbelievable.
no kidding. ::)
The conspiracy keeps growing.
Soon the number of conspirators will be in the 6 digit range.
-
Beach Bum,
Why are you changing the subject? if it's nonsense, then tell us what the object is.
Oh please. I am not about to give any credence whatsoever to this ridiculous theory. I thought this CT was crazy before today, but I didn't realize how insane it really is. Four missing planes and passengers from four planes? Faked news coverage? This is just bizarre.
-
Oh please. I am not about to give any credence whatsoever to this ridiculous theory. I thought this CT was crazy before today, but I didn't realize how insane it really is. Four missing planes and passengers from four planes? Faked news coverage? This is just bizarre.
Really? Step back for a moment.
You're saying they could pull off firing 3 disguised missiles, and another smaller one... but making 4 planes go away (one of which did land at Cleveland hopkins airport!) would be the hard part?
No offense BB, but we're tlaking about the future of the world here. If the US doesn't pull 9/11, we don't invade the middle east, and Russia/China start making deals (as they are now) with iran and others. 9/11 HAD to happen to ensure our way of life and your cushy job at UHWO. i've accepted it had to be done, and no one will ever serve time. I just like to discuss it.
-
wow, it just keeps going...deeper.....and deeper :-\
-
govts have done this for years.
the US lied about the attack to get us into vietnam, and TRIED to fake a plane shootdown near miami to initiate a war with Cuba. The joint chiefs and military men APPROVED IT! But JFK refused.
it is what it is, a psychological tool to get the large population to support things the govt wants to do. Bush is a good man, IMO. he knows he will wear the brunt of blame for the 911 attacks, by history. And eveyone knows it was way above his capability. But for the next 200 years, it definitely helped strengthen the US' position in the world, and keep our economy afloat. Sure, his friends got rich too - which makes it part strategic vision, part opportunism. but they took the risks too.
i love history and actually have the undergrad in secondary ed, social sciences. I was going to be a history teacher. 911 will be studied for hundreds of years. We are lucky ??? enough to have lived thru the biggest catalyst for world change since that meteor ruined the dinosaurs' picnic.
-
wow, it just keeps going...deeper.....and deeper :-\
Curiouser and curiouser. :) I suspect if I delved deeper into this nonsense (which I won't) it would become even nuttier.
-
Curiouser and curiouser. :) I suspect if I delved deeper into this nonsense (which I won't) it would become even nuttier.
beach bum, you're almost 40. You're not stupid.
You were just a toddler when the gulf of tonken happened, so that might have passed you by. But you've been here long enough on the forum - and you've gone from discussing evidence on 9/11 to just making fun of it.
You know the score. you just don't have the testicular fortitude to say it.
-
Curiouser and curiouser. :) I suspect if I delved deeper into this nonsense (which I won't) it would become even nuttier.
it's getting to the point that it was a worldwide conspiracy and the whole world pulled 9/11 off and are keeping it a secret. How many people are going to be involved?
-
CBS - multiple views of the missile, clipping N Tower. Far, and zoomed in.
spanish NOS news - multiple views of the missile, clipping N Tower. Far, and zoomed in.
FOX news - multiple views of the missile, clipping N Tower. Far, and zoomed in.
Gamma Press - multiple views of the missile, clipping N Tower. Far, and zoomed in.
TLC - multiple views of the missile, clipping N Tower. Far, and zoomed in.
All identical. From afar, and zoomed in.
im not sure what your trying to point out here. the plane hits the building and debris goes flying out and somehow that means it was a missile and the whole thing was a hoax?
-
it's getting to the oint that it was a worldwide conspiracy and the whole world pulled 9/11 off and are keeping it a secret. How many people are going to be involved?
it was done by a few hundred folks.
everyone since is playing ball for a few reasons. Fear, greed, patriotism, groupthink, etc.
Other nations AREN"T playing along actually. Numerous world leaders have called it an inside job, detailed the info they gave us BEFORE 9/11 with specific warnings, etc. The US media doesn't cover it.
-
it's getting to the point that it was a worldwide conspiracy and the whole world pulled 9/11 off and are keeping it a secret. How many people are going to be involved?
Tell me about it. Lucky our sleuths here in the good old USA sniffed out this sinister plot.
-
Tell me about it. Lucky our sleuths here in the good old USA sniffed out this sinister plot.
actually, our good friends in the french govt were against our aggressive action against iraq they saw coming with our UN resoultions, and they released their report Hunt The Boeing.
Remember Freedom Fries? Our patriotic duty was instantly to disparage anything the French said. Where did they start? Congress ;)
From there, many pissed off Americans went out of their way to prove the French wrong on their statement it was an "inside job". Problem is, when these bright patriotic Americans did this, the evidence showed the French were right.
Make sense now?
-
This is the object which looks like a missile in the other pics. It barrels down from the sky at probably 2000 mph, clips the N Tower, and leaves a smoke stream as it travels - coincidentally - to the place in WTC6 where they had the giant crater in the building.
it looks like a missile but its not........... theorist wants to believe in it so bad that anything passing in front of the camera is a missile...... it could be anything.......... debris...... you name it!!!
don't get me wrong here i find the subject fascinating, but before i believe in the ???, i'll need real proof, not ''i think or i could be''!!!
-
it looks like a missile but its not........... theorist wants to believe in it so bad that anything passing in front of the camera is a missile...... it could be anything.......... debris...... you name it!!!
don't get me wrong here i find the subject fascinating, but before i believe in the ???, i'll need real proof, not ''i think or i could be''!!!
You know it's not because you looked at the same video I did?
Neither you, nor I, can definitively say what that is. I don't claim this is proof.
I do think this footage - plus the crater in WTC6 where no building fell - should be enough to look at things a little closer.
-
it was done by a few hundred folks.
everyone since is playing ball for a few reasons. Fear, greed, patriotism, groupthink, etc.
Other nations AREN"T playing along actually. Numerous world leaders have called it an inside job, detailed the info they gave us BEFORE 9/11 with specific warnings, etc. The US media doesn't cover it.
who would these numerous world leaders be?
-
who would these numerous world leaders be?
hugo chavez and adhemidjhad.
germany's ambassador admitted he warned Bush 6 weeksn before 9/11 about the identify of 5 of the hijackers and attack date and target.
one of those middle east leaders questioned the pentagon attack right afterwards, as a former pilot.
putin said something about it.
one of the UK PM candidates called for a new investigation.
i can dig up more with details if you want. i don't pay much attention to these, as obviously world leaders usually don't talk out of school and fck up diplomatic relations with the #1 ass kicker on earth, us :)
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/project.jsp?project=911_project
-
hugo chavez and adhemidjhad.
germany's ambassador admitted he warned Bush 6 weeksn before 9/11 about the identify of 5 of the hijackers and attack date and target.
one of those middle east leaders questioned the pentagon attack right afterwards, as a former pilot.
putin said something about it.
one of the UK PM candidates called for a new investigation.
i can dig up more with details if you want. i don't pay much attention to these, as obviously world leaders usually don't talk out of school and fck up diplomatic relations with the #1 ass kicker on earth, us :)
http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/project.jsp?project=911_project
sure get the details where thye said it was an inside job. so far all see there is the German chancellor's warning, which is old news and not significant to it being an inside job, and chavez who's a kook.
-
sure get the details where thye said it was an inside job. so far all see there is the German chancellor's warning, which is old news and not significant to it being an inside job, and chavez who's a kook.
1) actually, the warning is pretty indicative of at least a "let it happen". When a foreign ambassador give you detailed info about a multiple hijacking and you don't even question those 5 men, it speaks volumes.
2) chavez a kook? He is anti-american so he have to hate him of course. But I challenge you to find any mistakes in his "America is taking over the worlds' resources" complaint.
-
1) actually, the warning is pretty indicative of at least a "let it happen". When a foreign ambassador give you detailed info about a multiple hijacking and you don't even question those 5 men, it speaks volumes.
yes, but sometimes you tend to lump 2 in one category to show support for the other.
1. they knew before hand.
2. missiles hit the pentagon, WTC's not the planes all of which was orchestrated by the government.
2) chavez a kook? He is anti-american so he have to hate him of course. But I challenge you to find any mistakes in his "America is taking over the worlds' resources" complaint.
i don't hate him. and he's right about us protecting our interests, but he's still a kook.
-
yes, but sometimes you tend to lump 2 in one category to show support for the other.
1. they knew before hand.
There is a belief that the 19 arabs had help from a small group of people here. Not "the govt" as is blindly thrown out - but a small group of rogue people with an agenda of invasion in the middle east. They did the missiles. The arabs just slashed their way to the cockpit before the globalhawk remote control system took the planes wherever they went.
i don't hate him. and he's right about us protecting our interests, but he's still a kook.
Why a kook though, just curious.
Are his beliefs crazy?
-
There is a belief that the 19 arabs had help from a small group of people here. Not "the govt" as is blindly thrown out - but a small group of rogue people with an agenda of invasion in the middle east. They did the missiles. The arabs just slashed their way to the cockpit before the globalhawk remote control system took the planes wherever they went.
Why a kook though, just curious.
Are his beliefs crazy?
i already told you about this,, those planes physically couldnt be controlled by remote. go look it up now. or just keep ignoring the facts to make your 'theory' sound better.
-
There is a belief that the 19 arabs had help from a small group of people here. Not "the govt" as is blindly thrown out - but a small group of rogue people with an agenda of invasion in the middle east. They did the missiles. The arabs just slashed their way to the cockpit before the globalhawk remote control system took the planes wherever they went.
Are his beliefs crazy?
Are his beliefs crazy? = yessssssssssss, and impossible
-
i already told you about this,, those planes physically couldnt be controlled by remote. go look it up now. or just keep ignoring the facts to make your 'theory' sound better.
Actually, in April of 2001, the Globalhawk technology was employed to fly a plane with the wingspan of a 737 across the pacific.
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/uav-01d.html
A month before 9/11, a remote control Boeing was launched and landed several times.
Tom Cassidy, president and CEO of Boeing, said he sent Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta a letter shortly after the Sept. 11 attacks.
"Aircraft anywhere in the nation could be remotely controlled from just one or two locations using satellite links, Cassidy said. Those locations could be heavily fortified against terrorists.
"The technology is available," Cassidy said. "We use it every day."
And - a review of Boeing documentation shows that in fact, the 757/767 flight computer has nearly all of the required capabilities as standard equipment, including guidance, communications, GPS navigation, and traffic control functions.
http://www.boeing.com/commercial/757-200/background.html
Do you still believe planes cannot be controlled by remote?
-
wait,, youve said in earlier posts that it couldnt have been a boeing jet. dude you change stories every day
-
wait,, youve said in earlier posts that it couldnt have been a boeing jet. dude you change stories every day
1) I just disproved your "planes cannt be remote controlled statement"
2) I believe that the hijackers stabbed their way to the cockpits, then the planes were taken control by remote control. They were then disposed of. The media reported Fl 93 landed in Cleveland that morning, and that anothe rplane had crashed in the Ohio/Ky border (and we know flight 77 fell off radar for 5 minutes there, before emerging and hitting the pentagon.)
So please just ask if you're confused about my position. The boeings were controlled and sent elsewhere, and the targets were hit with missiles. history will show it to be true. It was the catalyst we needed to take resources and position over there for the upcoming cold war II with Rus/China.
Hell, we just started peace talks with iran, 1 day after China announced new relationship with iran, and 1 week after Russia and China announced their new alliance.
-
Now, the contention is that a missile was fired from above to damage the WTC7 building, which was wired to fall later. The missile would have caused enough damage to justify the 47 story skyscraper falling later. No one looked at the giant hole (and huge smoke cloud) from WTC6 because the cameras were all pointed at WTC 1 and 2.
*IF* this very fast object had not clipped the north tower, it likely wouldn't have shown up on video due to its speed, and it would have traveled at a tad steeper angle to hit, which means it would have hit front and center, WTC7.
If you know it's nonsense, how about telling us what the object is then, if not a missile?
One thing which beats the shit out of me is that stupidity which is used to make some kind of arguments by using smudgy blowouts of poor quality video clips. "How about telling me..." How about growing up? If you look that clip and that flying object, you can't see what it is. You can only guess, and only thing which you idiots can think of is a missile? How fucking childish is that? Try to understand this simple thing: There have been aeroplane crashing in opposite side of that building just a moment a go, and it is quite normal that there is some flying debris which that crash has put in to move. That flying object with a smoke trail may be one of the rag head pilots flying while smoke is coming from his burning ass, furniture from the office, or that landing gear which was photographed on the street below. Furthermore, you morons don't have any way of knowing how many fuc*king times each of these clips have been edited, so please please pretty please; why don't you guys give even one argument which is not based on some fuc*k up video clip, some rumor which you have heard or read from some retard forum, or shit like that. Just one (1) hard fact, please? That is something you can't deliver, you gossip monger little bitch...
Here is few questions for you about the matter:
1. How you can ignore all those hundred of thousands eye witnesses which were in Manhattan in that time? People involved in this incident?
2. How you can be stupid enough to believe information which is coming only from the internet? Name one place where is more liars and mentally ill fuc*kers
than internet?
3. How you can explain why there would be conspiracy with these humongous proportions, when there isn't any way in hell to keep it secret. Conspiracy which include hundred of thousands of people all over the world is something which can't be happened.
4. How you can explain why use aeroplanes, when few simple bombs and statement from Bin Laden would be more than enough?
5. Why don't you go and get some medical attention to that pathological desire to assert oneself, which make you look like an idiot.
Fact is that anyone with a half a brain can see that there isn't any real facts in this conspiracy theory at all. Just a bunch of lies for stupid little wankers to read and watch.
-
One thing which beats the shit out of me is that stupidity which is used to make some kind of arguments by using smudgy blowouts of poor quality video clips. "How about telling me..." How about growing up? If you look that clip and that flying object, you can't see what it is. You can only guess, and only thing which you idiots can think of is a missile? How fucking childish is that? Try to understand this simple thing: There have been aeroplane crashing in opposite side of that building just a moment a go, and it is quite normal that there is some flying debris which that crash has put in to move. That flying object with a smoke trail may be one of the rag head pilots flying while smoke is coming from his burning ass, furniture from the office, or that landing gear which was photographed on the street below. Furthermore, you morons don't have any way of knowing how many fuc*king times each of these clips have been edited, so please please pretty please; why don't you guys give even one argument which is not based on some fuc*k up video clip, some rumor which you have heard or read from some retard forum, or shit like that. Just one (1) hard fact, please? That is something you can't deliver, you gossip monger little bitch...
Here is few questions for you about the matter:
1. How you can ignore all those hundred of thousands eye witnesses which were in Manhattan in that time? People involved in this incident?
2. How you can be stupid enough to believe information which is coming only from the internet? Name one place where is more liars and mentally ill fuc*kers
than internet?
3. How you can explain why there would be conspiracy with these humongous proportions, when there isn't any way in hell to keep it secret. Conspiracy which include hundred of thousands of people all over the world is something which can't be happened.
4. How you can explain why use aeroplanes, when few simple bombs and statement from Bin Laden would be more than enough?
5. Why don't you go and get some medical attention to that pathological desire to assert oneself, which make you look like an idiot.
Fact is that anyone with a half a brain can see that there isn't any real facts in this conspiracy theory at all. Just a bunch of lies for stupid little wankers to read and watch.
I agree.
-
No missile in this one.
http://s141.photobucket.com/albums/r43/littlebylittle_2007/?action=view¤t=CNNWTCBothPlanes.flv
-
That flying object with a smoke trail may be one of the rag head pilots flying while smoke is coming from his burning ass, furniture
I showed a video from multilpe versions of the same tv angle to show it wasn't doctored.
I showed a clip showing the trail of smoke that ABC censored for no reason other than to hide it.
I showed you FOX and drudge reporting a missile.
I showed you a big hole where the 'object' would have landed - a crater in WTC6.
I showed you the trajectory it very well could have taken if not clipping the north tower - front and center of WTC7, a building which collapsed mysteriously later.
you give us a racial slur and an impossible scenario. okay.
-
No missile in this one.
http://s141.photobucket.com/albums/r43/littlebylittle_2007/?action=view¤t=CNNWTCBothPlanes.flv
whatever the object was, it descended behind the North tower. it was blocked in this angle.
-
That flying object with a smoke trail may be one of the rag head pilots flying while smoke is coming from his burning ass, furniture
I showed a video from multilpe versions of the same tv angle to show it wasn't doctored.
I showed a clip showing the trail of smoke that ABC censored for no reason other than to hide it.
I showed you FOX and drudge reporting a missile.
I showed you a big hole where the 'object' would have landed - a crater in WTC6.
I showed you the trajectory it very well could have taken if not clipping the north tower - front and center of WTC7, a building which collapsed mysteriously later.
you give us a racial slur and an impossible scenario. okay.
You show a bunch of crap, which nobody can see anything but some flying object with a smoke trail. Then you guess that it could be a missile, because you are an imbecile, and incapable to handle the truth. I say it may be a flying rag head, which is just equally accurate guess than yours, and you start whining about it? Grow up, stop wanking with the matter and try to understand that there haven't been any conspiracy, except that which Bin Laden did to destroy those towers using passenger jets. And by the way, you didn't answer any of those questions which I make, which didn't surprise me at all, because I know that you are incapable to answer those. You are just full of shit, and you are ranting about the matter just to get some attention, you little attention whore. Why don't you put that plastic gun of yours in good use and play some russian roulette with it?
-
You show a bunch of crap, which nobody can see anything but some flying object with a smoke trail. Then you guess that it could be a missile, because you are an imbecile, and incapable to handle the truth. I say it may be a flying rag head, which is just equally accurate guess than yours, and you start whining about it? Grow up, stop wanking with the matter and try to understand that there haven't been any conspiracy, except that which Bin Laden did to destroy those towers using passenger jets. And by the way, you didn't answer any of those questions which I make, which didn't surprise me at all, because I know that you are incapable to answer those. You are just full of shit, and you are ranting about the matter just to get some attention, you little attention whore. Why don't you put that plastic gun of yours in good use and play some russian roulette with it?
*wince*
I agree, except for the gun part. :) Not enough people just come out and call this crap what it is.
-
history will own you. watch and see.
-
history will own you. watch and see.
Five simple questions, and you are incapable to answer any of those? You fuc*king child. Try get some mental help, why don't you, because it isn't normal to be so fuc*king stupid like you are. I bet you wear tin foil hat around a clock...
-
history will own you. watch and see.
In other words you got me :'(
-
Five simple questions, and you are incapable to answer any of those? You fuc*king child. Try get some mental help, why don't you, because it isn't normal to be so fuc*king stupid like you are. I bet you wear tin foil hat around a clock...
;DHAHAHAHAHHA mental image of 240 in tin foil hat HAHAHAHAHAHA